* Improve speed with indexes
For large table adjustments during VACUUM FULL, it is faster to cluster
or reindex rather than update the index. Also, index updates can bloat
the index.
"microsecond" and "millisecond" units were not considered valid input
by themselves, which caused inputs like "1 millisecond" to be rejected
erroneously.
Update the docs, add regression tests, and backport to 8.2 and 8.1
or abort within a backend; rearrange InitPostgres processing to make it so.
Revealed by just-added Asserts along with ECPG regression tests (hm, I wonder
why the core regression tests didn't expose it?). This possibly is another
reason for missing stats updates ...
and aborted transactions have different effects; also teach it not to assume
that prepared transactions are always committed.
Along the way, simplify the pgstats API by tying counting directly to
Relations; I cannot detect any redeeming social value in having stats
pointers in HeapScanDesc and IndexScanDesc structures. And fix a few
corner cases in which counts might be missed because the relation's
pgstat_info pointer hadn't been set.
inheritance child of an UPDATE/DELETE target relation can be excluded by
constraints. I had rearranged some code in set_append_rel_pathlist() to
avoid "useless" work when a child is excluded, but overdid it and left
the child with no cheapest_path entry, causing possible failure later
if the appendrel was involved in a join. Also, it seems that the dummy
plan generated by inheritance_planner() when all branches are excluded
has to be a bit less dummy now than was required in 8.2.
Per report from Jan Wieck. Add his test case to the regression tests.
and/or create plans for hypothetical situations; in particular, investigate
plans that would be generated using hypothetical indexes. This is a
heavily-rewritten version of the hooks proposed by Gurjeet Singh for his
Index Advisor project. In this formulation, the index advisor can be
entirely a loadable module instead of requiring a significant part to be
in the core backend, and plans can be generated for hypothetical indexes
without requiring the creation and rolling-back of system catalog entries.
The index advisor patch as-submitted is not compatible with these hooks,
but it needs significant work anyway due to other 8.2-to-8.3 planner
changes. With these hooks in the core backend, development of the advisor
can proceed as a pgfoundry project.
what a Var node refers to. This is no longer necessary because the new
flat-range-table representation of plan trees makes it relatively easy to dig
down through child plan levels to find the original reference; and to keep
doing it that way, we'd have to store joinaliasvars lists in flattened RTEs,
as demonstrated by bug report from Leszek Trenkner. This change makes
varnoold/varoattno truly just debug aids, which wasn't quite the case before.
Perhaps we should drop them, or only have them in assert-enabled builds?
in cases where a sub-SELECT inserts a WHERE clause between two outer joins,
that clause may prevent us from re-ordering the two outer joins. The code
was considering only the joins' own ON-conditions in determining reordering
safety, which is not good enough. Add a "delay_upper_joins" flag to
OuterJoinInfo to flag that we have detected such a clause and higher-level
outer joins shouldn't be permitted to commute with this one. (This might
seem overly coarse, but given the current rules for OJ reordering, it's
sufficient AFAICT.)
The failure case is actually pretty narrow: it needs a WHERE clause within
the RHS of a left join that checks the RHS of a lower left join, but is not
strict for that RHS (else we'd have simplified the lower join to a plain
join). Even then no failure will be manifest unless the planner chooses to
rearrange the join order.
Per bug report from Adam Terrey.
cheapest-startup-cost innerjoin indexscans, and make joinpath.c consider
both of these (when different) as the inside of a nestloop join. The
original design was based on the assumption that indexscan paths always
have negligible startup cost, and so total cost is the only important
figure of merit; an assumption that's obviously broken by bitmap
indexscans. This oversight could lead to choosing poor plans in cases
where fast-start behavior is more important than total cost, such as
LIMIT and IN queries. 8.1-vintage brain fade exposed by an example from
Chuck D.
is using mark/restore but not rewind or backward-scan capability. Insert a
materialize plan node between a mergejoin and its inner child if the inner
child is a sort that is expected to spill to disk. The materialize shields
the sort from the need to do mark/restore and thereby allows it to perform
its final merge pass on-the-fly; while the materialize itself is normally
cheap since it won't spill to disk unless the number of tuples with equal
key values exceeds work_mem.
Greg Stark, with some kibitzing from Tom Lane.
- Function renamed to "xpath".
- Function is now strict, per discussion.
- Return empty array in case when XPath expression detects nothing
(previously, NULL was returned in such case), per discussion.
- (bugfix) Work with fragments with prologue: select xpath('/a',
'<?xml version="1.0"?><a /><b />'); // now XML datum is always wrapped
with dummy <x>...</x>, XML prologue simply goes away (if any).
- Some cleanup.
Nikolay Samokhvalov
Some code cleanup and documentation work by myself.
WAL records that shows whether it is safe to remove full-page images
(ie, whether or not an on-line backup was in progress when the WAL entry
was made). Also make provision for an XLOG_NOOP record type that can be
used to fill in the extra space when decompressing the data for restore.
This is the portion of Koichi Suzuki's "full page writes" patch that
has to go into the core database. The remainder of that work is two
external compression and decompression programs, which for the time being
will undergo separate development on pgfoundry. Per discussion.
Also, twiddle the handling of BTREE_SPLIT records to ensure it'll be
possible to compress them (the previous coding caused essential info
to be omitted). The other commonly-used record types seem OK already,
with the possible exception of GIN and GIST WAL records, which I don't
understand well enough to opine on.
FreezeXid introduced in a recent commit, so there isn't any data loss in this
approach.
Doing it causes ALTER TABLE (or rather, the forms of it that cause a full table
rewrite) to be affected as well. In this case, the frozen point is RecentXmin,
because after the rewrite all the tuples are relabeled with the rewriting
transaction's Xid.
TOAST tables are fixed automatically as well, as fallout of the way they were
already being handled in the respective code paths.
With this patch, there is no longer need to VACUUM tables for Xid wraparound
purposes that have been cleaned up via TRUNCATE or CLUSTER.
had been taught not to do that ages ago, the SSL code was helpfully bleating
anyway. Resolves some recent reports such as bug #3266; however the
underlying cause of the related bug #2829 is still unclear.
and inet_server_addr() fail if the client connected over a "scoped" IPv6
address. In this case getnameinfo() will return a string ending with
a poorly-standardized "%something" zone specifier, which these functions
try to feed to network_in(), which won't take it. So that we don't lose
functionality altogether, suppress the zone specifier before giving the
string to network_in(). Per report from Brian Hirt.
TODO: probably someday the inet type should support scoped IPv6 addresses,
and then this patch should be reverted.
Backpatch to 8.2 ... is it worth going further?
>
> * Implement the SQL standard mechanism whereby REVOKE ROLE revokes only
> the privilege granted by the invoking role, and not those granted
> by other roles
recompute the limit/offset immediately, so that the updated values are
available when the child's ReScan function is invoked. Add a regression
test for this, too. Bug is new in HEAD (due to the bounded-sorting patch)
so no need for back-patch.
I did not do anything about merging this signaling with chgParam processing,
but if we were to do that we'd still need to compute the updated values
at this point rather than during the first ProcNode call.
Per observation and test case from Greg Stark, though I didn't use his patch.
