The function has a bool argument named "case_insensitive", but that was
spelled "case_sensitive" in the declaration. Make them consistent now
to avoid confusion in the future.
Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Michael Paquiër <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-WznJt9CMM9KJTMjJh_zbL5hD9oX44qdJ4aqZtjFi-zA3Tg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch: 10-
So far they were created below CacheMemoryContext. However, that's not
guaranteed to exist in all situations, leading to memory contexts created as
top-level contexts. There isn't actually a good reason anymore to create them
below CacheMemoryContext, so just creating them below TopMemoryContext seems
the best approach.
Reported-by: Reid Thompson <reid.thompson@crunchydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Author: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b948b729-42fe-f88c-2f4a-0e65d84c049b@amazon.com
Backpatch: 15-
Very occasionally the stats test failed due to the number of sessions not
being updated yet. Likely this requires that there is contention on the
database's stats entry. Solve this by forcing pending stats to be flushed
before fetching the stats.
I verified that there are no other test failures after making
pgstat_report_stat() only flush stats when force = true.
Per message from Tom Lane and buildfarm member crake.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3428246.1663271992@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch: 15-, where 5264add784 added the test
Treat arguments declared as RECORD as if that were a polymorphic type
(which it is, sort of), in that we substitute the actual argument type
while forming the function cache lookup key. This allows the specific
composite type to be known in some cases where it was not before,
at the cost of making a separate function cache entry for each named
composite type that's passed to the function during a session. The
particular symptom discussed in bug #17610 could be solved in other
more-efficient ways, but only at the cost of considerable development
work, and there are other cases where we'd still fail without this.
Per bug #17610 from Martin Jurča. Back-patch to v11 where we first
allowed plpgsql functions to be declared as taking type RECORD.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17610-fb1eef75bf6c2364@postgresql.org
If the createdb tests run under the C locale, the database cluster
will be initialized with encoding SQL_ASCII. With the checks added in
c7db01e325, this will cause several
ICU-related tests to fail because SQL_ASCII is not supported by ICU.
To work around that, use initdb option -E UTF8 for those tests to get
past that check.
Check in CREATE DATABASE and initdb that the selected encoding is
supported by ICU. Before, they would pass but users would later get
an error from the server when they tried to use the database.
Also document that initdb sets the encoding to UTF8 by default if the
ICU locale provider is chosen.
Author: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/6dd6db0984d86a51b7255ba79f111971@postgrespro.ru
I happened to notice that libpq_pipeline's private implementation
of pg_fatal lacked any pg_attribute_printf decoration. Indeed,
adding that turned up a mistake! We'd likely never have noticed
because the error exits in this code are unlikely to get hit,
but still, it's a bug.
We're so used to having the compiler check this stuff for us that
a printf-like function without pg_attribute_printf is a land mine.
I wonder if there is a way to detect such omissions.
Back-patch to v14 where this code came in.
There was a excessive structure, leading to somewhat disorganized
presentation of the information. Remove a few tags and reorder
paragraphs to make the text flow more easily. Also, reword some of it
to be more concise.
The bit about column list combination is not modified, other than to
remove an uninteresting (and IMO confusing and wrong) paragraph; I
intend to deal with it differently afterwards.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220913121138.yn7ekkfysxzhkm2u@alvherre.pgsql
After commit cc2c7d65fc added this flag,
failure to reset it caused assertion failures. In non-assert builds, it
made the system fail to achieve the objectives listed in that commit;
chiefly, we might emit a spurious log message. Back-patch to v15, where
that commit first appeared.
Bharath Rupireddy and Kyotaro Horiguchi. Reviewed by Dilip Kumar,
Nathan Bossart and Michael Paquier. Reported by Dilip Kumar.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFiTN-sE3ry=ycMPVtC+Djw4Fd7gbUGVv_qqw6qfzp=JLvqT3g@mail.gmail.com
In 29f45e299, we added support for optimizing the execution of NOT
IN(values) by using a hash table instead of a linear search over the
array. That commit neglected to update the header comment for
convert_saop_to_hashed_saop() to mention this fact. Here we fix that.
Author: James Coleman
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAaqYe99NUpAPcxgchGstgM23fmiGjqQPot8627YgkBgNt=BfA@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 15, where 29f45e299 was added.
This appears to be a merge mistake in 96ef3237bf. We could put it
back the way it was before JSON_TABLE and it'd be two lines shorter, but
it's likely that JSON_TABLE will be back and will prefer things this
way. It makes no other difference in practice.
Backpatch to 15.
Reported by Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAr4nOcNQskC4oBEZN4S+4heJ=1ch_ZKOxU+_Ef-FQSf-g@mail.gmail.com
The tlist of the EvalPlanQual outer plan for a ForeignScan node is
adjusted to produce a tuple whose descriptor matches the scan tuple slot
for the ForeignScan node. But in the case where the outer plan contains
an extra Sort node, if the new tlist contained columns required only for
evaluating PlaceHolderVars or columns required only for evaluating local
conditions, this would cause setrefs.c to fail with the error.
The cause of this is that when creating the outer plan by injecting the
Sort node into an alternative local join plan that could emit such extra
columns as well, we fail to arrange for the outer plan to propagate them
up through the Sort node, causing setrefs.c to fail to match up them in
the new tlist to what is available from the outer plan. Repair.
Per report from Alexander Pyhalov.
Richard Guo and Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by Alexander Pyhalov and Tom Lane.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/cfb17bf6dfdf876467bd5ef533852d18%40postgrespro.ru
The zlib documentation mentions the values supported for the compression
strategy, but this code has been using a hardcoded value of 0 rather
than Z_DEFAULT_STRATEGY. This commit adjusts the code to use
Z_DEFAULT_STRATEGY.
Backpatch down to where this code has been added to ease the backport of
any future patch touching this area.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1400032.1662217889@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 10
This adds additional variants of palloc, pg_malloc, etc. that
encapsulate common usage patterns and provide more type safety.
Specifically, this adds palloc_object(), palloc_array(), and
repalloc_array(), which take the type name of the object to be
allocated as its first argument and cast the return as a pointer to
that type. There are also palloc0_object() and palloc0_array()
variants for initializing with zero, and pg_malloc_*() variants of all
of the above.
Inspired by the talloc library.
This is backpatched from master so that future backpatchable code can
make use of these APIs. This patch by itself does not contain any
users of these APIs.
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/bb755632-2a43-d523-36f8-a1e7a389a907@enterprisedb.com
PG_COMPRESSION_OPTION_LEVEL is removed from the compression
specification logic, and instead the compression level is always
assigned with each library's default if nothing is directly given. This
centralizes the checks on the compression methods supported by a given
build, and always assigns a default compression level when parsing a
compression specification. This results in complaining at an earlier
stage than previously if a build supports a compression method or not,
aka when parsing a specification in the backend or the frontend, and not
when processing it. zstd, lz4 and zlib are able to handle in their
respective routines setting up the compression level the case of a
default value, hence the backend or frontend code (pg_receivewal or
pg_basebackup) has now no need to know what the default compression
level should be if nothing is specified: the logic is now done so as the
specification parsing assigns it. It can also be enforced by passing
down a "level" set to the default value, that the backend will accept
(the replication protocol is for example able to handle a command like
BASE_BACKUP (COMPRESSION_DETAIL 'gzip:level=-1')).
This code simplification fixes an issue with pg_basebackup --gzip
introduced by ffd5365, where the tarball of the streamed WAL segments
would be created as of pg_wal.tar.gz with uncompressed contents, while
the intention is to compress the segments with gzip at a default level.
The origin of the confusion comes from the handling of the default
compression level of gzip (-1 or Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION) and the value of
0 was getting assigned, which is what walmethods.c would consider
as equivalent to no compression when streaming WAL segments with its tar
methods. Assigning always the compression level removes the confusion
of some code paths considering a value of 0 set in a specification as
either no compression or a default compression level.
Note that 010_pg_basebackup.pl has to be adjusted to skip a few tests
where the shape of the compression detail string for client and
server-side compression was checked using gzip. This is a result of the
code simplification, as gzip specifications cannot be used if a build
does not support it.
Reported-by: Tom Lane
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/1400032.1662217889@sss.pgh.pa.us
Backpatch-through: 15
Locale options can be specified for initdb, createdb, and CREATE
DATABASE. In initdb, it has always been possible to specify --locale
and then some --lc-* option to override a category. CREATE DATABASE
and createdb didn't allow that, requiring either the all-categories
option or only per-category options. In
f2553d4306, this was changed in CREATE
DATABASE (perhaps by accident?) to be more like the initdb behavior,
but createdb still had the old behavior.
Now we change createdb to match the behavior of CREATE DATABASE and
initdb, and also update the documentation of CREATE DATABASE to match
the new behavior, which was not done in the above commit.
Author: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/7c99c132dc9c0ac630e0127f032ac480@postgrespro.ru
This change concerns a couple of .txt files (for internal state checks)
that were still written in the path where the binary is executed, and
not in the subdirectory located in the target cluster. Like the other
.txt files doing already so (like loadable_libraries.txt), these are
saved in the base output directory. Note that on failure, the logs
report the full path to the .txt file generated, so these are easy to
find.
Oversight in 38bfae3.
Author: Daniel Gustafsson
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, Justin Prysby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/181A6DA8-3B7F-4B71-82D5-363FF0146820@yesql.se
Backpatch-through: 15
The primary fix here is to fix has_matching_range() so it does not
reference ranges->values[-1] when nranges == 0. Similar problems existed
in AssertCheckRanges() too. It does not look like any of these problems
could lead to a crash as the array in question is at the end of the Ranges
struct, and values[-1] is memory that belongs to other fields in the
struct. However, let's get rid of these rather unsafe coding practices.
In passing, I (David) adjusted some comments to try to make it more clear
what some of the fields are for in the Ranges struct. I had to study the
code to find out what nsorted was for as I couldn't tell from the
comments.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAqJQzPitufX-jR=YUbJafpCDAKUnwgdbX_MzSc93wuvdw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 14, where multi-range brin was added.
Commit c4c340088 changed geometric operators to use float4 and float8
functions, and handle NaN's in a better way. The circle sameness test
had a typo in the code which resulted in all comparisons with the left
circle having a NaN radius considered same.
postgres=# select '<(0,0),NaN>'::circle ~= '<(0,0),1>'::circle;
?column?
----------
t
(1 row)
This fixes the sameness test to consider the radius of both the left
and right circle.
Backpatch to v12 where this was introduced.
Author: Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQAo8dK=yctg2ZzjJuzV4zgOPBxRU5+Kb+yatFiddtQk6Rw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: v12
pg_walinspect uses datatype double (double precision floating point
number) for WAL stats percentile calculations and expose them via
float4 (single precision floating point number), which an unnecessary
loss of precision and confusing. Even though, it's harmless that way,
let's use float8 (double precision floating-point number) to be in
sync with what pg_walinspect does internally and what it exposes to
the users. This seems to be the pattern used elsewhere in the code.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Author: Bharath Rupireddy
Reviewed-by: Peter Eisentraut
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/36ee692b-232f-0484-ce94-dc39d82021ad%40enterprisedb.com
Be more clear about when and how an extension-defined GUC comes to be
visible in pg_settings. (Move the para to the bottom of the page, too;
whoever thought this point was more important than the para about the
view being updatable had odd priorities IMNSHO.)
Back-patch to v15 where archive modules were added, since that seems
to have made this more of a sore spot than it was before.
Benoit Lobréau, Nathan Bossart
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPE8EZ7KHaXMHKwT=HOim23tDVKYA1PruRuTfeYdCrYWwPGhag@mail.gmail.com
The ECPG preprocessor converted code such as
static varchar str1[10], str2[20], str3[30];
into
static struct varchar_1 { int len; char arr[ 10 ]; } str1 ;
struct varchar_2 { int len; char arr[ 20 ]; } str2 ;
struct varchar_3 { int len; char arr[ 30 ]; } str3 ;
thus losing the storage attribute for the later variables.
Repeat the declaration for each such variable.
(Note that this occurred only for variables declared "varchar"
or "bytea", which may help explain how it escaped detection
for so long.)
Andrey Sokolov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/942241662288242@mail.yandex.ru
Remove no-longer-accurate claim that Windows lacks home directories.
Clarify the text by more clearly distinguishing which statements
reflect hard-wired choices versus which ones reflect overridable
defaults. Update the examples of version-specific file names,
and make them track future version changes by using "&majorversion;"
and "&version;". (BTW, in devel and beta releases this method
correctly says that you can use strings like "16devel" and "15beta4"
as minor version identifiers.)
Back-patch to v15, but not further, with the thought that in older
releases the examples with three-part version numbers still had
some historical relevance. v15 will be the first major release after
the last 9.x branch went out of support.
Robert Treat and Tom Lane, reviewed by Julien Rouhaud
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAJSLCQ07F-WCYYYOY8+dWhHcVeJ1Pb01cWc-c0Hu=M3EjKT2Eg@mail.gmail.com
When using the BSD UUID functions, contrib/uuid-ossp expects
uuid_create() to produce a version-1 UUID. FreeBSD still does so,
but in recent NetBSD releases that function produces a version-4
(random) UUID instead. That's not acceptable for our purposes:
if the user wanted v4 she would have asked for v4, not v1.
Hence, check the version digit and complain if it's not '1'.
Also drop the documentation's claim that the NetBSD implementation
is usable. It might be, depending on which OS version you're using,
but we're not going to get into that kind of detail.
(Maybe someday we should ditch all these external libraries
and just write our own UUID code, but today is not that day.)
Nazir Bilal Yavuz, with cosmetic adjustments and docs by me.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3848059.1661038772@sss.pgh.pa.us
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17358-89806e7420797025@postgresql.org
In commit 3d895bc846 I introduced a bogus semicolon mid-statement by
careless cut-n-paste; move it. This had already been reported by Justin
Pryzby.
Also, change the styling a bit by avoiding names in CamelCase. This is
more consistent with the style we use elsewhere.
Backpatch to 15.
Author: Vitaly Burovoy <vitaly.burovoy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9afe5766-5a61-7860-598c-136867fad065@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220819133016.GV26426@telsasoft.com
Because of inadequate filtering, the check triggers were confusing the
search for action triggers in GetForeignKeyActionTriggers and vice-versa
in GetForeignKeyCheckTriggers; this confusion results in seemingly
random assertion failures, and can have real impact in non-asserting
builds depending on catalog order. Change these functions so that they
correctly ignore triggers that are not relevant to each side.
To reduce the odds of further problems, do not break out of the
searching loop in assertion builds. This break is likely to hide bugs;
without it, we would have detected this bug immediately.
This problem was introduced by f4566345cf, so backpatch to 15 where
that commit first appeared.
Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220908172029.sejft2ppckbo6oh5@awork3.anarazel.de
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4104619.1662663056@sss.pgh.pa.us
On failure in restoring a block image, no details were provided, while
it is possible to see failure with an inconsistent record state, a
failure in processing decompression or a failure in decompression
because a build does not support this option.
RestoreBlockImage() is used in two code paths in the backend code,
during recovery and when checking a page consistency after applying
masking, and both places are changed to consume the error message
produced by the internal routine when it returns a false status. All
the error messages are reported under ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR, that gets
used also when attempting to access a page compressed by a method
not supported by the build attempting the decompression. This is
something that can happen in core when doing physical replication with
primary and standby using inconsistent build options, for example.
This routine is available since 2c03216d and it has never provided any
context about the error happening when it failed. This change is
justified even more after 57aa5b2, that introduced compression of FPWs
in WAL.
Reported-by: Justin Prysby
Author: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220905002320.GD31833@telsasoft.com
Backpatch-through: 15
During ALTER TABLE ATTACH PARTITION, if the name of a parent's foreign
key constraint is already used on the partition, the code tries to
choose another one before the FK attributes list has been populated,
so the resulting constraint name was "<relname>__fkey" instead of
"<relname>_<attrs>_fkey". Repair, and add a test case.
Backpatch to 12. In 11, the code to attach a partition was not smart
enough to cope with conflicting constraint names, so the problem doesn't
exist there.
Author: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220901184156.738ebee5@karst
We should process completed IOs *before* trying to start more, so that
it is always possible to decode one more record when the decoded record
queue is empty, even if maintenance_io_concurrency is set so low that a
single earlier WAL record might have saturated the IO queue.
That bug was hidden because the effect of maintenance_io_concurrency was
arbitrarily clamped to be at least 2. Fix the ordering, and also remove
that clamp. We need a special case for 0, which is now treated the same
as recovery_prefetch=off, but otherwise the number is used directly.
This allows for testing with 1, which would have made the problem
obvious in simple test scenarios.
Also add an explicit error message for missing contrecords. It was a
bit strange that we didn't report an error already, and became a latent
bug with prefetching, since the internal state that tracks aborted
contrecords would not survive retrying, as revealed by
026_overwrite_contrecord.pl with this adjustment. Reporting an error
prevents that.
Back-patch to 15.
Reported-by: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220831140128.GS31833%40telsasoft.com
Add a new logical replication section for "Column Lists" (analogous to the
Row Filters page). This explains how the feature can be used and the
caveats in it.
Author: Peter Smith
Reviewed-by: Shi yu, Vignesh C, Erik Rijkers, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 15, where it was introduced
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHut+PvOuc9=_4TbASc5=VUqh16UWtFO3GzcKQK_5m1hrW3vqg@mail.gmail.com
The addition of published column names forgot to filter on attisdropped,
leading to cases where you could see "........pg.dropped.1........"
or the like as a reportedly-published column.
While we're here, rewrite the new subquery to get a more efficient plan
for it.
Hou Zhijie, per report from Jaime Casanova. Back-patch to v15 where
the bug was introduced. (Sadly, this means we need a post-beta4
catversion bump before beta4 has even hit the streets. I see no
good alternative though.)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/Yxa1SU4nH2HfN3/i@ahch-to
Improve documentation regarding the limitations of unique and primary key
constraints on partitioned tables. The existing documentation didn't make
it clear that the constraint columns had to be present in the partition
key as bare columns. The reader could be led to believe that it was ok to
include the constraint columns as part of a function call's parameters or
as part of an expression. Additionally, the documentation didn't mention
anything about the fact that we disallow unique and primary key
constraints if the partition keys contain *any* function calls or
expressions, regardless of if the constraint columns appear as columns
elsewhere in the partition key.
The confusion here was highlighted by a report on the general mailing list
by James Vanns.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH7vdhNF0EdYZz3GLpgE3RSJLwWLhEk7A_fiKS9dPBT3Dz_3eA@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvoU-u9iTqKjteYRFfi+UNEk7dbSAcyxEQD==vZt9B1KnA@mail.gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Erik Rijkers
Backpatch-through: 11
Commit e3fcca0d0d reverted modifications to HOT for BRIN, but it also
removed a couple unrelated tests from stats.sql. Reinstate those tests.
Reported-by: Peter Eisentraut
Commit db0d67db2 tweaked sort costing, which however resulted in a
couple plan changes in our regression tests. Most of the new plans were
fine, but partition_aggregate were meant to test parallel plans and the
new plans were serial.
Fix that by lowering parallel_setup_cost to 0, which is enough to switch
to the parallel plan again.
Report and patch by David Rowley.
Author: David Rowley
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vondra
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpVFgWzXdtUQkjyOPhNrNvumRi_=ftgS79KeAZ92tnHKQ@mail.gmail.com
