The planner will now add a given PartitioPruneInfo to
PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos instead of directly to the
Append/MergeAppend plan node. What gets set instead in the
latter is an index field which points to the list element
of PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos containing the PartitioPruneInfo
belonging to the plan node.
A later commit will make AcquireExecutorLocks() do the initial
partition pruning to determine a minimal set of partitions to be
locked when validating a plan tree and it will need to consult the
PartitioPruneInfos referenced therein to do so. It would be better
for the PartitioPruneInfos to be accessible directly than requiring
a walk of the plan tree to find them, which is easier when it can be
done by simply iterating over PlannedStmt.partPruneInfos.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFGkMSge6TgC9KQzde0ohpAycLQuV7ooitEEpbKB0O_mg@mail.gmail.com
Matviews have been discarded from needing predicate locks since 3bf3ab8
and their introduction. At this point, there was no concurrent flavor
of REFRESH yet, hence there was no meaning in having materialized views
look at read/write conflicts with concurrent transactions using
themselves the serializable isolation level because they could only be
refreshed with an access exclusive lock. CONCURRENTLY, on the contrary,
allows reads and writes during a refresh as it holds a share update
exclusive lock.
Some isolation tests are added to show the effect of the change, with a
combination of one table and a matview based on it, using a mix of
REFRESH CONCURRENTLY and read/write queries.
This could arguably be considered as a bug, but as it is a subtle
behavior change potentially impacting applications no backpatch is
done.
Author: Yugo Nagata
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo, Dilip Kumar, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220726164434.42d4e33911b4b4fcf751c4e7@sraoss.co.jp
Writing "pg_regress --dbname= ..." led to a crash, because
we weren't expecting there to be no database name supplied.
It doesn't seem like a great idea to run regression tests
in whatever is the user's default database; so rather than
supporting this case let's explicitly reject it.
Per report from Xing Guo. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACpMh+A8cRvtvtOWVAZsCM1DU81GK4DL26R83y6ugZ1osV=ifA@mail.gmail.com
A future commit will move the checkAsUser field from RangeTblEntry
to a new node that, unlike RTEs, will only be created for tables
mentioned in the query but not for the inheritance child relations
added to the query by the planner. So, checkAsUser value for a
given child relation will have to be obtained by referring to that
for its ancestor mentioned in the query.
In preparation, it seems better to expand the use of RelOptInfo.userid
during planning in place of rte->checkAsUser so that there will be
fewer places to adjust for the above change.
Given that the child-to-ancestor mapping is not available during the
execution of a given "child" ForeignScan node, add a checkAsUser
field to ForeignScan to carry the child relation's RelOptInfo.userid.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGFCs2uq7VRKi7g+FFKbP6Ea_2_HkgZb2HPhUfaAKT3ng@mail.gmail.com
This adds coverage for a few scenarios not checked yet in psql, with
multiple query combined across files defined by \o, \g or both at the
same time. The results are saved in the output files defined, then
reloaded back to check what has been written to them.
Author: Daniel Verite
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25c2bb5b-9012-40f8-8088-774cb764046d@manitou-mail.org
This also adds references to this new chapter at relevant sections of
our documentation. Previously much of these internal details were
exposed to users, but not explained. This also updates RELEASE
SAVEPOINT.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-E_iy9fmrErxrCh8TZTyenpfo72Hf_XD2HLDppva4dUNA@mail.gmail.com
Author: Simon Riggs, Laurenz Albe
Reviewed-by: Bruce Momjian
Backpatch-through: 11
This commit moves the code in charge of deparsing the method and detail
strings fed later to parse_compress_specification() to a common routine,
where the backward-compatible case of only an integer being found (N
= 0 => "none", N > 1 => gzip at level N) is handled.
Note that this has a side-effect for pg_basebackup, as we now attempt to
detect "server-" and "client-" before checking for the integer-only
pre-14 grammar, where values like server-N and client-N (without the
follow-up detail string) are now valid rather than failing because of an
unsupported method name. Past grammars are still handled the same way,
but these flavors are now authorized, and would now switch to consider N
= 0 as no compression and N > 1 as gzip with the compression level used
as N, with the caller still controlling if the compression method should
be done server-side, client-side or is unspecified. The documentation
of pg_basebackup is updated to reflect that.
This benefits other code paths that would like to rely on the same logic
as pg_basebackup and pg_receivewal with option values used for
compression specifications, one area discussed lately being pg_dump.
Author: Georgios Kokolatos, Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/O4mutIrCES8ZhlXJiMvzsivT7ztAMja2lkdL1LJx6O5f22I2W8PBIeLKz7mDLwxHoibcnRAYJXm1pH4tyUNC4a8eDzLn22a6Pb1S74Niexg=@pm.me
The frontend-side routine in charge of building a SCRAM verifier
mentioned that the restrictions applying to SASLprep on the password
with the encoding are described at the top of fe-auth-scram.c, but this
information is in auth-scram.c.
This is wrong since 8f8b9be, so backpatch all the way down as this is an
important documentation bit.
Spotted while reviewing a different patch.
Backpatch-through: 11
Previously, we'd compress only when the active range of array entries
reached Max(4 * PROCARRAY_MAXPROCS, 2 * pArray->numKnownAssignedXids).
If max_connections is large, the first term could result in not
compressing for a long time, resulting in much wastage of cycles in
hot-standby backends scanning the array to take snapshots. Get rid
of that term, and just bound it to 2 * pArray->numKnownAssignedXids.
That however creates the opposite risk, that we might spend too much
effort compressing. Hence, consider compressing only once every 128
commit records. (This frequency was chosen by benchmarking. While
we only tried one benchmark scenario, the results seem stable over
a fairly wide range of frequencies.)
Also, force compression when processing RecoveryInfo WAL records
(which should be infrequent); the old code could perform compression
then, but would do so only after the same array-range check as for
the transaction-commit path.
Also, opportunistically run compression if the startup process is about
to wait for WAL, though not oftener than once a second. This should
prevent cases where we waste lots of time by leaving the array
not-compressed for long intervals due to low WAL traffic.
Lastly, add a simple check to keep us from uselessly compressing
when the array storage is already compact.
Back-patch, as the performance problem is worse in pre-v14 branches
than in HEAD.
Simon Riggs and Michail Nikolaev, with help from Tom Lane and
Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALdSSPgahNUD_=pB_j=1zSnDBaiOtqVfzo8Ejt5J_k7qZiU1Tw@mail.gmail.com
This is an oversight in commit 7c337b6b5: I apparently didn't think
about the possibility of a SQL function being executed multiple
times within a query. In that case, functions.c's primitive caching
mechanism allows the same utility parse tree to be presented for
execution more than once. We have to tell ProcessUtility to make
a working copy of the parse tree, or bad things happen.
Normally I'd add a regression test, but I think the reported crasher
is dependent on some rather random implementation choices that are
nowhere near functions.c, so its usefulness as a long-lived test
feels questionable. In any case, this fix is clearly correct given
the design choices of 7c337b6b5.
Per bug #17702 from Xin Wen. Thanks to Daniel Gustafsson for
analysis. Back-patch to v14 where the faulty commit came in
(before that, the responsibility for copying scribble-able
utility parse trees lay elsewhere).
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17702-ad24fdcdd1e9047a@postgresql.org
The JOIN_SEMI case Assert'ed that there are no PlaceHolderVars that
need to be evaluated at the semijoin's RHS, which is wrong because
there could be some in the semijoin's qual condition. However, there
could not be any references further up than that, and within the qual
there is not any way that such a PHV could have gone to null yet, so
we don't really need the PHV and there is no need to avoid making the
RHS-removal optimization. The upshot is that there's no actual bug
in production code, and we ought to just remove this misguided Assert.
While we're here, also drop the JOIN_RIGHT case, which is dead code
because reduce_outer_joins() already got rid of JOIN_RIGHT.
Per bug #17700 from Xin Wen. Uselessness of the JOIN_RIGHT case
pointed out by Richard Guo. Back-patch to v12 where this code
was added.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17700-2b5c10d917c30687@postgresql.org
When it's given as true, return a 0 in the position of the missing
column rather than raising an error.
This is currently unused, but it allows us to reimplement column
permission checking in a subsequent commit. It seems worth breaking
into a separate commit because it affects unrelated code.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqFfiai=qBxPDTjaio_ZcaqUKh+FC=prESrB8ogZgFNNNQ@mail.gmail.com
Previously, an idle startup (recovery) process would wake up every 5
seconds to have a chance to poll for promote_trigger_file, even if that
GUC was not configured. That promotion triggering mechanism was
effectively superseded by pg_ctl promote and pg_promote() a long time
ago. There probably aren't many users left and it's very easy to change
to the modern mechanisms, so we agreed to remove the feature.
This is part of a campaign to reduce wakeups on idle systems.
Author: Simon Riggs <simon.riggs@enterprisedb.com>
Reviewed-by: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-FsjnzVOQGBpQ589%3DnWuL1Ex0Ykn74Nh1hEjp2usZSR5g%40mail.gmail.com
This provides two new predefined roles: pg_vacuum_all_tables and
pg_analyze_all_tables. Roles which have been granted these roles can
perform vacuum or analyse respectively on any or all tables as if they
were a superuser. This removes the need to grant superuser privilege to
roles just so they can perform vacuum and/or analyze.
Nathan Bossart
Reviewed by: Bharath Rupireddy, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Stephen Frost, Robert
Haas, Mark Dilger, Tom Lane, Corey Huinker, David G. Johnston, Michael
Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220722203735.GB3996698@nathanxps13
Currently a table can only be vacuumed or analyzed by its owner or
a superuser. This can now be extended to any user by means of an
appropriate GRANT.
Nathan Bossart
Reviewed by: Bharath Rupireddy, Kyotaro Horiguchi, Stephen Frost, Robert
Haas, Mark Dilger, Tom Lane, Corey Huinker, David G. Johnston, Michael
Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220722203735.GB3996698@nathanxps13
This commit adds a basic set of authentication tests to check after the
new keywords added by a54b658 for the HBA and ident files, aka
"include", "include_if_exists" and "include_dir".
This includes checks for all the positive cases originally proposed,
where valid contents are generated for the HBA and ident files without
any errors happening in the server, checking as well the contents of
their respective system views. The error handling will be evaluated
separately (-DEXEC_BACKEND makes that trickier), and what we have here
covers most of the ground I would like to see covered if one manipulates
the tokenization logic of hba.c in the future.
While on it, some coverage is added for files included with '@' for
database or user name lists.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220223045959.35ipdsvbxcstrhya@jrouhaud
When loading plperl built against Strawberry perl or the msys2 ucrt perl
that have been built with gcc, a binary mismatch has been encountered
which looks like this:
loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got handshake key 0000000012800080, needed 0000000012900080)
To cure this we bring the handshake keys into sync by adding
NO_THREAD_SAFE_LOCALE to the defines used to build plperl.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20211005004334.tgjmro4kuachwiuc@alap3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c2da86a0-2906-744c-923d-16da6047875e@dunslane.net
Backpatch to all live branches.
Commit 9b4eafcaf4 added creattion of a directory to reserve TAP test
ports at the top of the build tree. In a non-vpath build this means at
the top of the source tree, so it needs to be added to .gitignore.
As suggested by Michael Paquier
Backpatch to all live branches.
Two booleans used for timeout tracking were used within some SIGALRM
signal handlers, but they were not declared as sig_atomic_t, so mark
them as such. This has no consequence on WIN32 for both tools.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQArCDQQiPiFR16=yu9k5s2tp4tgEe1U1ZbkW4ofx81AWWQ@mail.gmail.com
Strawberry uses __builtin_expect which Visual C doesn't have. For this
case define it as a noop. Solution taken from vim sources.
Backpatch to all live branches
Commit b663a4136, which allowed FDWs to INSERT rows in bulk, added to
nodeModifyTable.c code to flush pending inserts to the foreign-table
result relation(s) before completing processing of the ModifyTable node,
but the code failed to take into account the case where the INSERT query
has modifying CTEs, leading to incorrect results.
Also, that commit failed to flush pending inserts before firing BEFORE
ROW triggers so that rows are visible to such triggers.
In that commit we scanned through EState's
es_tuple_routing_result_relations or es_opened_result_relations list to
find the foreign-table result relations to which pending inserts are
flushed, but that would be inefficient in some cases. So to fix, 1) add
a List member to EState to record the insert-pending result relations,
and 2) modify nodeModifyTable.c so that it adds the foreign-table result
relation to the list in ExecInsert() if appropriate, and flushes pending
inserts properly using the list where needed.
While here, fix a copy-and-pasteo in a comment in ExecBatchInsert(),
which was added by that commit.
Back-patch to v14 where that commit appeared.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16qutyCmyJJzgQOhfBq%3DNoGDqTB6O0QBZTihrbqre%2BoxA%40mail.gmail.com
Peer connections require support for local connections to work, but the
test missed the same check as the other ones in this suite. The
buildfarm does not run the authentication tests on Windows, and, more
surprisingly, the CI with meson was already able to skip it.
Author: Anton A. Melnikov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/28b9d685-9590-45b1-fe87-358d61c6950a@inbox.ru
The code has been assuming already in a few places that the initial
recursion nesting depth is 0, and the recent changes in hba.c (mainly
783e8c6) have relies on this assumption in more places. The maximum
recursion nesting level is assumed to be 10 for hba.c and GUCs.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221124090724.n7amf5kpdhx6vb76@jrouhaud
Logical WAL senders display now as follows, gaining a database name:
postgres: walsender USER DATABASE HOST(PORT) STATE
Physical WAL senders show up the same, as of:
postgres: walsender USER HOST(PORT) STATE
This information was missing, hence it was not possible to know from ps
if a WAL sender was a logical or a physical one, and on which database
it is connected when it is logical.
Author: Tatsuhiro Nakamori
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao, Bharath Rupireddy
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/36a3b137e82e0ea9fe7e4234f03b64a1@oss.nttdata.com
pg_hba.conf and pg_ident.conf gain support for three record keywords:
- "include", to include a file.
- "include_if_exists", to include a file, ignoring it if missing.
- "include_dir", to include a directory of files. These are classified
by name (C locale, mostly) and need to be prefixed by ".conf", hence
following the same rules as GUCs.
This commit relies on the refactoring pieces done in efc9816, ad6c528,
783e8c6 and 1b73d0b, adding a small wrapper to build a list of
TokenizedAuthLines (tokenize_include_file), and the code is shaped to
offer some symmetry with what is done for GUCs with the same options.
pg_hba_file_rules and pg_ident_file_mappings gain a new field called
file_name, to track from which file a record is located, taking
advantage of the addition of rule_number in c591300 to offer an
organized view of the HBA or ident records loaded.
Bump catalog version.
Author: Julien Rouhaud
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220223045959.35ipdsvbxcstrhya@jrouhaud
When building hash indexes using the spool method, tuples are added to the
index page in hashkey order. Because of this, we can safely skip
performing the binary search on the existing tuples on the page to find
the location to insert the tuple based on its hashkey value. For this
case, we can just always put the tuple at the end of the item array as the
tuples will always arrive in hashkey order.
Testing has shown that this can improve hash index build speeds by 5-15%
with a unique set of integer values.
Author: Simon Riggs
Reviewed-by: David Rowley
Tested-by: David Zhang, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CANbhV-GBc5JoG0AneUGPZZW3o4OK5LjBGeKe_icpC3R1McrZWQ@mail.gmail.com
The memory context was created before attempting to open the first HBA
or ident file, which would cause it to leak. This had no consequences
for the system views for HBA and ident files, but this would cause
memory leaks in the postmaster on reload if the initial HBA and/or ident
files are missing, which is a valid behavior while the backend is
running.
Oversight in efc9816.
Author: Ted Yu
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CALte62xH6ivgiKKzPRJgfekPZC6FKLB3xbnf3=tZmc_gKj78dw@mail.gmail.com
This should have been added in efc9816, but it looks like I have found a
way to mess up a bit a patch split. This should have no consequence in
practice, but let's be clean.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y324HvGKiWxW2yxe@paquier.xyz
The list of TokenizedAuthLines generated at parsing for the HBA and
ident files is now stored in a static context called tokenize_context,
where only all the parsed tokens are stored. This context is created
when opening the first authentication file of a HBA/ident set (hba_file
or ident_file), and is cleaned up once we are done all the work around
it through a new routine called free_auth_file(). One call of
open_auth_file() should have one matching call of free_auth_file(), the
creation and deletion of the tokenization context is controlled by the
recursion depth of the tokenization.
Rather than having tokenize_auth_file() return a memory context that
includes all the records, the tokenization logic now creates and deletes
one memory context each time this function is called. This will
simplify recursive calls to this routine for the upcoming inclusion
record logic.
While on it, rename tokenize_inc_file() to tokenize_expand_file() as
this would conflict with the upcoming patch that will add inclusion
records for HBA/ident files. An '@' file has its tokens added to an
existing list.
Reloading HBA/indent configuration in a tight loop shows no leaks, as of
one type of test done (with and without -DEXEC_BACKEND).
Author: Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Y324HvGKiWxW2yxe@paquier.xyz
Some custom table access method may have their tuple format and use custom
executor nodes for their custom scan types. The ability to set a custom slot
would save them from tuple format conversion. Other users of custom executor
nodes may also benefit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfduJUU6ToecvTyRE_yjxTS80FyPpct4OHaLFk3OEheMTNA@mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov
Reviewed-by: Pavel Borisov
