mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2025-01-12 18:34:36 +08:00
eb5c404b17
Make the btree page-flags test macros (P_ISLEAF and friends) return clean boolean values, rather than values that might not fit in a bool. Use them in a few places that were randomly referencing the flag bits directly. In passing, change access/nbtree/'s only direct use of BUFFER_LOCK_SHARE to BT_READ. (Some think we should go the other way, but as long as we have BT_READ/BT_WRITE, let's use them consistently.) Masahiko Sawada, reviewed by Doug Doole Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBmWPeN=WBB5Jvyz_Nt3rmW1ebUyAnk3ZbJP3RMXALJog@mail.gmail.com
1249 lines
44 KiB
C
1249 lines
44 KiB
C
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*
|
|
* verify_nbtree.c
|
|
* Verifies the integrity of nbtree indexes based on invariants.
|
|
*
|
|
* For B-Tree indexes, verification includes checking that each page in the
|
|
* target index has items in logical order as reported by an insertion scankey
|
|
* (the insertion scankey sort-wise NULL semantics are needed for
|
|
* verification).
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2017, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
|
*
|
|
* IDENTIFICATION
|
|
* contrib/amcheck/verify_nbtree.c
|
|
*
|
|
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
*/
|
|
#include "postgres.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "access/nbtree.h"
|
|
#include "access/transam.h"
|
|
#include "catalog/index.h"
|
|
#include "catalog/pg_am.h"
|
|
#include "commands/tablecmds.h"
|
|
#include "miscadmin.h"
|
|
#include "storage/lmgr.h"
|
|
#include "utils/memutils.h"
|
|
#include "utils/snapmgr.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
PG_MODULE_MAGIC;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* A B-Tree cannot possibly have this many levels, since there must be one
|
|
* block per level, which is bound by the range of BlockNumber:
|
|
*/
|
|
#define InvalidBtreeLevel ((uint32) InvalidBlockNumber)
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* State associated with verifying a B-Tree index
|
|
*
|
|
* target is the point of reference for a verification operation.
|
|
*
|
|
* Other B-Tree pages may be allocated, but those are always auxiliary (e.g.,
|
|
* they are current target's child pages). Conceptually, problems are only
|
|
* ever found in the current target page. Each page found by verification's
|
|
* left/right, top/bottom scan becomes the target exactly once.
|
|
*/
|
|
typedef struct BtreeCheckState
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* Unchanging state, established at start of verification:
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* B-Tree Index Relation */
|
|
Relation rel;
|
|
/* ShareLock held on heap/index, rather than AccessShareLock? */
|
|
bool readonly;
|
|
/* Per-page context */
|
|
MemoryContext targetcontext;
|
|
/* Buffer access strategy */
|
|
BufferAccessStrategy checkstrategy;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Mutable state, for verification of particular page:
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/* Current target page */
|
|
Page target;
|
|
/* Target block number */
|
|
BlockNumber targetblock;
|
|
/* Target page's LSN */
|
|
XLogRecPtr targetlsn;
|
|
} BtreeCheckState;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Starting point for verifying an entire B-Tree index level
|
|
*/
|
|
typedef struct BtreeLevel
|
|
{
|
|
/* Level number (0 is leaf page level). */
|
|
uint32 level;
|
|
|
|
/* Left most block on level. Scan of level begins here. */
|
|
BlockNumber leftmost;
|
|
|
|
/* Is this level reported as "true" root level by meta page? */
|
|
bool istruerootlevel;
|
|
} BtreeLevel;
|
|
|
|
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(bt_index_check);
|
|
PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(bt_index_parent_check);
|
|
|
|
static void bt_index_check_internal(Oid indrelid, bool parentcheck);
|
|
static inline void btree_index_checkable(Relation rel);
|
|
static void bt_check_every_level(Relation rel, bool readonly);
|
|
static BtreeLevel bt_check_level_from_leftmost(BtreeCheckState *state,
|
|
BtreeLevel level);
|
|
static void bt_target_page_check(BtreeCheckState *state);
|
|
static ScanKey bt_right_page_check_scankey(BtreeCheckState *state);
|
|
static void bt_downlink_check(BtreeCheckState *state, BlockNumber childblock,
|
|
ScanKey targetkey);
|
|
static inline bool offset_is_negative_infinity(BTPageOpaque opaque,
|
|
OffsetNumber offset);
|
|
static inline bool invariant_leq_offset(BtreeCheckState *state,
|
|
ScanKey key,
|
|
OffsetNumber upperbound);
|
|
static inline bool invariant_geq_offset(BtreeCheckState *state,
|
|
ScanKey key,
|
|
OffsetNumber lowerbound);
|
|
static inline bool invariant_leq_nontarget_offset(BtreeCheckState *state,
|
|
Page other,
|
|
ScanKey key,
|
|
OffsetNumber upperbound);
|
|
static Page palloc_btree_page(BtreeCheckState *state, BlockNumber blocknum);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* bt_index_check(index regclass)
|
|
*
|
|
* Verify integrity of B-Tree index.
|
|
*
|
|
* Acquires AccessShareLock on heap & index relations. Does not consider
|
|
* invariants that exist between parent/child pages.
|
|
*/
|
|
Datum
|
|
bt_index_check(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
|
{
|
|
Oid indrelid = PG_GETARG_OID(0);
|
|
|
|
bt_index_check_internal(indrelid, false);
|
|
|
|
PG_RETURN_VOID();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* bt_index_parent_check(index regclass)
|
|
*
|
|
* Verify integrity of B-Tree index.
|
|
*
|
|
* Acquires ShareLock on heap & index relations. Verifies that downlinks in
|
|
* parent pages are valid lower bounds on child pages.
|
|
*/
|
|
Datum
|
|
bt_index_parent_check(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
|
{
|
|
Oid indrelid = PG_GETARG_OID(0);
|
|
|
|
bt_index_check_internal(indrelid, true);
|
|
|
|
PG_RETURN_VOID();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Helper for bt_index_[parent_]check, coordinating the bulk of the work.
|
|
*/
|
|
static void
|
|
bt_index_check_internal(Oid indrelid, bool parentcheck)
|
|
{
|
|
Oid heapid;
|
|
Relation indrel;
|
|
Relation heaprel;
|
|
LOCKMODE lockmode;
|
|
|
|
if (parentcheck)
|
|
lockmode = ShareLock;
|
|
else
|
|
lockmode = AccessShareLock;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We must lock table before index to avoid deadlocks. However, if the
|
|
* passed indrelid isn't an index then IndexGetRelation() will fail.
|
|
* Rather than emitting a not-very-helpful error message, postpone
|
|
* complaining, expecting that the is-it-an-index test below will fail.
|
|
*
|
|
* In hot standby mode this will raise an error when parentcheck is true.
|
|
*/
|
|
heapid = IndexGetRelation(indrelid, true);
|
|
if (OidIsValid(heapid))
|
|
heaprel = heap_open(heapid, lockmode);
|
|
else
|
|
heaprel = NULL;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Open the target index relations separately (like relation_openrv(), but
|
|
* with heap relation locked first to prevent deadlocking). In hot
|
|
* standby mode this will raise an error when parentcheck is true.
|
|
*/
|
|
indrel = index_open(indrelid, lockmode);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Since we did the IndexGetRelation call above without any lock, it's
|
|
* barely possible that a race against an index drop/recreation could have
|
|
* netted us the wrong table. Although the table itself won't actually be
|
|
* examined during verification currently, a recheck still seems like a
|
|
* good idea.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (heaprel == NULL || heapid != IndexGetRelation(indrelid, false))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_TABLE),
|
|
errmsg("could not open parent table of index %s",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(indrel))));
|
|
|
|
/* Relation suitable for checking as B-Tree? */
|
|
btree_index_checkable(indrel);
|
|
|
|
/* Check index */
|
|
bt_check_every_level(indrel, parentcheck);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Release locks early. That's ok here because nothing in the called
|
|
* routines will trigger shared cache invalidations to be sent, so we can
|
|
* relax the usual pattern of only releasing locks after commit.
|
|
*/
|
|
index_close(indrel, lockmode);
|
|
if (heaprel)
|
|
heap_close(heaprel, lockmode);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Basic checks about the suitability of a relation for checking as a B-Tree
|
|
* index.
|
|
*
|
|
* NB: Intentionally not checking permissions, the function is normally not
|
|
* callable by non-superusers. If granted, it's useful to be able to check a
|
|
* whole cluster.
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline void
|
|
btree_index_checkable(Relation rel)
|
|
{
|
|
if (rel->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_INDEX ||
|
|
rel->rd_rel->relam != BTREE_AM_OID)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
|
|
errmsg("only B-Tree indexes are supported as targets for verification"),
|
|
errdetail("Relation \"%s\" is not a B-Tree index.",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
|
|
|
|
if (RELATION_IS_OTHER_TEMP(rel))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
|
|
errmsg("cannot access temporary tables of other sessions"),
|
|
errdetail("Index \"%s\" is associated with temporary relation.",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(rel))));
|
|
|
|
if (!IndexIsValid(rel->rd_index))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED),
|
|
errmsg("cannot check index \"%s\"",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
|
|
errdetail("Index is not valid")));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Main entry point for B-Tree SQL-callable functions. Walks the B-Tree in
|
|
* logical order, verifying invariants as it goes.
|
|
*
|
|
* It is the caller's responsibility to acquire appropriate heavyweight lock on
|
|
* the index relation, and advise us if extra checks are safe when a ShareLock
|
|
* is held.
|
|
*
|
|
* A ShareLock is generally assumed to prevent any kind of physical
|
|
* modification to the index structure, including modifications that VACUUM may
|
|
* make. This does not include setting of the LP_DEAD bit by concurrent index
|
|
* scans, although that is just metadata that is not able to directly affect
|
|
* any check performed here. Any concurrent process that might act on the
|
|
* LP_DEAD bit being set (recycle space) requires a heavyweight lock that
|
|
* cannot be held while we hold a ShareLock. (Besides, even if that could
|
|
* happen, the ad-hoc recycling when a page might otherwise split is performed
|
|
* per-page, and requires an exclusive buffer lock, which wouldn't cause us
|
|
* trouble. _bt_delitems_vacuum() may only delete leaf items, and so the extra
|
|
* parent/child check cannot be affected.)
|
|
*/
|
|
static void
|
|
bt_check_every_level(Relation rel, bool readonly)
|
|
{
|
|
BtreeCheckState *state;
|
|
Page metapage;
|
|
BTMetaPageData *metad;
|
|
uint32 previouslevel;
|
|
BtreeLevel current;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* RecentGlobalXmin assertion matches index_getnext_tid(). See note on
|
|
* RecentGlobalXmin/B-Tree page deletion.
|
|
*/
|
|
Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(RecentGlobalXmin));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Initialize state for entire verification operation
|
|
*/
|
|
state = palloc(sizeof(BtreeCheckState));
|
|
state->rel = rel;
|
|
state->readonly = readonly;
|
|
/* Create context for page */
|
|
state->targetcontext = AllocSetContextCreate(CurrentMemoryContext,
|
|
"amcheck context",
|
|
ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_MINSIZE,
|
|
ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_INITSIZE,
|
|
ALLOCSET_DEFAULT_MAXSIZE);
|
|
state->checkstrategy = GetAccessStrategy(BAS_BULKREAD);
|
|
|
|
/* Get true root block from meta-page */
|
|
metapage = palloc_btree_page(state, BTREE_METAPAGE);
|
|
metad = BTPageGetMeta(metapage);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Certain deletion patterns can result in "skinny" B-Tree indexes, where
|
|
* the fast root and true root differ.
|
|
*
|
|
* Start from the true root, not the fast root, unlike conventional index
|
|
* scans. This approach is more thorough, and removes the risk of
|
|
* following a stale fast root from the meta page.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (metad->btm_fastroot != metad->btm_root)
|
|
ereport(DEBUG1,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_NO_DATA),
|
|
errmsg("harmless fast root mismatch in index %s",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Fast root block %u (level %u) differs from true root block %u (level %u).",
|
|
metad->btm_fastroot, metad->btm_fastlevel,
|
|
metad->btm_root, metad->btm_level)));
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Starting at the root, verify every level. Move left to right, top to
|
|
* bottom. Note that there may be no pages other than the meta page (meta
|
|
* page can indicate that root is P_NONE when the index is totally empty).
|
|
*/
|
|
previouslevel = InvalidBtreeLevel;
|
|
current.level = metad->btm_level;
|
|
current.leftmost = metad->btm_root;
|
|
current.istruerootlevel = true;
|
|
while (current.leftmost != P_NONE)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* Verify this level, and get left most page for next level down, if
|
|
* not at leaf level
|
|
*/
|
|
current = bt_check_level_from_leftmost(state, current);
|
|
|
|
if (current.leftmost == InvalidBlockNumber)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("index \"%s\" has no valid pages on level below %u or first level",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(rel), previouslevel)));
|
|
|
|
previouslevel = current.level;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Be tidy: */
|
|
MemoryContextDelete(state->targetcontext);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Given a left-most block at some level, move right, verifying each page
|
|
* individually (with more verification across pages for "readonly"
|
|
* callers). Caller should pass the true root page as the leftmost initially,
|
|
* working their way down by passing what is returned for the last call here
|
|
* until level 0 (leaf page level) was reached.
|
|
*
|
|
* Returns state for next call, if any. This includes left-most block number
|
|
* one level lower that should be passed on next level/call, which is set to
|
|
* P_NONE on last call here (when leaf level is verified). Level numbers
|
|
* follow the nbtree convention: higher levels have higher numbers, because new
|
|
* levels are added only due to a root page split. Note that prior to the
|
|
* first root page split, the root is also a leaf page, so there is always a
|
|
* level 0 (leaf level), and it's always the last level processed.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note on memory management: State's per-page context is reset here, between
|
|
* each call to bt_target_page_check().
|
|
*/
|
|
static BtreeLevel
|
|
bt_check_level_from_leftmost(BtreeCheckState *state, BtreeLevel level)
|
|
{
|
|
/* State to establish early, concerning entire level */
|
|
BTPageOpaque opaque;
|
|
MemoryContext oldcontext;
|
|
BtreeLevel nextleveldown;
|
|
|
|
/* Variables for iterating across level using right links */
|
|
BlockNumber leftcurrent = P_NONE;
|
|
BlockNumber current = level.leftmost;
|
|
|
|
/* Initialize return state */
|
|
nextleveldown.leftmost = InvalidBlockNumber;
|
|
nextleveldown.level = InvalidBtreeLevel;
|
|
nextleveldown.istruerootlevel = false;
|
|
|
|
/* Use page-level context for duration of this call */
|
|
oldcontext = MemoryContextSwitchTo(state->targetcontext);
|
|
|
|
elog(DEBUG2, "verifying level %u%s", level.level,
|
|
level.istruerootlevel ?
|
|
" (true root level)" : level.level == 0 ? " (leaf level)" : "");
|
|
|
|
do
|
|
{
|
|
/* Don't rely on CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() calls at lower level */
|
|
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
|
|
|
|
/* Initialize state for this iteration */
|
|
state->targetblock = current;
|
|
state->target = palloc_btree_page(state, state->targetblock);
|
|
state->targetlsn = PageGetLSN(state->target);
|
|
|
|
opaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(state->target);
|
|
|
|
if (P_IGNORE(opaque))
|
|
{
|
|
if (P_RIGHTMOST(opaque))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("block %u fell off the end of index \"%s\"",
|
|
current, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
else
|
|
ereport(DEBUG1,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_NO_DATA),
|
|
errmsg("block %u of index \"%s\" ignored",
|
|
current, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
goto nextpage;
|
|
}
|
|
else if (nextleveldown.leftmost == InvalidBlockNumber)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* A concurrent page split could make the caller supplied leftmost
|
|
* block no longer contain the leftmost page, or no longer be the
|
|
* true root, but where that isn't possible due to heavyweight
|
|
* locking, check that the first valid page meets caller's
|
|
* expectations.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (state->readonly)
|
|
{
|
|
if (!P_LEFTMOST(opaque))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("block %u is not leftmost in index \"%s\"",
|
|
current, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
|
|
if (level.istruerootlevel && !P_ISROOT(opaque))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("block %u is not true root in index \"%s\"",
|
|
current, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Before beginning any non-trivial examination of level, prepare
|
|
* state for next bt_check_level_from_leftmost() invocation for
|
|
* the next level for the next level down (if any).
|
|
*
|
|
* There should be at least one non-ignorable page per level,
|
|
* unless this is the leaf level, which is assumed by caller to be
|
|
* final level.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!P_ISLEAF(opaque))
|
|
{
|
|
IndexTuple itup;
|
|
ItemId itemid;
|
|
|
|
/* Internal page -- downlink gets leftmost on next level */
|
|
itemid = PageGetItemId(state->target, P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque));
|
|
itup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->target, itemid);
|
|
nextleveldown.leftmost = ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&(itup->t_tid));
|
|
nextleveldown.level = opaque->btpo.level - 1;
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* Leaf page -- final level caller must process.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that this could also be the root page, if there has
|
|
* been no root page split yet.
|
|
*/
|
|
nextleveldown.leftmost = P_NONE;
|
|
nextleveldown.level = InvalidBtreeLevel;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Finished setting up state for this call/level. Control will
|
|
* never end up back here in any future loop iteration for this
|
|
* level.
|
|
*/
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (state->readonly && opaque->btpo_prev != leftcurrent)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("left link/right link pair in index \"%s\" not in agreement",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Block=%u left block=%u left link from block=%u.",
|
|
current, leftcurrent, opaque->btpo_prev)));
|
|
|
|
/* Check level, which must be valid for non-ignorable page */
|
|
if (level.level != opaque->btpo.level)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("leftmost down link for level points to block in index \"%s\" whose level is not one level down",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Block pointed to=%u expected level=%u level in pointed to block=%u.",
|
|
current, level.level, opaque->btpo.level)));
|
|
|
|
/* Verify invariants for page -- all important checks occur here */
|
|
bt_target_page_check(state);
|
|
|
|
nextpage:
|
|
|
|
/* Try to detect circular links */
|
|
if (current == leftcurrent || current == opaque->btpo_prev)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("circular link chain found in block %u of index \"%s\"",
|
|
current, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
|
|
leftcurrent = current;
|
|
current = opaque->btpo_next;
|
|
|
|
/* Free page and associated memory for this iteration */
|
|
MemoryContextReset(state->targetcontext);
|
|
}
|
|
while (current != P_NONE);
|
|
|
|
/* Don't change context for caller */
|
|
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
|
|
|
|
return nextleveldown;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Function performs the following checks on target page, or pages ancillary to
|
|
* target page:
|
|
*
|
|
* - That every "real" data item is less than or equal to the high key, which
|
|
* is an upper bound on the items on the pages (where there is a high key at
|
|
* all -- pages that are rightmost lack one).
|
|
*
|
|
* - That within the page, every "real" item is less than or equal to the item
|
|
* immediately to its right, if any (i.e., that the items are in order within
|
|
* the page, so that the binary searches performed by index scans are sane).
|
|
*
|
|
* - That the last item stored on the page is less than or equal to the first
|
|
* "real" data item on the page to the right (if such a first item is
|
|
* available).
|
|
*
|
|
* Furthermore, when state passed shows ShareLock held, and target page is
|
|
* internal page, function also checks:
|
|
*
|
|
* - That all child pages respect downlinks lower bound.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note: Memory allocated in this routine is expected to be released by caller
|
|
* resetting state->targetcontext.
|
|
*/
|
|
static void
|
|
bt_target_page_check(BtreeCheckState *state)
|
|
{
|
|
OffsetNumber offset;
|
|
OffsetNumber max;
|
|
BTPageOpaque topaque;
|
|
|
|
topaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(state->target);
|
|
max = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(state->target);
|
|
|
|
elog(DEBUG2, "verifying %u items on %s block %u", max,
|
|
P_ISLEAF(topaque) ? "leaf" : "internal", state->targetblock);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Loop over page items, starting from first non-highkey item, not high
|
|
* key (if any). Also, immediately skip "negative infinity" real item (if
|
|
* any).
|
|
*/
|
|
for (offset = P_FIRSTDATAKEY(topaque);
|
|
offset <= max;
|
|
offset = OffsetNumberNext(offset))
|
|
{
|
|
ItemId itemid;
|
|
IndexTuple itup;
|
|
ScanKey skey;
|
|
|
|
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Don't try to generate scankey using "negative infinity" garbage
|
|
* data
|
|
*/
|
|
if (offset_is_negative_infinity(topaque, offset))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
/* Build insertion scankey for current page offset */
|
|
itemid = PageGetItemId(state->target, offset);
|
|
itup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->target, itemid);
|
|
skey = _bt_mkscankey(state->rel, itup);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* * High key check *
|
|
*
|
|
* If there is a high key (if this is not the rightmost page on its
|
|
* entire level), check that high key actually is upper bound on all
|
|
* page items.
|
|
*
|
|
* We prefer to check all items against high key rather than checking
|
|
* just the last and trusting that the operator class obeys the
|
|
* transitive law (which implies that all previous items also
|
|
* respected the high key invariant if they pass the item order
|
|
* check).
|
|
*
|
|
* Ideally, we'd compare every item in the index against every other
|
|
* item in the index, and not trust opclass obedience of the
|
|
* transitive law to bridge the gap between children and their
|
|
* grandparents (as well as great-grandparents, and so on). We don't
|
|
* go to those lengths because that would be prohibitively expensive,
|
|
* and probably not markedly more effective in practice.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!P_RIGHTMOST(topaque) &&
|
|
!invariant_leq_offset(state, skey, P_HIKEY))
|
|
{
|
|
char *itid,
|
|
*htid;
|
|
|
|
itid = psprintf("(%u,%u)", state->targetblock, offset);
|
|
htid = psprintf("(%u,%u)",
|
|
ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&(itup->t_tid)),
|
|
ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(&(itup->t_tid)));
|
|
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("high key invariant violated for index \"%s\"",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Index tid=%s points to %s tid=%s page lsn=%X/%X.",
|
|
itid,
|
|
P_ISLEAF(topaque) ? "heap" : "index",
|
|
htid,
|
|
(uint32) (state->targetlsn >> 32),
|
|
(uint32) state->targetlsn)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* * Item order check *
|
|
*
|
|
* Check that items are stored on page in logical order, by checking
|
|
* current item is less than or equal to next item (if any).
|
|
*/
|
|
if (OffsetNumberNext(offset) <= max &&
|
|
!invariant_leq_offset(state, skey,
|
|
OffsetNumberNext(offset)))
|
|
{
|
|
char *itid,
|
|
*htid,
|
|
*nitid,
|
|
*nhtid;
|
|
|
|
itid = psprintf("(%u,%u)", state->targetblock, offset);
|
|
htid = psprintf("(%u,%u)",
|
|
ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&(itup->t_tid)),
|
|
ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(&(itup->t_tid)));
|
|
nitid = psprintf("(%u,%u)", state->targetblock,
|
|
OffsetNumberNext(offset));
|
|
|
|
/* Reuse itup to get pointed-to heap location of second item */
|
|
itemid = PageGetItemId(state->target, OffsetNumberNext(offset));
|
|
itup = (IndexTuple) PageGetItem(state->target, itemid);
|
|
nhtid = psprintf("(%u,%u)",
|
|
ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&(itup->t_tid)),
|
|
ItemPointerGetOffsetNumber(&(itup->t_tid)));
|
|
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("item order invariant violated for index \"%s\"",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Lower index tid=%s (points to %s tid=%s) "
|
|
"higher index tid=%s (points to %s tid=%s) "
|
|
"page lsn=%X/%X.",
|
|
itid,
|
|
P_ISLEAF(topaque) ? "heap" : "index",
|
|
htid,
|
|
nitid,
|
|
P_ISLEAF(topaque) ? "heap" : "index",
|
|
nhtid,
|
|
(uint32) (state->targetlsn >> 32),
|
|
(uint32) state->targetlsn)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* * Last item check *
|
|
*
|
|
* Check last item against next/right page's first data item's when
|
|
* last item on page is reached. This additional check can detect
|
|
* transposed pages.
|
|
*
|
|
* This check is similar to the item order check that will have
|
|
* already been performed for every other "real" item on target page
|
|
* when last item is checked. The difference is that the next item
|
|
* (the item that is compared to target's last item) needs to come
|
|
* from the next/sibling page. There may not be such an item
|
|
* available from sibling for various reasons, though (e.g., target is
|
|
* the rightmost page on level).
|
|
*/
|
|
else if (offset == max)
|
|
{
|
|
ScanKey rightkey;
|
|
|
|
/* Get item in next/right page */
|
|
rightkey = bt_right_page_check_scankey(state);
|
|
|
|
if (rightkey &&
|
|
!invariant_geq_offset(state, rightkey, max))
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* As explained at length in bt_right_page_check_scankey(),
|
|
* there is a known !readonly race that could account for
|
|
* apparent violation of invariant, which we must check for
|
|
* before actually proceeding with raising error. Our canary
|
|
* condition is that target page was deleted.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!state->readonly)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Get fresh copy of target page */
|
|
state->target = palloc_btree_page(state, state->targetblock);
|
|
/* Note that we deliberately do not update target LSN */
|
|
topaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(state->target);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* All !readonly checks now performed; just return
|
|
*/
|
|
if (P_IGNORE(topaque))
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("cross page item order invariant violated for index \"%s\"",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Last item on page tid=(%u,%u) page lsn=%X/%X.",
|
|
state->targetblock, offset,
|
|
(uint32) (state->targetlsn >> 32),
|
|
(uint32) state->targetlsn)));
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* * Downlink check *
|
|
*
|
|
* Additional check of child items iff this is an internal page and
|
|
* caller holds a ShareLock. This happens for every downlink (item)
|
|
* in target excluding the negative-infinity downlink (again, this is
|
|
* because it has no useful value to compare).
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!P_ISLEAF(topaque) && state->readonly)
|
|
{
|
|
BlockNumber childblock = ItemPointerGetBlockNumber(&(itup->t_tid));
|
|
|
|
bt_downlink_check(state, childblock, skey);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Return a scankey for an item on page to right of current target (or the
|
|
* first non-ignorable page), sufficient to check ordering invariant on last
|
|
* item in current target page. Returned scankey relies on local memory
|
|
* allocated for the child page, which caller cannot pfree(). Caller's memory
|
|
* context should be reset between calls here.
|
|
*
|
|
* This is the first data item, and so all adjacent items are checked against
|
|
* their immediate sibling item (which may be on a sibling page, or even a
|
|
* "cousin" page at parent boundaries where target's rightlink points to page
|
|
* with different parent page). If no such valid item is available, return
|
|
* NULL instead.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that !readonly callers must reverify that target page has not
|
|
* been concurrently deleted.
|
|
*/
|
|
static ScanKey
|
|
bt_right_page_check_scankey(BtreeCheckState *state)
|
|
{
|
|
BTPageOpaque opaque;
|
|
ItemId rightitem;
|
|
BlockNumber targetnext;
|
|
Page rightpage;
|
|
OffsetNumber nline;
|
|
|
|
/* Determine target's next block number */
|
|
opaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(state->target);
|
|
|
|
/* If target is already rightmost, no right sibling; nothing to do here */
|
|
if (P_RIGHTMOST(opaque))
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* General notes on concurrent page splits and page deletion:
|
|
*
|
|
* Routines like _bt_search() don't require *any* page split interlock
|
|
* when descending the tree, including something very light like a buffer
|
|
* pin. That's why it's okay that we don't either. This avoidance of any
|
|
* need to "couple" buffer locks is the raison d' etre of the Lehman & Yao
|
|
* algorithm, in fact.
|
|
*
|
|
* That leaves deletion. A deleted page won't actually be recycled by
|
|
* VACUUM early enough for us to fail to at least follow its right link
|
|
* (or left link, or downlink) and find its sibling, because recycling
|
|
* does not occur until no possible index scan could land on the page.
|
|
* Index scans can follow links with nothing more than their snapshot as
|
|
* an interlock and be sure of at least that much. (See page
|
|
* recycling/RecentGlobalXmin notes in nbtree README.)
|
|
*
|
|
* Furthermore, it's okay if we follow a rightlink and find a half-dead or
|
|
* dead (ignorable) page one or more times. There will either be a
|
|
* further right link to follow that leads to a live page before too long
|
|
* (before passing by parent's rightmost child), or we will find the end
|
|
* of the entire level instead (possible when parent page is itself the
|
|
* rightmost on its level).
|
|
*/
|
|
targetnext = opaque->btpo_next;
|
|
for (;;)
|
|
{
|
|
CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS();
|
|
|
|
rightpage = palloc_btree_page(state, targetnext);
|
|
opaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(rightpage);
|
|
|
|
if (!P_IGNORE(opaque) || P_RIGHTMOST(opaque))
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
/* We landed on a deleted page, so step right to find a live page */
|
|
targetnext = opaque->btpo_next;
|
|
ereport(DEBUG1,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_NO_DATA),
|
|
errmsg("level %u leftmost page of index \"%s\" was found deleted or half dead",
|
|
opaque->btpo.level, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Deleted page found when building scankey from right sibling.")));
|
|
|
|
/* Be slightly more pro-active in freeing this memory, just in case */
|
|
pfree(rightpage);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* No ShareLock held case -- why it's safe to proceed.
|
|
*
|
|
* Problem:
|
|
*
|
|
* We must avoid false positive reports of corruption when caller treats
|
|
* item returned here as an upper bound on target's last item. In
|
|
* general, false positives are disallowed. Avoiding them here when
|
|
* caller is !readonly is subtle.
|
|
*
|
|
* A concurrent page deletion by VACUUM of the target page can result in
|
|
* the insertion of items on to this right sibling page that would
|
|
* previously have been inserted on our target page. There might have
|
|
* been insertions that followed the target's downlink after it was made
|
|
* to point to right sibling instead of target by page deletion's first
|
|
* phase. The inserters insert items that would belong on target page.
|
|
* This race is very tight, but it's possible. This is our only problem.
|
|
*
|
|
* Non-problems:
|
|
*
|
|
* We are not hindered by a concurrent page split of the target; we'll
|
|
* never land on the second half of the page anyway. A concurrent split
|
|
* of the right page will also not matter, because the first data item
|
|
* remains the same within the left half, which we'll reliably land on. If
|
|
* we had to skip over ignorable/deleted pages, it cannot matter because
|
|
* their key space has already been atomically merged with the first
|
|
* non-ignorable page we eventually find (doesn't matter whether the page
|
|
* we eventually find is a true sibling or a cousin of target, which we go
|
|
* into below).
|
|
*
|
|
* Solution:
|
|
*
|
|
* Caller knows that it should reverify that target is not ignorable
|
|
* (half-dead or deleted) when cross-page sibling item comparison appears
|
|
* to indicate corruption (invariant fails). This detects the single race
|
|
* condition that exists for caller. This is correct because the
|
|
* continued existence of target block as non-ignorable (not half-dead or
|
|
* deleted) implies that target page was not merged into from the right by
|
|
* deletion; the key space at or after target never moved left. Target's
|
|
* parent either has the same downlink to target as before, or a <=
|
|
* downlink due to deletion at the left of target. Target either has the
|
|
* same highkey as before, or a highkey <= before when there is a page
|
|
* split. (The rightmost concurrently-split-from-target-page page will
|
|
* still have the same highkey as target was originally found to have,
|
|
* which for our purposes is equivalent to target's highkey itself never
|
|
* changing, since we reliably skip over
|
|
* concurrently-split-from-target-page pages.)
|
|
*
|
|
* In simpler terms, we allow that the key space of the target may expand
|
|
* left (the key space can move left on the left side of target only), but
|
|
* the target key space cannot expand right and get ahead of us without
|
|
* our detecting it. The key space of the target cannot shrink, unless it
|
|
* shrinks to zero due to the deletion of the original page, our canary
|
|
* condition. (To be very precise, we're a bit stricter than that because
|
|
* it might just have been that the target page split and only the
|
|
* original target page was deleted. We can be more strict, just not more
|
|
* lax.)
|
|
*
|
|
* Top level tree walk caller moves on to next page (makes it the new
|
|
* target) following recovery from this race. (cf. The rationale for
|
|
* child/downlink verification needing a ShareLock within
|
|
* bt_downlink_check(), where page deletion is also the main source of
|
|
* trouble.)
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that it doesn't matter if right sibling page here is actually a
|
|
* cousin page, because in order for the key space to be readjusted in a
|
|
* way that causes us issues in next level up (guiding problematic
|
|
* concurrent insertions to the cousin from the grandparent rather than to
|
|
* the sibling from the parent), there'd have to be page deletion of
|
|
* target's parent page (affecting target's parent's downlink in target's
|
|
* grandparent page). Internal page deletion only occurs when there are
|
|
* no child pages (they were all fully deleted), and caller is checking
|
|
* that the target's parent has at least one non-deleted (so
|
|
* non-ignorable) child: the target page. (Note that the first phase of
|
|
* deletion atomically marks the page to be deleted half-dead/ignorable at
|
|
* the same time downlink in its parent is removed, so caller will
|
|
* definitely not fail to detect that this happened.)
|
|
*
|
|
* This trick is inspired by the method backward scans use for dealing
|
|
* with concurrent page splits; concurrent page deletion is a problem that
|
|
* similarly receives special consideration sometimes (it's possible that
|
|
* the backwards scan will re-read its "original" block after failing to
|
|
* find a right-link to it, having already moved in the opposite direction
|
|
* (right/"forwards") a few times to try to locate one). Just like us,
|
|
* that happens only to determine if there was a concurrent page deletion
|
|
* of a reference page, and just like us if there was a page deletion of
|
|
* that reference page it means we can move on from caring about the
|
|
* reference page. See the nbtree README for a full description of how
|
|
* that works.
|
|
*/
|
|
nline = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(rightpage);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Get first data item, if any
|
|
*/
|
|
if (P_ISLEAF(opaque) && nline >= P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque))
|
|
{
|
|
/* Return first data item (if any) */
|
|
rightitem = PageGetItemId(rightpage, P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque));
|
|
}
|
|
else if (!P_ISLEAF(opaque) &&
|
|
nline >= OffsetNumberNext(P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque)))
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* Return first item after the internal page's "negative infinity"
|
|
* item
|
|
*/
|
|
rightitem = PageGetItemId(rightpage,
|
|
OffsetNumberNext(P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque)));
|
|
}
|
|
else
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* No first item. Page is probably empty leaf page, but it's also
|
|
* possible that it's an internal page with only a negative infinity
|
|
* item.
|
|
*/
|
|
ereport(DEBUG1,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_NO_DATA),
|
|
errmsg("%s block %u of index \"%s\" has no first data item",
|
|
P_ISLEAF(opaque) ? "leaf" : "internal", targetnext,
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
return NULL;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Return first real item scankey. Note that this relies on right page
|
|
* memory remaining allocated.
|
|
*/
|
|
return _bt_mkscankey(state->rel,
|
|
(IndexTuple) PageGetItem(rightpage, rightitem));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Checks one of target's downlink against its child page.
|
|
*
|
|
* Conceptually, the target page continues to be what is checked here. The
|
|
* target block is still blamed in the event of finding an invariant violation.
|
|
* The downlink insertion into the target is probably where any problem raised
|
|
* here arises, and there is no such thing as a parent link, so doing the
|
|
* verification this way around is much more practical.
|
|
*/
|
|
static void
|
|
bt_downlink_check(BtreeCheckState *state, BlockNumber childblock,
|
|
ScanKey targetkey)
|
|
{
|
|
OffsetNumber offset;
|
|
OffsetNumber maxoffset;
|
|
Page child;
|
|
BTPageOpaque copaque;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Caller must have ShareLock on target relation, because of
|
|
* considerations around page deletion by VACUUM.
|
|
*
|
|
* NB: In general, page deletion deletes the right sibling's downlink, not
|
|
* the downlink of the page being deleted; the deleted page's downlink is
|
|
* reused for its sibling. The key space is thereby consolidated between
|
|
* the deleted page and its right sibling. (We cannot delete a parent
|
|
* page's rightmost child unless it is the last child page, and we intend
|
|
* to also delete the parent itself.)
|
|
*
|
|
* If this verification happened without a ShareLock, the following race
|
|
* condition could cause false positives:
|
|
*
|
|
* In general, concurrent page deletion might occur, including deletion of
|
|
* the left sibling of the child page that is examined here. If such a
|
|
* page deletion were to occur, closely followed by an insertion into the
|
|
* newly expanded key space of the child, a window for the false positive
|
|
* opens up: the stale parent/target downlink originally followed to get
|
|
* to the child legitimately ceases to be a lower bound on all items in
|
|
* the page, since the key space was concurrently expanded "left".
|
|
* (Insertion followed the "new" downlink for the child, not our now-stale
|
|
* downlink, which was concurrently physically removed in target/parent as
|
|
* part of deletion's first phase.)
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that while the cross-page-same-level last item check uses a trick
|
|
* that allows it to perform verification for !readonly callers, a similar
|
|
* trick seems difficult here. The trick that that other check uses is,
|
|
* in essence, to lock down race conditions to those that occur due to
|
|
* concurrent page deletion of the target; that's a race that can be
|
|
* reliably detected before actually reporting corruption.
|
|
*
|
|
* On the other hand, we'd need to lock down race conditions involving
|
|
* deletion of child's left page, for long enough to read the child page
|
|
* into memory (in other words, a scheme with concurrently held buffer
|
|
* locks on both child and left-of-child pages). That's unacceptable for
|
|
* amcheck functions on general principle, though.
|
|
*/
|
|
Assert(state->readonly);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Verify child page has the downlink key from target page (its parent) as
|
|
* a lower bound.
|
|
*
|
|
* Check all items, rather than checking just the first and trusting that
|
|
* the operator class obeys the transitive law.
|
|
*/
|
|
child = palloc_btree_page(state, childblock);
|
|
copaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(child);
|
|
maxoffset = PageGetMaxOffsetNumber(child);
|
|
|
|
for (offset = P_FIRSTDATAKEY(copaque);
|
|
offset <= maxoffset;
|
|
offset = OffsetNumberNext(offset))
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* Skip comparison of target page key against "negative infinity"
|
|
* item, if any. Checking it would indicate that it's not an upper
|
|
* bound, but that's only because of the hard-coding within
|
|
* _bt_compare().
|
|
*/
|
|
if (offset_is_negative_infinity(copaque, offset))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (!invariant_leq_nontarget_offset(state, child,
|
|
targetkey, offset))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("down-link lower bound invariant violated for index \"%s\"",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel)),
|
|
errdetail_internal("Parent block=%u child index tid=(%u,%u) parent page lsn=%X/%X.",
|
|
state->targetblock, childblock, offset,
|
|
(uint32) (state->targetlsn >> 32),
|
|
(uint32) state->targetlsn)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pfree(child);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Is particular offset within page (whose special state is passed by caller)
|
|
* the page negative-infinity item?
|
|
*
|
|
* As noted in comments above _bt_compare(), there is special handling of the
|
|
* first data item as a "negative infinity" item. The hard-coding within
|
|
* _bt_compare() makes comparing this item for the purposes of verification
|
|
* pointless at best, since the IndexTuple only contains a valid TID (a
|
|
* reference TID to child page).
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline bool
|
|
offset_is_negative_infinity(BTPageOpaque opaque, OffsetNumber offset)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* For internal pages only, the first item after high key, if any, is
|
|
* negative infinity item. Internal pages always have a negative infinity
|
|
* item, whereas leaf pages never have one. This implies that negative
|
|
* infinity item is either first or second line item, or there is none
|
|
* within page.
|
|
*
|
|
* Right-most pages don't have a high key, but could be said to
|
|
* conceptually have a "positive infinity" high key. Thus, there is a
|
|
* symmetry between down link items in parent pages, and high keys in
|
|
* children. Together, they represent the part of the key space that
|
|
* belongs to each page in the index. For example, all children of the
|
|
* root page will have negative infinity as a lower bound from root
|
|
* negative infinity downlink, and positive infinity as an upper bound
|
|
* (implicitly, from "imaginary" positive infinity high key in root).
|
|
*/
|
|
return !P_ISLEAF(opaque) && offset == P_FIRSTDATAKEY(opaque);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Does the invariant hold that the key is less than or equal to a given upper
|
|
* bound offset item?
|
|
*
|
|
* If this function returns false, convention is that caller throws error due
|
|
* to corruption.
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline bool
|
|
invariant_leq_offset(BtreeCheckState *state, ScanKey key,
|
|
OffsetNumber upperbound)
|
|
{
|
|
int16 natts = state->rel->rd_rel->relnatts;
|
|
int32 cmp;
|
|
|
|
cmp = _bt_compare(state->rel, natts, key, state->target, upperbound);
|
|
|
|
return cmp <= 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Does the invariant hold that the key is greater than or equal to a given
|
|
* lower bound offset item?
|
|
*
|
|
* If this function returns false, convention is that caller throws error due
|
|
* to corruption.
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline bool
|
|
invariant_geq_offset(BtreeCheckState *state, ScanKey key,
|
|
OffsetNumber lowerbound)
|
|
{
|
|
int16 natts = state->rel->rd_rel->relnatts;
|
|
int32 cmp;
|
|
|
|
cmp = _bt_compare(state->rel, natts, key, state->target, lowerbound);
|
|
|
|
return cmp >= 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Does the invariant hold that the key is less than or equal to a given upper
|
|
* bound offset item, with the offset relating to a caller-supplied page that
|
|
* is not the current target page? Caller's non-target page is typically a
|
|
* child page of the target, checked as part of checking a property of the
|
|
* target page (i.e. the key comes from the target).
|
|
*
|
|
* If this function returns false, convention is that caller throws error due
|
|
* to corruption.
|
|
*/
|
|
static inline bool
|
|
invariant_leq_nontarget_offset(BtreeCheckState *state,
|
|
Page nontarget, ScanKey key,
|
|
OffsetNumber upperbound)
|
|
{
|
|
int16 natts = state->rel->rd_rel->relnatts;
|
|
int32 cmp;
|
|
|
|
cmp = _bt_compare(state->rel, natts, key, nontarget, upperbound);
|
|
|
|
return cmp <= 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Given a block number of a B-Tree page, return page in palloc()'d memory.
|
|
* While at it, perform some basic checks of the page.
|
|
*
|
|
* There is never an attempt to get a consistent view of multiple pages using
|
|
* multiple concurrent buffer locks; in general, we only acquire a single pin
|
|
* and buffer lock at a time, which is often all that the nbtree code requires.
|
|
*
|
|
* Operating on a copy of the page is useful because it prevents control
|
|
* getting stuck in an uninterruptible state when an underlying operator class
|
|
* misbehaves.
|
|
*/
|
|
static Page
|
|
palloc_btree_page(BtreeCheckState *state, BlockNumber blocknum)
|
|
{
|
|
Buffer buffer;
|
|
Page page;
|
|
BTPageOpaque opaque;
|
|
|
|
page = palloc(BLCKSZ);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* We copy the page into local storage to avoid holding pin on the buffer
|
|
* longer than we must.
|
|
*/
|
|
buffer = ReadBufferExtended(state->rel, MAIN_FORKNUM, blocknum, RBM_NORMAL,
|
|
state->checkstrategy);
|
|
LockBuffer(buffer, BT_READ);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Perform the same basic sanity checking that nbtree itself performs for
|
|
* every page:
|
|
*/
|
|
_bt_checkpage(state->rel, buffer);
|
|
|
|
/* Only use copy of page in palloc()'d memory */
|
|
memcpy(page, BufferGetPage(buffer), BLCKSZ);
|
|
UnlockReleaseBuffer(buffer);
|
|
|
|
opaque = (BTPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(page);
|
|
|
|
if (P_ISMETA(opaque) && blocknum != BTREE_METAPAGE)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("invalid meta page found at block %u in index \"%s\"",
|
|
blocknum, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
|
|
/* Check page from block that ought to be meta page */
|
|
if (blocknum == BTREE_METAPAGE)
|
|
{
|
|
BTMetaPageData *metad = BTPageGetMeta(page);
|
|
|
|
if (!P_ISMETA(opaque) ||
|
|
metad->btm_magic != BTREE_MAGIC)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("index \"%s\" meta page is corrupt",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
|
|
if (metad->btm_version != BTREE_VERSION)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("version mismatch in index \"%s\": file version %d, code version %d",
|
|
RelationGetRelationName(state->rel),
|
|
metad->btm_version, BTREE_VERSION)));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Deleted pages have no sane "level" field, so can only check non-deleted
|
|
* page level
|
|
*/
|
|
if (P_ISLEAF(opaque) && !P_ISDELETED(opaque) && opaque->btpo.level != 0)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("invalid leaf page level %u for block %u in index \"%s\"",
|
|
opaque->btpo.level, blocknum, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
|
|
if (blocknum != BTREE_METAPAGE && !P_ISLEAF(opaque) &&
|
|
!P_ISDELETED(opaque) && opaque->btpo.level == 0)
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("invalid internal page level 0 for block %u in index \"%s\"",
|
|
opaque->btpo.level, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
|
|
if (!P_ISLEAF(opaque) && P_HAS_GARBAGE(opaque))
|
|
ereport(ERROR,
|
|
(errcode(ERRCODE_INDEX_CORRUPTED),
|
|
errmsg("internal page block %u in index \"%s\" has garbage items",
|
|
blocknum, RelationGetRelationName(state->rel))));
|
|
|
|
return page;
|
|
}
|