>
>
> Features We Do _Not_ Want
> =========================
>
> * All backends running as threads in a single process (not want)
>
> This eliminates the process protection we get from the current setup.
> Thread creation is usually the same overhead as process creation on
> modern systems, so it seems unwise to use a pure threaded model.
>
> * Optimizer hints (not want)
>
> Optimizer hints are used to work around problems in the optimizer. We
> would rather have the problems reported and fixed.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-08/msg00506.php
< A package would be a schema with its own variables,
< private functions, and initialization functions. It
> A package would be a schema with public/private variables,
> public/private functions, and initialization functions. It
< private functions, and initialization functions
> private functions, and initialization functions. It
> is also possible to implement these capabilities
> in all schemas and not use a separate "packages"
> syntax at all.
< o Automatically force archiving of partially-filled WAL files when
> o -Automatically force archiving of partially-filled WAL files when
<
< Doing this will allow administrators to know more easily when
< the archive contains all the files needed for point-in-time
< recovery.
< http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-04/msg00121.php
<
< o Add reporting of the current WAL file and offset, perhaps as
> o -Add reporting of the current WAL file and offset, perhaps as
<
< The offset allows parts of a WAL file to be archived using
< an external program.
<
< o Allow point-in-time recovery to archive partially filled
< write-ahead logs? [pitr]
> o Add command to archive partially filled write-ahead logs? [pitr]
< of a disk failure. This could be triggered by a user command or
< a timer.
> of a disk failure.
< recovery. A function call to do this would also be useful.
> recovery.
> o Add reporting of the current WAL file and offset, perhaps as
> part of partial log file archiving
>
> The offset allows parts of a WAL file to be archived using
> an external program.
>
< o Add reporting of the current WAL file and offset, perhaps as
< part of partial log file archiving
<
< The offset allows parts of a WAL file to be archived using
< an external program.
< o Add reporting of the current WAL file, perhaps as part of
< partial log file archiving
> o Add reporting of the current WAL file and offset, perhaps as
> part of partial log file archiving
< o Add ALTER TABLE tab ADD/DROP INHERITS parent
<
< This allows tables to be added/removed from an inheritance
< hierarchy. This is particularly useful for table partitioning.
< http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-05/msg00988.php
<
> o -Add ALTER TABLE tab INHERIT / NO INHERIT parent
< o Add support for WITH HOLD cursors
> o Add support for WITH HOLD and SCROLL cursors
>
> PL/pgSQL cursors should support the same syntax as
> backend cursors.
>
< * %Disallow changing DEFAULT expression of a SERIAL column?
<
< This should be done only if the existing SERIAL problems cannot be
< fixed.
<
> * -Disallow changing DEFAULT expression of a SERIAL column
< * Reuse index tuples that point to rows that are not visible to anyone?
> * Reuse index tuples that point to heap tuples that are not visible to
> anyone?
< * Allow heap reuse of UPDATEd rows if old and new versions are on the
< same heap page?
> * Allow heap reuse of UPDATEd rows if no indexed columns are changed,
> and old and new versions are on the same heap page?
< This is possible for same-page updates because a single index row
< can point to both old and new values.
> While vacuum handles DELETEs fine, updating of non-indexed columns, like
> counters, are difficult for VACUUM to handle efficiently. This method
> is possible for same-page updates because a single index row can be
> used to point to both old and new values.
>
> * Allow heap reuse of UPDATEd rows if old and new versions are on the
> same heap page?
>
> This is possible for same-page updates because a single index row
> can point to both old and new values.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-06/msg01305.php
