Commit a07e03fd8f enlarged the work done
here under the pg_class heap buffer lock. Two preexisting actions are
best done before holding that lock. Both RelationGetNumberOfBlocks()
and visibilitymap_count() do I/O, and the latter might exclusive-lock a
visibility map buffer. Moving these reduces contention and risk of
undetected LWLock deadlock. Back-patch to v12, like that commit.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241031200139.b4@rfd.leadboat.com
This reverts commit 95c5acb3fc (v17) and
counterparts in each other non-master branch. If released, that commit
would have caused a worst-in-years minor release regression, via
undetected LWLock self-deadlock. This commit and its self-deadlock fix
warrant more bake time in the master branch.
Reported by Alexander Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10ec0bc3-5933-1189-6bb8-5dec4114558e@gmail.com
* In DetachPartitionFinalize() we were applying a tuple conversion map
to tuples that didn't need one, which can lead to erratic behavior if
a partitioned table has a partition with a different column order, as
reported by Alexander Lakhin. This was introduced by 53af9491a0.
Don't do that. Also, modify a recently added test case to exercise
this.
* The same function as well as CloneFkReferenced() were acquiring
AccessShareLock on a partition, only to have CreateTrigger() later
acquire ShareRowExclusiveLock on it. This can lead to deadlock by
lock escalation, unnecessarily. Avoid that by acquiring the stronger
lock to begin with. This probably dates back to branch 12, but I have
never seen a report of this being a problem in the field.
* Innocuous but wasteful: also introduced by 53af9491a0, we were
reading a pg_constraint tuple from syscache that we don't need, as
reported by Tender Wang. Don't.
Backpatch to 15.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/461e9c26-2076-8224-e119-84998b6a784e@gmail.com
Commit a07e03fd8f changed inplace updates
to wait for heap_update() commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE.
By keeping the pin during that wait, a sequence of autovacuum workers
and an uncommitted GRANT starved one foreground LockBufferForCleanup()
for six minutes, on buildfarm member sarus. Prevent, at the cost of a
bit of complexity. Back-patch to v12, like the earlier commit. That
commit and heap_inplace_lock() have not yet appeared in any release.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20241026184936.ae.nmisch@google.com
Historical corrections for Mexico, Mongolia, and Portugal.
Notably, Asia/Choibalsan is now an alias for Asia/Ulaanbaatar
rather than being a separate zone, mainly because the differences
between those zones were found to be based on untrustworthy data.
There are two functions that can be used in event triggers to get more
details about a rewrite happening on a relation. Both had a limited
documentation:
- pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_reason() and
pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_oid() were not mentioned in the main
event trigger section in the paragraph dedicated to the event
table_rewrite.
- pg_event_trigger_table_rewrite_reason() returns an integer which is a
bitmap of the reasons why a rewrite happens. There was no explanation
about the meaning of these values, forcing the reader to look at the
code to find out that these are defined in event_trigger.h.
While on it, let's add a comment in event_trigger.h where the
AT_REWRITE_* are defined, telling to update the documentation when
these values are changed.
Backpatch down to 13 as a consequence of 1ad23335f3, where this area
of the documentation has been heavily reworked.
Author: Greg Sabino Mullane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKAnmmL+Z6j-C8dAx1tVrnBmZJu+BSoc68WSg3sR+CVNjBCqbw@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 13
Disabling enable_indexscan has always also disabled Index Only Scans.
Here we make that more clear in the documentation in an attempt to
prevent future complaints complaining about this expected behavior.
Reported-by: Melanie Plageman
Author: David G. Johnston, David Rowley
Backpatch-through: 12, oldest supported version
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAAKRu_atV=kovgpaLREyG68PB5+ncKvJ2UNoeRetEgyC3Yb5Sw@mail.gmail.com
Coverity complained that pg_saslprep() could suffer integer overflow,
leading to under-allocation of the output buffer, if the input string
exceeds SIZE_MAX/4. This hazard seems largely hypothetical, but it's
easy enough to defend against, so let's do so.
This patch creates a third place in src/common/ where we are locally
defining MaxAllocSize so that we can test against that in the same way
in backend and frontend compiles. That seems like about two places
too many, so the next patch will move that into common/fe_memutils.h.
I'm hesitant to do that in back branches however.
Back-patch to v14. The code looks similar in older branches, but
before commit 67a472d71 there was a separate test on the input string
length that prevented this hazard.
Per Coverity report.
This was introduced in commit bfa2cee784, which replaced the old
bsearch_cmp() function we had in extended_stats.c with the current
implementation. The original discussion or commit message of
bfa2cee784 didn't mention where the new implementation came from, but
based on some googling, I'm guessing *BSD or libiberty, all of which
share this same code, with or without this fix.
Author: Ranier Vilela
Reviewed-by: Nathan Bossart
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAEudQAp34o_8u6sGSVraLwuMv9F7T9hyHpePXHmRaxR2Aboi%2Bw%40mail.gmail.com
A buffer lock won't stop a reader having already checked tuple
visibility. If a vac_update_datfrozenid() and then a crash happened
during inplace update of a relfrozenxid value, datfrozenxid could
overtake relfrozenxid. That could lead to "could not access status of
transaction" errors. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In
v14 and earlier, this also back-patches the assertion removal from
commit 7fcf2faf9c.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240620012908.92.nmisch@google.com
The inplace update survives ROLLBACK. The inval didn't, so another
backend's DDL could then update the row without incorporating the
inplace update. In the test this fixes, a mix of CREATE INDEX and ALTER
TABLE resulted in a table with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a
source of index corruption. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions).
The back branch versions don't change WAL, because those branches just
added end-of-recovery SIResetAll(). All branches change the ABI of
extern function PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple(). No PGXN extension
calls that, and there's no apparent use case in extensions.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Andres Freund.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240523000548.58.nmisch@google.com
An inplace update's invalidation messages are part of its transaction's
commit record. However, the update survives even if its transaction
aborts or we stop recovery before replaying its transaction commit.
After recovery, a backend that started in recovery could update the row
without incorporating the inplace update. That could result in a table
with an index, yet relhasindex=f. That is a source of index corruption.
This bulk invalidation avoids the functional consequences. A future
change can fix the !RecoveryInProgress() scenario without changing the
WAL format. Back-patch to v17 - v12 (all supported versions). v18 will
instead add invalidations to WAL.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240618152349.7f.nmisch@google.com
It was possible for the code to read out-of-bound data from the
"day_tab" table with some crafted input data. Let's treat these as
invalid input as the month number is incorrect.
A test is added to test this case with a check on the errno returned by
the decoding routine. A test close to the new one added in this commit
was testing for a failure, but did not look at the errno generated, so
let's use this commit to also change it, adding a check on the errno
returned by DecodeDateTime().
Like the other test scripts, dt_test should likely be expanded to
include more checks based on the errnos generated in these code paths.
This is left as future work.
This issue exists since 2e6f97560a, so backpatch all the way down.
Reported-by: Pavel Nekrasov
Author: Bruce Momjian, Pavel Nekrasov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18614-6bbe00117352309e@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
... to fix bugs when the referenced table is partitioned.
The catalog representation we chose for foreign keys connecting
partitioned tables (in commit f56f8f8da6) is inconvenient, in the
sense that a standalone table has a different way to represent the
constraint when referencing a partitioned table, than when the same
table becomes a partition (and vice versa). Because of this, we need to
create additional catalog rows on detach (pg_constraint and pg_trigger),
and remove them on attach. We were doing some of those things, but not
all of them, leading to missing catalog rows in certain cases.
The worst problem seems to be that we are missing action triggers after
detaching a partition, which means that you could update/delete rows
from the referenced partitioned table that still had referencing rows on
that table, the server failing to throw the required errors.
!!!
Note that this means existing databases with FKs that reference
partitioned tables might have rows that break relational integrity, on
tables that were once partitions on the referencing side of the FK.
Another possible problem is that trying to reattach a table
that had been detached would fail indicating that internal triggers
cannot be found, which from the user's point of view is nonsensical.
In branches 15 and above, we fix this by creating a new helper function
addFkConstraint() which is in charge of creating a standalone
pg_constraint row, and repurposing addFkRecurseReferencing() and
addFkRecurseReferenced() so that they're only the recursive routine for
each side of the FK, and they call addFkConstraint() to create
pg_constraint at each partitioning level and add the necessary triggers.
These new routines can be used during partition creation, partition
attach and detach, and foreign key creation. This reduces redundant
code and simplifies the flow.
In branches 14 and 13, we have a much simpler fix that consists on
simply removing the constraint on detach. The reason is that those
branches are missing commit f4566345cf, which reworked the way this
works in a way that we didn't consider back-patchable at the time.
We opted to leave branch 12 alone, because it's different from branch 13
enough that the fix doesn't apply; and because it is going in EOL mode
very soon, patching it now might be worse since there's no way to undo
the damage if it goes wrong.
Existing databases might need to be repaired.
In the future we might want to rethink the catalog representation to
avoid this problem, but for now the code seems to do what's required to
make the constraints operate correctly.
Co-authored-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Co-authored-by: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Reported-by: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Reported-by: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr@dalibo.com>
Reported-by: Thomas Baehler (SBB CFF FFS) <thomas.baehler2@sbb.ch>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230420144344.40744130@karst
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230705233028.2f554f73@karst
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/GVAP278MB02787E7134FD691861635A8BC9032@GVAP278MB0278.CHEP278.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18541-628a61bc267cd2d3@postgresql.org
If the query is rewritten into a NOTIFY command by a DO INSTEAD
rule, we'd get an assertion failure, or in non-assert builds
issue a rather confusing error message. Improve that.
Also fix a longstanding grammar mistake in a nearby error message.
Per bug #18664 from Alexander Lakhin. Back-patch to all supported
branches.
Tender Wang and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18664-ffd0ebc2386598df@postgresql.org
The finished transaction list can contain XIDs that are older than the
serializable global xmin. It's a short-lived state;
ClearOldPredicateLocks() removes any such transactions from the list,
and it's called whenever the global xmin advances. But if another
backend calls SummarizeOldestCommittedSxact() in that window, it will
call SerialAdd() on an XID that's older than the global xmin, or if
there are no more transactions running, when global xmin is
invalid. That trips the assertion in SerialAdd().
Fixes bug #18658 reported by Andrew Bille. Thanks to Alexander Lakhin
for analysis. Backpatch to all versions.
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/18658-7dab125ec688c70b%40postgresql.org
The present wording about viewing shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages
seems to suggest that the parameter cannot be viewed after startup
at all, whereas the intent is to make it clear that you can't use
"postgres -C" to view this parameter while the server is running.
This commit rephrases this section to remove the ambiguity.
Author: Seino Yuki
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier, David G. Johnston, Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/420584fd274f9ec4f337da55ffb3b790%40oss.nttdata.com
Backpatch-through: 15
After repartitioning the inner side of a hash join that would have
exceeded the allowed size, we check if all the tuples from a parent
partition moved to one child partition. That is evidence that it
contains duplicate keys and later attempts to repartition will also
fail, so we should give up trying to limit memory (for lack of a better
fallback strategy).
A thinko prevented the check from working correctly in partition 0 (the
one that is partially loaded into memory already). After
repartitioning, we should check for extreme skew if the *parent*
partition's space_exhausted flag was set, not the child partition's.
The consequence was repeated futile repartitioning until per-partition
data exceeded various limits including "ERROR: invalid DSA memory alloc
request size 1811939328", OS allocation failure, or temporary disk space
errors. (We could also do something about some of those symptoms, but
that's material for separate patches.)
This problem only became likely when PostgreSQL 16 introduced support
for Parallel Hash Right/Full Join, allowing NULL keys into the hash
table. Repartitioning always leaves NULL in partition 0, no matter how
many times you do it, because the hash value is all zero bits. That's
unlikely for other hashed values, but they might still have caused
wasted extra effort before giving up.
Back-patch to all supported releases.
Reported-by: Craig Milhiser <craig@milhiser.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BwnhO1OfgXbmXgC4fv_uu%3DOxcDQuHvfoQ4k0DFeB0Qqd-X-rQ%40mail.gmail.com
Commit 2dc1deaea turns out to have been still a brick shy of a load,
because CALL statements executing within a plpgsql exception block
could still pass the wrong snapshot to stable functions within the
CALL's argument list. That happened because standard_ProcessUtility
forces isAtomicContext to true if IsTransactionBlock is true, which
it always will be inside a subtransaction. Then ExecuteCallStmt
would think it does not need to push a new snapshot --- but
_SPI_execute_plan didn't do so either, since it thought it was in
nonatomic mode.
The best fix for this seems to be for _SPI_execute_plan to operate
in atomic execution mode if IsSubTransaction() is true, even when the
SPI context as a whole is non-atomic. This makes _SPI_execute_plan
have the same rules about when non-atomic execution is allowed as
_SPI_commit/_SPI_rollback have about when COMMIT/ROLLBACK are allowed,
which seems appropriately symmetric. (If anyone ever tries to allow
COMMIT/ROLLBACK inside a subtransaction, this would all need to be
rethought ... but I'm unconvinced that such a thing could be logically
consistent at all.)
For further consistency, also check IsSubTransaction() in
SPI_inside_nonatomic_context. That does not matter for its
one present-day caller StartTransaction, which can't be reached
inside a subtransaction. But if any other callers ever arise,
they'd presumably want this definition.
Per bug #18656 from Alexander Alehin. Back-patch to all
supported branches, like previous fixes in this area.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18656-cade1780866ef66c@postgresql.org
Commit a4ccc1cef introduced the Generation Context and modified the
logical decoding process to use a Generation Context with a fixed
block size of 8MB for storing tuple data decoded during logical
decoding (i.e., rb->tup_context). Several reports have indicated that
the logical decoding process can be terminated due to
out-of-memory (OOM) situations caused by excessive memory usage in
rb->tup_context.
This issue can occur when decoding a workload involving several
concurrent transactions, including a long-running transaction that
modifies tuples. By design, the Generation Context does not free a
memory block until all chunks within that block are
released. Consequently, if tuples modified by the long-running
transaction are stored across multiple memory blocks, these blocks
remain allocated until the long-running transaction completes, leading
to substantial memory fragmentation. The memory usage during logical
decoding, tracked by rb->size, does not account for memory
fragmentation, resulting in potentially much higher memory consumption
than the value of the logical_decoding_work_mem parameter.
Various improvement strategies were discussed in the relevant
thread. This change reduces the block size of the Generation Context
used in rb->tup_context from 8MB to 8kB. This modification
significantly decreases the likelihood of substantial memory
fragmentation occurring and is relatively straightforward to
backport. Performance testing across multiple platforms has confirmed
that this change will not introduce any performance degradation that
would impact actual operation.
Backport to all supported branches.
Reported-by: Alex Richman, Michael Guissine, Avi Weinberg
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Fujii Masao, David Rowley
Tested-by: Hayato Kuroda, Shlok Kyal
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAD21AoBTY1LATZUmvSXEssvq07qDZufV4AF-OHh9VD2pC0VY2A%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
find_computable_ec_member() had the wrong mental model of what
its primary caller prepare_sort_from_pathkeys() would do with
the selected EquivalenceClass member expression. We will not
compute the EC expression in a plan node atop the one returning
the passed-in targetlist; rather, the EC expression will be
computed as an additional column of that targetlist. So any
Var or quasi-Var used in the given tlist is also available to the
EC expression. In simple cases this makes no difference because
the given tlist is just a list of Vars or quasi-Vars --- but if
we are considering an appendrel member produced by flattening
a UNION ALL, the tlist may contain expressions, resulting in
failure to match and a "could not find pathkey item to sort"
error.
To fix, we can flatten both the tlist and the EC members with
pull_var_clause(), and then just check for subset-ness, so
that the code is actually shorter than before.
While this bug is quite old, the present patch only works back to
v13. We could possibly make it work in v12 by back-patching parts
of 375398244. On the whole though I don't like the risk/reward
ratio of that idea. v12's final release is next month, meaning
there would be no chance to correct matters if the patch causes a
regression. Since this failure has escaped notice for 14 years,
it's likely nobody will hit it in the field with v12.
Per bug #18652 from Alexander Lakhin.
Andrei Lepikhov and Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18652-deaa782ebcca85d1@postgresql.org
Commit 149ac7d455 which re-implemented pgindent in Perl explicitly
imported the devnull function from File::Spec, but the module does
not export anything. In recent versions of Perl calling a missing
import function cause a warning, which combined with warnings being
fatal cause pgindent to error out.
Backpatch to all supported versions.
Author: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Discusson: https://postgr.es/m/2372cd74-11b0-46f9-b28e-8f9627215d19@ewie.name
Backpatch-through: v12
The test was unstable in branches 14 and 15 as we were relying on the
number of changes in the table having a toast column to start streaming.
On branches >= 16, we have a GUC debug_logical_replication_streaming which
can stream each change, so the test was stable in those branches.
Change the test to use PREPARE TRANSACTION as that should make the result
consistent and test the code changed in 022564f60c.
Reported-by: Daniel Gustafsson as per buildfarm
Author: Hou Zhijie, Amit Kapila
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/8C2F86AA-981E-4803-B14D-E264C0255330@yesql.se
Commit 1ab67c9dfa, which modified this catalog query so that it
doesn't return temporary relations, forgot to schema-qualify the
operator. A comment earlier in the function implores us to fully
qualify everything in the query:
* Since we execute the constructed query with the default search_path
* (which could be unsafe), everything in this query MUST be fully
* qualified.
This commit fixes that. While at it, add a newline for consistency
with surrounding code.
Reviewed-by: Noah Misch
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZwQJYcuPPUsF0reU%40nathan
Backpatch-through: 12
Several places treat MyStartTime as a "long", which is only 32 bits
wide on some platforms. In reality, MyStartTime is a pg_time_t,
i.e., a signed 64-bit integer. This will lead to interesting bugs
on the aforementioned systems in 2038 when signed 32-bit integers
are no longer sufficient to store Unix time (e.g., "pg_ctl start"
hanging). To fix, ensure that MyStartTime is handled as a 64-bit
value everywhere. (Of course, users will need to ensure that
time_t is 64 bits wide on their system, too.)
Co-authored-by: Max Johnson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CO1PR07MB905262E8AC270FAAACED66008D682%40CO1PR07MB9052.namprd07.prod.outlook.com
Backpatch-through: 12
During logical decoding of in-progress transactions, we perform the toast
table scan while fetching the default toast value for an attribute. We
forgot to initialize the flag during this scan to indicate that the system
table scan is in progress. We need this flag to ensure that during logical
decoding we never directly access the tableam or heap APIs because we check
for concurrent aborts only in systable_* APIs.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Takeshi Ideriha, Hou Zhijie
Reviewed-by: Amit Kapila, Hou Zhijie
Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18641-6687273b7f15269d@postgresql.org
pg_cursor() supposed that any Portal it finds in the hash table must
have sourceText set up, but there's an edge case where that is not so.
A newly-created Portal has sourceText = NULL, and that doesn't change
until PortalDefineQuery is called. In SPI_cursor_open_internal,
we perform GetCachedPlan between CreatePortal and PortalDefineQuery,
and it's possible for user-defined code to execute during that
planning and cause a fetch from the pg_cursors view, resulting in a
null-pointer-dereference crash. (It looks like the same could happen
in exec_bind_message, but I've not tried to provoke a failure there.)
I considered trying to fix this by setting sourceText sooner, but
there may be instances of this same calling pattern in extensions,
and we couldn't be sure they'd get the memo promptly. It seems
better to redefine pg_cursor as not showing Portals that have
not yet had PortalDefineQuery called on them, which we can do by
just skipping them if sourceText is still NULL.
(Before a1c692358, pg_cursor would instead return a row with NULL
in the statement column. We could revert to that behavior but it
doesn't really seem like a better definition, especially since our
documentation doesn't suggest that the column could be NULL.)
Per report from PetSerAl. Back-patch to all supported branches.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAKygsHTBXLXjwV43kpZa+Cs+XTiaeeJiZdL4cPBm9f4MTdw7wg@mail.gmail.com
Use pqParseIntParam (nee parse_int_param) instead of using strtol
directly. This allows trailing whitespace, which the previous coding
didn't, and makes the spelling of the error message consistent with
other similar cases.
This seems to be an oversight in commit e7a221797, which introduced
parse_int_param. That fixed places that were using atoi(), but missed
this place which was randomly using strtol() instead.
Ordinarily I'd consider this minor cleanup not worth back-patching.
However, it seems that ecpg assumes it can add trailing whitespace
to URL parameters, so that use of the keepalives option fails in
that context. Perhaps that's worth improving as a separate matter.
In the meantime, back-patch this to all supported branches.
Yuto Sasaki (some further cleanup by me)
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/TY2PR01MB36286A7B97B9A15793335D18C1772@TY2PR01MB3628.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
COMMIT PREPARED removes on-disk 2PC files near its end, but the state
checked if a file is on-disk or not gets read from shared memory while
not holding the two-phase state lock.
Because of that, there was a small window where a second backend doing a
PREPARE TRANSACTION could reuse the GlobalTransaction put back into the
2PC free list by the COMMIT PREPARED, overwriting the "ondisk" flag read
afterwards by the COMMIT PREPARED to decide if its on-disk two-phase
state file should be removed, preventing the file deletion.
This commit fixes this issue so as the "ondisk" flag in the
GlobalTransaction is read while holding the two-phase state lock, not
from shared memory after its entry has been added to the free list.
Orphaned two-phase state files flushed to disk after a checkpoint are
discarded at the beginning of recovery. However, a truncation of
pg_xact/ would make the startup process issue a FATAL when it cannot
read the SLRU page holding the state of the transaction whose 2PC file
was orphaned, which is a necessary step to decide if the 2PC file should
be removed or not. Removing manually the file would be necessary in
this case.
Issue introduced by effe7d9552, so backpatch all the way down.
Mea culpa.
Author: wuchengwen
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/tencent_A7F059B5136A359625C7B2E4A386B3C3F007@qq.com
Backpatch-through: 12
There were unnecessary non-breaking spaces (nbsp, U+00A0, 0xc2a0 in
UTF-8) in the docs. This commit replaces them with ASCII spaces
(0x20).
config.sgml is backpatched through 17.
ref/drop_extension.sgml is backpatched through 13.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240930.153404.202479334310259810.ishii%40postgresql.org
Reviewed-by: Yugo Nagata, Daniel Gustafsson
Backpatch-through: 17, 13
Because we have been setting this too low, there has been a
long-standing warning about a missing declaration for inet_pton().
Modern gcc now considers this an error, so we have been getting failures
on the buildfarm animal fairywren.
Fix suggested by Thomas Munro.
This isn't needed in later branches, as they already set MIN_WINNT
higher, nor on earlier branches because they don't use inet_pton().
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/574fae43-c993-4a25-b0e5-04c3e9c36d6d@dunslane.net
Reindexing temp tables or indexes of other sessions is not allowed.
However, reindexdb in parallel mode previously listed them as
the objects to process, leading to failures.
This commit ensures reindexdb in parallel mode skips temporary tables
and indexes by adding a condition based on the relpersistence column
in pg_class to the object listing queries, preventing these issues.
Note that this commit does not affect reindexdb when temporary tables
or indexes are explicitly specified using the -t or -j options;
reindexdb in that case still does not skip them and can cause an error.
Back-patch to v13 where parallel mode was introduced in reindexdb.
Author: Fujii Masao
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/5f37ee56-14fb-44fe-9150-9eb97e10538b@oss.nttdata.com
An invalid toast index is skipped in reindex_relation(). These would be
remnants of a failed REINDEX CONCURRENTLY and they should never been
rebuilt as there can only be one valid toast index at a time.
REINDEX_REL_SUPPRESS_INDEX_USE, used by CLUSTER and VACUUM FULL, needs
to maintain a list of the indexes being processed. The list of indexes
is retrieved from the relation cache, and includes invalid indexes. The
code has missed that invalid toast indexes are ignored in
reindex_relation() as this leads to a hard failure in reindex_index(),
and they were left in the reindex pending list, making the list
inconsistent when rechecked. The incorrect memory access was happening
when scanning pg_class for the refresh of pg_database.datfrozenxid, when
doing a scan of pg_class.
This issue exists since REINDEX CONCURRENTLY exists, where invalid toast
indexes can exist, so backpatch all the way down.
Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Tender Wang
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/18630-9aed99c38830657d@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
Otherwise testing an existing installation can fail, if there are other locks,
e.g. from one of the isolation tests.
This was originally applied as c3315a7da5 in 16~, but it is possible
to see this test fail depending on the concurrent activity for older
active branches.
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221003234111.4ob7yph6r4g4ywhu@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch-through: 12
Running vacuumdb with a non-superuser while another user has created a
temporary table would lead to a mid-flight permission failure,
interrupting the operation. vacuum_rel() skips temporary relations of
other backends, and it makes no sense for vacuumdb to know about these
relations, so let's switch it to ignore temporary relations entirely.
Adding a qual in the query based on relpersistence simplifies the
generation of its WHERE clause in vacuum_one_database(), per se the
removal of "has_where".
Author: VaibhaveS, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Fujii Masao
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAM_eQjwfAR=y3G1fGyS1U9FTmc+FyJm9amNfY2QCZBnDDbNPZg@mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 12
The previous commit fixed some ways of losing an inplace update. It
remained possible to lose one when a backend working toward a
heap_update() copied a tuple into memory just before inplace update of
that tuple. In catalogs eligible for inplace update, use LOCKTAG_TUPLE
to govern admission to the steps of copying an old tuple, modifying it,
and issuing heap_update(). This includes MERGE commands. To avoid
changing most of the pg_class DDL, don't require LOCKTAG_TUPLE when
holding a relation lock sufficient to exclude inplace updaters.
Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions). In v13 and v12, "UPDATE
pg_class" or "UPDATE pg_database" can still lose an inplace update. The
v14+ UPDATE fix needs commit 86dc90056d,
and it wasn't worth reimplementing that fix without such infrastructure.
Reviewed by Nitin Motiani and (in earlier versions) Heikki Linnakangas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20231027214946.79.nmisch@google.com
As previously-added tests demonstrated, heap_inplace_update() could
instead update an unrelated tuple of the same catalog. It could lose
the update. Losing relhasindex=t was a source of index corruption.
Inplace-updating commands like VACUUM will now wait for heap_update()
commands like GRANT TABLE and GRANT DATABASE. That isn't ideal, but a
long-running GRANT already hurts VACUUM progress more just by keeping an
XID running. The VACUUM will behave like a DELETE or UPDATE waiting for
the uncommitted change.
For implementation details, start at the systable_inplace_update_begin()
header comment and README.tuplock. Back-patch to v12 (all supported
versions). In back branches, retain a deprecated heap_inplace_update(),
for extensions.
Reported by Smolkin Grigory. Reviewed by Nitin Motiani, (in earlier
versions) Heikki Linnakangas, and (in earlier versions) Alexander
Lakhin.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMp+ueZQz3yDk7qg42hk6-9gxniYbp-=bG2mgqecErqR5gGGOA@mail.gmail.com
The current use always releases this locktag. A planned use will
continue that intent. It will involve more areas of code, making unlock
omissions easier. Warn under debug_assertions, like we do for various
resource leaks. Back-patch to v12 (all supported versions), the plan
for the commit of the new use.
Reviewed by Heikki Linnakangas.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20240512232923.aa.nmisch@google.com
Project policy is to not leave global objects behind after a regress
test run. This was found as a result of the development of a patch
to make pg_regress detect such leftovers automatically, which in the
end was withdrawn due to issues with parallel runs.
This was originally committed as 936e3fa378, but the issue also exists
in the 12~16 range.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/E1phvk7-000VAH-7k@gemulon.postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 12
