that has parameters is always planned afresh for each Bind command,
treating the parameter values as constants in the planner. This removes
the performance penalty formerly often paid for using out-of-line
parameters --- with this definition, the planner can do constant folding,
LIKE optimization, etc. After a suggestion by Andrew@supernews.
can create or modify rules for the table. Do setRuleCheckAsUser() while
loading rules into the relcache, rather than when defining a rule. This
ensures that permission checks for tables referenced in a rule are done with
respect to the current owner of the rule's table, whereas formerly ALTER TABLE
OWNER would fail to update the permission checking for associated rules.
Removal of separate RULE privilege is needed to prevent various scenarios
in which a grantee of RULE privilege could effectively have any privilege
of the table owner. For backwards compatibility, GRANT/REVOKE RULE is still
accepted, but it doesn't do anything. Per discussion here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-04/msg01138.php
of the syntax as this fundamentally dead-end approach can, in particular
combinations of single and multi column assignments. Improve rather
inadequate documentation and provide some regression tests.
> * Simplify ability to create partitioned tables
>
> This would allow creation of partitioned tables without requiring
> creation of rules for INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE, and constraints for
> rapid partition selection. Options could include range and hash
> partition selection.
>
> * Allow auto-selection of partitioned tables for min/max() operations
< Last updated: Sat Sep 2 08:31:04 EDT 2006
> Last updated: Sat Sep 2 16:31:46 EDT 2006
< o Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...) = (...) for updating multiple
< columns
> o -Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...) = (val, ...) for updating
> multiple columns
> o Allow UPDATE tab SET ROW (col, ...) = (SELECT...)
< A subselect can also be used as the value source.
RETURNING play nice with views/rules. To wit, have the rule rewriter
rewrite any RETURNING clause found in a rule to produce what the rule's
triggering query asked for in its RETURNING clause, in particular drop
the RETURNING clause if no RETURNING in the triggering query. This
leaves the responsibility for knowing how to produce the view's output
columns on the rule author, without requiring any fundamental changes
in rule semantics such as adding new rule event types would do. The
initial implementation constrains things to ensure that there is
exactly one, unconditionally invoked RETURNING clause among the rules
for an event --- later we might be able to relax that, but for a post
feature freeze fix it seems better to minimize how much invention we do.
Per gripe from Jaime Casanova.
"server_version" but uses the handy PG_VERSION_NUM which allows apps to
do things like if ($version >= 80200) without having to parse apart the
value of server_version themselves.
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
< Last updated: Tue Aug 29 12:21:52 EDT 2006
> Last updated: Wed Aug 30 20:34:28 EDT 2006
< o Allow COPY (SELECT ...) TO 'filename'
<
< COPY should also be able to output views using COPY (SELECT
< * FROM view) TO 'filename' internally.
< http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-09/msg00148.php
> o -Allow COPY (SELECT ...) TO 'filename'
queries via a cursor, fetching a limited number of rows at a time and
therefore not risking exhausting memory. A disadvantage of the scheme
is that 'aligned' output mode will align each group of rows independently
leading to odd-looking output, but all the other output formats work
reasonably well. Chris Mair, with some additional hacking by moi.
optionally bind. I re-added the "statement:" label so people will
understand why the line is being printed (it is log_*statement
behavior).
Use single quotes for bind values, instead of double quotes, and double
literal single quotes in bind values (and document that). I also made
use of the DETAIL line to have much cleaner output.
> o Allow DEFERRABLE and end-of-statement UNIQUE constraints?
>
> This would allow UPDATE tab SET col = col + 1 to work if col has
> a unique index. Currently, uniqueness checks are done while the
> command is being executed, rather than at the end of the statement
> or transaction.
>
<
< * Allow DEFERRABLE and end-of-statement UNIQUE constraints?
<
< This would allow UPDATE tab SET col = col + 1 to work if col has
< a unique index. Currently, uniqueness checks are done while the
< command is being executed, rather than at the end of the statement
< or transaction.
< * Allow DEFERRABLE UNIQUE constraints?
> * Allow DEFERRABLE and end-of-statement UNIQUE constraints?
>
> This would allow UPDATE tab SET col = col + 1 to work if col has
> a unique index. Currently, uniqueness checks are done while the
> command is being executed, rather than at the end of the statement
> or transaction.
>
Fix all the standard PLs to be able to return tuples from FOO_RETURNING
statements as well as utility statements that return tuples. Also,
fix oversight that SPI_processed wasn't set for a utility statement
returning tuples. Per recent discussion.
< * All backends running as threads in a single process (not want)
> * All backends running as threads in a single process (not wanted)
< * Optimizer hints (not want)
> * Optimizer hints (not wanted)
>
> * Allow AS in "SELECT col AS label" to be optional (not wanted)
>
> Because we support postfix operators, it isn't possible to make AS
> optional and continue to use bison.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2006-08/msg00164.php
< o Allow COPY to output from SELECT
> o Allow COPY (SELECT ...) TO 'filename'
< COPY should also be able to output views.
> COPY should also be able to output views using COPY (SELECT
> * FROM view) TO 'filename' internally.
