This is analogous to the syntax allowed for VACUUM. This allows us to
avoid making new options reserved keywords and makes it easier to
allow arbitrary argument order. Oh, and it's consistent with the other
commands, too.
Author: Nathan Bossart
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquier, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/D3FC73E2-9B1A-4DB4-8180-55F57D116B4E@amazon.com
The LIKE INCLUDING ALL clause to CREATE TABLE intuitively indicates
cloning of extended statistics on the source table, but it failed to do
so. Patch it up so that it does. Also include an INCLUDING STATISTICS
option to the LIKE clause, so that the behavior can be requested
individually, or excluded individually.
While at it, reorder the INCLUDING options, both in code and in docs, in
alphabetical order which makes more sense than feature-implementation
order that was previously used.
Backpatch this to Postgres 10, where extended statistics were
introduced, because this is seen as an oversight in a fresh feature
which is better to get consistent from the get-go instead of changing
only in pg11.
In pg11, comments on statistics objects are cloned too. In pg10 they
are not, because I (Álvaro) was too coward to change the parse node as
required to support it. Also, in pg10 I chose not to renumber the
parser symbols for the various INCLUDING options in LIKE, for the same
reason. Any corresponding user-visible changes (docs) are backpatched,
though.
Reported-by: Stephen Froehlich
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Álvaro Herrera, Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CY1PR0601MB1927315B45667A1B679D0FD5E5EF0@CY1PR0601MB1927.namprd06.prod.outlook.com
It seems fairly hard to explain recent buildfarm failures without the
theory that something is doing an ANALYZE behind our backs. Probe
for this directly to see if it's true.
In principle the outputs of these queries should be stable, since the table
in question is small enough that ANALYZE's sample will include all rows.
But even if that turns out to be wrong, we can put up with some failures
for a bit. I don't intend to leave this here indefinitely.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/25502.1520277552@sss.pgh.pa.us
Up to now we've not worried about whether psql's tab completion queries
would work against prior server versions. But since we support older
server versions in describe.c, we really ought to do so here as well.
Failing to take care of this not only leads to loss of tab-completion
service when using an older server, but risks aborting a user's open
transaction when we send an incompatible query to the server.
The recent changes in pg_proc.prokind are one reason to take this more
seriously now than before, and the proposed patch for completion after
SELECT needs some such capability as well.
Hence, create some infrastructure to allow selection of one of several
versions of a query depending on server version. For cases where we
just need to select one of several query strings, introduce VersionedQuery
and COMPLETE_WITH_VERSIONED_QUERY(). Likewise extend the SchemaQuery
infrastructure to allow versioning of those.
I went ahead and fixed the prokind issues, to serve as an illustration
of how to use versioned SchemaQuery. To have some illustration of
VersionedQuery, change the support for completion of publication and
subscription names so that psql will not send sure-to-fail queries to
pre-v10 servers. There is much more that should be done to make tab
completion more friendly to older servers, but this commit is mainly
meant to get the infrastructure in place, so I stopped here.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/24314.1520190408@sss.pgh.pa.us
Commit 34db06ef9a adopted a lock-free
design for shm_mq.c, but it introduced a race condition that could
lose messages. When shm_mq_receive_bytes() detects that the other end
has detached, it must make sure that it has seen the final version of
mq_bytes_written, or it might miss a message sent before detaching.
Thomas Munro
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm%3D2myZ4qxpt1a%3DC%2BwEv3o188K13K3UvD-44FK0SdAzHy%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
pg_rewind checks whether each file is a relation data file, from its path.
Previously this check logic had the bug which made pg_rewind fail to
recognize any relation data files in tablespaces. Which also caused
an assertion failure in pg_rewind.
Back-patch to 9.5 where pg_rewind was added.
Author: Takayuki Tsunakawa
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0A3221C70F24FB45833433255569204D1F8D6C7A@G01JPEXMBYT05
If convert_to_scalar is passed a pair of datatypes it can't cope with,
its former behavior was just to elog(ERROR). While this is OK so far as
the core code is concerned, there's extension code that would like to use
scalarltsel/scalargtsel/etc as selectivity estimators for operators that
work on non-core datatypes, and this behavior is a show-stopper for that
use-case. If we simply allow convert_to_scalar to return FALSE instead of
outright failing, then the main logic of scalarltsel/scalargtsel will work
fine for any operator that behaves like a scalar inequality comparison.
The lack of conversion capability will mean that we can't estimate to
better than histogram-bin-width precision, since the code will effectively
assume that the comparison constant falls at the middle of its bin. But
that's still a lot better than nothing. (Someday we should provide a way
for extension code to supply a custom version of convert_to_scalar, but
today is not that day.)
While poking at this issue, we noted that the existing code for handling
type bytea in convert_to_scalar is several bricks shy of a load.
It assumes without checking that if the comparison value is type bytea,
the bounds values are too; in the worst case this could lead to a crash.
It also fails to detoast the input values, so that the comparison result is
complete garbage if any input is toasted out-of-line, compressed, or even
just short-header. I'm not sure how often such cases actually occur ---
the bounds values, at least, are probably safe since they are elements of
an array and hence can't be toasted. But that doesn't make this code OK.
Back-patch to all supported branches, partly because author requested that,
but mostly because of the bytea bugs. The change in API for the exposed
routine convert_network_to_scalar() is theoretically a back-patch hazard,
but it seems pretty unlikely that any third-party code is calling that
function directly.
Tomas Vondra, with some adjustments by me
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b68441b6-d18f-13ab-b43b-9a72188a4e02@2ndquadrant.com
In PostgreSQL 9.5, the documentation for pg_stat_replication was moved,
so some of the links pointed to an appropriate location.
Author: Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>
Separate out the pg_attribute logic of genbki.pl into its own function.
Drop unnecessary "defined $catalog->{data}" check. This both narrows
and shortens the data writing loop of the script. There is no functional
change (the emitted files are the same as before).
John Naylor
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJVSVGXnLH=BSo0x-aA818f=MyQqGS5nM-GDCWAMdnvQJTRC1A@mail.gmail.com
Rationalize a couple of macro names:
* In catalog/pg_init_privs.h, rename Anum_pg_init_privs_privs to
Anum_pg_init_privs_initprivs to match the column's actual name.
* In ecpg, rename ZPBITOID to BITOID to match catalog/pg_type.h.
This reduces reader confusion, and will allow us to generate these
macros automatically in future.
In catalog/pg_tablespace.h, fix the ordering of related DATA and
#define lines to agree with how it's done elsewhere. This has no
impact today, but simplifies life for the bootstrap data conversion
scripts.
John Naylor
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJVSVGXnLH=BSo0x-aA818f=MyQqGS5nM-GDCWAMdnvQJTRC1A@mail.gmail.com
Add checks in each test file that the build supports the feature,
otherwise skip all the tests. Before, if someone were to (accidentally)
invoke these tests without build support, they would fail in confusing
ways.
based on patch from Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
The SSL and LDAP test suites are not run by default, as they are not
secure for multi-user environments. This commit adds an extra make
variable to optionally enable them, for example:
make check-world PG_TEST_EXTRA='ldap ssl'
Author: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Sloppy coding in this function could lead to leaking a VM buffer pin,
or to attempting to free the same pin twice. Repair. While at it,
reduce the code's tendency to free and reacquire the same page pin.
Back-patch to 9.6; before that, this routine did not concern itself
with VM pages.
Amit Kapila and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1KJKwhc=isgTQHjM76CAdVswzNeAuZkh_cx-6QgGkSEgA@mail.gmail.com
Previously, it'd try to create log files under the source directory
not the build directory. This fell over if the source isn't writable
by the building user.
Fabien Coelho
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/alpine.DEB.2.20.1801101038340.2283@lancre
The new column distinguishes normal functions, procedures, aggregates,
and window functions. This replaces the existing columns proisagg and
proiswindow, and replaces the convention that procedures are indicated
by prorettype == 0. Also change prorettype to be VOIDOID for procedures.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Commit 1bc0100d27 added this test, and
commits 882ea509fe,
958e20e42d,
4fa396464e tried to stabilize it. It's
still not stable, so keep trying.
The latest comment from Tom Lane is that disabling autovacuum seems
like a good strategy, but we might need to do it on more tables, hence
this patch.
Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A9928F1.2010206@lab.ntt.co.jp
Instead of marking data from the ringer buffer consumed and setting the
sender's latch for every message, do it only when the amount of data we
can consume is at least 1/4 of the size of the ring buffer, or when no
data remains in the ring buffer. This is dramatically faster in my
testing; apparently, the savings from sending signals less frequently
outweighs the benefit of letting the sender know about available buffer
space sooner.
Patch by me, reviewed by Andres Freund and tested by Rafia Sabih.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYK7RFj6r7KLEfSGtYZCi3zqTRhAz8mcsDbUAjEmLOZ3Q@mail.gmail.com
Previously, mq_bytes_read and mq_bytes_written were protected by the
spinlock, but that turns out to cause pretty serious spinlock
contention on queries which send many tuples through a Gather or
Gather Merge node. This patches changes things so that we instead
read and write those values using 8-byte atomics. Since mq_bytes_read
can only be changed by the receiver and mq_bytes_written can only be
changed by the sender, the only purpose of the spinlock is to prevent
reads and writes of these values from being torn on platforms where
8-byte memory access is not atomic, making the conversion fairly
straightforward.
Testing shows that this produces some slowdown if we're using emulated
64-bit atomics, but since they should be available on any platform
where performance is a primary concern, that seems OK. It's faster,
sometimes a lot faster, on platforms where such atomics are available.
Patch by me, reviewed by Andres Freund, who also suggested the
design. Also tested by Rafia Sabih.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA+TgmoYuK0XXxmUNTFT9TSNiBtWnRwasBcHHRCOK9iYmDLQVPg@mail.gmail.com
Previously, it just returned the heap tuple count, which might be only an
estimate, and would be completely the wrong thing if the index is partial.
Since this function scans every index page anyway to find free pages,
it's practically free to count the surviving index tuples. Let's do that
and return an accurate count.
This is easily visible as a wrong reltuples value for a partial GiST
index following VACUUM, so back-patch to all supported branches.
Andrey Borodin, reviewed by Michail Nikolaev
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/151956654251.6915.675951950408204404.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
From this version ActivePerl ships both a .lib and a .a file for the
perl library, which our code would detect as there being no library
available. Instead, we should pick the .lib version and use that.
Report and suggested fix in bug #15065
Author: Heath Lord
For consistency with other code that deals in numbers of buckets, the
macro BUCKETS_PER_PARTITION should produce a value of type size_t.
Also, fix a mention of an obsolete proposed name for dshash.c that
appeared in a comment.
Author: Thomas Munro, based on an observation from Amit Kapila
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAA4eK1%2BBOp5aaW3aHEkg5Bptf8Ga_BkBnmA-%3DXcAXShs0yCiYQ%40mail.gmail.com
These errors have been seen in the field in corrupted-data situations.
It seems worthwhile to report them with ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED, rather
than the generic ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR, for the benefit of log monitoring
and tools like amcheck. However, use errmsg_internal so that the text
strings still aren't translated; it seems unlikely to be worth
translators' time to do so.
Back-patch to 9.3, like the predecessor commit d70cf811f that introduced
these elog calls originally (replacing Asserts).
Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzmn4-Pg-UGFwyuyK-wiTih9j32pwg_7T9iwqXpAUZr=Mg@mail.gmail.com
Commit 4800f16a7a added some sanity checks to ensure we don't
accidentally corrupt data, but in one of them we failed to consider the
effects of a database upgraded from 9.2 or earlier, where a tuple
exclusively locked prior to the upgrade has a slightly different bit
pattern. Fix that by using the macro that we fixed in commit
74ebba84ae for similar situations.
Reported-by: Alexandre Garcia
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPYLKR6yxV4=pfW0Gwij7aPNiiPx+3ib4USVYnbuQdUtmkMaEA@mail.gmail.com
Andres suspects that this bug may have wider ranging consequences, but I
couldn't find anything.
Since 9.5, it's possible that some but not all columns of an index
support returning the indexed value for index-only scans. If the
same indexed column appears in index columns that behave both ways,
check_index_only() supposed that it'd be OK to do an index-only scan
testing that column; but that fails if we have to recheck the indexed
condition on one of the columns that doesn't support this.
In principle we could make this work by remapping the recheck expressions
to pull the value from a column that does support returning the indexed
value. But such cases are so weird and rare that, at least for now,
it doesn't seem worth the trouble. Instead, just teach check_index_only
that a value is returnable only if all the index columns containing it
are returnable, rather than any of them.
Per report from David Pereiro Lagares. Back-patch to 9.5 where the
possibility of this situation appeared.
Kyotaro Horiguchi
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1516210494.1798.16.camel@nlpgo.com
formrdesc's comment listed the specific catalogs it is called for,
but the list was out of date. Rather than jumping back onto that
maintenance treadmill, let's just remove the list. It tells the
reader nothing that can't be learned quickly and more reliably by
searching relcache.c for callers of formrdesc().
Oversight noted by Kyotaro Horiguchi.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20180214.105314.138966434.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Commit a26116c6c accidentally changed the behavior of the SQL format_type()
function while refactoring. For the reasons explained in that function's
comment, a NULL typemod argument should behave differently from a -1
argument. Since we've managed to break this, add a regression test
memorializing the intended behavior.
In passing, be consistent about the type of the "flags" parameter.
Noted by Rushabh Lathia, though I revised the patch some more.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGPqQf3RB2q-d2Awp_-x-Ur6aOxTUwnApt-vm-iTtceZxYnePg@mail.gmail.com
Use IndexTupleSize everywhere, instead. Also, remove IndexTupleSize's
internal typecast, as that's not really needed and might mask coding
errors. Change some pointer variable datatypes in the call sites
to compensate for that and make it clearer what we're assuming.
Ildar Musin, Robert Haas, Stephen Frost
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/0274288e-9e88-13b6-c61c-7b36928bf221@postgrespro.ru
Solaris 11.4 has built-in functions named b64_encode and b64_decode.
Rename ours to something else to avoid the conflict (fortunately,
ours are static so the impact is limited).
One could wish for less duplication of code in this area, but that
would be a larger patch and not very suitable for back-patching.
Since this is a portability fix, we want to put it into all supported
branches.
Report and initial patch by Rainer Orth, reviewed and adjusted a bit
by Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ydd372wk28h.fsf@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE
specscanner.l had a fixed limit of 1024 bytes on the length of
individual SQL stanzas in an isolation test script. People are
starting to run into that, so fix it by making the buffer resizable.
Once we allow this in HEAD, it seems inevitable that somebody will
try to back-patch a test that exceeds the old limit, so back-patch
this change as a preventive measure.
Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8D628BE4-6606-4FF6-A3FF-8B2B0E9B43D0@yesql.se
The previous code considered two tables to have the partition scheme
if the underlying columns had the same collation, but what we
actually need to compare is not the collations associated with the
column but the collation used for partitioning. Fix that.
Robert Haas and Amit Langote
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/0f95f924-0efa-4cf5-eb5f-9a3d1bc3c33d@lab.ntt.co.jp
Parallel-aware plan nodes must be prepared to run without parallelism
if it's not possible at execution time for whatever reason. Commit
ab72716778, which introduced Parallel
Append, overlooked this.
Rajkumar Raghuwanshi reported this problem, and I included his test
case in this patch. The code changes are by me.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAKcux6=WqkUudLg1GLZZ7fc5ScWC1+Y9qD=pAHeqy32WoeJQvw@mail.gmail.com
Commit 1bc0100d27 added this test,
and commit 882ea509fe tried to
stabilize it. There were still failures, so commit
958e20e42d tried again to stabilize
it. That approach is still failing on jaguarundi, though, so
back it out and try something else. Specifically, instead of
disabling remote estimates for the table in question, let's tell
autovacuum to leave it alone.
Etsuro Fujita
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/5A82DCCE.3060107@lab.ntt.co.jp
