postgresql/doc/README.flex
1996-08-18 22:14:33 +00:00

148 lines
3.6 KiB
Plaintext

From: ernst.molitor@uni-bonn.de
Hi,
thank you for the latest Postgres95 distribution!
>does the createuser bug still persist, or have
>we finally worked that one out?
As has been indication by Bruce Momjian, the createuser problem was
caused by a bug in flex 2.5.3 (which has been confirmed by Vern
Paxson, the flex maintainer - many thanks to them); the bug will be
fixed in flex 2.5.4. Vern Paxson has been so kind as to supply me with
a patch that will be part of the 2.5.4 release; I'm including it below
in case someone has installed flex 2.5.3 and doesn't want to go
back to 2.5.2...
Regards,
Ernst
---
*** flex-2.5.3/flex.skl Sat May 25 21:02:33 1996
--- flex.skl Tue Jul 2 16:35:49 1996
***************
*** 1,7 ****
/* A lexical scanner generated by flex */
/* Scanner skeleton version:
! * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/Attic/README.flex,v 1.1.1.1 1996/08/18 22:14:17 scrappy Exp $
*/
#define FLEX_SCANNER
--- 1,7 ----
/* A lexical scanner generated by flex */
/* Scanner skeleton version:
! * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/Attic/README.flex,v 1.1.1.1 1996/08/18 22:14:17 scrappy Exp $
*/
#define FLEX_SCANNER
***************
*** 783,789 ****
/* don't do the read, it's not guaranteed to return an EOF,
* just force an EOF
*/
! yy_n_chars = 0;
else
{
--- 783,789 ----
/* don't do the read, it's not guaranteed to return an EOF,
* just force an EOF
*/
! yy_current_buffer->yy_n_chars = yy_n_chars = 0;
else
{
***************
*** 838,843 ****
--- 838,845 ----
/* Read in more data. */
YY_INPUT( (&yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf[number_to_move]),
yy_n_chars, num_to_read );
+
+ yy_current_buffer->yy_n_chars = yy_n_chars;
}
if ( yy_n_chars == 0 )
***************
*** 947,953 ****
yy_cp += (int) (dest - source);
yy_bp += (int) (dest - source);
! yy_n_chars = yy_current_buffer->yy_buf_size;
if ( yy_cp < yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf + 2 )
YY_FATAL_ERROR( "flex scanner push-back overflow" );
--- 949,956 ----
yy_cp += (int) (dest - source);
yy_bp += (int) (dest - source);
! yy_current_buffer->yy_n_chars =
! yy_n_chars = yy_current_buffer->yy_buf_size;
if ( yy_cp < yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf + 2 )
YY_FATAL_ERROR( "flex scanner push-back overflow" );
***************
*** 997,1009 ****
switch ( yy_get_next_buffer() )
{
case EOB_ACT_END_OF_FILE:
{
if ( yywrap() )
- {
- yy_c_buf_p = yytext_ptr + offset;
return EOF;
- }
if ( ! yy_did_buffer_switch_on_eof )
YY_NEW_FILE;
--- 1000,1025 ----
switch ( yy_get_next_buffer() )
{
+ case EOB_ACT_LAST_MATCH:
+ /* This happens because yy_g_n_b()
+ * sees that we've accumulated a
+ * token and flags that we need to
+ * try matching the token before
+ * proceeding. But for input(),
+ * there's no matching to consider.
+ * So convert the EOB_ACT_LAST_MATCH
+ * to EOB_ACT_END_OF_FILE.
+ */
+
+ /* Reset buffer status. */
+ yyrestart( yyin );
+
+ /* fall through */
+
case EOB_ACT_END_OF_FILE:
{
if ( yywrap() )
return EOF;
if ( ! yy_did_buffer_switch_on_eof )
YY_NEW_FILE;
***************
*** 1017,1031 ****
case EOB_ACT_CONTINUE_SCAN:
yy_c_buf_p = yytext_ptr + offset;
break;
-
- case EOB_ACT_LAST_MATCH:
- #ifdef __cplusplus
- YY_FATAL_ERROR(
- "unexpected last match in yyinput()" );
- #else
- YY_FATAL_ERROR(
- "unexpected last match in input()" );
- #endif
}
}
}
--- 1033,1038 ----