mirror/postgresql
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git synced 2024-12-15 08:20:16 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
d3bd1a00bc
postgresql/doc/TODO.detail/win32
Bruce Momjian ad579a9e43 Add Win32 thread to TODO.detail.
2002-06-13 18:00:47 +00:00

7322 lines
318 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22549@postgresql.org Wed May 8 11:22:40 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22549@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48FMd408780
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:22:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 631C147696B; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:49:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 5DF8047648C; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:32:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB684762F2
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:32:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2693475C4C
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:15:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g48CZKt22122;
Wed, 8 May 2002 08:35:20 -0400
Message-ID: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 08:35:20 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
Subject: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Do we want a Win32 native version of PostgreSQL?
The only reasons *not* to use Cygwin is licensing, installation hassles, and
maybe stability or performance. Therefore, there is no strong technical reason
to defend its removal, only a philosophical one.
The debates on licensing on this list go on for weeks and people feel
passionately about the subject. It seems odd that no one speaks out about the
GNU requirement of cygwin.
If there is a desire to create a PostgreSQL that is "fork" free, then we should
do it now. If now strong desire exists, then we should make an entry in the FAQ
and move on.
If we want to be "portable" (and this should help us with a threading model
later on) we need to cleanup all of the global variables.
PostgreSQL's postmaster should not touch any global variables that are defined
outside something like a pg_global structure and should not touch any static
variables at all. If postmaster initializes a variable that will get cloned on
a fork(), conceptually it is a shared global variable and belongs in
pg_globals. Going all the way and replacing all globals and statics with a
struct should allow threading with TLS. (Thread Local Storage)
Port lib. Regardless where it comes from, the porting code should be a self
contained library, not a list of objects. On Windows, a .DLL can do some things
easier than an application. Also, having a library allows more flexibility as
to how a port is designed.
We should spec out our port interface. This includes file, semaphores, shared
memory, signals/events, process control, IPC, system resources, etc. This will
grow as we re-port to other environments like Windows.
any comments?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22551@postgresql.org Wed May 8 11:41:42 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22551@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48Fff409057
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:41:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3D2974763EC; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:07:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 9FB764765CA; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:43:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F12D47627E
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:43:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC71475F1B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:21:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g48EGGt22584;
Wed, 8 May 2002 10:16:16 -0400
Message-ID: <3CD93330.2F3541D2@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:16:16 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
References: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com> <1782.1020866623@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Tom Lane wrote:
>
> mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes:
> > Port lib. Regardless where it comes from, the porting code should be a
> > self contained library, not a list of objects. On Windows, a .DLL can
> > do some things easier than an application. Also, having a library
> > allows more flexibility as to how a port is designed.
>
> That may be necessary on Windoze, but on any other platform breaking out
> an essential part of the backend as a library strikes me as a dead loss.
> You create extra risk of installation mistakes, can't-find-library
> startup failures, version mismatch problems, etc, etc --- for zero gain
> that I can see.
It does not need, and probably should not be by default, a shared library under
UNIX. A static library is fine. The issue is whether or not it makes sense to
try and design all porting layers the same, or allow the port engineer the
flexibility to create what they need the way they need to do it.
A side note:
The "Windoze" comment says a lot Tom. Believe me, I am currently no fan of
Windows, but there is something to be said about doing a good job supporting
such a popular platform, regardless of our personal opinions. When I was
working at DMN, I had to make sure we could find country music and Brittany
Spears. Distasteful, but certainly something that needed to be done.
IMHO, I think a great PostgreSQL implementation for Win32 is a nail in the
coffin for Windows. If we give them a great database, which runs well under
Windows, for free, MSSQL will now have a serious competitor for the medium to
small marketplace.
Once MSSQL has viable cross-platform competition in this space, one less
requirement for Windows will exist. Right now, if you implement on Windows, you
are most likely going to use MSSQL and be stuck there. With a good Win32
PostgreSQL, an engineer can implement on PostgreSQL for Windows, and easily
move it to a "real" environment for stability.
I see it as an important step.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22561@postgresql.org Wed May 8 15:02:45 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22561@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48J2i411999
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:02:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 75F024766AF; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:15:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id E4F5F476768; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:25:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF975476774
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:22:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275C2476365
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:57:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g48FvBv02684;
Wed, 8 May 2002 11:57:11 -0400 (EDT)
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
cc: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
In-Reply-To: <3CD9461E.1FDC6344@fourpalms.org>
References: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com> <3CD9461E.1FDC6344@fourpalms.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
message dated "Wed, 08 May 2002 08:37:02 -0700"
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 11:57:11 -0400
Message-ID: <2681.1020873431@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> writes:
> 2) If (1) does not exempt the PostgreSQL app from GPL polution, then why
> not distribute PostgreSQL on Windows using a GPL license?
Given the cygwin licensing terms stated at
http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
it appears to me that we need not open that can of worms (and I'd much
rather not muddy the licensing waters that way, regardless of any
arguments about whether it would hurt or not...)
As near as I can tell, we *could* develop a self-contained installation
package for PG+cygwin without any licensing problem. So that set of
problems could be solved with a reasonable amount of work. I'm still
unclear on whether there are serious technical problems (performance,
stability) with using cygwin.
(Actually, even if there are performance or stability problems, an
easily-installable package would still address the needs of people who
want to "try it out" or "get their feet wet". And maybe that's all we
need to do. We always have said that we recommend a Unix platform for
production-grade PG installations, and IMNSHO that recommendation would
not change one iota if there were a native rather than cygwin-based
Windows port. So I'm unconvinced that we have a problem to solve
anyway...)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22572@postgresql.org Wed May 8 15:21:17 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22572@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48JLG412576
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:21:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BA544476CFE; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:58:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 516A14768DC; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:15:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFF147646E
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:41:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE53475B42
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 12:34:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g48GT7t23160;
Wed, 8 May 2002 12:29:07 -0400
Message-ID: <3CD95253.45C01EC0@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 12:29:07 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
References: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com> <3CD9461E.1FDC6344@fourpalms.org> <2681.1020873431@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3CD94E04.AF837261@fourpalms.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> ...
> > As near as I can tell, we *could* develop a self-contained installation
> > package for PG+cygwin without any licensing problem.
>
> Right. That was my opinion also. But istm that however the discussion
> settles out, there is a path to success.
These last couple days have really started me thinking about Windows again. I
developed Windows software for over a decade, geez much longer than that, I
wrote my first Windows program using the Windows 1.03 SDK. (I am in a 12 step
program now, but you guys are causing a relapse!)
Listen, here is purely my opinion on the matter, I am speaking from my
experience as a Windows user, developer, and author (Tricks of the Windows 3.1
Masters).
It is useless to spend serious time on a cygwin version. Yea, it is cool and
all, but it won't be used. From the eyes of a Windows user cygwin is a hack and
a mess. An IT guy that only knows Windows will never use it, and if presented
with a program that forces a UNIX like directory tree on their hard drive and
UNIX like tools to manage it, they will delete the program and curse the time
spent installing it.
Performance may also be an issue, I don't know for sure, but it is suspected.
The cygwin fork troubles me as well. It may work, but I would not call it a
"production" technique, how about you? Would you bet your business on cygwin
and a hacked fork()?
No matter what steps you take, cygwin will not be seen by Windows users as
anything but a sloppy/messy/horrible hack. It is a fact of life. You are
welcome to disagree, but I assure you it is true.
>From a usefulness perspective, a cygwin version of PostgreSQL will be nothing
more than a proof of concept, a test bed, or a demo. It will never be used as a
serious database. How much work does that warrant?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22576@postgresql.org Wed May 8 17:06:18 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22576@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48L6I414548
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BA4F7475E25; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:06:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 60B724766C8; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC22D4764C2
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:57:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from www.wgcr.org (www.wgcr.org [206.74.232.194])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24B8476509
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:58:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([10.1.2.103])
by www.wgcr.org (8.9.3/8.9.3/WGCR) with ESMTP id OAA26136;
Wed, 8 May 2002 14:58:09 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:49:39 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
References: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com> <3CD9461E.1FDC6344@fourpalms.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CD9461E.1FDC6344@fourpalms.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <200205081449.39473.lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
On Wednesday 08 May 2002 11:37 am, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> 1) cygwin is licensed under GPL. So is GNU/Linux, which provides the
> same APIs as cygwin does. Linux does not pollute application licenses,
> presumably because Linux itself is not *required* to run the
The Linux kernel is not under a pure GPL.
COPYING in the kernel source says this, prepended to the GPL:
NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover user programs that use kernel
services by normal system calls - this is merely considered normal use
of the kernel, and does *not* fall under the heading of "derived work".
Also note that the GPL below is copyrighted by the Free Software
Foundation, but the instance of code that it refers to (the Linux
kernel) is copyrighted by me and others who actually wrote it.
Also note that the only valid version of the GPL as far as the kernel
is concerned is _this_ particular version of the license (ie v2, not
v2.2 or v3.x or whatever), unless explicitly otherwise stated.
Linus Torvalds
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Does cygwin make the same statement?
> 2) If (1) does not exempt the PostgreSQL app from GPL polution, then why
> not distribute PostgreSQL on Windows using a GPL license?
[snip]
> 3) If (2) is the case, then development could continue under the BSD
> license, since developers could use the BSD-original code for their
> development work. So there is no risk of "backflow polution".
Can PostgreSQL, Inc be the GPL distributor for these purposes, being a
separate entity from the PostgreSQL Global Development Group?
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22580@postgresql.org Wed May 8 17:34:55 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22580@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48LYs414954
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:34:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 389864764D9; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:25:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id D4E77476647; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:03:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8860F4763EF
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:02:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (h24-71-223-10.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0764765E6
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:53:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pd4mr2so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd4mr2so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.213]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001))
with ESMTP id <0GVT009HA5Y0UG@l-daemon> for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed,
08 May 2002 13:54:00 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml5so.prod.shaw.ca
(pn2ml5so-qfe0.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.121.149]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001))
with ESMTP id <0GVT00GCO5Y0ZV@l-daemon> for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed,
08 May 2002 13:54:00 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from refractions.net
(h24-65-178-198.gv.shawcable.net [24.65.178.198]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001))
with ESMTP id <0GVT00GCZ5XZ1F@l-daemon> for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Wed,
08 May 2002 13:54:00 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 12:53:57 -0700
From: Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Message-ID: <3CD98255.4B52751@refractions.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.17 i586)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en
References: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com> <3CD9461E.1FDC6344@fourpalms.org>
<2681.1020873431@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3CD94E04.AF837261@fourpalms.org>
<3CD95253.45C01EC0@mohawksoft.com>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
mlw wrote:
>
> No matter what steps you take, cygwin will not be seen by Windows users as
> anything but a sloppy/messy/horrible hack. It is a fact of life. You are
> welcome to disagree, but I assure you it is true.
Just to clarify here: is it confirmed that having the complete cygwin
distribution is a necessary condition to having a running PostgreSQL on
windows? Is it not possible that, having built postgresql with the full
cygwin, it would be possible to make a nice clean setup.exe package
which bundles the postgresql executables, the required cygwin dlls and
other niceties into an easy install package? Given that, I do not think
your putative windows user would care at all about what was going on
under the covers. As long as the install was clean, there were utilities
(pgadmin?) to start working with the database right away, and things
"just worked", the ugliness (or exquisite symmetry... I am not an
expert) of the fork() implementation really would not be an issue :)
Of course, an imaginary beautiful packaging regime hinges on the
possibility of bundling the cygwin api libraries cleanly without
bundling all the rest of the cygwin scruft (unix directory heirarchy,
etc etc). Anyone have any light to shed on cygwin's "packagability"?
P.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22581@postgresql.org Wed May 8 17:58:25 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22581@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48LwP415342
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:58:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CC3F3476BD3; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id F00F5476833; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:09:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id D372D4764F1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:09:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC6DA4759FC
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:17:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g48KCHt24008;
Wed, 8 May 2002 16:12:17 -0400
Message-ID: <3CD986A1.9DC78DD2@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:12:17 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Ramsey <pramsey@refractions.net>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
References: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com> <3CD9461E.1FDC6344@fourpalms.org>
<2681.1020873431@sss.pgh.pa.us> <3CD94E04.AF837261@fourpalms.org>
<3CD95253.45C01EC0@mohawksoft.com> <3CD98255.4B52751@refractions.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Paul Ramsey wrote:
>
> mlw wrote:
> >
> > No matter what steps you take, cygwin will not be seen by Windows users as
> > anything but a sloppy/messy/horrible hack. It is a fact of life. You are
> > welcome to disagree, but I assure you it is true.
>
> Just to clarify here: is it confirmed that having the complete cygwin
> distribution is a necessary condition to having a running PostgreSQL on
> windows? Is it not possible that, having built postgresql with the full
> cygwin, it would be possible to make a nice clean setup.exe package
> which bundles the postgresql executables, the required cygwin dlls and
> other niceties into an easy install package? Given that, I do not think
> your putative windows user would care at all about what was going on
> under the covers. As long as the install was clean, there were utilities
> (pgadmin?) to start working with the database right away, and things
> "just worked", the ugliness (or exquisite symmetry... I am not an
> expert) of the fork() implementation really would not be an issue :)
Windows users expect to have C:\my programs\postgres as the install location. A
person who has used or looked at MSSQL would expect to deal with the real file
system. The cygwin environment shields the UNIX program from Windows, the
Windows user would expect the program to deal with the system as is.
The Windows user that would install PostgreSQL would expect it to be a real
windows program, but would be savvy enough (and prejudiced enough) to know if
it weren't.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22585@postgresql.org Wed May 8 19:23:09 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22585@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g48NN8416625
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 8 May 2002 19:23:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7823A475A2E; Wed, 8 May 2002 19:22:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 19B3C4768DA; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:52:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260C14767D9
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:52:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from temp.joelburton.com (unknown [209.190.238.101])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF620475C14
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:09:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from joeltf0d13cyyp (unknown [209.190.238.100])
by temp.joelburton.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id F16DF2B95F; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:14:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Joel Burton" <joel@joelburton.com>
To: "Paul Ramsey" <pramsey@refractions.net>, "mlw" <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 18:09:41 -0400
Message-ID: <JGEPJNMCKODMDHGOBKDNIEFNCNAA.joel@joelburton.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <3CD98255.4B52751@refractions.net>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:54 PM
> To: mlw
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
>
>
> mlw wrote:
> >
> > No matter what steps you take, cygwin will not be seen by
> Windows users as
> > anything but a sloppy/messy/horrible hack. It is a fact of life. You are
> > welcome to disagree, but I assure you it is true.
>
> Just to clarify here: is it confirmed that having the complete cygwin
> distribution is a necessary condition to having a running PostgreSQL on
> windows? Is it not possible that, having built postgresql with the full
> cygwin, it would be possible to make a nice clean setup.exe package
> which bundles the postgresql executables, the required cygwin dlls and
> other niceties into an easy install package? Given that, I do not think
> your putative windows user would care at all about what was going on
> under the covers. As long as the install was clean, there were utilities
> (pgadmin?) to start working with the database right away, and things
> "just worked", the ugliness (or exquisite symmetry... I am not an
> expert) of the fork() implementation really would not be an issue :)
>
> Of course, an imaginary beautiful packaging regime hinges on the
> possibility of bundling the cygwin api libraries cleanly without
> bundling all the rest of the cygwin scruft (unix directory heirarchy,
> etc etc). Anyone have any light to shed on cygwin's "packagability"?
Certainly, we don't need all of cygwin (eg bison, gcc, perl, et al). We'd
need the dll, sh, rm, and few other things. I'm not sure if it would need to
be in the standard cygwin file structure; I know that you can reconfigure
this when you use cygwin (I used to). In any event, instead of having to
have a novice pick & guess which of >100 packages they need, we could put
together the 5 or 6 they need.
I'm not sure I agree entirely with mlw: some Windows admins will be afraid
of cygwin, but, I'll bet more than a few won't even notice that its being
used (especially if we can change the dir names, provide windows shortcuts
to the commands like initdb, create database, pg_ctl, etc., which would be
trivial to do).
Still unanswered is real data on whether cygwin would be good for serious
production use by real people. However, for the test/play/try-out model, I
think cygwin would be a fine solution, and wouldn't (shouldn't?) require too
much work.
- J.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22603@postgresql.org Thu May 9 03:24:18 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22603@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g497OG421663
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:24:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BD8C94762B1; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:24:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id A799C475F77; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:23:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82716476077
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:23:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp6.jaring.my (smtp6.jaring.my [61.6.32.56])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB0DD475A35
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:21:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pc.mecomb.com (j202.crc20.jaring.my [61.6.157.216])
by smtp6.jaring.my (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g497LYl12649;
Thu, 9 May 2002 15:21:35 +0800 (MYT)
Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.1.20020509143654.036387b0@192.228.128.13>
X-Sender: lyeoh@192.228.128.13
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 15:34:06 +0800
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>
From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh@pop.jaring.my>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CD949FA.86BD95D2@mohawksoft.com>
References: <3CD91B88.38CD6C3@mohawksoft.com>
<15577.17903.180863.251963@kelvin.csl.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Who really is your target "market" on the windows platform? Microsoft
Access users (many)? MySQL users(insignificant?)? MSSQL (many)?
Assuming that the postgresql team isn't getting lots of money or resources
to do it. I don't see why you would want to invest a lot to support windows
from a long term point of view. Windows can be a costly platform to support.
Because if you become a serious threat, Microsoft can rip the rug from
beneath you any chance they get. Also Microsoft WILL always change their
APIs. They're not stupid. If Microsoft freezes their APIs they will end up
like "yet another BIOS manufacturer", and bye bye profit margins. Microsoft
will strive to keep it a proprietary AND changing API.
Windows is rather different operationally. Automating vacuum etc on windows
is going to be different. Starting postgresql as a service is going to be
different as well. Same for uninstalling. So support requests are going to
be different.
If your target market is consumer - Windows consumer users also have
different expectations. Most will want nicer GUIs (those that don't care
won't mind running Postgresql elsewhere).
BTW if your target market is a bit higher end - typically those that "must
use" windows also "must use" MSSQL/Oracle/etc. You will thus have to build
brand recognition for Postgresql on Windows.
All this will cost you.
That said, is it easier to support only Windows NT/2000 and forget about
Win9x? The bigger dbs don't support win9x either (how does Oracle/DB2
support NT? They seem to work ok). Leave MySQL to the Win9x people ;). BTW
does MySQL really perform OK on Win9x?
Forget the Cygwin approach. Is there really a market for that? Unless
things have got a lot easier, installing Cygwin is like installing a new
O/S just to install your app. And installing and learning a new system has
got to be one of the major barriers, otherwise people will either buy a new
USD500 1.5+ GHz pc or use VMware+BSD/Linux+Postgresql ;).
Cheerio,
Link.
At 11:53 AM 5/8/02 -0400, mlw wrote:
>writing software for over 20 years now, and sometimes you just have to hold
>your nose. It would be nice if we could code what we want, the way we want, in
>the language we want, on the platforms we want.
>
>Windows represents a HUGE user base, it also represents a platform for which a
>real good native PostgreSQL should do well. There are, to my knowledge, no
>good
>and free databases available for Windows.
>
>PostgreSQL on Windows could be very cool as a serious poster child for why
>open-source is the way to go.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22605@postgresql.org Thu May 9 03:42:59 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22605@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g497gw422047
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:42:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A01394762EE; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:42:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id E51C14762AD; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:42:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6547E475A24
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:42:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from salem.vale-housing.co.uk (mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk [193.195.77.162])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D2A5475A19
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:42:18 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 08:42:18 +0100
Message-ID: <214E9C0A75426D47A876A2FD8A07426E9747@salem.vale-housing.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Thread-Topic: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
Thread-Index: AcH251A9jOrpk8IETTmDgJDVmp55WQAAClTQABEg5nA=
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>,
"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g497gw422047
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dann Corbit [mailto:DCorbit@connx.com]
> Sent: 09 May 2002 00:31
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Path to PostgreSQL portabiliy
>
>
> If you have a Win32 workstation...
> Look here:
> http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/
>
> Then click on the thing that says "Install Now" (Looks like a
> black "C" with a green tongue).
>
> after a small boatload of clicks, you will see a Window
> labeled "Cygwin Setup". Under +All you will find...
> +Admin
> +Archive
> +Base
> +Database
>
> Click on the plus sign next to the Database category.
>
> You will see:
> 7.2.1-1 [options] [Bin] [Src] [Package] posgresql:
> PostgreSQL Data Base Management System
>
> In other words, they already have an automated installation
> procedure for PostgreSQL if you are using Cygwin.
The last time I tried that (coupla months ago) it listed the versions of
the packages in reverse order, so I spent about 15 very tedious minutes
making sure that I have the latest version of all the packages I wanted
selected.
Then I spent an hour or 2 battling with ntsec and initdb on my laptop
(logged onto, but disconnected from the domain). After that I gave up
and went back to my very old release that works fine.
The point I'm trying to make is that if I, as a not inexperienced
sysadmin of both Windows and Unix systems (not to mention PostgreSQL
which I like to think I'm fairly familiar with) has this trouble, what
impression is that going to give the first time user, who's probably
going to go elsewhere at the first sign of trouble?
Regards, Dave.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22628@postgresql.org Thu May 9 10:26:16 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22628@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49EQF406536
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:26:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A60614764BC; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:26:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 5A7754763DA; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:13:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31877476414
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:13:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD714764C9
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:10:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49E53t28604;
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:05:03 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:05:03 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
References: <200205091344.g49DiBp01273@saturn.janwieck.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> It'd be worth trying to understand cygwin issues in detail before we
> > >> sign up to do and support a native Windows port.
> >
> > > Actually, there are licensing issues involved ... we could never put a
> > > 'windows binary' up for anon-ftp, since to distribute it would require the
> > > cygwin.dll to be distributed, and to do that, there is a licensing cost
> > > ... of course, I guess we could require ppl to download cygwin seperately,
> > > install that, then install the binary over top of that ...
> >
> > <<itch>> And how much development time are we supposed to expend to
> > avoid that?
> >
> > Give me a technical case for avoiding Cygwin, and maybe I can get
> > excited about it. I'm not planning to lift a finger on the basis
> > of licensing though... after all, Windows users are accustomed to
> > paying for software, no?
>
> Nobody asked you to lift any of your fingers. A few people
> (including me) just see value in a native Windows port,
> kicking out the Cygwin requirement.
>
> I have the impression you never did use Cygwin. I did, thanks
> but no thanks.
I have used the cygwin version too. It is a waste of time. No Windows user will
ever accept it. No windows-only user is going to use the cygwin tools. From a
production stand point, would anyone reading this trust their data to
PostgreSQL running on cygwin? Think about it, if you wouldn't, why would anyone
else.
I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting opinions, that if
you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then we should write a real Win32
version.
If the global/static variables which are initialized by the postmaster are
moved to a structure, we can should be able to remove the fork() requirement
and port to a Win32 native system.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22630@postgresql.org Thu May 9 10:37:12 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22630@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49EbB409822
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:37:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8ADB347661B; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:37:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 834AC4765D2; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:32:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04C04763ED
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:32:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858BD47644B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:25:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g49EPhW19333;
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:25:43 -0400 (EDT)
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
In-Reply-To: <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com>
References: <200205091344.g49DiBp01273@saturn.janwieck.net> <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com>
Comments: In-reply-to mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
message dated "Thu, 09 May 2002 10:05:03 -0400"
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:25:43 -0400
Message-ID: <19330.1020954343@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes:
> I have used the cygwin version too. It is a waste of time. No Windows user will
> ever accept it. No windows-only user is going to use the cygwin tools.
With decent packaging, no windows-only user would even know we have
cygwin in there. The above argument is just plain irrelevant. The real
point is that we need a nice clean friendly GUI for both installation
and administration --- and AFAICS that will take about the same amount of
work to write whether the server requires cygwin internally or not.
Rather than expending largely-pointless work on internal rewrites of
the server, people who care about this issue ought to be thinking about
the GUI problems.
> From a production stand point, would anyone reading this trust their
> data to PostgreSQL running on cygwin?
I wouldn't trust my data to *any* database running on a Microsoft OS.
Period. The above argument thus doesn't impress me at all, especially
when it's being made without offering a shred of evidence that cygwin
contributes any major degree of instability.
I am especially unhappy about the prospect of major code revisions
and development time spent on chasing this rather than improving our
performance and stability on Unix-type OSes. I agree with the comment
someone else made: that's just playing Microsoft's game.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22634@postgresql.org Thu May 9 11:12:12 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22634@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49FCB419783
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:12:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DCF27475C4C; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:12:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 5CAC8476567; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:08:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582F94762CF
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:08:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807C3475C8E
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:00:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49Et1t28775;
Thu, 9 May 2002 10:55:01 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDA8DC5.A76330A1@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:55:01 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
References: <200205091344.g49DiBp01273@saturn.janwieck.net> <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com> <19330.1020954343@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Tom Lane wrote:
> With decent packaging, no windows-only user would even know we have
> cygwin in there. The above argument is just plain irrelevant. The real
> point is that we need a nice clean friendly GUI for both installation
> and administration --- and AFAICS that will take about the same amount of
> work to write whether the server requires cygwin internally or not.
Can a cygwin version of PostgreSQL see the native file system, like: C:\My
Database, D:\postgres?
> > From a production stand point, would anyone reading this trust their
> > data to PostgreSQL running on cygwin?
>
> I wouldn't trust my data to *any* database running on a Microsoft OS.
That is a prejudice that is affecting your judgment. Many people do trust
Windows, do I? No, but a lot of people do. People have trusted their businesses
on Windows NT/2K/XP, many are still doing so. We want these people to use
PostgreSQL, so when they see the error in their ways, they have a way out.
> The above argument thus doesn't impress me at all, especially
> when it's being made without offering a shred of evidence that cygwin
> contributes any major degree of instability.
>From a software development standpoint, I am VERY uncomfortable with the
technique of a user space program copying its writeable memory to another
process's. It may work until Microsoft changes something with the next version
of IE. What about anti-virus software, cygwin has problems with them, and you
have to have anti-virus software on Windows.
On top of that, the time spent copying the whole process is too long, and it
forces real memory to be allocated and initialized at process startup.
So, the cygwin fork() will cause PostgreSQL to be slower and use more memory
than a native version, and will not co-exist well with anti-virus software.
>
> I am especially unhappy about the prospect of major code revisions
> and development time spent on chasing this rather than improving our
> performance and stability on Unix-type OSes. I agree with the comment
> someone else made: that's just playing Microsoft's game.
Maybe is is playing "Microsoft's Game" but the end result will be a program
that can seriously compete with MSSQL on Windows, and provide a REAL migration
path to UNIX.
Many developers use MSSQL because they "have it" in MSDN, so to them, it is
free. Once they develop something using it, they are tied to Windows. When it
comes time to deploy their pet project, the company has to cough up the price
of the server.
A native, friendly, Win32 PostgreSQL that works the same on Windows as it does
on FreeBSD, Linux, Solaris, etc. Will offer the developer real options away
from Windows.
Also: I don't think it needs to be a major rewrite, no strategy needs to
change, it is basically renaming variables, i.e. my_global_var becomes
pg_globals.my_global_var.
Once that is done, a port writer can do what ever they need to do to get that
structure to the child correctly. As an exercise, I bet if we did this, we
would find bugs which are lurking, as yet unfound.
Besides, the discipline of using a globals structure will improve the code
base. Don't you agree?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22635@postgresql.org Thu May 9 11:26:08 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22635@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49FQ7422749
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:26:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2AD70475C8E; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:26:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 73B2E4764F7; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:23:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53F84475FE2
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:23:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from myst.fourpalms.org (www.fourpalms.org [64.3.68.148])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5269D47626D
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:13:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fourpalms.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by myst.fourpalms.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 254F4201196; Thu, 9 May 2002 08:13:18 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <3CDA920D.9AF8F9CF@fourpalms.org>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 08:13:17 -0700
From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>
Organization: Yes
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.8-34.1mdk i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: Lee Kindness <lkindness@csl.co.uk>, Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
References: <29206.1020833367@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200205091344.g49DiBp01273@saturn.janwieck.net> <15578.33799.700751.945380@kelvin.csl.co.uk> <3CDA866D.25E7FADF@mohawksoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
...
> PostgreSQL's feature set and price ($0), with a good installer, would do VERY
> well.
That may be (I'd like to think so!).
We've identified at least a couple of barriers to folks running
PostgreSQL on Windows. The installer and GUI issue needs to be solved no
matter what, and we *could* have a version running on Windows with just
those things in place.
imho if we are going down the path, we need to take the first steps. And
those do *not* require code rewrites to do so (or at least don't appear
to).
If we had a package available for Windows -- with some developers such
as yourself supporting it -- then we could talk about putting more
resources into supporting that platform better. But the perception of at
least some of the key developers (including myself) is that *if* we did
the code rewrite, and *if* we spent the effort to end up as a native on
Windows, then we *very well might* be an unreliable database on an
unreliable platform.
istm that getting a well packaged system running now, then being able to
identify *only cygwin* as the barrier to better reliability would get
more support for changes in the backend code.
And if we were working toward some ability to do threading anyway (I
don't see that in the near future, but we've talked in the past about
structuring the query engine around "tuple sources" which could then be
distributed across threads or across machines) then maybe the next step
is easier.
My 2c...
- Thomas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22644@postgresql.org Thu May 9 12:57:33 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22644@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49GvX424180
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:57:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B60CA47643B; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:57:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 841634766DB; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:50:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B98D476528
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:50:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp012.mail.yahoo.com (smtp012.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.32])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4DB2475AD5
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:41:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psc.progress.com (HELO saturn.janwieck.net) (janwieck@192.233.92.200 with login)
by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 16:41:17 -0000
Received: (from wieck@localhost)
by saturn.janwieck.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g49GbGx01621;
Thu, 9 May 2002 12:37:16 -0400
From: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200205091637.g49GbGx01621@saturn.janwieck.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
In-Reply-To: <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com> from mlw at "May 9, 2002 10:05:03
am"
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:37:16 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
mlw wrote:
> I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting opinions, that if
> you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then we should write a real Win32
> version.
>
> If the global/static variables which are initialized by the postmaster are
> moved to a structure, we can should be able to remove the fork() requirement
> and port to a Win32 native system.
My opinion here is that until May 1998 Postgres did exec(),
so it was clean and okay for CreateProcess() up to then. Just
because we optimized it for the copy-on-write behaviour,
modern Unix kernels do with fork() only, is NO reason to
accept sloppy coding. The Postmaster and the backend have
different responsibilities. In fact, I still consider them
beeing different programs even if they reside in one
executable. Mixing global variables of one with the other is
wrong.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22662@postgresql.org Thu May 9 14:47:23 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22662@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49IlM425877
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:47:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C6581475F6B; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:47:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id D1B6D476703; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:42:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6884766AF
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:42:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3726B47649E
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:28:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49IN2t29643;
Thu, 9 May 2002 14:23:02 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDABE86.D38370F4@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 14:23:02 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
References: <200205091344.g49DiBp01273@saturn.janwieck.net> <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com> <20020509170233.2DC5A38CB3@cbbrowne.com> <3CDAB0B3.C7375A12@mohawksoft.com> <20020509174604.89E5938D1A@cbbrowne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com wrote:
>
> > cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com wrote:
> >>> I think, and I know people are probably sick of me spouting
> >>> opinions, that if you want a Windows presence for PostgreSQL, then
> >>> we should write a real Win32 version.
> >>
> >> The crucial wrong word is the word "we."
>
> >> If _you_ want a Windows presence, then _you_ should write a real
> >> Win32 version. That clearly attaches responsibility to someone who
> >> is interested.
>
> > I have already said that I am willing to write the pieces for a
> > Windows port. The issue is changes in PostgreSQL required to do it.
>
> No, I don't think you understand.
>
> If you're planning to do a port, then _all_ changes are your
> responsibility. Nobody ought to need to change PostgreSQL in order for
> you to write a Windows port; that, in fact, would be a waste of time,
> having several people working on something that should probably be done
> by one person.
Without buy-in from the group, there is no point in me wasting my time doing
all the work necessary. I'm not interested in making Mark's special version of
PostgreSQL.
If we can agree on a strategy and a course, then it is worth doing. If all the
changes made fall on the floor because the group does not like them, then I
wasted my time. Got it?
Also, doing the Windows portions of the code will represent a significant
investment of my time. I'm not interested in doing a lot of work on a shoddy
project. If you ask the core group to put out a crappy version of PostgreSQL
for a UNIX, they would fight long and hard against it. Why should we be willing
to produce a crappy version for Windows, just because the people here don't
like Windows.
I don't care about Solaris, but I understand WHY it is important to make
PostgreSQL work well on it. I don't understand why the people in this group
don't see the same purpose for a Windows port. To be honest, I think a good
Windows port will do wonders for PostgreSQL's acceptance.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22680@postgresql.org Thu May 9 17:57:11 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22680@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49LvA428333
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:57:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 348D7476690; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:57:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 64C1747675C; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8E1476162
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:56:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rh72.home.ee (adsl1030.estpak.ee [213.168.29.11])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DEF475F1A
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:55:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by rh72.home.ee (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49JrRc02592;
Fri, 10 May 2002 00:53:28 +0500
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
cc: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <19330.1020954343@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <200205091344.g49DiBp01273@saturn.janwieck.net>
<3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com> <19330.1020954343@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.4
Date: 10 May 2002 00:53:27 +0500
Message-ID: <1020974008.2080.65.camel@rh72.home.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 19:25, Tom Lane wrote:
> mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes:
> > I have used the cygwin version too. It is a waste of time. No Windows user will
> > ever accept it. No windows-only user is going to use the cygwin tools.
>
> With decent packaging, no windows-only user would even know we have
> cygwin in there. The above argument is just plain irrelevant. The real
> point is that we need a nice clean friendly GUI for both installation
> and administration --- and AFAICS that will take about the same amount of
> work to write whether the server requires cygwin internally or not.
<evil grin>
We can go the Oracle way and write a 200MB cross-platform java installer
requiring and exact version of java runtime
</evil grin>
> Rather than expending largely-pointless work on internal rewrites of
> the server, people who care about this issue ought to be thinking about
> the GUI problems.
pgAccess is quite nice (Disclaimer: I'm not a windows weenie, I run it
inside vmware/win98 IE browser test environment on my Linux workstation
;).
Why not just bundle what we've got ?
> > From a production stand point, would anyone reading this trust their
> > data to PostgreSQL running on cygwin?
>
> I wouldn't trust my data to *any* database running on a Microsoft OS.
> Period.
Do we support Xenix and SCO ?
> The above argument thus doesn't impress me at all, especially
> when it's being made without offering a shred of evidence that cygwin
> contributes any major degree of instability.
>From the comments here it seems to be either cygwin or more likely
cygipc
> I am especially unhappy about the prospect of major code revisions
> and development time spent on chasing this rather than improving our
> performance and stability on Unix-type OSes. I agree with the comment
> someone else made: that's just playing Microsoft's game.
Not!
I think that this thread is mostly about coordinating code and interface
cleanups that are likely beneficial for both *NIX and non-*NIX platforms
mainly
* cleaner support for semaphores
* separating shared and per-process data
* process creation
* (file operations)
* (init and service scripts)
if done properly none of these will degrade code quality nor
performance.
Also, having a clean interface for those will not only enable any
interested party to make windows/BeOS/OSX/QNX binaries with less effort,
it will most likely make it easier make use of advances in *NIX world
like AIO, multiprocessor systems, NUMA and distributed systems, and just
make things more robust and reliable by making code inspection easier.
---------------
Hannu
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22694@postgresql.org Thu May 9 21:02:16 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22694@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4A12F400739
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:02:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F206D47693C; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:01:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 7D8704768C8; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:01:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932C8475D9D
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:01:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp001.bizmail.yahoo.com (smtp001.bizmail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.125])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3159C475E90
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 20:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO egutierrez) (eg@eldergriffon.org@205.216.186.2 with login)
by smtp1.bm.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 May 2002 00:59:59 -0000
Message-ID: <00f701c1f7bd$ffdeddc0$8500005a@egutierrez>
Reply-To: "Ernesto Gutierrez" <egutierrez@eldergriffon.org>
From: "Ernesto Gutierrez" <egutierrez@eldergriffon.org>
To: "mlw" <markw@mohawksoft.com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
cc: "Jan Wieck" <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <200205091344.g49DiBp01273@saturn.janwieck.net> <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com> <19330.1020954343@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] How much work is a native Windows application?
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 17:59:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com> writes:
> > I have used the cygwin version too. It is a waste of time. No Windows
user will
> > ever accept it. No windows-only user is going to use the cygwin tools.
>
> With decent packaging, no windows-only user would even know we have
> cygwin in there. The above argument is just plain irrelevant. The real
> point is that we need a nice clean friendly GUI for both installation
> and administration --- and AFAICS that will take about the same amount of
> work to write whether the server requires cygwin internally or not.
I'm afraid I agree with mlw, Tom. I don't think the problem ends at the GUI,
although for many people it would. The issue extends at least also to
support and troubleshooting. In a production environment, I have a better
chance of figuring out what's going wrong with an application written
natively for an operating system dealing directly with that operating
system. I would take a dim view of using PostgreSQL running on cygwin unless
I had extensive experience doing it, or if there were no other alternative.
> > From a production stand point, would anyone reading this trust their
> > data to PostgreSQL running on cygwin?
>
> I wouldn't trust my data to *any* database running on a Microsoft OS.
> Period. The above argument thus doesn't impress me at all, especially
> when it's being made without offering a shred of evidence that cygwin
> contributes any major degree of instability.
If you could prove to me that cygwin doesn't contribute *any* instability,
I'd still be pretty worried, probably for the same reasons that you don't
trust any Microsoft OS. There are increased chances that something could go
critically wrong, particularly in an environment fundamentally different. I
think mlw's basic point is quite valid, that PG+cygwin will not ever find
favor with decision-makers who are used to Windows systems. Suspicion of
the other environment's foibles is common, and goes both ways.
> I am especially unhappy about the prospect of major code revisions
> and development time spent on chasing this rather than improving our
> performance and stability on Unix-type OSes. I agree with the comment
> someone else made: that's just playing Microsoft's game.
There I don't deny you may be right.
Ernie Gutierrez
Walnut Creek, CA
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22642@postgresql.org Thu May 9 12:49:06 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22642@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49Gn5424077
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:49:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D130647648A; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 4AB694766F0; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:37:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id D272E4765B6
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:37:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from barry.xythos.com (sdsl-216-36-77-241.dsl.sjc.megapath.net [216.36.77.241])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C87E476482
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:34:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from xythos.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by barry.xythos.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49GGZg09296;
Thu, 9 May 2002 09:16:35 -0700
Message-ID: <3CDAA0E3.5060706@xythos.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 09:16:35 -0700
From: Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
cc: "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk>,
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>, Joel Burton <joel@joelburton.com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL
References: <E2870D8CE1CCD311BAF50008C71EDE8E01F74896@MAIL_EXCHANGE> <19035.1020952312@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
I have found this whole thread very interesting (I'm still not sure
where it is going though :-). But let me throw in some of my thoughts.
A windows version of postgres (whether native of cygwin based) is
important. I have many developers with windows as their desktop OS and
they have a postgres db installed to do development work. Postgres on
cygwin is fine for this need. While I may not trust it in a production
environment it is certainly good enough for development.
A second use we have for postgres on windows is in evals of our product.
We provide an eval version of our software as an InstallShield
installed .exe that includes our code, postgres and the necessary cygwin
parts. People doing evals just want to install the eval on their
everyday machine (most likely running windows) and it needs to be dead
simple to install. This can be done with postgres and cygwin. In this
example again the current postgres+cygwin works well enough for our
evals. Again I wouldn't run the production version in this environment,
but it is good enough for an eval.
Our eval does show that it is possible to repackage postgres plus the
parts of cygwin it needs into a nice installer and have it work. (It is
a lot of work but is certainly possible). In fact in our eval install
we even use cygrunsrv to install postgres as a windows service.
The biggest problem we have had is the fact that the utility scripts
(like pg_ctl, createdb, etc) are all shell scripts that call a whole
host of other utilities. It is pretty straight forward to package up
the postgres executable and the libraries it needs from cygwin. It is a
whole different problem making sure you have a standard unix style shell
environment with all the utilities installed so that you can run the
shell scripts.
thanks,
--Barry
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk> writes:
>
>>Cygwin is not the only additon needed, cygipc will also be needed (GPL)
>>(see: http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/index.html )
>
>
> Good point, but is this a requirement that we could get rid of, now that
> we have the SysV IPC stuff somewhat isolated? AFAICT cygipc provides
> the SysV IPC API (shmget, semget, etc) --- but if there are usable
> equivalents in the basic Cygwin environment, we could probably use them
> now.
>
> Considering how often we see the forgot-to-start-cygipc mistake,
> removing this requirement would be a clear win.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22665@postgresql.org Thu May 9 15:30:11 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22665@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49JUA426599
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:30:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2FCB8475B68; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:29:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 0739B47669C; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:28:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4074C47642C
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:28:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp017.mail.yahoo.com (smtp017.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.114])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48B34476481
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:24:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from psc.progress.com (HELO saturn.janwieck.net) (janwieck@192.233.92.200 with login)
by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 May 2002 19:24:32 -0000
Received: (from wieck@localhost)
by saturn.janwieck.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g49JKN402145;
Thu, 9 May 2002 15:20:23 -0400
From: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200205091920.g49JKN402145@saturn.janwieck.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PG+Cygwin Production Experience (was RE: Path to PostgreSQL
In-Reply-To: <3CDAA0E3.5060706@xythos.com> from Barry Lind at "May 9, 2002 09:16:35
am"
To: Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:20:23 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk>,
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>, mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>, Joel Burton <joel@joelburton.com>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Barry Lind wrote:
> I have found this whole thread very interesting (I'm still not sure
> where it is going though :-). But let me throw in some of my thoughts.
>
> A windows version of postgres (whether native of cygwin based) is
> important. I have many developers with windows as their desktop OS and
> they have a postgres db installed to do development work. Postgres on
> cygwin is fine for this need. While I may not trust it in a production
> environment it is certainly good enough for development.
>
> A second use we have for postgres on windows is in evals of our product.
> We provide an eval version of our software as an InstallShield
> installed .exe that includes our code, postgres and the necessary cygwin
> parts. People doing evals just want to install the eval on their
> everyday machine (most likely running windows) and it needs to be dead
> simple to install. This can be done with postgres and cygwin. In this
> example again the current postgres+cygwin works well enough for our
> evals. Again I wouldn't run the production version in this environment,
> but it is good enough for an eval.
>
> Our eval does show that it is possible to repackage postgres plus the
> parts of cygwin it needs into a nice installer and have it work. (It is
> a lot of work but is certainly possible). In fact in our eval install
> we even use cygrunsrv to install postgres as a windows service.
>
> The biggest problem we have had is the fact that the utility scripts
> (like pg_ctl, createdb, etc) are all shell scripts that call a whole
> host of other utilities. It is pretty straight forward to package up
> the postgres executable and the libraries it needs from cygwin. It is a
> whole different problem making sure you have a standard unix style shell
> environment with all the utilities installed so that you can run the
> shell scripts.
Do I read this right? You wrap the binary eval version of
your product, the binary PostgreSQL and CygWin including some
of the utility programs into one InstallShield .exe and ship
that?
Hmmm, PostgreSQL's license is totally fine with that. And
your program is your program. But as far as I know bundling
with CygWin like this costs money. So you pay license fees to
RedHat for shipping eval copies of your product and don't see
any value in a native Windows port? Nobel, nobel, or does
your product have such an outstanding eval/sell ratio that it
doesn't matter?
Jan
>
> thanks,
> --Barry
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Henshall, Stuart - WCP" <SHenshall@westcountrypublications.co.uk> writes:
> >
> >>Cygwin is not the only additon needed, cygipc will also be needed (GPL)
> >>(see: http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/cygipc/index.html )
> >
> >
> > Good point, but is this a requirement that we could get rid of, now that
> > we have the SysV IPC stuff somewhat isolated? AFAICT cygipc provides
> > the SysV IPC API (shmget, semget, etc) --- but if there are usable
> > equivalents in the basic Cygwin environment, we could probably use them
> > now.
> >
> > Considering how often we see the forgot-to-start-cygipc mistake,
> > removing this requirement would be a clear win.
> >
> > regards, tom lane
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22643@postgresql.org Thu May 9 12:55:39 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22643@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49Gtc424128
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:55:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8604C4759A4; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:55:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id E12EE4766BF; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69ED347650F
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:50:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail1.ihs.com (unknown [170.207.70.222])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA565475A6C
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 12:40:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from css120.ihs.com (css120.ihs.com [170.207.105.120])
by mail1.ihs.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g49GdO1j016176
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:39:24 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 10:34:58 -0600 (MDT)
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
In-Reply-To: <3CDA820F.136D65F5@mohawksoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205091029070.3510-100000@css120.ihs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
There are some issues that the whole idea of a win32 port should bring up.
One of them is whether or not postgresql should be rewritten as a
multi-threaded app.
If postgresql will never be rewritten as a multi-threaded app, then
performance under Windows is likely to ALWAYS be slow, since that
multi-thread is the preferred model for good performance on W32. note
that many Unixes prefer multi-threaded models as well (Solaris comes to
mind) so there's the possibility that a multi-threaded postgresql could
enjoy better performance on more than just windows.
If postgresql IS going to eventually be multi-threaded, then the whole
win32 port should probably be delayed until then, since it would solve
many of the issues of fork() versus createprocess().
Just my thoughts on it.
Scott
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22660@postgresql.org Thu May 9 14:31:54 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22660@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49IVs425698
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:31:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3CD18476584; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:31:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id C48014767E8; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:24:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1B34762A6
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:24:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail1.ihs.com (unknown [170.207.70.222])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF97476700
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:19:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from css120.ihs.com (css120.ihs.com [170.207.105.120])
by mail1.ihs.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g49IIQsp027731;
Thu, 9 May 2002 12:18:26 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 12:13:59 -0600 (MDT)
From: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
In-Reply-To: <200205091751.g49HpTi01846@saturn.janwieck.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0205091207540.3940-100000@css120.ihs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
On Thu, 9 May 2002, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > If postgresql IS going to eventually be multi-threaded, then the whole
> > win32 port should probably be delayed until then, since it would solve
> > many of the issues of fork() versus createprocess().
>
> If multi-threading is the plan, then there is light at the
> end of the tunnel ... the upcoming train...
That's a bit extreme don't you think? I'm not fan of multi-threading as
the one true way, and since I use linux as my server for postgresql, there
is no gain for me in a multi-threaded model. In fact, I'd prefer
postgresql stay multi-process for robustness.
BUT, if there are plans to go multi-thread, or could be plans, then those
should take priority over how to port to windows, since making postgresql
multi-threaded will change it so much as to make the current "how do we
port to windows" thread meaningless.
One of the primary reasons given for avoiding cygwin is that postgresql
runs so slowly under it on windows, but I submit that it probably won't
run a heck of a lot faster if it was written as a native app as long as
it's running as a multi-process design. Since there's probably no great
gain to be had from moving it out from under cygwin, why bother?
My vote would be to stay multi-process and Unix compatible. I have no
real use for windows as a server, and do NOT want to sacrifice the
performance / reliability I have with postgresql under Linux for a windows
port.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22683@postgresql.org Thu May 9 18:20:10 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22683@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49MK9428615
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:20:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 723B04767BA; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:19:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id B32AF476783; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:19:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED46475EFF
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:19:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rh72.home.ee (adsl1030.estpak.ee [213.168.29.11])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1234E475B2D
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:16:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by rh72.home.ee (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49KF2c02624;
Fri, 10 May 2002 01:15:06 +0500
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
<D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE10@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
<D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE10@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.4
Date: 10 May 2002 01:15:02 +0500
Message-ID: <1020975306.2451.76.camel@rh72.home.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 02:33, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> It took a few hundred man hours to do it.
About 2-8 weeks for one full time programmer ?
> I see the whole Win32 port as
> a non issue. Several parties have already completed it (including the
> place where I work -- CONNX Solutions Inc.). If we did not do it or all
> parties who already did it were hit by a comet or something, someone
> else would accomplish it. It isn't trivial but it isn't impossible
> either. If a need is large enough, someone will manage it. The need is
> large enough. Ergo...
Do you know which of these run ((reasonably) well) on win9x ?
> Here are some other things related:
>
> A ready to go Win32 PosgreSQL package:
> http://www.dbexperts.net/postgresql
Perhaps we should back up and let dbexperts et.al. recover their costs
and after that repent and commit changes back to main tree ;)
## insert a little ad-hominem attack to everyone objecting a native
## win32 port as owning stock in some win32-pg-selling company
BTW, do they have an evaluation version or do they think that people
would in that case evaluate on win32 and then buy a cheap linux box for
$495.- :)
--------------------
Hannu
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22676@postgresql.org Thu May 9 17:36:50 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22676@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49Lan428029
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2AB3947673E; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id BA90247671E; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:35:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA57D47660B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:35:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voyager.corporate.connx.com (unknown [209.20.248.131])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D3F475A41
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:34:39 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:33:40 -0700
Message-ID: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE10@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Thread-Topic: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
Thread-Index: AcH3nsEyepyPj/gRTNiZtJugpq+PAQAAduvQ
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
To: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g49Lan428029
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hannu Krosing [mailto:hannu@tm.ee]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:10 PM
> To: Jan Wieck
> Cc: Scott Marlowe; PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
>
>
> On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 22:51, Jan Wieck wrote:
> > Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > > There are some issues that the whole idea of a win32 port
> should bring up.
> > > One of them is whether or not postgresql should be rewritten as a
> > > multi-threaded app.
> >
> > Please, don't add this one to it.
> >
> > I'm all for the native Windows port, yes, but I've discussed
> > the multi-thread questions for days at Great Bridge, then
> > again with my new employer, with people on shows and whatnot.
> >
> > Anything in the whole backend is designed with a multi-
> > process model in mind. You'll not do that in any reasonable
> > amount of time.
>
> IIRC you are replying to the man who _has_ actually don this ?
>
> Perhaps using an unreasonable amount of time but still ... :)
It took a few hundred man hours to do it. I see the whole Win32 port as
a non issue. Several parties have already completed it (including the
place where I work -- CONNX Solutions Inc.). If we did not do it or all
parties who already did it were hit by a comet or something, someone
else would accomplish it. It isn't trivial but it isn't impossible
either. If a need is large enough, someone will manage it. The need is
large enough. Ergo...
Here are some other things related:
A ready to go Win32 PosgreSQL package:
http://www.dbexperts.net/postgresql
An open source project to productize PostgreSQL for Windows (has gone
nowhere so far):
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/winpackage/projdisplay.php
A native Win32 port accomplished by a Japanese Group:
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
If you look under the "Gists for Patch" it contains exactly the same
tasks that CONNX Solutions Inc. had to accomplish in every case.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22677@postgresql.org Thu May 9 17:48:03 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22677@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49Lm3428149
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:48:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0F0CF475A41; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:48:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id B847047670D; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:47:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE1E475A41
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:46:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527374766C2
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:46:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49LfTt30402;
Thu, 9 May 2002 17:41:37 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDAED09.E890975B@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 17:41:29 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE10@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Dann Corbit wrote:
> It took a few hundred man hours to do it. I see the whole Win32 port as
> a non issue. Several parties have already completed it (including the
> place where I work -- CONNX Solutions Inc.). If we did not do it or all
> parties who already did it were hit by a comet or something, someone
> else would accomplish it. It isn't trivial but it isn't impossible
> either. If a need is large enough, someone will manage it. The need is
> large enough. Ergo...
>
> Here are some other things related:
>
> A ready to go Win32 PosgreSQL package:
> http://www.dbexperts.net/postgresql
>
> An open source project to productize PostgreSQL for Windows (has gone
> nowhere so far):
> http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/winpackage/projdisplay.php
>
> A native Win32 port accomplished by a Japanese Group:
> http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
> If you look under the "Gists for Patch" it contains exactly the same
> tasks that CONNX Solutions Inc. had to accomplish in every case.
These packages are based upon cygwin. Problems with cygwin:
(1) GNU license issues.
(2) Does not work well with anti-virus software
(3) Since OS level copy-on-write is negated, process creation is much slower.
(4) Since OS level copy on write is negated, memory that otherwise would not be
allocated to the process is forced to ba allocated when the parent process data
is copied.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22679@postgresql.org Thu May 9 17:53:53 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22679@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49Lrq428243
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:53:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AF15A4766A3; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:53:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 9C26F4766EC; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:53:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F95D475D60
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:52:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voyager.corporate.connx.com (unknown [209.20.248.131])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2590475C8C
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 17:52:56 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:51:50 -0700
Message-ID: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE12@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Thread-Topic: Issues tangential to win32 support
Thread-Index: AcH3oxZJFXJ0zN07QyKdZT4UsSj7LQAAB7dA
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
To: "mlw" <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g49Lrq428243
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mlw [mailto:markw@mohawksoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:41 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Issues tangential to win32 support
>
>
> Dann Corbit wrote:
> > It took a few hundred man hours to do it. I see the whole
> Win32 port as
> > a non issue. Several parties have already completed it
> (including the
> > place where I work -- CONNX Solutions Inc.). If we did not
> do it or all
> > parties who already did it were hit by a comet or something, someone
> > else would accomplish it. It isn't trivial but it isn't impossible
> > either. If a need is large enough, someone will manage it.
> The need is
> > large enough. Ergo...
> >
> > Here are some other things related:
> >
> > A ready to go Win32 PosgreSQL package:
> > http://www.dbexperts.net/postgresql
> >
> > An open source project to productize PostgreSQL for Windows
> (has gone
> > nowhere so far):
> > http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/winpackage/projdisplay.php
> >
> > A native Win32 port accomplished by a Japanese Group:
> > http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
> > If you look under the "Gists for Patch" it contains exactly the same
> > tasks that CONNX Solutions Inc. had to accomplish in every case.
>
> These packages are based upon cygwin. Problems with cygwin:
>
> (1) GNU license issues.
> (2) Does not work well with anti-virus software
> (3) Since OS level copy-on-write is negated, process creation
> is much slower.
> (4) Since OS level copy on write is negated, memory that
> otherwise would not be
> allocated to the process is forced to ba allocated when the
> parent process data
> is copied.
Our package avoids Cygwin altogether. We wrote our own POSIX layer from
scratch, and we junked fork() for CreateProcess() {and inserted copious:
#ifdef ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE
/* our code goes here */
#else
/* Standard UNIX code goes here */
#endif
It's complete, and it performs like the burning blue blazes. We have
run the full PostgreSQL test suite to completion with success. However,
before we release any SQL tool, we have our own test suite with tens of
thousands of tests to perform. Hence, we won't have a release until
June at the earliest.
I think the Japanese one also does not use Cygwin (but I have not tried
installing it yet).
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22681@postgresql.org Thu May 9 18:02:06 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22681@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49M26428426
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:02:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6E81C476693; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:02:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 69A68476733; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:01:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AC1475A7B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:01:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739E74759A5
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:01:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49Lu1t30454;
Thu, 9 May 2002 17:56:01 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDAF071.CF3DAB58@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 17:56:01 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE12@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Dann Corbit wrote:
> Our package avoids Cygwin altogether. We wrote our own POSIX layer from
> scratch, and we junked fork() for CreateProcess() {and inserted copious:
> #ifdef ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE
> /* our code goes here */
> #else
> /* Standard UNIX code goes here */
> #endif
OK, what sorts of things did you do in your ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE? Were they ever
migrated back into the main tree? Did you simulate fork() or a stand-alone?
I know Windows very well, but I have thus far remained ignorant of PostgreSQL
internals.
>
> It's complete, and it performs like the burning blue blazes. We have
> run the full PostgreSQL test suite to completion with success. However,
> before we release any SQL tool, we have our own test suite with tens of
> thousands of tests to perform. Hence, we won't have a release until
> June at the earliest.
>
> I think the Japanese one also does not use Cygwin (but I have not tried
> installing it yet).
The japanese site claims cygwin.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22682@postgresql.org Thu May 9 18:17:03 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22682@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49MH3428574
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:17:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 745F04765DF; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:16:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id C342F47678A; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:13:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF8D475FBD
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:13:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voyager.corporate.connx.com (unknown [209.20.248.131])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1612E47621B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:11:46 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:10:43 -0700
Message-ID: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE13@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Thread-Topic: Issues tangential to win32 support
Thread-Index: AcH3pRcvhdfkS6Z+SXCu6lfzMZH4qAAAK5Cw
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
To: "mlw" <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g49MH3428574
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mlw [mailto:markw@mohawksoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:56 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Issues tangential to win32 support
>
>
> Dann Corbit wrote:
> > Our package avoids Cygwin altogether. We wrote our own
> POSIX layer from
> > scratch, and we junked fork() for CreateProcess() {and
> inserted copious:
> > #ifdef ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE
> > /* our code goes here */
> > #else
> > /* Standard UNIX code goes here */
> > #endif
>
> OK, what sorts of things did you do in your
> ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE? Were they ever
> migrated back into the main tree? Did you simulate fork() or
> a stand-alone?
I explained it in another mail.
We had quite a few changes we had to make (several hundred man-hours,
about half of which was the POSIX layer and the precise time routines).
No sense trying to simulate fork() -- it stinks on Win32. The Cygwin
and PW32 implementations of fork() are dogs. Smarter folks than us
tried it and failed miserably. Why reinvent a broken wheel? We use
create process and our own startup code. Our version is competitive
with fork() on Linux for spawning tasks and in general the queries run
considerably faster.
> I know Windows very well, but I have thus far remained
> ignorant of PostgreSQL
> internals.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22684@postgresql.org Thu May 9 18:34:44 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22684@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49MYi428719
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:34:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BC4F84759C3; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:34:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 6AD90476737; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:33:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6926D475B2D
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:33:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voyager.corporate.connx.com (unknown [209.20.248.131])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7563E4759C3
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:33:40 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:31:14 -0700
Message-ID: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82906F443@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Thread-Topic: Issues tangential to win32 support
Thread-Index: AcH3pRcvhdfkS6Z+SXCu6lfzMZH4qAAA0jKA
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
To: "mlw" <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g49MYi428719
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mlw [mailto:markw@mohawksoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:56 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Issues tangential to win32 support
>
>
> Dann Corbit wrote:
> > Our package avoids Cygwin altogether. We wrote our own
> POSIX layer from
> > scratch, and we junked fork() for CreateProcess() {and
> inserted copious:
> > #ifdef ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE
> > /* our code goes here */
> > #else
> > /* Standard UNIX code goes here */
> > #endif
>
> OK, what sorts of things did you do in your
> ICKY_WIN32_KLUDGE? Were they ever
> migrated back into the main tree? Did you simulate fork() or
> a stand-alone?
>
> I know Windows very well, but I have thus far remained
> ignorant of PostgreSQL
> internals.
>
> >
> > It's complete, and it performs like the burning blue
> blazes. We have
> > run the full PostgreSQL test suite to completion with
> success. However,
> > before we release any SQL tool, we have our own test suite
> with tens of
> > thousands of tests to perform. Hence, we won't have a release until
> > June at the earliest.
> >
> > I think the Japanese one also does not use Cygwin (but I
> have not tried
> > installing it yet).
>
> The japanese site claims cygwin.
This is not correct. (Fortunately, we have someone here who reads and
writes Japanese).
At any rate, it is a complete, native implementation of PostgreSQL
without any need for Cygwin.
Just to be sure, I did a "depends" on each of the binaries and none of
them use Cywin.
So the Japanese site did exactly the same thing that we did.
Here are bitmaps showing the complete dependency trees of both the
Japanese efforts and ours as well:
Us:
ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/chess-engines/new-approach/connx.bmp
Japanese:
ftp://cap.connx.com/pub/chess-engines/new-approach/japanese.bmp
No Cygwin in sight in either case.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22685@postgresql.org Thu May 9 18:39:40 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22685@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49Mde428784
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:39:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6F0264767C5; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:39:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 9916F476790; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:39:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B4C475F09
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:39:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52C3475B2D
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:39:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49MXot30610;
Thu, 9 May 2002 18:33:50 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDAF94E.2F60382E@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 18:33:50 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82906F443@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Dann Corbit wrote:
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
Mentions cygwin, am I misunderstanding?
Does not matter, the issue is that you guys said you did it. OK, have you been
able to bring the changed back into the main source tree? (Are you not trying?)
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22686@postgresql.org Thu May 9 18:46:24 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22686@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49MkN428851
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:46:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 32CEF476649; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:46:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 232D6476760; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:45:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id A983647642B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:45:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voyager.corporate.connx.com (unknown [209.20.248.131])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782BD475F09
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:44:49 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 15:43:47 -0700
Message-ID: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE16@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Thread-Topic: Issues tangential to win32 support
Thread-Index: AcH3ql/GnGAJD4NhSHug0+KSRuGWRAAAAz7Q
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
To: "mlw" <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g49MkN428851
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mlw [mailto:markw@mohawksoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 3:34 PM
> To: Dann Corbit
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Issues tangential to win32 support
>
>
> Dann Corbit wrote:
> http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
>
> Mentions cygwin, am I misunderstanding?
>
> Does not matter, the issue is that you guys said you did it.
> OK, have you been
> able to bring the changed back into the main source tree?
> (Are you not trying?)
I am not enrolled in the CVS project, and don't even know how to use it.
We use "Visual Source Safe" here -- really an icky tool but at least
everyone here knows it.
There is some debate here as to whether to keep the changes private or
to turn them back to the project. Not sure how it will turn out.
I am not sure that the project would want them anyway, since the
represent some pretty major surgery and impact the readability of the
code in a quite adverse way.
At any rate, the Japanese version appears to be released. In fact, I
have downloaded the whole project and gave it a spin. It is actually
very nice. If you just need to use something for right now, why not go
with that version?
In any case, there is simply no way possible that anything will ever
escape from here before June at the absolute earliest (full regression
test is company policy).
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22687@postgresql.org Thu May 9 18:57:40 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22687@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g49Mve428946
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 48E914767D3; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:57:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 91564476774; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:57:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1145475F1A
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:56:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DAA475C93
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 18:56:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49MpWt30673;
Thu, 9 May 2002 18:51:36 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDAFD74.177491F2@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 18:51:32 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CE16@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Dann Corbit wrote:
> I am not enrolled in the CVS project, and don't even know how to use it.
> We use "Visual Source Safe" here -- really an icky tool but at least
> everyone here knows it.
Source Safe? Yikes. I haven't used that in a long time.
>
> There is some debate here as to whether to keep the changes private or
> to turn them back to the project. Not sure how it will turn out.
>
> I am not sure that the project would want them anyway, since the
> represent some pretty major surgery and impact the readability of the
> code in a quite adverse way.
I hear you on that. I have tons of code that has #ifdef GCC and #ifdef WIN32 in
lots of places.
Obviously you wrap what you can in macros and/or functions, but you can't do
that 100% the time. Some people REALLY hate #ifdef/#endif and view them as a
bad coding practice. Others, like myself, view them as a proper usage of the
language constructs and judicious use of them actually help the developer
understand the code better.
>
> At any rate, the Japanese version appears to be released. In fact, I
> have downloaded the whole project and gave it a spin. It is actually
> very nice. If you just need to use something for right now, why not go
> with that version?
I have no desire for a Windows version for myself, but I see the need for it.
>
> In any case, there is simply no way possible that anything will ever
> escape from here before June at the absolute earliest (full regression
> test is company policy).
ok
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22697@postgresql.org Thu May 9 21:51:20 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22697@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4A1pJ401192
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:51:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 02BA5476885; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:51:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 1003F4768DF; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:50:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D095476366
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:50:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sraigw.sra.co.jp (sraigw.sra.co.jp [202.32.10.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29196475F41
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:50:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from srascb.sra.co.jp (srascb [133.137.8.65])
by sraigw.sra.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7W-sraigw) with ESMTP id KAA91464;
Fri, 10 May 2002 10:50:26 +0900 (JST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
by srascb.sra.co.jp (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4A1nxJ71113;
Fri, 10 May 2002 10:49:59 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Received: from sranhm.sra.co.jp (sranhm [133.137.170.62])
by srascb.sra.co.jp (8.11.6/8.11.6av) with ESMTP id g4A1nwV71105;
Fri, 10 May 2002 10:49:58 +0900 (JST)
(envelope-from t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Received: from localhost (IDENT:t-ishii@srapc1474.sra.co.jp [133.137.170.59])
by sranhm.sra.co.jp (8.9.3+3.2W/3.7W-srambox) with ESMTP id KAA19819;
Fri, 10 May 2002 10:50:25 +0900
To: markw@mohawksoft.com
cc: DCorbit@connx.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Issues tangential to win32 support
In-Reply-To: <3CDAF94E.2F60382E@mohawksoft.com>
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82906F443@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
<3CDAF94E.2F60382E@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.1
=?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQjAqGyhCKQ==?=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <20020510104904P.t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:49:04 +0900
From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 16
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
> Dann Corbit wrote:
> http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
>
> Mentions cygwin, am I misunderstanding?
Are you talking about following in the page?
----------------------------------------------------------------
* Notice: Based upon the GNU-cygwin, there is a version that works
similar to the Unix-compatible operability. Tanida-san Web site is
supporting this environment in Japanese.
----------------------------------------------------------------
It cleary refers to another work.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22721@postgresql.org Fri May 10 10:04:20 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22721@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4AE4J417221
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 10 May 2002 10:04:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DFC5B47635A; Fri, 10 May 2002 10:04:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 59D6347691C; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:59:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC721476554
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:59:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from salem.vale-housing.co.uk (mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk [193.195.77.162])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEE5475F77
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:55:50 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:55:53 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <214E9C0A75426D47A876A2FD8A07426E66B4@salem.vale-housing.co.uk>
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Thread-Topic: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions
Thread-Index: AcH4KhqAuSFbFlyoSAuLblrF7gO4DQAACK+w
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
cc: <Jason@tishler.net>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g4AE4J417221
Status: RO
Some comments from Jason Tishler the Cygwin-PostgreSQL maintainer...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@tishler.net]
> Sent: 10 May 2002 15:00
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgsql-cygwin@postgresql.org
> Subject: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions
>
>
> Dave,
>
> Would you forward this to pgsql-hackers since I'm not subscribed?
>
> On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:45:42PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jason Tishler [mailto:jason@tishler.net]
> > > Sent: 09 May 2002 21:52
> > > To: Dave Page
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 07:51:33PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > > > BTW Are you aware there is currently a rather busy thread
> > > > about native Windows/Beos ports on -hackers...
> > >
> > > No, I'm not subscribed, but I just read all that I could find
> > > in the archives.
> > > [snip]
> > >
> > > > ...which is currently drifting towards a cutdown Cygwin version?
> > >
> > > Maybe I'll be out of (another) job soon? :,)
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Personnally, I think (from a 'good for PostgreSQL' rather
> than 'good
> > for Cygwin' perspective) that the way forward is a Cygwin
> based system
> > but using a tailored downloader/installer that installs the system
> > 'like a Windows app' (and quickly & easily etc.) rather than the
> > current way which is Windows 'being' *nix. I think that's very
> > offputting for many potential users (as others have said on the
> > -hackers thread).
>
> I agree with the above, but more can be done with Cygwin and
> its setup.exe that can give a fair amount of bang for the
> buck for some good short time gains too. I will give some
> details below.
>
> I also wanted to dispel some misinformation (IMO) that I
> perceived from the above mentioned posts and/or elaborate on
> some of the items:
>
> 1. Cygwin's setup.exe supports categories and dependencies.
> Hence, there is no reason to install all Cygwin packages in
> order to ensure properly PostgreSQL operation. Someone just
> has to determine what is the minimal set of packages
> necessary for PostgreSQL and I will update the setup.hint
> accordingly. The current setup.hint is as follows:
>
> sdesc: "PostgreSQL Data Base Management System"
> category: Database
> requires: ash cygwin readline zlib libreadline5
>
> Sorry, but since I install all Cygwin packages plus about 30
> additional ones I haven't desire to determine what are the
> minimal requirements.
>
> 2. Cygwin's setup.exe is customizable. There is a tool
> called "upset" that generates the setup.ini file that drives
> setup.exe. PostgreSQL could offer a customized setup. For
> example, this is what the XEmacs folks are doing.
>
> 3. Cygwin's setup.exe can run package specific postinstall
> scripts during the installation. Hence, someone could
> automate the steps enumerated (e.g., postmaster NT service
> installation, initdb, etc.) in my README:
>
http://www.tishler.net/jason/software/postgresql/postgresql-7.2.1.README
to ease the installation burden.
4. Cygwin PostgreSQL is perceived to have poor performance. I have
never done any benchmarks regarding this issue, but apparently Terry
Carlin (from the defunct Great Bridge) did:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2001-08/msg00029.php
Specifically, he indicates the following:
BTW, Up through 40 users, PostgreSQL under CYGWIN using the TPC-C
benchmark performed very much the same as Linux PostgreSQL on the
exact hardware.
5. Cygwin PostgreSQL is perceived to have poor reliability.
Unfortunately, I have not been able to gather data to concur or refute
this perception due a sudden job "change" last summer. :,) However,
there are reports such as the following on the pgsql-cygwin list:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2002-04/msg00021.php
IMO, the biggest reliability issue with Cygwin PostgreSQL is it's
dependency on cygipc. There is some very recent work to create a Cygwin
daemon to support features such as System V IPC. So soon the cygipc
dependency and its "problems" will be going way.
Those interested in a "Windows" PostgreSQL should possibly consider
contributing in this area or other "hard edges" (due to Windows-isms)
that would improve the reliability of Cygwin PostgreSQL. BTW, I have
found the Cygwin core developers very responsive to PostgreSQL problems
because it drives the Cygwin DLL harder than most other applications.
6. Satisfying the Cygwin license for binary distribution is very simple.
Just include the source for the Cygwin DLL and all executables that are
linked with it in your distribution package. It is really that easy.
Jason
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22731@postgresql.org Fri May 10 12:36:48 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22731@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4AGal420683
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 10 May 2002 12:36:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 48C10476917; Fri, 10 May 2002 12:36:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 749E94767FA; Fri, 10 May 2002 12:32:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393C4476885
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 12:32:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (unknown [192.204.191.242])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE7C47696B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 10 May 2002 12:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g4AGV6W28998;
Fri, 10 May 2002 12:31:06 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Jason@tishler.net
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions
In-Reply-To: <214E9C0A75426D47A876A2FD8A07426E66B4@salem.vale-housing.co.uk>
References: <214E9C0A75426D47A876A2FD8A07426E66B4@salem.vale-housing.co.uk>
Comments: In-reply-to "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
message dated "Fri, 10 May 2002 14:55:53 +0100"
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 12:31:06 -0400
Message-ID: <28995.1021048266@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
"Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> forwards:
> 4. Cygwin PostgreSQL is perceived to have poor performance. I have
> never done any benchmarks regarding this issue, but apparently Terry
> Carlin (from the defunct Great Bridge) did:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2001-08/msg00029.php
> Specifically, he indicates the following:
> BTW, Up through 40 users, PostgreSQL under CYGWIN using the TPC-C
> benchmark performed very much the same as Linux PostgreSQL on the
> exact hardware.
It should be noted that the benchmark Terry is describing fires up
N concurrent backends and then measures the runtime for a specific query
workload. So it's not measuring connection startup time, which is
alleged by some to be Cygwin's weak spot. Nonetheless, I invite the
Postgres-on-Cygwin-isn't-worth-our-time camp to produce some benchmarks
supporting their position. I'm getting tired of reading unsubstantiated
assertions.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22748@postgresql.org Fri May 10 17:51:28 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22748@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4ALpR425360
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:51:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B8E63476930; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:51:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id D9736476A51; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:50:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 055B3476966; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rh72.home.ee (adsl1030.estpak.ee [213.168.29.11])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E7336476919; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:49:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by rh72.home.ee (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4AJmC601988;
Sat, 11 May 2002 00:48:15 +0500
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32, How about this?
From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>,
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Iavor Raytchev <iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CDC3AAE.E39FF877@mohawksoft.com>
References: <3CDC3AAE.E39FF877@mohawksoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.4
Date: 11 May 2002 00:48:12 +0500
Message-ID: <1021060097.1891.6.camel@rh72.home.ee>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 02:25, mlw wrote:
> A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin dll. I
> know and understand there is some disagreement with this position, but in this
> I'm sure about this.
...
> I believe we can use the cygwin development environment, and direct gcc not to
> link with the cygwin dll. Last time I looked it was a command line option. This
> will produce a native windows application. No emulation, just a standard C
> runtime.
It seems that mingw (http://www.mingw.org/) does exactly this and
provides needed headers/libs. And they have also non-cycwin minimal
build environment (MSYS) that supplies make,sh and other stuff we might
use for running initdb and other shell scripts.
> Some of the hits will be file path manipulation, '/' vs '\', the notion of
> drive letters, and case insensitivity in file names.
>
> Unicode may be an issue, I haven't looked at that yet. Is that a must for the
> initial release?
Probably not.
>>
> A couple simple programs can be written using msvc to monitor, start and stop
> PostgreSQL. The programs will be simple using the application wizard, just make
> a small dialog box application.
dev-c++ has also wizards for easy making of trivial user interfaces
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dev-cpp/
--------------
Hannu
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22745@postgresql.org Fri May 10 17:31:05 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22745@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4ALV5424831
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:31:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 49E56476A11; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:31:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 7536F4769BC; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:30:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 05493475AC1; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:30:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9F61B475985; Fri, 10 May 2002 17:30:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g4ALP2t04627;
Fri, 10 May 2002 17:25:06 -0400
Message-ID: <3CDC3AAE.E39FF877@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 17:25:02 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-SMP-020426 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>,
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Iavor Raytchev <iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: [HACKERS] Native Win32, How about this?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin dll. I
know and understand there is some disagreement with this position, but in this
I'm sure about this.
The tools used to create the binary need not be Microsoft, many venders have
used Borland or Watcom, the run of the mill user/developer does not care. The
developers who do care won't mind the cygwin development environment as long as
it produces a native Windows binary that does not play tricks such as fork().
Windows developers don't care too much about source code. The build environment
will not be a problem.
The issue is that the system must perform well and must be stable. I do not
believe that cygwin can meet this requirement. Having done some research for
these discussions, I think we know it has startup performance issues and
unknown operational issues.
FYI: My PHP project msession, can produce both a Windows version and a Cygwin
version. It is threaded C++, but I have measured a performance improvements
using the native Windows version over the cygwin version. I have since
abandoned the cygwin version.
I believe we can use the cygwin development environment, and direct gcc not to
link with the cygwin dll. Last time I looked it was a command line option. This
will produce a native windows application. No emulation, just a standard C
runtime.
Some of the hits will be file path manipulation, '/' vs '\', the notion of
drive letters, and case insensitivity in file names.
Unicode may be an issue, I haven't looked at that yet. Is that a must for the
initial release?
There will be a need for some emulation/api specification of things like
semaphores, shared memory, file API (I would like to use Windows native
CreateFile routines, as these should be pretty fast.), and so on.
We will also have to breakup postgres and postmaster, and for the Windows
version use CreateProcess. There are a number of ways to attack this, globals
in a structure based in shared memory, globals in a .DLL exported to processes
and shared, and so on.
I think a huge time savings can be had by avoiding rewriting everything for the
Microsoft build environment. As far as I know, and please correct me if I'm
wrong, code produced by the cygwin gcc is freely distributable and need not be
GPL.
Once we have it working without fork() using the cygwin build environment, we
will have a native Windows application, we can then further evaluate whether or
not we want to expend the work to make a MSC version.
Once the backend and most of the tools are built without requiring the
cygwin.dll, installation is a breeze. Just dump it somewhere and run it.
A couple simple programs can be written using msvc to monitor, start and stop
PostgreSQL. The programs will be simple using the application wizard, just make
a small dialog box application.
Pgaccess will provide all the GUI stuff, and we may even be able to wrap the
monitor code into pgaccess.
The server install can be done with install shield.
There is code that will run any program as an NT service. We can use that for
server installations. We can use the MSVC wizard application to pop-up in the
tool bar.
Have I missed anything?
Is this a realistic and attainable plan?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22762@postgresql.org Sat May 11 11:30:25 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22762@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4BFUP414425
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 11 May 2002 11:30:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5492D475933; Sat, 11 May 2002 11:30:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 27EFF475D4A; Sat, 11 May 2002 11:29:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B5C475954
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sat, 11 May 2002 11:29:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tomts19-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts19.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.73])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DFB475933
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sat, 11 May 2002 11:29:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cbbrowne.com ([64.229.208.28]) by tomts19-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with ESMTP
id <20020511152928.RCBU27276.tomts19-srv.bellnexxia.net@cbbrowne.com>
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
Sat, 11 May 2002 11:29:28 -0400
Received: from cbbrowne.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cbbrowne.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE43E36B5A
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sat, 11 May 2002 11:26:18 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 (debian 2.5-1) with nmh-1.0.4+dev
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
From: cbbrowne@cbbrowne.com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32, How about this?
In-Reply-To: Message from mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
of "Fri, 10 May 2002 17:25:02 EDT." <3CDC3AAE.E39FF877@mohawksoft.com>
References: <3CDC3AAE.E39FF877@mohawksoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-82808586P";
micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 11:26:18 -0400
Message-ID: <20020511152618.CE43E36B5A@cbbrowne.com>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
--==_Exmh_-82808586P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin
> dll. I know and understand there is some disagreement with this
> position, but in this I'm sure about this.
That may ultimately be desirable.
In the short term, it is likely preferable to use cygwin.
It is only necessary to point at MySQL for an example. Cygwin is used there.
<http://www.mysql.com/downloads/mysql-3.23.html> It is being used widely,
"crap" or not.
Cygwin may not ultimately be the ideal thing to use; we don't yet live in
Pangloss' "Best of All Possible Worlds," and thus have to live with some
things not being ideal.
If having the installer install Cygwin as well as the DBMS makes it easy to
have something usable soon, and this allows 100,000 WinFolk to try out
PostgreSQL, then that's a Big Win. Out of 100K users, surely two or three may
be attracted into working on a more Panglossian solution.
It may be fair to say that none of those 100K folk would be using PostgreSQL
to support HA applications involving hundreds of GB of data. That's _fine_.
If there are new 100K folk using PostgreSQL/cygwin, _some_ of them will
outgrow its capabilities, and come looking for improvements.
And as they're Windows users, accustomed to having to pay hefty amounts to
Microsoft to get support no better than that provided by the Psychic Friends
Network (see <http://www.bmug.org/news/articles/MSvsPF.html>), they'll
doubtless be prepared to have to pay _something_ in order for
"PostgreSQL/Win3K-Enterprise Edition" to become available.
That seems a not too unreasonable path towards the "Best of All Possible
Worlds." There may be a bit of hyperbole in the above, but any time Voltaire
gets quoted, that's likely to happen :-).
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.gultn@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/wp.html
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
--
(concatenate 'string "cbbrowne" "@ntlug.org")
http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/multiplexor.html
It's a little known fact that the Dark Ages were caused by the Y1K
problem.
--==_Exmh_-82808586P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin
> dll. I know and understand there is some disagreement with this
> position, but in this I'm sure about this.
That may ultimately be desirable.
In the short term, it is likely preferable to use cygwin.
It is only necessary to point at MySQL for an example. Cygwin is used there.
<http://www.mysql.com/downloads/mysql-3.23.html> It is being used widely,
"crap" or not.
Cygwin may not ultimately be the ideal thing to use; we don't yet live in
Pangloss' "Best of All Possible Worlds," and thus have to live with some
things not being ideal.
If having the installer install Cygwin as well as the DBMS makes it easy to
have something usable soon, and this allows 100,000 WinFolk to try out
PostgreSQL, then that's a Big Win. Out of 100K users, surely two or three may
be attracted into working on a more Panglossian solution.
It may be fair to say that none of those 100K folk would be using PostgreSQL
to support HA applications involving hundreds of GB of data. That's _fine_.
If there are new 100K folk using PostgreSQL/cygwin, _some_ of them will
outgrow its capabilities, and come looking for improvements.
And as they're Windows users, accustomed to having to pay hefty amounts to
Microsoft to get support no better than that provided by the Psychic Friends
Network (see <http://www.bmug.org/news/articles/MSvsPF.html>), they'll
doubtless be prepared to have to pay _something_ in order for
"PostgreSQL/Win3K-Enterprise Edition" to become available.
That seems a not too unreasonable path towards the "Best of All Possible
Worlds." There may be a bit of hyperbole in the above, but any time Voltaire
gets quoted, that's likely to happen :-).
- --
(reverse (concatenate 'string "gro.gultn@" "enworbbc"))
http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/wp.html
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.
- --
(concatenate 'string "cbbrowne" "@ntlug.org")
http://www.cbbrowne.com/info/multiplexor.html
It's a little known fact that the Dark Ages were caused by the Y1K
problem.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 (debian 2.3.1-1)
iD8DBQE83TgaN7hZUGqmpxMRAqSeAJ9jkunhAG72NLz7rcPMVcWXbHWY+gCgxu+D
wumPJyqj0/9k5bc+v7NVvFI=
=pKbi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-82808586P--
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22812@postgresql.org Mon May 13 11:30:34 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22812@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4DFUY429652
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 13 May 2002 11:30:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5ADB2476B07; Mon, 13 May 2002 11:30:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id C126F47616C; Mon, 13 May 2002 10:57:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0592C475D9A; Mon, 13 May 2002 10:57:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7C929476103; Mon, 13 May 2002 09:51:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from althea.tishler.net
(bgp572446bgs.eatntn01.nj.comcast.net [68.39.6.197])
by mtaout03.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.6 (built Apr
26 2002)) with SMTP id <0GW100GMXYIEET@mtaout03.icomcast.net>; Mon,
13 May 2002 09:51:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by althea.tishler.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon,
13 May 2002 09:59:04 -0400
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 09:59:04 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32, How about this?
In-Reply-To: <3CDC3AAE.E39FF877@mohawksoft.com>
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>,
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Iavor Raytchev <iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Mail-Followup-To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>,
Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>,
Jean-Michel POURE <jm.poure@freesurf.fr>,
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
Iavor Raytchev <iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Message-ID: <20020513135857.GB2224@tishler.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
References: <3CDC3AAE.E39FF877@mohawksoft.com>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
mlw,
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:25:02PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> A binary version of PostgreSQL for Windows should not use the cygwin
> dll. I know and understand there is some disagreement with this position,
> but in this I'm sure about this.
Sorry, but I'm not going to touch the above -- even with a ten foot pole.
Or, at least try not to... :,)
> I believe we can use the cygwin development environment, and direct gcc
> not to link with the cygwin dll. Last time I looked it was a command line
> option. This will produce a native windows application. No emulation,
> just a standard C runtime.
Yes, the above mentioned option is "-mno-cygwin".
> Some of the hits will be file path manipulation, '/' vs '\', the notion of
> drive letters, and case insensitivity in file names.
Case insensitivity is typically "enabled" regardless. Unless you are
referring to CYGWIN=check_case:strict, but almost no one uses this setting.
Just to be explicit, another hit will be the loss of Posix.
> [snip]
>
> I think a huge time savings can be had by avoiding rewriting everything
> for the Microsoft build environment.
Yes, you should use Cygwin and gcc -mno-cygwin or MSYS and Mingw.
> As far as I know, and please correct me if I'm wrong, code produced by
> the cygwin gcc is freely distributable and need not be GPL.
The above is true only with gcc -mno-cygwin or Mingw code. Any code
produced by the normal Cygwin gcc (and hence, linked against cygwin1.dll)
is effectively GPL'd or at least required to be open source.
> [snip]
Jason
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22887@postgresql.org Thu May 16 07:48:56 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22887@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4GBmtB15522
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 16 May 2002 07:48:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0271647632A; Thu, 16 May 2002 07:48:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id BAB2B475985; Thu, 16 May 2002 07:48:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF92475961
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 07:48:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from n05.sp.kp.dlr.de (gw.sp.kp.dlr.de [129.247.97.187])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241A9475958
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 07:48:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (IDENT:root@yyy.kp.dlr.de [129.247.113.223])
by n05.sp.kp.dlr.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g4GBmCa79404
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 13:48:12 +0200
Received: from there (Joelap.sea.com [192.168.0.21])
by localhost.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA14722
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 13:48:10 +0200
Message-ID: <200205161148.NAA14722@localhost.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Joerg Hessdoerfer <Joerg.Hessdoerfer@sea-gmbh.com>
Organization: S.E.A Datentechnik GmbH
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: [HACKERS] WIN32 native ... lets start?!?
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 13:47:45 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Hi all,
I followed the various threads regarding this for some time now. My current
situation is:
I'm working at a company which does industrial automation, and does it's own
custom products. We try to be cross-platform, but it's a windoze world, as
far as most measurement devices or PLCs are concerned. We also employ
databases for various tasks (including simple ones as holding configuration
data, but also hammering production data into it at a rate of several hundred
records/sec.)
Well, we would *love* to use PostgreSQL in most our projects and products,
(and we do already use it in some), because it has proven to be very reliable
and quite fast.
So, I'm faced with using PostgreSQL on windows also (you can't always put a
Linux box besides). We do this using cygwin, but it's a bit painful ;-)
(although it works!).
Thinking about the hreads I read, it seems there are 2 obstacles to native PG
on W:
1.) no fork,
2.) no SYSV IPC
Ok, 1.) is an issue, but there's a fork() in MinGW, so it's 'just' going to
be a bit slow on new connections to the DB, right?? But this could be sorted
out once we *have* a native WIN32 build.
The second one's a bit harder, but... I'm currently trying to find time to do
a minimal implementation of SYSV IPC on WIN32 calls, just enough to get PG up
(doesn't need msg*() for example, right?).
As far as I understand it, we would not need to have IPC items around *after*
all backends and postmaster have gone away, or? Then there's no need for a
'daemon' process like in cygwin.
So, my route would be to get it to run *somehow* without paying attention to
speed and not to change much of the existing code, THEN see how we could get
rid of fork() on windows.
What do you guys think? Anyone up to join efforts? (I'll start the IPC thingy
anyway, as an exercise, and see where I'll end).
Greetings,
Joerg
P.s.: thanks for a great database system!!
--
Leading SW developer - S.E.A GmbH
Mail: joerg.hessdoerfer@sea-gmbh.com
WWW: http://www.sea-gmbh.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M22888@postgresql.org Thu May 16 09:39:14 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M22888@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g4GDdDB16601
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:39:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3B67F476017; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:39:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 2F5C2476361; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:38:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F99475E20
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:38:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from earth.hub.org (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EB6475D63
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 16 May 2002 09:38:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AB6651035F3; Thu, 16 May 2002 10:38:26 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from earth.hub.org (earth.hub.org [64.49.215.11])
by earth.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 92DBB1035CA; Thu, 16 May 2002 10:38:25 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:38:25 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Joerg Hessdoerfer <Joerg.Hessdoerfer@sea-gmbh.com>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIN32 native ... lets start?!?
In-Reply-To: <200205161148.NAA14722@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <20020516103501.Q6260-100000@mail1.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
Actually, take a look at the thread starting at:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2002-05/msg00665.php
Right now, IMHO, the big show stopper is passing global variables to the
child processes in Windows ... the above thread talks about a method of
pulling together the global variables *cleanly* that Tom seems to feel
wouldn't add much in the way of long term maintenance headaches ... *and*,
as I understand it, would provide us with a means to use threading in
future developments if deemed appropriate ...
>From what I read by those 'in the know' about Windows programming, if we
could centralize the global variables somewhat, using CreateProcess in
Windows shouldn't be a big deal, eliminiating the whole fork() headache
...
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Joerg Hessdoerfer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I followed the various threads regarding this for some time now. My current
> situation is:
>
> I'm working at a company which does industrial automation, and does it's own
> custom products. We try to be cross-platform, but it's a windoze world, as
> far as most measurement devices or PLCs are concerned. We also employ
> databases for various tasks (including simple ones as holding configuration
> data, but also hammering production data into it at a rate of several hundred
> records/sec.)
> Well, we would *love* to use PostgreSQL in most our projects and products,
> (and we do already use it in some), because it has proven to be very reliable
> and quite fast.
>
> So, I'm faced with using PostgreSQL on windows also (you can't always put a
> Linux box besides). We do this using cygwin, but it's a bit painful ;-)
> (although it works!).
>
> Thinking about the hreads I read, it seems there are 2 obstacles to native PG
> on W:
>
> 1.) no fork,
> 2.) no SYSV IPC
>
> Ok, 1.) is an issue, but there's a fork() in MinGW, so it's 'just' going to
> be a bit slow on new connections to the DB, right?? But this could be sorted
> out once we *have* a native WIN32 build.
>
> The second one's a bit harder, but... I'm currently trying to find time to do
> a minimal implementation of SYSV IPC on WIN32 calls, just enough to get PG up
> (doesn't need msg*() for example, right?).
> As far as I understand it, we would not need to have IPC items around *after*
> all backends and postmaster have gone away, or? Then there's no need for a
> 'daemon' process like in cygwin.
>
> So, my route would be to get it to run *somehow* without paying attention to
> speed and not to change much of the existing code, THEN see how we could get
> rid of fork() on windows.
>
> What do you guys think? Anyone up to join efforts? (I'll start the IPC thingy
> anyway, as an exercise, and see where I'll end).
>
> Greetings,
> Joerg
>
> P.s.: thanks for a great database system!!
> --
> Leading SW developer - S.E.A GmbH
> Mail: joerg.hessdoerfer@sea-gmbh.com
> WWW: http://www.sea-gmbh.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23371@postgresql.org Mon Jun 3 07:19:20 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23371@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g53BJJB21871
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 07:19:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 304D947586C; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 07:19:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id DE7D6475FD8; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:16:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E99475AEC
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:16:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mta03.fuse.net (mx3.fuse.net [216.68.1.123])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDF147590F
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:14:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from void ([216.196.153.74]) by mta03.fuse.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.01 201-253-122-118-101-20010319) with ESMTP
id <20020603011508.MQKV21986.mta03.fuse.net@void>
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>;
Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:15:08 -0400
Message-ID: <010201c20a9b$8779a4a0$b401a8c0@vrlas>
Reply-To: "coventry" <coventry@one.net>
From: "coventry" <coventry@one.net>
To: "pg hackers" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 21:11:02 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
I think its already been determined that the cygwin option is too low
performing.
However, the apache stuff could be quite useful - but if that effort
were to be undertaken, it would make more sense to move all versions of the
code the
the apache runtime, for all platforms. Are there any other runtime
libraries out there
that are cross platform, open/free and high performance? I know the mozilla
XPCOM
libraries work quite nicely, but are geared more towards multithreaded
apps - and the
COM-alike infrastructure is something we wouldn't need.
~Jon
----- Original Message -----
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>;
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
> mlw wrote:
> > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll
write it
> > for Windows.
> >
> > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind
of cool
> > to have.
>
> I am wondering why we don't just use the Cygwin shm/sem code in our
> project, or maybe the Apache stuff; why bother reinventing the wheel.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From jason@tishler.net Mon Jun 3 09:19:17 2002
Return-path: <jason@tishler.net>
Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g53DJFB23357
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:19:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from althea.tishler.net
(bgp572446bgs.eatntn01.nj.comcast.net [68.39.6.197])
by mtaout03.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May
13 2002)) with SMTP id <0GX40012FSX60N@mtaout03.icomcast.net> for
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us; Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:17:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by althea.tishler.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon,
03 Jun 2002 09:18:41 -0400
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:18:40 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
In-Reply-To: <200206030049.g530nL822000@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Mail-Followup-To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <20020603131840.GA1020@tishler.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
References: <3CD318C1.FF21DFDB@mohawksoft.com>
<200206030049.g530nL822000@candle.pha.pa.us>
Status: RO
Bruce,
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> mlw wrote:
> > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write it
> > for Windows.
> >
> > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind of
> > cool to have.
>
> I am wondering why we don't just use the Cygwin shm/sem code in our
> project, or maybe the Apache stuff; why bother reinventing the wheel.
Are you referring to cygipc above? If so, they even one of the original
cygipc authors would discourage this:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2001-09/msg00017.html
Specifically, Ludovic Lange states the following:
> I really think the solution would be to start again from scratch
> another implementation, as was suggested. The way we did it was
> quick and dirty, the goals weren't to have production systems
> running on it but only to run prototypes. So the internal design
> (if there is any) may not be adequate for the cygwin project.
However, Rob Collins has contributed a MinGW daemon to Cygwin to support
switching users, System V IPC, etc. So, this code base may be a more
suitable starting point to satisfy PostgreSQL's native Win32 System V
IPC needs.
Jason
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23378@postgresql.org Mon Jun 3 09:29:13 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23378@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g53DTCB24153
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:29:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E30C2475E32; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:29:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 026FB475D81; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:28:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56123475BFD
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:28:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1E2475A3E
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:27:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from althea.tishler.net
(bgp572446bgs.eatntn01.nj.comcast.net [68.39.6.197])
by mtaout02.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May
13 2002)) with SMTP id <0GX4003JUTE16I@mtaout02.icomcast.net> for
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:27:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by althea.tishler.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon,
03 Jun 2002 09:28:48 -0400
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 09:28:48 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
In-Reply-To: <3CFAC785.4AAF9F79@mohawksoft.com>
To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Mail-Followup-To: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>,
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Message-ID: <20020603132848.GB1020@tishler.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
References: <200206030049.g530nL822000@candle.pha.pa.us>
<3CFAC785.4AAF9F79@mohawksoft.com>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:33:57PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > mlw wrote:
> > > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write
> > > it for Windows.
> > >
> > > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind of
> > > cool to have.
> >
> > I am wondering why we don't just use the Cygwin shm/sem code in our
> > project, or maybe the Apache stuff; why bother reinventing the wheel.
>
> but! in the course of testing some code, I managed to gain some experience
> with cygwin. I have seen fork() problems with a large number of processes.
Since Cygwin's fork() is implemented with WaitForMultipleObjects(),
it has a limitation of only 63 children per parent. Also, there can
be DLL base address conflicts (causing Cygwin fork() to fail) that are
avoidable by rebasing the appropriate DLLs. AFAICT, Cygwin PostgreSQL is
currently *not* affected by this issue where as other Cygwin applications
such as Python and Apache are.
Jason
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23379@postgresql.org Mon Jun 3 10:08:15 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23379@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g53E8EB27402
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:08:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2B4DA475F6D; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:08:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 3D70D475DB5; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:54:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDC6475C95
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:54:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp014.mail.yahoo.com (smtp014.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.58])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5BB0475DA3
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:46:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO saturn.janwieck.net) (janwieck@192.233.92.205 with login)
by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Jun 2002 13:46:50 -0000
Received: (from wieck@localhost)
by saturn.janwieck.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g53Didi02442;
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:44:39 -0400
From: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200206031344.g53Didi02442@saturn.janwieck.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
In-Reply-To: <20020603132848.GB1020@tishler.net> from Jason Tishler at "Jun 3,
2002 09:28:48 am"
To: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 09:44:38 -0400 (EDT)
cc: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:33:57PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > mlw wrote:
> > > > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll write
> > > > it for Windows.
> > > >
> > > > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind of
> > > > cool to have.
> > >
> > > I am wondering why we don't just use the Cygwin shm/sem code in our
> > > project, or maybe the Apache stuff; why bother reinventing the wheel.
> >
> > but! in the course of testing some code, I managed to gain some experience
> > with cygwin. I have seen fork() problems with a large number of processes.
>
> Since Cygwin's fork() is implemented with WaitForMultipleObjects(),
> it has a limitation of only 63 children per parent. Also, there can
> be DLL base address conflicts (causing Cygwin fork() to fail) that are
> avoidable by rebasing the appropriate DLLs. AFAICT, Cygwin PostgreSQL is
> currently *not* affected by this issue where as other Cygwin applications
> such as Python and Apache are.
Whatever technical problems there are, we can debate on and
on if it's worth working around them in PostgreSQL or fixing
them in CygWIN or whatever.
The main problem will remain. That using PostgreSQL under
CygWIN requires some UNIX know how. So a pure Windows
user/shop needs UNIX knowledge to run our "Windows port" of
PostgreSQL? Interesting definition of "port".
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From markw@mohawksoft.com Mon Jun 3 17:40:50 2002
Return-path: <markw@mohawksoft.com>
Received: from snoopy.mohawksoft.com (h0050bf7a618d.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.138.78])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g53LemB04653
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 17:40:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mohawksoft.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by snoopy.mohawksoft.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g53LcIG12116;
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 17:38:18 -0400
Sender: markw@snoopy.mohawksoft.com
Message-ID: <3CFBE1C9.A0B83716@mohawksoft.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2002 17:38:17 -0400
From: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-3smp i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports
References: <200206030049.g530nL822000@candle.pha.pa.us>
<3CFAC785.4AAF9F79@mohawksoft.com> <20020603132848.GB1020@tishler.net>
<3CFB70F3.63AE630B@mohawksoft.com> <20020603142957.GA952@tishler.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO
Jason Tishler wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:36:51AM -0400, mlw wrote:
> > Jason Tishler wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 09:33:57PM -0400, mlw wrote:
> > > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > > mlw wrote:
> > > > > > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll
> > > > > > write it for Windows.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be
> > > > > > kind of cool to have.
> > > > >
> > > > > I am wondering why we don't just use the Cygwin shm/sem code in our
> > > > > project, or maybe the Apache stuff; why bother reinventing the wheel.
> > > >
> > > > but! in the course of testing some code, I managed to gain some experience
> > > > with cygwin. I have seen fork() problems with a large number of processes.
> > >
> > > Since Cygwin's fork() is implemented with WaitForMultipleObjects(),
> > > it has a limitation of only 63 children per parent. Also, there can
> > > be DLL base address conflicts (causing Cygwin fork() to fail) that are
> > > avoidable by rebasing the appropriate DLLs. AFAICT, Cygwin PostgreSQL is
> > > currently *not* affected by this issue where as other Cygwin applications
> > > such as Python and Apache are.
> >
> > Why would not PostgreSQL be affected by this?
>
> Sorry, if I was unclear -- I should have used two paragraphs above and
> maybe a few more words... :,)
>
> Cygwin PostgreSQL *is* affected by the Cygwin 63 children per parent
> fork limitation.
>
> PostgreSQL *can* be affected by the Cygwin DLL base address conflict
> fork issue, but in my experience (both personal and by monitoring the
> Cygwin and pgsql-cygwin lists), no one has been affected yet. The DLL
> base address conflict is a "probability" thing. The more DLLs loaded
> the greater the chance of a conflict (and fork() failing). Since, Cygwin
> PostgreSQL loads only a few DLLs, this has not become an issue (yet).
I'm not sure the DLL load address is a big issue for PostgreSQL, AFAIK no
option DLLs will be loaded by Postmaster. So, with fork() it will be a simple
process. A PostgreSQL child will die upon completion, and never execute fork().
My concern would be the limit on the number of child processes allowed. 63 is
far below what would be considered a usable number in production, and as long
as that is an issue, I don't think anyone would take PostgreSQL seriously.
A Windows version of PostgreSQL must run within the confines of the Windows OS.
The reason, IMHO, that no one has found any serious bugs in the cygwin version,
is because no one is seriously using it. Anyone who *would* seriously use it,
knows better.
From robert.schrem@WiredMinds.de Mon Jun 3 10:08:28 2002
Return-path: <robert.schrem@WiredMinds.de>
Received: from mail.wiredminds.de (mail.wiredminds.de [212.9.164.91])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g53E8QB27442
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:08:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from pc-robert (roberts@pc-robert.wiredminds.de [192.168.111.59])
by mail.wiredminds.de (8.11.3/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g53E8lC04991;
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:08:47 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Robert Schrem <robert.schrem@WiredMinds.de>
Reply-To: robert.schrem@WiredMinds.de
Organization: WiredMinds GmbH
To: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Win32/OS2/BeOS native ports - the 'BEST OPEN SOURCE database backend'
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:08:14 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4]
cc: mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
References: <3CD318C1.FF21DFDB@mohawksoft.com> <200206030049.g530nL822000@candle.pha.pa.us> <20020603131840.GA1020@tishler.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020603131840.GA1020@tishler.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <200206031608.14726.robert.schrem@wiredminds.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g53E8QB27442
Status: RO
Hi,
You may want to have a look at: http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/
You find there code for a 'Fast synchronized access to shared
memory for Windows and for i86 Unix-es".
kind regards,
Robert
> Bruce,
>
> On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 08:49:21PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > mlw wrote:
> > > Like I told Marc, I don't care. You spec out what you want and I'll
> > > write it for Windows.
> > >
> > > That being said, a SysV IPC interface for native Windows would be kind
> > > of cool to have.
> >
> > I am wondering why we don't just use the Cygwin shm/sem code in our
> > project, or maybe the Apache stuff; why bother reinventing the wheel.
>
> Are you referring to cygipc above? If so, they even one of the original
> cygipc authors would discourage this:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2001-09/msg00017.html
>
> Specifically, Ludovic Lange states the following:
> > I really think the solution would be to start again from scratch
> > another implementation, as was suggested. The way we did it was
> > quick and dirty, the goals weren't to have production systems
> > running on it but only to run prototypes. So the internal design
> > (if there is any) may not be adequate for the cygwin project.
>
> However, Rob Collins has contributed a MinGW daemon to Cygwin to support
> switching users, System V IPC, etc. So, this code base may be a more
> suitable starting point to satisfy PostgreSQL's native Win32 System V
> IPC needs.
>
> Jason
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23404@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 00:34:21 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23404@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g554YKs05329
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:34:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F1588475998; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:34:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 6300547627A; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:34:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9BA475A5B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:33:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD19E475E84
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g554XiN05245
for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:33:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <20020516103501.Q6260-100000@mail1.hub.org>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 00:33:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
OK, I think I am now caught up on the Win32/cygwin discussion, and would
like to make some remarks.
First, are we doing enough to support the Win32 platform? I think the
answer is clearly "no". There are 3-5 groups/companies working on Win32
ports of PostgreSQL. We always said there would not be PostgreSQL forks
if we were doing our job to meet user needs. Well, obviously, a number
of groups see a need for a better Win32 port and we aren't meeting that
need, so they are. I believe this is one of the few cases where groups
are going out on their own because we are falling behind.
So, there is no question in my mind we need to do more to encourage
Win32 ports. Now, on to the details.
INSTALLER
---------
We clearly need an installer that is zero-hassle for users. We need to
decide on a direction for this.
GUI
---
We need a slick GUI. pgadmin2 seems to be everyone's favorite, with
pgaccess on Win32 also an option. What else do we need here?
BINARY
------
This is the big daddy. It is broken down into several sections:
FORK()
How do we handle fork()? Do we use the cygwin method that copies the
whole data segment, or put the global data in shared memory and copy
that small part manually after we create a new process?
THREADING
Related to fork(), do we implement an optionally threaded postmaster,
which eliminates CreateProcess() entirely? I don't think we will have
superior performance on Win32 without it. (This would greatly help
Solaris as well.)
IPC
We can use Cygwin, MinGW, Apache, or our own code for this. Are there
other options?
ENVIRONMENT
Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
using cygwin for this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a roadmap, it would be good to get consensus on as many of these
items as possible so people can start working in these areas. We can
keep a web page of decisions we have made to help rally developers to
the project.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23405@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 01:02:39 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23405@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5552cs07802
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:02:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id C97A6475986; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:02:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 1F2124761F2; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:02:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3866A475A3B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:01:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voyager.corporate.connx.com (unknown [209.20.248.131])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F2B475986
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 22:02:14 -0700
Message-ID: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82906F465@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Thread-Topic: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Thread-Index: AcIMSk/7WQpVSQqTSsiRN1SUew56HgAAWkLg
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g5552cs07802
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 PM
> To: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
>
>
> OK, I think I am now caught up on the Win32/cygwin
> discussion, and would
> like to make some remarks.
>
> First, are we doing enough to support the Win32 platform? I think the
> answer is clearly "no". There are 3-5 groups/companies
> working on Win32
> ports of PostgreSQL. We always said there would not be
> PostgreSQL forks
> if we were doing our job to meet user needs. Well,
> obviously, a number
> of groups see a need for a better Win32 port and we aren't
> meeting that
> need, so they are. I believe this is one of the few cases
> where groups
> are going out on their own because we are falling behind.
>
> So, there is no question in my mind we need to do more to encourage
> Win32 ports. Now, on to the details.
>
> INSTALLER
> ---------
>
> We clearly need an installer that is zero-hassle for users.
> We need to
> decide on a direction for this.
>
> GUI
> ---
>
> We need a slick GUI. pgadmin2 seems to be everyone's favorite, with
> pgaccess on Win32 also an option. What else do we need here?
Nothing else. It is better than any commercial tools in current use.
An excellent piece of work.
> BINARY
> ------
>
> This is the big daddy. It is broken down into several sections:
>
> FORK()
>
> How do we handle fork()? Do we use the cygwin method that copies the
> whole data segment, or put the global data in shared memory and copy
> that small part manually after we create a new process?
Do not try to do a fork() on Win32. The one at PW32 is better, but
still awful. Win32 just does not have fascilities for fork().
If you use Cygwin, it will kill the project for commercial use (at least
for many institutions). That's fine, but it will become an academic
exercise instead of a viable commercial tool. If they are comfortable
in that [Cygwin] environment, it makes no sense to use Cygwin instead of
Redhat. The Redhat version will fork() 100 times faster. After all, if
they are going to use unix tools in a unix interface with Unix scripts
you might as well use UNIX. And Cygwin requires a license for
commercial use.
http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
> THREADING
>
> Related to fork(), do we implement an optionally threaded postmaster,
> which eliminates CreateProcess() entirely? I don't think we will have
> superior performance on Win32 without it. (This would greatly help
> Solaris as well.)
CreateProcess() works well for Win32. That is the approach that we used
and also the approach used by the Japanese team.
It is very simple. Simply do a create process call and then perform the
same operations that were done up to that point. It isn't difficult.
Threading is another possibility. I think create process is better,
because you can clone the rights of the one who attaches for the spawned
server (if you want to do that).
>
> IPC
>
> We can use Cygwin, MinGW, Apache, or our own code for this. Are there
> other options?
We wrote our own from scratch. Cygwin will kill it. If there is a
MinGW version it might be OK, but if MinGW is GPL, that will kill it.
Have a look at ACE:
http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
Their license is on the same level as a BSD license. Now, they use C++,
but you can always write:
extern "C" {
}
wrappers for stuff and keep PostgreSQL itself in pure, vanilla C. GCC
does come with a C++ compiler, so it isn't going to cut anyone off.
> ENVIRONMENT
>
> Lots of our code requires a Unix shell and utilities. Will
> we continue
> using cygwin for this?
We wrote our own utilities from scratch (e.g. initdb). The Japanese
group that did the port did the same thing.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------
>
> As a roadmap, it would be good to get consensus on as many of these
> items as possible so people can start working in these areas. We can
> keep a web page of decisions we have made to help rally developers to
> the project.
If you want a roadmap, the Japanese group laid it out for you. They
did the exact same steps as we did. Now, I don't know if we will be
able to contribute or not (it is very much up in the air). And we had
to do a lot of hacking of the source, so you might not want it if we
volunteered.
Suggestion:
Ask the Japanese group if they would like to post their changes back or
expose them so that the programming team can get ideas form it.
I actually like what they did better than what we did (A giant DLL and
all the binaries are microscopic -- it was how I suggested to do it here
but it was vetoed).
Anyway, here is a roadmap laid out for you exactly. Just do what it
says and you will be fine:
http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
Look at where it says "Gists for patch" and do that.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From markir@slingshot.co.nz Wed Jun 5 03:44:54 2002
Return-path: <markir@slingshot.co.nz>
Received: from smtp-1.attica.net.nz (pop3-1.tranzpeer.net [202.180.66.199])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with SMTP id g557iqs18525
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 03:44:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 93765 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2002 07:44:08 -0000
Received: from p175.nas1.wlg.callplus.net.nz (202.180.103.175)
by pop3-1.tranzpeer.net with SMTP; 5 Jun 2002 07:44:08 -0000
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
From: Mark kirkwood <markir@slingshot.co.nz>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
In-Reply-To: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.2-5mdk
Date: 05 Jun 2002 19:38:52 +1200
Message-ID: <1023262733.1314.7.camel@spikey.slithery.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Status: ROr
On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 16:33, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, I think I am now caught up on the Win32/cygwin discussion, and would
> like to make some remarks.
>
> First, are we doing enough to support the Win32 platform? I think the
> answer is clearly "no". There are 3-5 groups/companies working on Win32
> ports of PostgreSQL. We always said there would not be PostgreSQL forks
> if we were doing our job to meet user needs. Well, obviously, a number
> of groups see a need for a better Win32 port and we aren't meeting that
> need, so they are. I believe this is one of the few cases where groups
> are going out on their own because we are falling behind.
>
> So, there is no question in my mind we need to do more to encourage
> Win32 ports. Now, on to the details.
>
> INSTALLER
> ---------
>
> We clearly need an installer that is zero-hassle for users. We need to
> decide on a direction for this.
>
> GUI
> ---
>
> We need a slick GUI. pgadmin2 seems to be everyone's favorite, with
> pgaccess on Win32 also an option. What else do we need here?
>
> BINARY
> ------
>
> This is the big daddy. It is broken down into several sections:
>
> FORK()
>
> How do we handle fork()? Do we use the cygwin method that copies the
> whole data segment, or put the global data in shared memory and copy
> that small part manually after we create a new process?
>
> THREADING
>
> Related to fork(), do we implement an optionally threaded postmaster,
> which eliminates CreateProcess() entirely? I don't think we will have
> superior performance on Win32 without it. (This would greatly help
> Solaris as well.)
>
> IPC
>
> We can use Cygwin, MinGW, Apache, or our own code for this. Are there
> other options?
>
> ENVIRONMENT
>
> Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
> using cygwin for this?
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> As a roadmap, it would be good to get consensus on as many of these
> items as possible so people can start working in these areas. We can
> keep a web page of decisions we have made to help rally developers to
> the project.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
Is it worth looking at how the mysql crowd did their win32 port -
(or is that intrinsically a _bad_thing_ to do..) ?
(I am guessing that is why their sources requires c++ ....)
regards
Mark
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23408@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 08:16:29 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23408@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g55CGSs07449
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:16:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6FA76475997; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:16:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id AECD347622F; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:14:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0E7476110
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:14:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D067D475FE1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 08:05:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from althea.tishler.net
(bgp572446bgs.eatntn01.nj.comcast.net [68.39.6.197])
by mtaout06.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May
13 2002)) with SMTP id <0GX800E3YEXHHV@mtaout06.icomcast.net> for
pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 08:05:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by althea.tishler.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed,
05 Jun 2002 08:07:06 -0400
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 08:07:06 -0400
From: Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
<D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82906F465@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>,
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Message-ID: <20020605120705.GA1544@tishler.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82906F465@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
Dan,
The following is to help keep the archives accurate and should not be
construed as an argument against the native Win32 port.
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 10:02:14PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
> And Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
> http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
The above is not necessarily true:
Red Hat sells a special Cygwin License for customers who are unable
to provide their application in open source code form.
Note that the above only comes into play if your application links
with the Cygwin DLL. This is easily avoidable by using JDBC, ODBC,
Win32 libpq, etc. Hence, most people will not be required to purchase
this license from Red Hat.
Jason
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com Wed Jun 5 15:31:26 2002
Return-path: <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
Received: from ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox.mot.com [129.188.136.101])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g55JVPs09926
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:31:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: [from pobox3.mot.com (pobox3.mot.com [10.64.251.242]) by ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox 2.1) with ESMTP id MAA21713; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:31:25 -0700 (MST)]
Received: [from pronto1.comm.mot.com (pronto1.comm.mot.com [173.6.1.22]) by pobox3.mot.com (MOT-pobox3 2.0) with ESMTP id MAA08146; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 12:31:08 -0700 (MST)]
Received: from kovalenkoigor (idennt19534 [145.1.195.34])
by pronto1.comm.mot.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA09587;
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 14:31:24 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <11f301c20cc7$b1f73a70$22c30191@comm.mot.com>
From: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
"PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 14:32:13 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Status: ROr
I might be naive here, but would not proper threading model remove the need
for fork() altogether? On both Unix and Win32? Should not be too hard to
come up with abstraction which encapsulates POSIX, BeOS and Win32 threads...
I am not sure how universal POSIX threads are by now. Any important Unix
platforms which don't support them yet?
This has downside of letting any bug to kill the whole thing. On the bright
side, performance should be better on some platforms (note however, Apache
group still can't come up with implementation of threaded model which would
provide better performance than forked or other models). The need to deal
with possibility of 'alien' postmaster running along with orphaned backends
would also be removed since there would be only one process.
Issue of thread safety of code will come up undoubtedly and some things will
probably have to be revamped. But in long term this is probably best way if
you want to have efficient and uniform Unix AND Win32 implementations.
I am not too familiar with Win32. Speaking about POSIX threads, it would be
something like a thread pool with low & high watermarks. Main thread would
handle thread pool and hand over requests to worker threads (blocked on
condvar). How does that sound?
-- igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:33 PM
Subject: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
> OK, I think I am now caught up on the Win32/cygwin discussion, and would
> like to make some remarks.
>
> First, are we doing enough to support the Win32 platform? I think the
> answer is clearly "no". There are 3-5 groups/companies working on Win32
> ports of PostgreSQL. We always said there would not be PostgreSQL forks
> if we were doing our job to meet user needs. Well, obviously, a number
> of groups see a need for a better Win32 port and we aren't meeting that
> need, so they are. I believe this is one of the few cases where groups
> are going out on their own because we are falling behind.
>
> So, there is no question in my mind we need to do more to encourage
> Win32 ports. Now, on to the details.
>
> INSTALLER
> ---------
>
> We clearly need an installer that is zero-hassle for users. We need to
> decide on a direction for this.
>
> GUI
> ---
>
> We need a slick GUI. pgadmin2 seems to be everyone's favorite, with
> pgaccess on Win32 also an option. What else do we need here?
>
> BINARY
> ------
>
> This is the big daddy. It is broken down into several sections:
>
> FORK()
>
> How do we handle fork()? Do we use the cygwin method that copies the
> whole data segment, or put the global data in shared memory and copy
> that small part manually after we create a new process?
>
> THREADING
>
> Related to fork(), do we implement an optionally threaded postmaster,
> which eliminates CreateProcess() entirely? I don't think we will have
> superior performance on Win32 without it. (This would greatly help
> Solaris as well.)
>
> IPC
>
> We can use Cygwin, MinGW, Apache, or our own code for this. Are there
> other options?
>
> ENVIRONMENT
>
> Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
> using cygwin for this?
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
>
> As a roadmap, it would be good to get consensus on as many of these
> items as possible so people can start working in these areas. We can
> keep a web page of decisions we have made to help rally developers to
> the project.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23416@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 16:05:36 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23416@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g55K5Zs15637
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:05:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D84B3476449; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:05:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id CD4754763D0; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:05:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD45476001
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:05:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09559475FC9
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:05:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g55K52615577;
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <11f301c20cc7$b1f73a70$22c30191@comm.mot.com>
To: Igor Kovalenko <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 16:05:02 -0400 (EDT)
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> I might be naive here, but would not proper threading model remove the need
> for fork() altogether? On both Unix and Win32? Should not be too hard to
> come up with abstraction which encapsulates POSIX, BeOS and Win32 threads...
> I am not sure how universal POSIX threads are by now. Any important Unix
> platforms which don't support them yet?
>
> This has downside of letting any bug to kill the whole thing. On the bright
> side, performance should be better on some platforms (note however, Apache
> group still can't come up with implementation of threaded model which would
> provide better performance than forked or other models). The need to deal
> with possibility of 'alien' postmaster running along with orphaned backends
> would also be removed since there would be only one process.
>
> Issue of thread safety of code will come up undoubtedly and some things will
> probably have to be revamped. But in long term this is probably best way if
> you want to have efficient and uniform Unix AND Win32 implementations.
>
> I am not too familiar with Win32. Speaking about POSIX threads, it would be
> something like a thread pool with low & high watermarks. Main thread would
> handle thread pool and hand over requests to worker threads (blocked on
> condvar). How does that sound?
Good summary. I think we would support both threaded and fork()
operation, and users can control which they prefer. For a web backend
where many sessions are a single query, people may want to give up the
stability of fork() and go with threads, even on Unix.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From thomas@fourpalms.org Wed Jun 5 18:02:46 2002
Return-path: <thomas@fourpalms.org>
Received: from myst.fourpalms.org (fwuser@sentry.sonalysts.com [198.6.208.103])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g55M2js26493
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:02:45 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3CFE8A79.84738F2F@fourpalms.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 15:02:33 -0700
From: Thomas Lockhart <thomas@fourpalms.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.8-34.1mdk i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: Igor Kovalenko <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
References: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO
...
> Good summary. I think we would support both threaded and fork()
> operation, and users can control which they prefer. For a web backend
> where many sessions are a single query, people may want to give up the
> stability of fork() and go with threads, even on Unix.
I would think that we would build on our strengths of having a fork/exec
model for separate clients. A threaded model *could* benefit individual
clients who are doing queries on multiprocessor servers, and I would be
supportive of efforts to enable that.
But the requirements for that may be less severe than for managing
multiple clients within the same process, and imho there is not strong
requirement to enable the latter for our current crop of well supported
targets. If it came for free then great, but if it came with a high cost
then the choice is not as obvious. It is also not a *requirement* if we
were instead able to do the multiple threads for a single client
scenerio first.
- Thomas
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23421@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 18:42:44 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23421@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g55Mghs29966
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:42:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 96863475D45; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:42:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 8F68F47645B; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:36:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C2B47630D
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:36:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from myst.fourpalms.org (sentry.sonalysts.com [198.6.208.103])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C5647639F
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:21:31 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3CFE8EE2.46020ACC@fourpalms.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 15:21:22 -0700
From: Thomas Lockhart <thomas@fourpalms.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.8-34.1mdk i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
Igor Kovalenko <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CF21@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
...
> Notion:
> Have one version do both. Your server can fork(), and your sever can
> thread. It can fork() and thread, it can fork() or thread.
> That gives the best of all worlds. One client who has his attachments
> to a database all setup might want to do a bunch of similar queries.
> Hence a threaded model is nice.
> A server may be set up to clone the rights of the attaching process for
> security reasons. Then you launch a new server with fork().
Right. If/when that is possible then let's do it, as long as the cost is
not too high. But the intermediate steps are a possibility also, and are
not precluded from discussion.
This will all work out as a *convergence* of interests imho. And there
is no great identifiable benefit for our current crop of platforms for
going to a threaded model *unless* that enables queries for a single
client to execute in parallel (all imho of course ;).
So our convergence of interests for all platforms is in enabling
threading for these two purposes, and focusing on enabling the
multithreaded single client *first* means that the current crop of
clients don't have to accept all negatives while we start on the road to
better support of Win32 machines.
- Thomas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23422@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 19:23:03 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23422@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g55NN2s03496
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:23:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 66BF747611A; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:22:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 9D9824765FF; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:05:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7939A476591
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:05:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.celerityonline.com (unknown [65.90.8.22])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52DB8476304
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:49:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 11143 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2002 23:09:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO jmf1) (199.3.237.161)
by 0 with SMTP; 5 Jun 2002 23:09:05 -0000
Message-ID: <001201c20ce3$6e21bed0$a1ed03c7@dev.ngcn>
From: "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:50:46 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
One note: SGI developers discovered they could get amazing performance using
as hybrid threaded and forked-process model with apache - we might want to
look into this. They even have a library for network-communication
utilizing thier 'state threads' model. Please see:
http://state-threads.sourceforge.net/docs/st.html
Thus, on platforms where it can be supported, we should keep in mind that a
hybrid multiprocess/multithreaded postgresql might be the fastest
solution...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
> Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> > I might be naive here, but would not proper threading model remove the
need
> > for fork() altogether? On both Unix and Win32? Should not be too hard to
> > come up with abstraction which encapsulates POSIX, BeOS and Win32
threads...
> > I am not sure how universal POSIX threads are by now. Any important Unix
> > platforms which don't support them yet?
> >
> > This has downside of letting any bug to kill the whole thing. On the
bright
> > side, performance should be better on some platforms (note however,
Apache
> > group still can't come up with implementation of threaded model which
would
> > provide better performance than forked or other models). The need to
deal
> > with possibility of 'alien' postmaster running along with orphaned
backends
> > would also be removed since there would be only one process.
> >
> > Issue of thread safety of code will come up undoubtedly and some things
will
> > probably have to be revamped. But in long term this is probably best way
if
> > you want to have efficient and uniform Unix AND Win32 implementations.
> >
> > I am not too familiar with Win32. Speaking about POSIX threads, it would
be
> > something like a thread pool with low & high watermarks. Main thread
would
> > handle thread pool and hand over requests to worker threads (blocked on
> > condvar). How does that sound?
>
> Good summary. I think we would support both threaded and fork()
> operation, and users can control which they prefer. For a web backend
> where many sessions are a single query, people may want to give up the
> stability of fork() and go with threads, even on Unix.
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23423@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 20:10:50 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23423@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g560Aos07172
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:10:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D99C3475A0B; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:10:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id A128A476354; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:08:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15E44759BA
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:07:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from klamath.dyndns.org (CPE002078144ae0.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [24.102.202.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAE6475999
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:07:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from boston (unknown [192.168.40.12])
by klamath.dyndns.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 13A207010; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:07:48 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:05:44 -0400
From: Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
To: "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>
cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Message-ID: <20020605200544.4a486fe4.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <001201c20ce3$6e21bed0$a1ed03c7@dev.ngcn>
References: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us>
<001201c20ce3$6e21bed0$a1ed03c7@dev.ngcn>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:50:46 -0400
"Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net> wrote:
> One note: SGI developers discovered they could get amazing performance using
> as hybrid threaded and forked-process model with apache - we might want to
> look into this. They even have a library for network-communication
> utilizing thier 'state threads' model.
I think ST is designed for network I/O-bound apps -- last I checked,
disk I/O will still block an entire ST process. While you can get around
that by using another process to do disk I/O, it sounds like ST won't be
that useful.
However, Chris KL. (I believe) raised the idea of using POSIX AIO for
PostgreSQL. Without having looked into it extensively, this technique
sounds promising. Perhaps someone who has looked into this further
(e.g. someone from Redhat) can comment?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23424@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 20:56:59 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23424@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g560uws10602
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:56:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 33E48475FC6; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:56:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id C7F5C476365; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:52:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF93476263
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:52:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ingenico.com.au (unknown [202.167.40.101])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2064764A7
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:50:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <004301c20cf4$1b8d8c10$660d090a@software.ingenico.com.au>
From: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au>
To: "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us> <001201c20ce3$6e21bed0$a1ed03c7@dev.ngcn>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 10:50:09 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Yes I proposed to use the GNU Pth library instead. It's an event
demultiplexer just like the sgi library, but has a posix thread interface.
This architecture is actually the more robust and also the more scalable. On
a single processor server, you don't have the multi-thread synchronization
and context switching overhead and you also take full advantage of
multi-processor servers when you create several processes. Plus you have
much less concern about global variables.
Also for those concerned about the licence of this library here is an
abstract of it:
"The author places this library under the LGPL to make sure that it
can be used both commercially and non-commercially provided that
modifications to the code base are always donated back to the official
code base under the same license conditions. Please keep in mind that
especially using this library in code not staying under the GPL or
the LGPL _is_ allowed and that any taint or license creap into code
that uses the library is not the authors intention. It is just the
case that _including_ this library into the source tree of other
applications is a little bit more inconvinient because of the LGPL.
But it has to be this way for good reasons. And keep in mind that
inconvinient doesn't mean not allowed or even impossible."
So it can be used in both commercial and non commercial project.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
> One note: SGI developers discovered they could get amazing performance
using
> as hybrid threaded and forked-process model with apache - we might want to
> look into this. They even have a library for network-communication
> utilizing thier 'state threads' model. Please see:
>
> http://state-threads.sourceforge.net/docs/st.html
>
> Thus, on platforms where it can be supported, we should keep in mind that
a
> hybrid multiprocess/multithreaded postgresql might be the fastest
> solution...
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
> To: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
> Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
>
>
> > Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> > > I might be naive here, but would not proper threading model remove the
> need
> > > for fork() altogether? On both Unix and Win32? Should not be too hard
to
> > > come up with abstraction which encapsulates POSIX, BeOS and Win32
> threads...
> > > I am not sure how universal POSIX threads are by now. Any important
Unix
> > > platforms which don't support them yet?
> > >
> > > This has downside of letting any bug to kill the whole thing. On the
> bright
> > > side, performance should be better on some platforms (note however,
> Apache
> > > group still can't come up with implementation of threaded model which
> would
> > > provide better performance than forked or other models). The need to
> deal
> > > with possibility of 'alien' postmaster running along with orphaned
> backends
> > > would also be removed since there would be only one process.
> > >
> > > Issue of thread safety of code will come up undoubtedly and some
things
> will
> > > probably have to be revamped. But in long term this is probably best
way
> if
> > > you want to have efficient and uniform Unix AND Win32 implementations.
> > >
> > > I am not too familiar with Win32. Speaking about POSIX threads, it
would
> be
> > > something like a thread pool with low & high watermarks. Main thread
> would
> > > handle thread pool and hand over requests to worker threads (blocked
on
> > > condvar). How does that sound?
> >
> > Good summary. I think we would support both threaded and fork()
> > operation, and users can control which they prefer. For a web backend
> > where many sessions are a single query, people may want to give up the
> > stability of fork() and go with threads, even on Unix.
> >
> > --
> > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
19026
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23425@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 21:01:51 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23425@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5611ps10999
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:01:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E700E476412; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:01:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id CE484476430; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:00:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F39475A7F
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:00:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1694763B1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:53:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g560rF010370;
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206060053.g560rF010370@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <20020605200544.4a486fe4.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
To: Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 20:53:15 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Jon Franz <coventry@one.net>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:50:46 -0400
> "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net> wrote:
> > One note: SGI developers discovered they could get amazing performance using
> > as hybrid threaded and forked-process model with apache - we might want to
> > look into this. They even have a library for network-communication
> > utilizing thier 'state threads' model.
>
> I think ST is designed for network I/O-bound apps -- last I checked,
> disk I/O will still block an entire ST process. While you can get around
> that by using another process to do disk I/O, it sounds like ST won't be
> that useful.
>
> However, Chris KL. (I believe) raised the idea of using POSIX AIO for
> PostgreSQL. Without having looked into it extensively, this technique
> sounds promising. Perhaps someone who has looked into this further
> (e.g. someone from Redhat) can comment?
I know Red Hat is interested in AIO. Only a few OS's support it so it
was hard to get exited about it at the time, but with threading, a
AIO-specific module could be attempted.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23426@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 21:07:19 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23426@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5617Js11634
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:07:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6F5E14761D1; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:07:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id B3CC8476464; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:03:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20694762DC
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:03:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candeias.terra.com.br (candeias.terra.com.br [200.176.3.18])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62EE047594F
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:01:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtp4-poa.terra.com.br (smtp4-poa.terra.com.br [200.176.3.35])
by candeias.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B442E43DB2; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:01:59 -0300 (EST)
Received: from 200.176.55.246 (cm-net-cwb-C8B037F6.brdterra.com.br [200.176.55.246])
(authenticated user howe)
by smtp4-poa.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0F7F3AC5A2; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:01:57 -0300 (EST)
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:05:11 -0300
From: Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60i)
Reply-To: Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>
Organization: ACME
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <527177268.20020605220511@carcass.dhs.org>
To: Thomas Lockhart <thomas@fourpalms.org>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
Igor Kovalenko <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <3CFE8A79.84738F2F@fourpalms.org>
References: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us>
<3CFE8A79.84738F2F@fourpalms.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, June 5, 2002, 7:02:33 PM, you wrote:
TL> ...
>> Good summary. I think we would support both threaded and fork()
>> operation, and users can control which they prefer. For a web backend
>> where many sessions are a single query, people may want to give up the
>> stability of fork() and go with threads, even on Unix.
TL> I would think that we would build on our strengths of having a fork/exec
TL> model for separate clients. A threaded model *could* benefit individual
TL> clients who are doing queries on multiprocessor servers, and I would be
TL> supportive of efforts to enable that.
Just a note - this is also the solution adopted by Interbase/Firebird
and it seems interesting. They already had the same problems
PostgreSQL has been under today.
Those interested in read about Interbase's architeture, please refer
to http://community.borland.com/article/0,1410,23217,00.html.
"Classic" is the fork() model, and the "SuperServer" is the threaded
model.
-------------
Best regards,
Steve Howe mailto:howe@carcass.dhs.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23427@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 21:24:58 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23427@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g561Ovs13529
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:24:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 503F8476458; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:24:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 75959475FC6; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A5F475C05
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:23:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ingenico.com.au (unknown [202.167.40.101])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE4B475BC7
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:23:57 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <002001c20cf8$a6b86400$660d090a@software.ingenico.com.au>
From: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au>
To: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au>, "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>,
<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us> <001201c20ce3$6e21bed0$a1ed03c7@dev.ngcn> <004301c20cf4$1b8d8c10$660d090a@software.ingenico.com.au>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:22:40 +1000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Gnu Pth also supports AIO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicolas Bazin" <nbazin@ingenico.com.au>
To: "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
> Yes I proposed to use the GNU Pth library instead. It's an event
> demultiplexer just like the sgi library, but has a posix thread interface.
> This architecture is actually the more robust and also the more scalable.
On
> a single processor server, you don't have the multi-thread synchronization
> and context switching overhead and you also take full advantage of
> multi-processor servers when you create several processes. Plus you have
> much less concern about global variables.
>
> Also for those concerned about the licence of this library here is an
> abstract of it:
> "The author places this library under the LGPL to make sure that it
> can be used both commercially and non-commercially provided that
> modifications to the code base are always donated back to the official
> code base under the same license conditions. Please keep in mind that
> especially using this library in code not staying under the GPL or
> the LGPL _is_ allowed and that any taint or license creap into code
> that uses the library is not the authors intention. It is just the
> case that _including_ this library into the source tree of other
> applications is a little bit more inconvinient because of the LGPL.
> But it has to be this way for good reasons. And keep in mind that
> inconvinient doesn't mean not allowed or even impossible."
>
> So it can be used in both commercial and non commercial project.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>
> To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 8:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
>
>
> > One note: SGI developers discovered they could get amazing performance
> using
> > as hybrid threaded and forked-process model with apache - we might want
to
> > look into this. They even have a library for network-communication
> > utilizing thier 'state threads' model. Please see:
> >
> > http://state-threads.sourceforge.net/docs/st.html
> >
> > Thus, on platforms where it can be supported, we should keep in mind
that
> a
> > hybrid multiprocess/multithreaded postgresql might be the fastest
> > solution...
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
> > To: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
> > Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 4:05 PM
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
> >
> >
> > > Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> > > > I might be naive here, but would not proper threading model remove
the
> > need
> > > > for fork() altogether? On both Unix and Win32? Should not be too
hard
> to
> > > > come up with abstraction which encapsulates POSIX, BeOS and Win32
> > threads...
> > > > I am not sure how universal POSIX threads are by now. Any important
> Unix
> > > > platforms which don't support them yet?
> > > >
> > > > This has downside of letting any bug to kill the whole thing. On the
> > bright
> > > > side, performance should be better on some platforms (note however,
> > Apache
> > > > group still can't come up with implementation of threaded model
which
> > would
> > > > provide better performance than forked or other models). The need to
> > deal
> > > > with possibility of 'alien' postmaster running along with orphaned
> > backends
> > > > would also be removed since there would be only one process.
> > > >
> > > > Issue of thread safety of code will come up undoubtedly and some
> things
> > will
> > > > probably have to be revamped. But in long term this is probably best
> way
> > if
> > > > you want to have efficient and uniform Unix AND Win32
implementations.
> > > >
> > > > I am not too familiar with Win32. Speaking about POSIX threads, it
> would
> > be
> > > > something like a thread pool with low & high watermarks. Main thread
> > would
> > > > handle thread pool and hand over requests to worker threads (blocked
> on
> > > > condvar). How does that sound?
> > >
> > > Good summary. I think we would support both threaded and fork()
> > > operation, and users can control which they prefer. For a web backend
> > > where many sessions are a single query, people may want to give up the
> > > stability of fork() and go with threads, even on Unix.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> > > pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
> > > + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> > > + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania
> 19026
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to
majordomo@postgresql.org
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23428@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 21:36:56 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23428@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g561aus16058
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id D2A20475DCB; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:36:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 04705476424; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:34:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761234761D1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:34:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from matinhos.terra.com.br (matinhos.terra.com.br [200.176.3.21])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C366E4760C3
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:33:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mucuri.terra.com.br (mucuri.terra.com.br [200.176.3.39])
by matinhos.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2AF4346F9A; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:34:03 -0300 (EST)
Received: from 200.176.55.246 (cm-net-cwb-C8B037F6.brdterra.com.br [200.176.55.246])
(authenticated user howe)
by mucuri.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BDDA2BE8C8; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:34:02 -0300 (EST)
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:37:17 -0300
From: Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60i)
Reply-To: Steve Howe <howe@carcass.dhs.org>
Organization: ACME
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <17029102737.20020605223717@carcass.dhs.org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Hello Bruce,
Wednesday, June 5, 2002, 1:33:44 AM, you wrote:
BM> INSTALLER
BM> ---------
BM> We clearly need an installer that is zero-hassle for users. We need to
BM> decide on a direction for this.
I suggest Nullsoft install system
(http://www.nullsoft.com/free/nsis/). It's real good and very simple
to use. I can help on this if you want.
BM> ENVIRONMENT
BM> Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
BM> using cygwin for this?
There are other ports ( http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/ ) that won't
require Cygwin but they won't provide an environment so complete as
Cygwin does.
I also would like to empathize that probably a small GUI for
controlling the PostgreSQL service/application would be nice. I think
about something sitting in the system tray like MSSQL, Oracle,
Interbase, etc. does.
I could code this in Delphi if you like. I don't have experience in
writing GUI apps in C. There is an open source versions of Delphi so
it won't be a problem compiling it.
Also coming with this, a code for starting the PostgreSQL as a service
would be really nice. For those from UNIX world that don't know what a
service is, think about it as a daemon for Windows. A service can be
automatically started when the machine boots up.
-------------
Best regards,
Steve Howe mailto:howe@carcass.dhs.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23429@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 22:54:37 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23429@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g562sas28774
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:54:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5F28C475956; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:54:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id B91B8476423; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:54:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A253475999
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:53:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox.mot.com [129.188.136.101])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3F8475956
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:53:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: [from pobox4.mot.com (pobox4.mot.com [10.64.251.243]) by ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox 2.1) with ESMTP id TAA19790; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:53:41 -0700 (MST)]
Received: [from pronto1.comm.mot.com (pronto1.comm.mot.com [173.6.1.22]) by pobox4.mot.com (MOT-pobox4 2.0) with ESMTP id TAA00693; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 19:53:40 -0700 (MST)]
Received: from kovalenkoigor (idennt19534 [145.1.195.34])
by pronto1.comm.mot.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA03882;
Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:53:39 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <129501c20d05$7a671a10$22c30191@comm.mot.com>
From: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
To: "Neil Conway" <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>
cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <200206052005.g55K52615577@candle.pha.pa.us><001201c20ce3$6e21bed0$a1ed03c7@dev.ngcn> <20020605200544.4a486fe4.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 21:54:29 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
I think SGI gets amazing performance because they have very good (efficient)
synchronisation primitives on SGI. Some proprietary light-weight mutexes.
Using threaded or mixed model just by itself is not going to do a miracle.
Threads will save you some context switch time, but that will probably
translate into lower CPU usage rather than performance boost. And if your
mutexes are not fast or awkwardly implemented (say Linux), it might be even
worse. Apache is not all that fast on Linux as on SGI, whatever model you
chose. I also doubt that purely threaded model would be slower than mixed
one.
Now about the AIO model. It is useful when you need to do something else
while I/O requests are being processed as long as platform does it in some
useful way. If all you can do is to submit requests and keep sitting in
select/poll then AIO does not buy you anything you can't get by just using
threaded model. However, if you can tag the requests and set up
notifications, then few I/O threads could handle relatively large number of
requests from different clients. Note, this means you don't have any
association between clients and servers at all, there is pool of generic I/O
threads which serve requests from whoever they come. It saves system
resources and scales very well. It also provides interesting possibilities
for fault recovery - since handlers are generic all the state information
would have to be kept in some kind of global context area. That area can be
saved into persistent memory or dumped onto disk and *recovered* after a
forced restart. Server and library could be designed in such a way that
clients may continue where they left with a recoverable error.
In POSIX AIO model you can tag requests and set up notifications via
synchronous signals. You wait for them *synchronously* in 'waiter' thread
via sigwaitinfo() and avoid the headache of asynchronous signals hitting you
any time... Unfortunately on some platforms (Solaris) the depth of
synchronous signal queue is fixed at magic value 32 (and not adjustable).
This may not be a problem if you're sure that waiting thread will be able to
drain the queue faster than it gets filled with notifications... but I'm not
sure there is a portable way to guarantee that, so you need to check for
overloads and handle them... that complicates things. On Solaris you also
need a mile of compiler/linker switches to even get this scheme to work and
I am afraid other platforms may not support it at all (but then again, they
may not support AIO to begin with).
And speaking about getting best of all worlds. Note how Apache spent nearly
3 years developing their portable Multi-Processing Modules scheme. What they
got for that is handful of models neither of which perform noticeably better
than original pre-fork() model. Trying to swallow all possible ways to
handle things on all possible platforms usually does not produce very fast
code. It tends to produce very complex code with mediocre performance and
introduces extra complexity into configuration process. If you consider all
that was done mostly to support Win32, one might doubt if it was worth the
while.
What I am trying to say is, extra complexity in model to squeeze few percent
of performance is not a wise investment of time and efforts. On Win32 you
don't really compete in terms of performance. You compete in terms of
easyness and features. Spend 3 years trying to support Windows and Unix in
most optimal way including all subvariants of Unix ... meanwhile MSFT will
come up with some bundled SQL server. It probably will have more features
since they will spend time doing features rather than inventing a model to
support gazillion of platforms. Chances are, it will be faster too - due to
better integration with OS and better compiler.
I am not in position to tell you what to do guys. But if I was asked, I'd
say supporting Win32 is only worth it if it comes as a natural result of a
simple, coherent and uniform model applied to Unix. Threaded model may not
have as much inherent stability as forked/mixed, but it has inherent
simplicity and better Unix/Windows/BeOS portability. It can be done faster
and simpler code will make work on features easier.
Regards,
- Igor
"There are 2 ways to design an efficient system - first is to design it so
complex that there are no obvious deficiencies, second is to design it so
simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. Second way is much harder"
(author unknown to me)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Conway" <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>
To: "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002 18:50:46 -0400
> "Jon Franz" <coventry@one.net> wrote:
> > One note: SGI developers discovered they could get amazing performance
using
> > as hybrid threaded and forked-process model with apache - we might want
to
> > look into this. They even have a library for network-communication
> > utilizing thier 'state threads' model.
>
> I think ST is designed for network I/O-bound apps -- last I checked,
> disk I/O will still block an entire ST process. While you can get around
> that by using another process to do disk I/O, it sounds like ST won't be
> that useful.
>
> However, Chris KL. (I believe) raised the idea of using POSIX AIO for
> PostgreSQL. Without having looked into it extensively, this technique
> sounds promising. Perhaps someone who has looked into this further
> (e.g. someone from Redhat) can comment?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com>
> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23430@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 22:58:30 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23430@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g562wUs29151
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:58:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 04083476398; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:58:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id D1058476456; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:57:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9D447627F
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:57:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0344760D1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:56:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g562v0q28990
for pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:57:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206060257.g562v0q28990@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 22:57:00 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Here is a summary of the responses to my Win32 roadmap. I hope this
will allow further discussion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
INSTALLER
---------
Cygwin Setup.exe http://cygwin.com
Nullsoft http://www.nullsoft.com/free/nsis/
GUI
---
pgAdmin2 http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/pgadmin2.php?ContentID=1
pgaccess http://pgaccess.org/
Java admin (to be written)
Dev-C++ admin (to be written) http://sourceforge.net/projects/dev-cpp/
BINARY
------
FORK()
cygwin fork() http://cygwin.com
CreateProcess() and copy global area
THREADING
Posix threads
Gnu pth http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/
ST http://state-threads.sourceforge.net/docs/st.html
(single-session multi-threading possible)
(Posix AIO is possible)
IPC
Cygwin http://cygwin.com
MinGW http://www.mingw.org/
ACE http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/ACE.html
APR http://apr.apache.org/
Our own
ENVIRONMENT
Cygwin http://cygwin.com
UnxUtils http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/
Write own initdb
IMPLEMENTATIONS
---------------
PostgreSQLe http://hp.vector.co.jp/authors/VA023283/PostgreSQLe.html
Dbexperts http://www.dbexperts.net/postgresql
Connx http://www.connx.com/
gborg http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/winpackage/projdisplay.php
Interbase http://community.borland.com/article/0,1410,23217,00.html
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23432@postgresql.org Thu Jun 6 01:01:09 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23432@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g56518s09229
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 01:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4E125476364; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 01:01:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id C658E47644F; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 01:00:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1CF475ADA
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 00:59:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85238475AFB
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 00:59:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g564xaS09100;
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 00:59:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206060459.g564xaS09100@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <129501c20d05$7a671a10$22c30191@comm.mot.com>
To: Igor Kovalenko <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 00:59:36 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, Jon Franz <coventry@one.net>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Igor Kovalenko wrote:
> I think SGI gets amazing performance because they have very good (efficient)
> synchronization primitives on SGI. Some proprietary light-weight mutexes.
> Using threaded or mixed model just by itself is not going to do a miracle.
> Threads will save you some context switch time, but that will probably
> translate into lower CPU usage rather than performance boost. And if your
> mutexes are not fast or awkwardly implemented (say Linux), it might be even
> worse. Apache is not all that fast on Linux as on SGI, whatever model you
> chose. I also doubt that purely threaded model would be slower than mixed
> one.
Let me throw out an idea. I have been mentioning full fork, light
fork(copy globals only), and threading as possible solutions.
Another idea uses neither threading nor copying. It is the old system
we used before I removed exec() from our code. We used to pass the
database name as an argument to an exec'ed postgres binary that
continued with the database connection.
We removed the exec, then started moving what we could into the
postmaster so each backend didn't need to do the initialization.
One solution is to return to that for Win32 only, so instead of doing:
initialization()
want for connection()
fork backend()
we do for Win32:
want for connection()
exec backend()
initialization()
It wouldn't be hard to do. We would still do CreateProcess rather than
CreateThread, but it eliminates the fork/threading issues. We don't
know the database before the connection arrives, so we don't do a whole
lot of initialization.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From janwieck@yahoo.com Thu Jun 6 09:40:20 2002
Return-path: <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with SMTP id g56DeJs00804
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:40:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from unknown (HELO saturn.janwieck.net) (janwieck@192.233.92.205 with login)
by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jun 2002 13:40:18 -0000
Received: (from wieck@localhost)
by saturn.janwieck.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g56DZFt26403;
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:35:15 -0400
From: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <200206061335.g56DZFt26403@saturn.janwieck.net>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <200206060459.g564xaS09100@candle.pha.pa.us> from Bruce Momjian
at "Jun 6, 2002 00:59:36 am"
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 09:35:14 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Igor Kovalenko <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>,
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, Jon Franz <coventry@one.net>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Status: RO
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Let me throw out an idea. I have been mentioning full fork, light
> fork(copy globals only), and threading as possible solutions.
>
> Another idea uses neither threading nor copying. It is the old system
> we used before I removed exec() from our code. We used to pass the
> database name as an argument to an exec'ed postgres binary that
> continued with the database connection.
>
> We removed the exec, then started moving what we could into the
> postmaster so each backend didn't need to do the initialization.
>
> One solution is to return to that for Win32 only, so instead of doing:
>
> initialization()
> want for connection()
> fork backend()
>
> we do for Win32:
>
> want for connection()
> exec backend()
> initialization()
Summarizes pretty much what we discussed Monday on the phone.
Except that the postmaster still has to initialize the shared
memory and other stuff. It's just that the backends and
helper processes need to reinitialize themself (attach).
> It wouldn't be hard to do. We would still do CreateProcess rather than
> CreateThread, but it eliminates the fork/threading issues. We don't
> know the database before the connection arrives, so we don't do a whole
> lot of initialization.
All I see so far is the reading of the postgresql.conf, the
pg_hba.conf and the password files. Nothing fancy and the
postmaster could easily write out a binary content only file
that the backends then read, eliminating the parsing
overhead.
The bad news is that Tom is right. We did a terrible job in
using the new side effect, that the shared memory segment is
at the same address in all forked processes, after removing
the need to reattach.
In detail the XLog code, the FreeSpaceMap code and the
"shared memory" hashtable code now use pointers, located in
shared memory. For the XLog and FreeSpace code this is
understandable, because they where developed under the fork()
only model. But the dynahash code used offsets only until
v7.1!
All three (no claim that that's all) make it impossible to
ever have someone attaching to the shared memory from the
outside. So with these moves we made the shared memory a
"Postmaster and children" only thing. Raises the question,
why we need an IPC key at all any more.
Anyhow, looks as if I can get that fork() vs. fork()+exec()
feature done pretty soon. It'll be controlled by another
Postmaster commandline switch. After cleaning up the mess I
did to get it working quick, I'll provide a patch for
discussion.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23442@postgresql.org Thu Jun 6 11:14:35 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23442@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g56FEZs11270
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:14:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9055E4765D8; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:14:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id F0E4C476584; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:11:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5646247635D
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:11:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1964765F7
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g56F6IW10267;
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206061506.g56F6IW10267@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <200206061335.g56DZFt26403@saturn.janwieck.net>
To: Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 11:06:18 -0400 (EDT)
cc: Igor Kovalenko <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>,
Neil Conway <nconway@klamath.dyndns.org>, Jon Franz <coventry@one.net>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Jan Wieck wrote:
> > One solution is to return to that for Win32 only, so instead of doing:
> >
> > initialization()
> > want for connection()
> > fork backend()
> >
> > we do for Win32:
> >
> > want for connection()
> > exec backend()
> > initialization()
>
> Summarizes pretty much what we discussed Monday on the phone.
> Except that the postmaster still has to initialize the shared
> memory and other stuff. It's just that the backends and
> helper processes need to reinitialize themself (attach).
Yes, obviously I simplified, and I do believe our optimizations are
helping on Unix. It is just that I think for Win32 the fork is more
harmful than removing those optimizations.
One thing that may not have been clear is that we don't need to play
with globals at all. We just pass whatever info we want to the child
via command-line arguments, rather than shared memory.
> > It wouldn't be hard to do. We would still do CreateProcess rather than
> > CreateThread, but it eliminates the fork/threading issues. We don't
> > know the database before the connection arrives, so we don't do a whole
> > lot of initialization.
>
> All I see so far is the reading of the postgresql.conf, the
> pg_hba.conf and the password files. Nothing fancy and the
> postmaster could easily write out a binary content only file
> that the backends then read, eliminating the parsing
> overhead.
Yes, that is clearly possible. Another option is to just write out a
no-comments, no-whitespace version of each file and just have the
backends read those. The advantage is that we can use the same code to
read them, and I don't think it would be any slower than a binary file.
> The bad news is that Tom is right. We did a terrible job in
> using the new side effect, that the shared memory segment is
> at the same address in all forked processes, after removing
> the need to reattach.
>
> In detail the XLog code, the FreeSpaceMap code and the
> "shared memory" hashtable code now use pointers, located in
> shared memory. For the XLog and FreeSpace code this is
> understandable, because they where developed under the fork()
> only model. But the dynahash code used offsets only until
> v7.1!
>
> All three (no claim that that's all) make it impossible to
> ever have someone attaching to the shared memory from the
> outside. So with these moves we made the shared memory a
> "Postmaster and children" only thing. Raises the question,
> why we need an IPC key at all any more.
Well, we could force shmat() to bind to the same address, but I suspect
that might fail in some cases.
> Anyhow, looks as if I can get that fork() vs. fork()+exec()
> feature done pretty soon. It'll be controlled by another
> Postmaster commandline switch. After cleaning up the mess I
> did to get it working quick, I'll provide a patch for
> discussion.
Yes, very little impact. We then need someone to do some Win32 timings
to see if things have improved. As Tom mentioned, we need some hard
numbers for these things. In fact, I would like a Win32 test that takes
our code and compares fork(), then exit(), with CreateProcess(), exit().
It doesn't have create a db session, but I would like to see some
timings to know what we are gaining. Heck, time CreateThread too and
let's see what that shows.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23447@postgresql.org Thu Jun 6 13:18:53 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23447@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g56HIqs22989
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:18:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 099C0476682; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:18:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 43A26476705; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:15:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3D447667B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:14:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52DB64765A1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 15366 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jun 2002 17:10:31 -0000
Received: from pd902f0fa.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (217.2.240.250)
by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 6 Jun 2002 17:10:31 -0000
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 19:11:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
X-X-Sender: peter@localhost.localdomain
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <200206050433.g554XiN05245@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206061855500.838-100000@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
> using cygwin for this?
We should probably get rid of using shell scripts for application programs
altogether, for a number of reasons besides this one, such as the
inability to properly handle input values with spaces, commas, etc. (we
probably don't handle very long values either on some platforms), the
inability to maintain open database connections so that createlang needs
to prompt for the same password thrice, general portable scripting
headaches, and the lack of internationalization facilities.
I'd even volunteer to do this. Comments?
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23453@postgresql.org Thu Jun 6 15:28:52 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23453@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g56JSqs06231
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 15:28:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3F4C2476828; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 15:28:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 96B12476900; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:52:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4313B476855
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:51:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ED6476852
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:57:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g56Hv5D27106;
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206061757.g56Hv5D27106@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206061855500.838-100000@localhost.localdomain>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > Lots of our code requires a unix shell and utilities. Will we continue
> > using cygwin for this?
>
> We should probably get rid of using shell scripts for application programs
> altogether, for a number of reasons besides this one, such as the
> inability to properly handle input values with spaces, commas, etc. (we
> probably don't handle very long values either on some platforms), the
> inability to maintain open database connections so that createlang needs
> to prompt for the same password thrice, general portable scripting
> headaches, and the lack of internationalization facilities.
>
> I'd even volunteer to do this. Comments?
I know I have discouraged it because I think shell script language has a
good toolset for those applications. I have fixed all the spacing
issues.
What language where you thinking of using? C?
Also, it seems Win32 doesn't need these scripts, except initdb.
PostgreSQLe didn't use the, it just did initdb, and the rest were done
using a GUI. However, initdb would remain a problem. PostgreSQLe wrote
its own.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23466@postgresql.org Fri Jun 7 03:43:24 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23466@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g577hNs29367
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 03:43:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0CDD6475AF5; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 03:43:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id E5D12476626; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 03:42:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB46E4758D8
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 03:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276C247517F
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 03:42:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([193.195.77.162] helo=dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk)
by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 17GEOH-000ApS-0U; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 08:42:33 +0100
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 08:42:33 +0100
Message-ID: <D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF610150CB@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Thread-Index: AcINqHe1e6l54BF0TYqaBR+Lc+A3PwATWOng
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Steve Howe" <howe@carcass.dhs.org>,
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g577hNs29367
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Howe [mailto:howe@carcass.dhs.org]
> Sent: 06 June 2002 02:37
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
>
>
> Hello Bruce,
>
> Wednesday, June 5, 2002, 1:33:44 AM, you wrote:
>
> BM> INSTALLER
> BM> ---------
>
> BM> We clearly need an installer that is zero-hassle for
> users. We need
> BM> to decide on a direction for this.
> I suggest Nullsoft install system
> (http://www.nullsoft.com/free/nsis/). It's > real good and very
> simple to use. I can help on this if you want.
I think that a Windows Installer compatible package would be better as
it would allow us to build the package as a merge module which others
could use in their installers for their PostgreSQL based apps, allowing
one installation to install everything they require easily and (more
importantly) correctly. An example of this can be found in the psqlODBC
installer.
I can handle this if required.
> BM> ENVIRONMENT
>
> I also would like to empathize that probably a small GUI for
> controlling the PostgreSQL service/application would be nice.
I'm happy to add such code to pgAdmin - seems like the natural thing to
do (to me at least!).
Regards, Dave.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23560@postgresql.org Mon Jun 10 10:09:49 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23560@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5AE9ms04329
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:09:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6D20B4762F3; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:46:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id A1731476422; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:30:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134104763B9
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:08:40 -0400 (EDT)
Mailbox-Line: From ss@technicalpursuit.com Fri Jun 7 18:08:40 2002
Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54385476379
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:08:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from idearatxp ([12.253.59.186]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com
(InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP
id <20020607220840.TUBC1024.sccrmhc01.attbi.com@idearatxp>
for <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>;
Fri, 7 Jun 2002 22:08:40 +0000
Message-ID: <032201c20e6f$815a1b40$80c310ac@idearatxp>
From: "Scott Shattuck" <ss@technicalpursuit.com>
To: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206062106400.1028-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2002 16:05:58 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM,X_OSIRU_SPAM_SRC version=2.20
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Level: *****
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.20 (devel $Id: win32,v 1.1 2002/06/13 18:00:47 momjian Exp $)
X-Spam-Report: Detailed Report
SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details: (5 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Received via a relay in relays.osirusoft.com
SPAM: [RBL check: found 61.202.127.204.relays.osirusoft.com., type: 127.0.0.4]
SPAM: Hit! (3.0 points) DNSBL: sender is Confirmed Spam Source
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
How about a SOAP interface and a web-based front end that provides the cross
platform support? My company's TIBET framework would provide a solid
foundation for this kind of admin suite. In fact, we're already in the
planning stages on doing just that.
ss
Scott Shattuck
Technical Pursuit Inc.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > GUI
> > ---
> > pgAdmin2
http://pgadmin.postgresql.org/pgadmin2.php?ContentID=1
> > pgaccess http://pgaccess.org/
> > Java admin (to be written)
> > Dev-C++ admin (to be written)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/dev-cpp/
>
> Surely Unix folks would like a GUI as well?
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23489@postgresql.org Fri Jun 7 18:31:35 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23489@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g57MVYs01005
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:31:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CFFC547671F; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:31:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 682B44767FC; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:27:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63436476915
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:27:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A6AB47666E
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 18:27:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (qmail 15805 invoked by uid 0); 7 Jun 2002 22:27:10 -0000
Received: from pd902f0ad.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (217.2.240.173)
by mail.gmx.net (mp002-rz3) with SMTP; 7 Jun 2002 22:27:10 -0000
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 00:27:59 +0200 (CEST)
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
X-X-Sender: peter@localhost.localdomain
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <200206061757.g56Hv5D27106@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206072008310.935-100000@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I know I have discouraged it because I think shell script language has a
> good toolset for those applications. I have fixed all the spacing
> issues.
My point is that it is not, for the reasons that I listed. Handling
spaces is a small part of one of the several problems, there are problems
with newlines, tabs, commas, slashes, quotes -- everytime you call sed or
read you lose one character.
> What language where you thinking of using? C?
Yes, that way we can share code (pg_dumpall<->pg_dump, initdb<->postgres),
use the established internationalization facilities, and use libpq
directly in create* and drop*.
> Also, it seems Win32 doesn't need these scripts, except initdb.
The utility of these programs is independent of the platform. If we think
pg_dumpall is not useful, then let's remove it.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
From tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us Sat Jun 8 11:48:49 2002
Return-path: <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Received: from sss.pgh.pa.us (root@[192.204.191.242])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g58Fmns11593
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:48:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sss2.sss.pgh.pa.us (tgl@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by sss.pgh.pa.us (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g58FmKb13969;
Sat, 8 Jun 2002 11:48:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206072008310.935-100000@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206072008310.935-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Comments: In-reply-to Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
message dated "Sat, 08 Jun 2002 00:27:59 +0200"
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 11:48:20 -0400
Message-ID: <13966.1023551300@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Status: ROr
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> Also, it seems Win32 doesn't need these scripts, except initdb.
> The utility of these programs is independent of the platform. If we think
> pg_dumpall is not useful, then let's remove it.
I have been seriously considering converting pg_dumpall to C anyway,
because it's already *very* messy, and I don't see any reasonable
way to make it support dumping per-database and per-user config
settings. (Do you really want to try to parse array values in a
shell script?)
(I'd actually consider making pg_dumpall a part of the pg_dump
executable; then it could invoke pg_dump as a subroutine call...)
If Peter's got the time/energy to convert 'em all, I'm for it.
regards, tom lane
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23524@postgresql.org Sat Jun 8 17:48:57 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23524@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g58Lmus13022
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 1C2704758FB; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:48:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 27ACF475DD1; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:48:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92D64759A6
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:48:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from candle.pha.pa.us (216-55-132-35.dsl.san-diego.abac.net [216.55.132.35])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDA4475951
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:48:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from pgman@localhost)
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) id g58LmCa13018;
Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:48:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Message-ID: <200206082148.g58LmCa13018@candle.pha.pa.us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206072008310.935-100000@localhost.localdomain>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:48:12 -0400 (EDT)
cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL97 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: ROr
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I know I have discouraged it because I think shell script language has a
> > good toolset for those applications. I have fixed all the spacing
> > issues.
>
> My point is that it is not, for the reasons that I listed. Handling
> spaces is a small part of one of the several problems, there are problems
> with newlines, tabs, commas, slashes, quotes -- everytime you call sed or
> read you lose one character.
>
> > What language where you thinking of using? C?
>
> Yes, that way we can share code (pg_dumpall<->pg_dump, initdb<->postgres),
> use the established internationalization facilities, and use libpq
> directly in create* and drop*.
>
> > Also, it seems Win32 doesn't need these scripts, except initdb.
>
> The utility of these programs is independent of the platform. If we think
> pg_dumpall is not useful, then let's remove it.
I think the first two targets for C-ification would be pg_dumpall and
initdb. The others have SQL equivalents. Maybe pg_ctl too.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23541@postgresql.org Sun Jun 9 07:10:14 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23541@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g59BAEs18595
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 07:10:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 78848475BCE; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 07:09:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 34984475908; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 06:41:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3F84758E6
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 06:40:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACAB4758E6
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 06:38:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([193.195.77.162] helo=dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk)
by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 17H05a-000G8M-0U; Sun, 09 Jun 2002 11:38:27 +0100
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Roadmap for a Win32 port
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 11:38:26 +0100
Message-ID: <D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF610150D6@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Thread-Index: AcIPOqo6zyhIgICZRXi+W7OR5HfNigAZldCg
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g59BAEs18595
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 08 June 2002 22:48
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
>
>
> >
> > > Also, it seems Win32 doesn't need these scripts, except initdb.
> >
> > The utility of these programs is independent of the
> platform. If we
> > think pg_dumpall is not useful, then let's remove it.
>
> I think the first two targets for C-ification would be
> pg_dumpall and initdb. The others have SQL equivalents.
> Maybe pg_ctl too.
I looked at this issue some time ago & came to the conclusion that the
only scripts that Win32 really needed were pg_dumpall, initdb &
initlocation.
The others have SQL equivalents as you say, apart from pg_ctl which
under Windows should probably (and generally is) be replaced by the SCM
(Service Control Manager). The only thing that comes to mind that the
SCM can't do is a reload.
Regards, Dave.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23406@postgresql.org Wed Jun 5 01:06:31 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23406@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5556Vs08055
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:06:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 169794762A7; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:06:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id C60EB47625B; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:06:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB789475C75
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:06:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from voyager.corporate.connx.com (unknown [209.20.248.131])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B950475A3B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 01:06:14 -0400 (EDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: [HACKERS] Cooperation
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 22:06:31 -0700
Message-ID: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CF1A@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
Thread-Topic: Cooperation
Thread-Index: AcIMTsGaRnYrKZMWTBSGbLPlP1vlAQ==
From: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
To: <sogapj@fb.freeserve.ne.jp>, <ichiro@ichiro.org>, <tosiyuki@gol.com>
cc: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g5556Vs08055
Status: RO
I apologize for my English language message. I am unable to speak
Japanese. We do have a native Japanese speaker here, who could be
called upon if necessary.
The PostgreSQL team is planning to do a native Win32 port. Perhaps you
would like to help with the effort. In that way, your changes will get
propagated back up the source code tree and you can gain the benefits
from future development efforts without performing any work.
We did a port to Win32 also, but your approach seems much better. We
have very fat executables and you have a marvelous DLL approach.
Probably, the way that you perform the operations is much better.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23451@postgresql.org Thu Jun 6 15:09:15 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23451@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g56J9Es04710
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 15:09:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 233E7476798; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 15:09:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 53BA8476C21; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF6E475B2B
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 03:39:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.astrodesign.co.jp (ns.astrodesign.co.jp [210.169.228.106])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7083475AD1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2002 03:39:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:38:55 +0900
From: ISHIKAWA Toshiyuki <t-ishikawa@astrodesign.co.jp>
To: "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>
cc: sogapj@fb.freeserve.ne.jp, ichiro@ichiro.org, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Cooperation
Message-ID: <20020606163855.4d8f2be5.t-ishikawa@astrodesign.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CF1A@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
References: <D90A5A6C612A39408103E6ECDD77B82920CF1A@voyager.corporate.connx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Dann Corbit wrote:
> I apologize for my English language message. I am unable to speak
> Japanese. We do have a native Japanese speaker here, who could be
> called upon if necessary.
There is no need to aplogize writing an e-mail in English.
It's global standards, but some portion is a bit difficult
to understand. Anyhow, we must firstly express our thanks
for your interest in our project, though we are facing also
hard obstacles as listed on the Web site.
> The PostgreSQL team is planning to do a native Win32 port. Perhaps you
> would like to help with the effort. In that way, your changes will get
> propagated back up the source code tree and you can gain the benefits
> from future development efforts without performing any work.
It is nice to hear that the PostgreSQL development team has also working
on this subject. Will you please illustrate the procedure more clearly how
to we contribute our effort to your project. The last four words in the
above clause mean that once we supply you with the changed source, then
everything afterwords could be handled by the team? How the copy right
will be dealt with?
The development has been continued by the volunteer developers here,
however, we have to admit that businesses (companies) are also involved
to support those people providing time to work on the development,
not to commercialization purpose but expecting some return, e.g. earning
company's prestige. So, we have to regulate those backgrouds first based
upon your proposal. We are positive to help you with our effort anyway,
if things goes well.
> We did a port to Win32 also, but your approach seems much better. We
> have very fat executables and you have a marvelous DLL approach.
> Probably, the way that you perform the operations is much better.
Thanks.
Toshi
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From dpage@vale-housing.co.uk Sun Jun 9 06:38:29 2002
Return-path: <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
Received: from anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.88])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g59AcSs05017
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Sun, 9 Jun 2002 06:38:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailgate.vale-housing.co.uk ([193.195.77.162] helo=dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk)
by anchor-post-30.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 17H05a-000G8M-0U; Sun, 09 Jun 2002 11:38:27 +0100
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RE: Roadmap for a Win32 port
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 11:38:26 +0100
Message-ID: <D85C66DA59BA044EB96AB9683819CF610150D6@dogbert.vale-housing.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: Roadmap for a Win32 port
Thread-Index: AcIPOqo6zyhIgICZRXi+W7OR5HfNigAZldCg
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>,
"Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>
cc: "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by candle.pha.pa.us id g59AcSs05017
Status: RO
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent: 08 June 2002 22:48
> To: Peter Eisentraut
> Cc: PostgreSQL-development
> Subject: Re: Roadmap for a Win32 port
>
>
> >
> > > Also, it seems Win32 doesn't need these scripts, except initdb.
> >
> > The utility of these programs is independent of the
> platform. If we
> > think pg_dumpall is not useful, then let's remove it.
>
> I think the first two targets for C-ification would be
> pg_dumpall and initdb. The others have SQL equivalents.
> Maybe pg_ctl too.
I looked at this issue some time ago & came to the conclusion that the
only scripts that Win32 really needed were pg_dumpall, initdb &
initlocation.
The others have SQL equivalents as you say, apart from pg_ctl which
under Windows should probably (and generally is) be replaced by the SCM
(Service Control Manager). The only thing that comes to mind that the
SCM can't do is a reload.
Regards, Dave.
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23620@postgresql.org Tue Jun 11 10:20:54 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23620@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5BEKrs26980
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:20:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id E71DB476475; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:20:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id E021E47641C; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:20:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C77475905
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:20:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.gne.de (mail.gne.de [213.83.0.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02B0475864
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 10:20:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DO5GNE-MTA by mail.gne.de
with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:19:39 +0200
Message-ID: <sd06231b.068@mail.gne.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:19:21 +0200
From: "Ulrich Neumann" <U_Neumann@gne.de>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: [HACKERS] Native Win32/OS2/BeOS/NetWare ports
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Guinevere: 1.1.14 ; GNE Grebe Neumann Gl
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Hello together
i've seen a lot of discussion about a native win32/OS2/BEOS port of
PostgreSQL.
During the last months i've ported PostgreSQL over to Novell NetWare
and i've
changed the code that I use pthreads instead of fork() now.
I had a lot of work with the variables and cleanup but mayor parts are
done.
I would appreciate if we could combine this work.
My plan was to finish this port, discuss the port with other people and
offer all the work
to the PostgreSQL source tree, but now i'm jumping in here because of
all the discussions.
What i've done in detail:
- i've defined #USE_PTHREADS in pg_config.h to differentiate between
the forked and the
threaded backend.
- I've added several parts in postmaster.c so all functions are based
on pthreads now.
- I've changed the signal handling because signals are process based
- I've changed code in ipc.c to have a clean shutdown of threads
- I've written some functions to switch the global variables. The
globals are controled with
POSIX semaphores.
- I've written a new implementation of shared memory and semaphores-
With pthreads I don't
need real shared memory any more and i'm using POSIX semaphores now
- Several minor changes.
There is still some more work to do like fixing memory leaks or
handling bad situations, but in general it's
functional on NetWare.
BTW: Is it possible to add some lines on the PostgreSQL webpage that
there is a first beta of
PostgreSQL for NetWare available and to offer a binary download for the
NetWare version?
Ulrich Neumann
----------------------------------
This e-mail is virus scanned
Diese e-mail ist virusgeprueft
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23641@postgresql.org Tue Jun 11 15:01:17 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23641@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5BJ1Gs23405
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:01:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 950F7476CC5; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:01:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 113114768E2; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CF5475B98
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:48:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox.mot.com [129.188.136.101])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57F4760D1
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 14:14:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: [from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by ftpbox.mot.com (ftpbox 2.1) with ESMTP id LAA03778; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:14:07 -0700 (MST)]
Received: [from pronto1.comm.mot.com (pronto1.comm.mot.com [173.6.1.22]) by pobox.mot.com (MOT-pobox 2.0) with ESMTP id LAA14457; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 11:14:07 -0700 (MST)]
Received: from kovalenkoigor (idennt19534 [145.1.195.34])
by pronto1.comm.mot.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA23438;
Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:14:06 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <00c901c21173$e5f95870$22c30191@comm.mot.com>
From: "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com>
To: "Ulrich Neumann" <U_Neumann@gne.de>, <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
References: <sd06231b.068@mail.gne.de>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32/OS2/BeOS/NetWare ports
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 13:14:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
> Hello together
>
> i've seen a lot of discussion about a native win32/OS2/BEOS port of
> PostgreSQL.
>
> During the last months i've ported PostgreSQL over to Novell NetWare
> and i've
> changed the code that I use pthreads instead of fork() now.
>
> I had a lot of work with the variables and cleanup but mayor parts are
> done.
>
> I would appreciate if we could combine this work.
Very nice... I have patches for QNX6 which also involved redoing shared
memory and sempahores stuff. It would make very good sense to intergate,
especially since you managed to do something very close to what I wanted :)
> My plan was to finish this port, discuss the port with other people and
> offer all the work
> to the PostgreSQL source tree, but now i'm jumping in here because of
> all the discussions.
>
> What i've done in detail:
> - i've defined #USE_PTHREADS in pg_config.h to differentiate between
> the forked and the
> threaded backend.
> - I've added several parts in postmaster.c so all functions are based
> on pthreads now.
> - I've changed the signal handling because signals are process based
Careful here. On certain systems (on many, I suspect) POSIX semantics for
signals is NOT default. Enforcing POSIX semantics requires certain compile
time switches which will also change behavior of various functions.
> - I've changed code in ipc.c to have a clean shutdown of threads
> - I've written some functions to switch the global variables. The
> globals are controled with
> POSIX semaphores.
> - I've written a new implementation of shared memory and semaphores-
> With pthreads I don't
> need real shared memory any more and i'm using POSIX semaphores now
POSIX semaphores for what? I assume by the conext that you're talking about
replacing SysV semaphores which are used to control access to shared memory.
If that is the case, POSIX semaphores are not the best choice really. POSIX
mutexes would be okay, but on SMP systems spinlocks (hardware TAS based
macros or POSIX spinlocks) would probably be better anyway. Note that on
most platforms spinlocks are used for that and SysV semaphores were just a
'last resort' which had unacceptable performance and so I guess it was not
used at all.
Do you have your patch somewhere online?
-- igor
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
From pgsql-hackers-owner+M23662@postgresql.org Wed Jun 12 04:38:26 2002
Return-path: <pgsql-hackers-owner+M23662@postgresql.org>
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by candle.pha.pa.us (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g5C8cQs16000
for <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:38:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BFF694758D8; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:38:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from postgresql.org (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 627664767B0; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:37:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (postgresql.org [64.49.215.8])
by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D69475961
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:37:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.gne.de (mail.gne.de [213.83.0.2])
by postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE69B475D95
for <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 04:36:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from DO5GNE-MTA by mail.gne.de
with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:35:57 +0200
Message-ID: <sd07240d.003@mail.gne.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.1
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 10:35:24 +0200
From: "Ulrich Neumann" <U_Neumann@gne.de>
To: <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Antw: Re: [HACKERS] Native Win32/OS2/BeOS/NetWare ports
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Guinevere: 1.1.14 ; GNE Grebe Neumann Gl
Precedence: bulk
Sender: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
Status: RO
Hi Igor,
Thanks for your information.
I was aware of the "signal" problems and i've done it with thread based
signals
This part is functional on my platform but it isn't fully cooked.
Another problem
is to make this part portable.
Your assumption to replace SysV semaphores with POSIX semaphores is
correct.
My first guess was to use mutexes instead of semaphores at all because
the
way semaphores are used in Postgres is more something like a "mutex",
but only semaphores worked for me at this time because the underlying
C Library had some problems with mutexes and spinlocks. (I'm also
working on a new C Library for a future OS).
Actually I don't have my code downloadable somewhere because the code
doesn't look very nice in some parts. There is also temporary debug
code
in it right now. The best I think is to send it to you via email. If
this is OK
please give me a short notice or send an email to me and I'll send you
a
copy.
Ulrich
>>> "Igor Kovalenko" <Igor.Kovalenko@motorola.com> 11.06.2002 20:14:58
>>>
> Hello together
>
> i've seen a lot of discussion about a native win32/OS2/BEOS port of
> PostgreSQL.
>
> During the last months i've ported PostgreSQL over to Novell NetWare
> and i've
> changed the code that I use pthreads instead of fork() now.
>
> I had a lot of work with the variables and cleanup but mayor parts
are
> done.
>
> I would appreciate if we could combine this work.
Very nice... I have patches for QNX6 which also involved redoing
shared
memory and sempahores stuff. It would make very good sense to
intergate,
especially since you managed to do something very close to what I
wanted :)
> My plan was to finish this port, discuss the port with other people
and
> offer all the work
> to the PostgreSQL source tree, but now i'm jumping in here because
of
> all the discussions.
>
> What i've done in detail:
> - i've defined #USE_PTHREADS in pg_config.h to differentiate between
> the forked and the
> threaded backend.
> - I've added several parts in postmaster.c so all functions are
based
> on pthreads now.
> - I've changed the signal handling because signals are process based
Careful here. On certain systems (on many, I suspect) POSIX semantics
for
signals is NOT default. Enforcing POSIX semantics requires certain
compile
time switches which will also change behavior of various functions.
> - I've changed code in ipc.c to have a clean shutdown of threads
> - I've written some functions to switch the global variables. The
> globals are controled with
> POSIX semaphores.
> - I've written a new implementation of shared memory and semaphores-
> With pthreads I don't
> need real shared memory any more and i'm using POSIX semaphores now
POSIX semaphores for what? I assume by the conext that you're talking
about
replacing SysV semaphores which are used to control access to shared
memory.
If that is the case, POSIX semaphores are not the best choice really.
POSIX
mutexes would be okay, but on SMP systems spinlocks (hardware TAS
based
macros or POSIX spinlocks) would probably be better anyway. Note that
on
most platforms spinlocks are used for that and SysV semaphores were
just a
'last resort' which had unacceptable performance and so I guess it was
not
used at all.
Do you have your patch somewhere online?
-- igor
---------------------------(end of
broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
----------------------------------
This e-mail is virus scanned
Diese e-mail ist virusgeprueft
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink