blbuildempty did not do even approximately the right thing: it tried
to add a metapage to the relation's regular data fork, which already
has one at that point. It should look like the ambuildempty methods
for all the standard index types, ie, initialize a metapage image in
some transient storage and then write it directly to the init fork.
To support that, refactor BloomInitMetapage into two functions.
In passing, fix BloomInitMetapage so it doesn't leave the rd_options
field of the index's relcache entry pointing at transient storage.
I'm not sure this had any visible consequence, since nothing much
else is likely to look at a bloom index's rd_options, but it's
certainly poor practice.
Per bug #14155 from Zhou Digoal.
Report: <20160524144146.22598.42558@wrigleys.postgresql.org>
Originally, this test created a 100000-row test table, which made it
run rather slowly compared to other contrib tests. Investigation with
gcov showed that we got no further improvement in code coverage after
the first 700 or so rows, making the large table 99% a waste of time.
Cut it back to 2000 rows to fix the runtime problem and still leave
some headroom for testing behaviors that may appear later.
A closer look at the gcov results showed that the main coverage
omissions in contrib/bloom occurred because the test never filled more
than one entry in the notFullPage array; which is unsurprising because
it exercised index cleanup only in the scenario of complete table
deletion, allowing every page in the index to become deleted rather
than not-full. Add testing that allows the not-full path to be
exercised as well.
Also, test the amvalidate function, because blvalidate.c had zero
coverage without that, and besides it's a good idea to check for
mistakes in the bloom opclass definitions.
Module provides new access method. It is actually a simple Bloom filter
implemented as pgsql's index. It could give some benefits on search
with large number of columns.
Module is a single way to test generic WAL interface committed earlier.
Author: Teodor Sigaev, Alexander Korotkov
Reviewers: Aleksander Alekseev, Michael Paquier, Jim Nasby
