If the query is rewritten into a NOTIFY command by a DO INSTEAD
rule, we'd get an assertion failure, or in non-assert builds
issue a rather confusing error message. Improve that.
Also fix a longstanding grammar mistake in a nearby error message.
Per bug #18664 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Tender Wang and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18664-ffd0ebc2386598df@postgresql.org
The finished transaction list can contain XIDs that are older than the
serializable global xmin. It's a short-lived state;
ClearOldPredicateLocks() removes any such transactions from the list,
and it's called whenever the global xmin advances. But if another
backend calls SummarizeOldestCommittedSxact() in that window, it will
call SerialAdd() on an XID that's older than the global xmin, or if
there are no more transactions running, when global xmin is
invalid. That trips the assertion in SerialAdd().
Fixes bug #18658 reported by Andrew Bille. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin
for analysis. Backpatch to all versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18658-7dab125ec688c70b%40postgresql.org
This test can act as a template when implementing an isolation test with
injection points, and tracks in a much simpler way some of the behaviors
implied in the existing isolation test "inplace" that has been added in
c35f419d6e. Particularly, a detach does not affect a backend wait; a
wait needs to be interrupted by a wakeup.
Reviewed-by: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZxGTONm_ctQz--io@paquier.xyz
The decision in b6e1157e7 to ignore raw_expr when evaluating a
JsonValueExpr was incorrect. While its value is not ultimately
used (since formatted_expr's value is), failing to initialize it
can lead to problems, for instance, when the expression tree in
raw_expr contains Aggref nodes, which must be initialized to
ensure the parent Agg node works correctly.
Also, optimize eval_const_expressions_mutator()'s handling of
JsonValueExpr a bit. Currently, when formatted_expr cannot be folded
into a constant, we end up processing it twice -- once directly in
eval_const_expressions_mutator() and again recursively via
ece_generic_processing(). This recursive processing is required to
handle raw_expr. To avoid the redundant processing of formatted_expr,
we now process raw_expr directly in eval_const_expressions_mutator().
Finally, update the comment of JsonValueExpr to describe the roles of
raw_expr and formatted_expr more clearly.
Bug: #18657
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Fabio R. Sluzala <fabio3rs@gmail.com>
Diagnosed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18657-1b90ccce2b16bdb8@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 16
pg_shadow is not "publicly readable". (pg_group is, but there seems
no need to make that distinction here.) Seems to be a thinko dating
clear back to 7762619e9.
Antonin Houska
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/31926.1729252247@antos
Make nbtree backwards scans optimistically access the next page to be
read to the left by following a prevPage block number that's now stashed
in currPos when the leaf page is first read. This approach matches the
one taken during forward scans, which follow a symmetric nextPage block
number from currPos. We stash both a prevPage and a nextPage, since the
scan direction might change (when fetching from a scrollable cursor).
Backwards scans will no longer need to lock the same page twice, except
in rare cases where the scan detects a concurrent page split (or page
deletion). Testing has shown this optimization to be particularly
effective during parallel index-only backwards scans: ~12% reductions in
query execution time are quite possible.
We're much better off being optimistic; concurrent left sibling page
splits are rare in general. It's possible that we'll need to lock more
pages than the pessimistic approach would have, but only when there are
_multiple_ concurrent splits of the left sibling page we now start at.
If there's just a single concurrent left sibling page split, the new
approach to scanning backwards will at least break even relative to the
old one (we'll acquire the same number of leaf page locks as before).
The optimization from this commit has long been contemplated by comments
added by commit 2ed5b87f96, which changed the rules for locking/pinning
during nbtree index scans. The approach that that commit introduced to
leaf level link traversal when scanning forwards is now more or less
applied all the time, regardless of the direction we're scanning in.
Following uniform conventions around sibling link traversal is simpler.
The only real remaining difference between our forward and backwards
handling is that our backwards handling must still detect and recover
from any concurrent left sibling splits (and concurrent page deletions),
as documented in the nbtree README. That is structured as a single,
isolated extra step that takes place in _bt_readnextpage.
Also use this opportunity to further simplify the functions that deal
with reading pages and traversing sibling links on the leaf level, and
to document their preconditions and postconditions (with respect to
things like buffer locks, buffer pins, and seizing the parallel scan).
This enhancement completely supersedes the one recently added by commit
3f44959f.
Author: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEze2WgpBGRgTTxTWVPXc9+PB6fc1a7t+VyGXHzfnrFXcQVxnA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WzkBTuFv7W2+84jJT8mWZLXVL0GHq2hMUTn6c9Vw=eYrCw@mail.gmail.com
The present wording about viewing shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages
seems to suggest that the parameter cannot be viewed after startup
at all, whereas the intent is to make it clear that you can't use
"postgres -C" to view this parameter while the server is running.
This commit rephrases this section to remove the ambiguity.
Author: Seino Yuki
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, David G. Johnston, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/420584fd274f9ec4f337da55ffb3b790%40oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 15
Commit 5d2e1cc117 introduced some strsep() uses, but it did the
memory management wrong in some cases. We need to keep a separate
pointer to the allocate memory so that we can free it later, because
strsep() advances the pointer we pass to it, and it at the end it
will be NULL, so any free() calls won't do anything.
(This fixes two of the four places changed in commit 5d2e1cc117. The
other two don't have this problem.)
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/79692bf9-17d3-41e6-b9c9-fc8c3944222a@eisentraut.org
The previous code (from commit 5d2e1cc117) did not detect end of
string correctly, so it would fail to error out if fewer than the
expected number of fields were present, which could then later lead to
a crash when NULL string pointers are accessed.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/79692bf9-17d3-41e6-b9c9-fc8c3944222a@eisentraut.org
Commit 3bf3ab8c56 initially introduced support for unlogged
materialized views, but this was later disallowed by commit 3223b25ff7.
Additionally, commit d25f519107 added more code for handling
unlogged materialized views. This commit cleans up all unused
code related to them.
If unlogged materialized views had been supported in any official
release, psql would need to retain code to handle them for compatibility
with older servers. However, since they were never included in
an official release, this code is no longer necessary.
Author: Pixian Shi
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAccyYKRZ=OvAvgowiSH+OELbStLP=p2Ht=R3CgT=OaNSH5DAA@mail.gmail.com
The arguments of the function were listed in an incorrect order in the
description of the routine. This information can be seen with perldoc.
Issue spotted while working on this area of the code.
Backpatch-through: 17
Don't get confused by an unmatched right brace in the input.
(Previously, this led to discarding information about file-level
variables and then possibly crashing.)
Detect, rather than crash on, an attempt to index into a non-array
variable.
As before, in the absence of field complaints I'm not too
excited about back-patching these.
Per valgrind testing by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/a239aec2-6c79-5fc9-9272-cea41158a360@gmail.com
After repartitioning the inner side of a hash join that would have
exceeded the allowed size, we check if all the tuples from a parent
partition moved to one child partition. That is evidence that it
contains duplicate keys and later attempts to repartition will also
fail, so we should give up trying to limit memory (for lack of a better
fallback strategy).
A thinko prevented the check from working correctly in partition 0 (the
one that is partially loaded into memory already). After
repartitioning, we should check for extreme skew if the *parent*
partition's space_exhausted flag was set, not the child partition's.
The consequence was repeated futile repartitioning until per-partition
data exceeded various limits including "ERROR: invalid DSA memory alloc
request size 1811939328", OS allocation failure, or temporary disk space
errors. (We could also do something about some of those symptoms, but
that's material for separate patches.)
This problem only became likely when PostgreSQL 16 introduced support
for Parallel Hash Right/Full Join, allowing NULL keys into the hash
table. Repartitioning always leaves NULL in partition 0, no matter how
many times you do it, because the hash value is all zero bits. That's
unlikely for other hashed values, but they might still have caused
wasted extra effort before giving up.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Reported-by: Craig Milhiser <craig@milhiser.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BwnhO1OfgXbmXgC4fv_uu%3DOxcDQuHvfoQ4k0DFeB0Qqd-X-rQ%40mail.gmail.com
Instead of using Node *, we can use an incomplete struct. That way,
everything has the correct type and fewer casts are required. This
technique is already used elsewhere in node type definitions.
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/637eeea8-5663-460b-a114-39572c0f6c6e%40eisentraut.org
Valgrind reports that checks on lex->inc_state are undefined for the
"dummy lexer" used for incremental parsing, since it's only partially
initialized on the stack. This was introduced in 0785d1b8b2.
Zero-initialize the whole struct.
Author: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAOYmi+n9QWr4gsAADZc6qFQjFViXQYVk=gBy_EvxuqsgPJcb_g@mail.gmail.com
adf97c156 made it so ExprStates could support hashing and changed Hash
Join to use that instead of manually extracting Datums from tuples and
hashing them one column at a time.
When hashing multiple columns or expressions, the code added in that
commit stored the intermediate hash value in the ExprState's resvalue
field. That was a mistake as steps may be injected into the ExprState
between each hashing step that look at or overwrite the stored
intermediate hash value. EEOP_PARAM_SET is an example of such a step.
Here we fix this by adding a new dedicated field for storing
intermediate hash values and adjust the code so that all apart from the
final hashing step store their result in the intermediate field.
In passing, rename a variable so that it's more aligned to the
surrounding code and also so a few lines stay within the 80 char margin.
Reported-by: Andres Freund
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvqo9eenEFXND5zZ9JxO_k4eTA4jKMGxSyjdTrsmYvnmZw@mail.gmail.com
This commit adds missing checks for COPY FORCE_NOT_NULL and FORCE_NULL
when applied to all columns via "*". These options now correctly
require CSV mode and are disallowed in COPY TO, making their behavior
consistent with FORCE_QUOTE.
Some regression tests are added to verify the correct behavior for the
all-columns case, including FORCE_QUOTE, which was not tested.
Backpatch down to 17, where support for the all-column grammar with
FORCE_NOT_NULL and FORCE_NULL has been added.
Author: Joel Jacobson
Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/65030d1d-5f90-4fa4-92eb-f5f50389858e@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 17
Some queries in copy2 are there to check various option combinations,
and used "stdin" or "stdout" incompatible with the COPY TO or FROM
clauses combined with them, which was confusing. This commit rewrites
these queries to use a compatible grammar.
The coverage of the tests is unchanged. Like the original commit
451d1164b9, backpatch down to 16 where these have been introduced. A
follow-up commit will rely on this area of the tests for a bug fix.
Author: Joel Jacobson
Reviewed-by: Zhang Mingli
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/65030d1d-5f90-4fa4-92eb-f5f50389858e@app.fastmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
Commit 2dc1deaea turns out to have been still a brick shy of a load,
because CALL statements executing within a plpgsql exception block
could still pass the wrong snapshot to stable functions within the
CALL's argument list. That happened because standard_ProcessUtility
forces isAtomicContext to true if IsTransactionBlock is true, which
it always will be inside a subtransaction. Then ExecuteCallStmt
would think it does not need to push a new snapshot --- but
_SPI_execute_plan didn't do so either, since it thought it was in
nonatomic mode.
The best fix for this seems to be for _SPI_execute_plan to operate
in atomic execution mode if IsSubTransaction() is true, even when the
SPI context as a whole is non-atomic. This makes _SPI_execute_plan
have the same rules about when non-atomic execution is allowed as
_SPI_commit/_SPI_rollback have about when COMMIT/ROLLBACK are allowed,
which seems appropriately symmetric. (If anyone ever tries to allow
COMMIT/ROLLBACK inside a subtransaction, this would all need to be
rethought ... but I'm unconvinced that such a thing could be logically
consistent at all.)
For further consistency, also check IsSubTransaction() in
SPI_inside_nonatomic_context. That does not matter for its
one present-day caller StartTransaction, which can't be reached
inside a subtransaction. But if any other callers ever arise,
they'd presumably want this definition.
Per bug #18656 from Alexander Alehin. Back-patch to all
supported branches, like previous fixes in this area.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18656-cade1780866ef66c@postgresql.org
Commit a4ccc1cef introduced the Generation Context and modified the
logical decoding process to use a Generation Context with a fixed
block size of 8MB for storing tuple data decoded during logical
decoding (i.e., rb->tup_context). Several reports have indicated that
the logical decoding process can be terminated due to
out-of-memory (OOM) situations caused by excessive memory usage in
rb->tup_context.
This issue can occur when decoding a workload involving several
concurrent transactions, including a long-running transaction that
modifies tuples. By design, the Generation Context does not free a
memory block until all chunks within that block are
released. Consequently, if tuples modified by the long-running
transaction are stored across multiple memory blocks, these blocks
remain allocated until the long-running transaction completes, leading
to substantial memory fragmentation. The memory usage during logical
decoding, tracked by rb->size, does not account for memory
fragmentation, resulting in potentially much higher memory consumption
than the value of the logical_decoding_work_mem parameter.
Various improvement strategies were discussed in the relevant
thread. This change reduces the block size of the Generation Context
used in rb->tup_context from 8MB to 8kB. This modification
significantly decreases the likelihood of substantial memory
fragmentation occurring and is relatively straightforward to
backport. Performance testing across multiple platforms has confirmed
that this change will not introduce any performance degradation that
would impact actual operation.
Backport to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Alex Richman, Michael Guissine, Avi Weinberg
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Fujii Masao, David Rowley
Tested-by: Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBTY1LATZUmvSXEssvq07qDZufV4AF-OHh9VD2pC0VY2A%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
Avoid null-pointer crash when considering a cursor declaration
that's outside any C function (a case which is useless anyway).
Ensure a cursor for a prepared statement is marked as initially
not open. At worst, if we chanced to get not-already-zeroed memory
from malloc(), this oversight would result in failing to issue a
"cursor "foo" has been declared but not opened" warning that would
have been appropriate.
Avoid running off the end of the buffer when there are mismatched
square brackets following a variable name. This could lead to
SIGSEGV after reaching the end of memory.
Given the lack of field complaints, none of these seem to be worth
back-patching, but let's clean them up in HEAD.
Per valgrind testing by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5f5bcecd-d7ec-b8c0-6c92-d1a7c6e0f639@gmail.com
Commit 5bf748b8 taught nbtree ScalarArrayOp index scans to decide when
and how to start the next primitive index scan based on physical index
characteristics. This included rules for deciding whether to start a
new primitive index scan (or whether to move onto the right sibling leaf
page instead) that specifically consider truncated lower-order columns
(-inf columns) from leaf page high keys.
These omitted columns were treated as satisfying the scan's required
scan keys, though only for scan keys marked required in the current scan
direction (forward). Scan keys that didn't get this behavior (those
marked required in the backwards direction only) usually didn't give the
scan reasonable cause to reposition itself to a later leaf page (via
another descent of the index in _bt_first), but _bt_advance_array_keys
would nevertheless always give up by forcing another call to _bt_first.
_bt_advance_array_keys was unwilling to allow the scan to continue onto
the next leaf page, to reconsider whether we really should start another
primitive scan based on the details of the sibling page's tuples. This
didn't match its behavior with similar cases involving keys required in
the current scan direction (forward), which seems unprincipled. It led
to an excessive number of primitive scans/index descents for queries
with a higher-order = array scan key (with dense, contiguous values)
mixed with a lower-order required > or >= scan key.
Bring > and >= strategy scan keys in line with other required scan key
types: treat truncated -inf scan keys as having satisfied scan keys
required in either scan direction (forwards and backwards alike) during
array advancement. That way affected scans can continue to the right
sibling leaf page. Advancement must now schedule an explicit recheck of
the right sibling page's high key in cases involving > or >= scan keys.
The recheck gives the scan a way to back out and start another primitive
index scan (we can't just rely on _bt_checkkeys with > or >= scan keys).
This work can be considered a stand alone optimization on top of the
work from commit 5bf748b8. But it was written in preparation for an
upcoming patch that will add skip scan to nbtree. In practice scans
that use "skip arrays" will tend to be much more sensitive to any
implementation deficiencies in this area.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wz=9A_UtM7HzUThSkQ+BcrQsQZuNhWOvQWK06PRkEp=SKQ@mail.gmail.com
Generally, we don't want any overriding xreflabels in the options
list, so that we can link to options and the link renders as the
option name. The -g option did this differently and config.sgml made
use of that for a link. The new --no-data-checksums option (commit
983a588e0b) apparently copied this pattern, but that seems like the
wrong direction, as a future patch revealed.
To fix, remove the two xreflabels and rewrite the link in config.sgml
with an explicit link text.
Two near-identical copies of clause_sides_match_join() existed in
joinpath.c and analyzejoins.c. Deduplicate this by moving the function
into restrictinfo.h.
It isn't quite clear that keeping the inline property of this function
is worthwhile, but this commit is just an exercise in code
deduplication. More effort would be required to determine if the inline
property is worth keeping.
Author: James Hunter <james.hunter.pg@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJVSvF7Nm_9kgMLOch4c-5fbh3MYg%3D9BdnDx3Dv7Fcb64zr64Q%40mail.gmail.com
This module provides SQL functions that allow to inspect logical
decoding components.
It currently allows to inspect the contents of serialized logical
snapshots of a running database cluster, which is useful for debugging
or educational purposes.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Shveta Malik, Peter Smith, Peter Eisentraut
Reviewed-by: David G. Johnston
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZscuZ92uGh3wm4tW%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
This commit moves the definitions of the SnapBuild and SnapBuildOnDisk
structs, related to logical snapshots, to the snapshot_internal.h
file. This change allows external tools, such as
pg_logicalinspect (with an upcoming patch), to access and utilize the
contents of logical snapshots.
Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Shveta Malik, Peter Smith
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZscuZ92uGh3wm4tW%40ip-10-97-1-34.eu-west-3.compute.internal
Put the rule type at the start not the end, and put spaces
between the constitutent token names instead of smashing them
into an illegible mess. This has no functional impact but
I think it makes the rules a great deal more readable.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1185216.1724001216@sss.pgh.pa.us
parse.pl contains several constant tables that describe tweaks
to be made to the backend grammar. In the same spirit as
00b0e7204, add cross-checks that each table entry is used at
least once (or exactly once if that's appropriate). This should
help catch cases where adjustments to the backend grammar cause
a table entry not to match as expected.
Per suggestion from Michael Paquier.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZsLVbjsc5x5Saesg@paquier.xyz
Careless string hacking caused parse.pl to transform gram.y's
declaration
%nonassoc IDENT PARTITION RANGE ROWS ...
into
%nonassoc IDENT
%nonassoc CSTRING PARTITION RANGE ROWS ...
It turns out that this has no semantic impact, because the
generated preproc.c is exactly the same either way (if you
inject a blank line to keep line numbers the same).
Nonetheless, given the great emphasis that the commentary in
gram.y places on keeping those other keywords at the same
precedence level as IDENT, this seems like foolishly risking ecpg
behaving differently from the core parser. Adjust the code so
that CSTRING is added to the precedence line without breaking it
into two lines.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2157151.1713540065@sss.pgh.pa.us
Invent a notion of "local" storage that will automatically be
reclaimed at the end of each statement. Use this for location
strings as well as other visibly short-lived data within the parser.
Also, make cat_str and make_str return local storage and not free
their inputs, which allows dispensing with a whole lot of retail
mm_strdup calls. We do have to add some new ones in places where
a local-lifetime string needs to be added to a longer-lived data
structure, but on balance there are a lot less mm_strdup calls than
before.
In hopes of flushing out places where changes were necessary,
I changed YYLTYPE from "char *" to "const char *", which forced
const-ification of various function arguments that probably
should've been like that all along.
This still leaks somewhat more memory than v17, but that will be
cleaned up in future commits.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2011420.1713493114@sss.pgh.pa.us
mm_alloc and mm_strdup were in type.c, which seems a completely
random choice. No doubt the original author thought two small
functions didn't deserve their own file. But I'm about to add
some more memory-management stuff beside them, so let's put them
in a less surprising place. This seems like a better home for
mmerror, mmfatal, and the cat_str/make_str family, too.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2011420.1713493114@sss.pgh.pa.us
