mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2024-12-27 08:39:28 +08:00
201 lines
8.4 KiB
Plaintext
201 lines
8.4 KiB
Plaintext
An attempt at some sort of Full Text Indexing for PostgreSQL.
|
|
|
|
The included software is an attempt to add some sort of Full Text Indexing
|
|
support to PostgreSQL. I mean by this that we can ask questions like:
|
|
|
|
Give me all rows that have 'still' and 'nash' in the 'artist' or 'title'
|
|
fields.
|
|
|
|
Ofcourse we can write this as:
|
|
|
|
select * from cds where (artist ~* 'stills' or title ~* 'stills') and
|
|
(artist ~* 'nash' or title ~* 'nash');
|
|
|
|
But this does not use any indices, and therefore, if your database
|
|
gets very large, it will not have very high performance (the above query
|
|
requires a sequential scan of the table).
|
|
|
|
The approach used by this add-on is to define a trigger on the table and
|
|
columns you want to do these queries on. On every insert to the table, it
|
|
takes the value in the specified columns, breaks the text in these columns
|
|
up into pieces, and stores all sub-strings into another table, together
|
|
with a reference to the row in the original table that contained this
|
|
sub-string (it uses the oid of that row).
|
|
|
|
By now creating an index over the 'fti-table', we can search for
|
|
substrings that occur in the original table. By making a join between
|
|
the fti-table and the orig-table, we can get the actual rows we want
|
|
(this can also be done by using subselects - but subselects are currently
|
|
inefficient in PostgreSQL, and maybe there're other ways too).
|
|
|
|
The trigger code also allows an array called StopWords, that prevents
|
|
certain words from being indexed.
|
|
|
|
As an example we take the previous query, where we assume we have all
|
|
sub-strings in the table 'cds-fti':
|
|
|
|
select c.*
|
|
from cds c, cds-fti f1, cds-fti f2
|
|
where f1.string ~ '^stills' and
|
|
f2.string ~ '^nash' and
|
|
f1.id = c.oid and
|
|
f2.id = c.oid ;
|
|
|
|
We can use the ~ (case-sensitive regular expression) here, because of
|
|
the way sub-strings are built: from right to left, ie. house -> 'se' +
|
|
'use' + 'ouse' + 'house'. If a ~ search starts with a ^ (match start of
|
|
string), btree indices can be used by PostgreSQL.
|
|
|
|
Now, how do we create the trigger that maintains the fti-table? First: the
|
|
fti-table should have the following schema:
|
|
|
|
create cds-fti ( string varchar(N), id oid ) without oids;
|
|
|
|
Don't change the *names* of the columns, the varchar() can in fact also
|
|
be of text-type. If you do use varchar, make sure the largest possible
|
|
sub-string will fit.
|
|
|
|
The create the function that contains the trigger::
|
|
|
|
create function fti() returns trigger as
|
|
'/path/to/fti.so' language 'C';
|
|
|
|
And finally define the trigger on the 'cds' table:
|
|
|
|
create trigger cds-fti-trigger after update or insert or delete on cds
|
|
for each row execute procedure fti(cds-fti, artist, title);
|
|
|
|
Here, the trigger will be defined on table 'cds', it will create
|
|
sub-strings from the fields 'artist' and 'title', and it will place
|
|
those sub-strings in the table 'cds-fti'.
|
|
|
|
Now populate the table 'cds'. This will also populate the table 'cds-fti'.
|
|
It's fastest to populate the table *before* you create the indices. Use the
|
|
supplied 'fti.pl' to assist you with this.
|
|
|
|
Before you start using the system, you should at least have the following
|
|
indices:
|
|
|
|
create index cds-fti-idx on cds-fti (string); -- String matching
|
|
create index cds-fti-idx on cds-fti (id); -- For deleting a cds row
|
|
create index cds-oid-idx on cds (oid); -- For joining cds to cds-fti
|
|
|
|
To get the most performance out of this, you should have 'cds-fti'
|
|
clustered on disk, ie. all rows with the same sub-strings should be
|
|
close to each other. There are 3 ways of doing this:
|
|
|
|
1. After you have created the indices, execute 'cluster cds-fti-idx on cds-fti'.
|
|
2. Do a 'select * into tmp-table from cds-fti order by string' *before*
|
|
you create the indices, then 'drop table cds-fti' and
|
|
'alter table tmp-table rename to cds-fti'
|
|
3. *Before* creating indices, dump the contents of the cds-fti table using
|
|
'pg_dump -a -t cds-fti dbase-name', remove the \connect
|
|
from the beginning and the \. from the end, and sort it using the
|
|
UNIX 'sort' program, and reload the data.
|
|
|
|
Method 1 is very slow, 2 a lot faster, and for very large tables, 3 is
|
|
preferred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BENCH:
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Maarten Boekhold <maartenb@dutepp0.et.tudelft.nl>
|
|
The following data was generated by the 'timings.sh' script included
|
|
in this directory. It uses a very large table with music-related
|
|
articles as a source for the fti-table. The tables used are:
|
|
|
|
product : contains product information : 540.429 rows
|
|
artist_fti : fti table for product : 4.501.321 rows
|
|
clustered : same as above, only clustered : 4.501.321 rows
|
|
|
|
A sequential scan of the artist_fti table (and thus also the clustered table)
|
|
takes around 6:16 minutes....
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately I cannot provide anybody else with this test-data, since I
|
|
am not allowed to redistribute the data (it's a database being sold by
|
|
a couple of wholesale companies). Anyways, it's megabytes, so you probably
|
|
wouldn't want it in this distribution anyways.
|
|
|
|
I haven't tested this with less data.
|
|
|
|
The test-machine is a Pentium 133, 64 MB, Linux 2.0.32 with the database
|
|
on a 'QUANTUM BIGFOOT_CY4320A, 4134MB w/67kB Cache, CHS=8960/15/63'. This
|
|
is a very slow disk.
|
|
|
|
The postmaster was running with:
|
|
|
|
postmaster -i -b /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres -S 1024 -B 256 \
|
|
-o -o /usr/local/pgsql/debug-output -F -d 1
|
|
|
|
('trashing' means a 'select count(*) from artist_fti' to completely trash
|
|
any disk-caches and buffers....)
|
|
|
|
TESTING ON UNCLUSTERED FTI
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.050u 0.000s 5m37.484s 0.01%
|
|
2: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.050u 0.030s 5m32.447s 0.02%
|
|
3: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.030u 0.020s 5m28.822s 0.01%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lling and ^tones : 0.020u 0.030s 0m54.313s 0.09%
|
|
2: ^lling and ^tones : 0.040u 0.030s 0m5.057s 1.38%
|
|
3: ^lling and ^tones : 0.010u 0.050s 0m2.072s 2.89%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.020u 0.030s 0m26.241s 0.19%
|
|
2: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.050u 0.010s 0m1.316s 4.55%
|
|
3: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.030u 0.020s 0m1.029s 4.85%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lling : 0.040u 0.010s 0m55.104s 0.09%
|
|
2: ^lling : 0.030u 0.030s 0m4.716s 1.27%
|
|
3: ^lling : 0.040u 0.010s 0m2.157s 2.31%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.040u 0.000s 1m5.630s 0.06%
|
|
2: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.050u 0.020s 1m3.561s 0.11%
|
|
3: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.050u 0.010s 1m5.923s 0.09%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lling (no join) : 0.050u 0.020s 0m24.139s 0.28%
|
|
2: ^lling (no join) : 0.040u 0.040s 0m1.087s 7.35%
|
|
3: ^lling (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m0.772s 6.48%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.030s 0m9.075s 0.77%
|
|
2: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.030u 0.010s 0m0.609s 6.56%
|
|
3: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.010s 0m0.503s 9.94%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m49.898s 0.10%
|
|
2: ^rol (no join) : 0.030u 0.020s 0m3.136s 1.59%
|
|
3: ^rol (no join) : 0.030u 0.020s 0m1.231s 4.06%
|
|
|
|
TESTING ON CLUSTERED FTI
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.020u 0.020s 2m17.120s 0.02%
|
|
2: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.030u 0.020s 2m11.767s 0.03%
|
|
3: ^lapton and ^ric : 0.040u 0.010s 2m8.128s 0.03%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lling and ^tones : 0.020u 0.030s 0m18.179s 0.27%
|
|
2: ^lling and ^tones : 0.030u 0.010s 0m1.897s 2.10%
|
|
3: ^lling and ^tones : 0.040u 0.010s 0m1.619s 3.08%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.070u 0.010s 0m11.765s 0.67%
|
|
2: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.040u 0.010s 0m1.198s 4.17%
|
|
3: ^aughan and ^evie : 0.030u 0.020s 0m0.872s 5.73%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lling : 0.040u 0.000s 0m28.623s 0.13%
|
|
2: ^lling : 0.030u 0.010s 0m2.339s 1.70%
|
|
3: ^lling : 0.030u 0.010s 0m1.975s 2.02%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.020u 0.010s 0m17.667s 0.16%
|
|
2: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.030u 0.010s 0m3.745s 1.06%
|
|
3: ^stev and ^ray and ^vaugh : 0.030u 0.020s 0m3.439s 1.45%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^lling (no join) : 0.020u 0.040s 0m2.218s 2.70%
|
|
2: ^lling (no join) : 0.020u 0.020s 0m0.506s 7.90%
|
|
3: ^lling (no join) : 0.030u 0.030s 0m0.510s 11.76%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.050s 0m2.048s 4.39%
|
|
2: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.030u 0.020s 0m0.332s 15.04%
|
|
3: ^vaughan (no join) : 0.040u 0.010s 0m0.318s 15.72%
|
|
trashing
|
|
1: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m2.384s 2.09%
|
|
2: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m0.676s 7.39%
|
|
3: ^rol (no join) : 0.020u 0.030s 0m0.697s 7.17%
|