Commit Graph

491 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Eisentraut
611806cd72 Add trailing commas to enum definitions
Since C99, there can be a trailing comma after the last value in an
enum definition.  A lot of new code has been introducing this style on
the fly.  Some new patches are now taking an inconsistent approach to
this.  Some add the last comma on the fly if they add a new last
value, some are trying to preserve the existing style in each place,
some are even dropping the last comma if there was one.  We could
nudge this all in a consistent direction if we just add the trailing
commas everywhere once.

I omitted a few places where there was a fixed "last" value that will
always stay last.  I also skipped the header files of libpq and ecpg,
in case people want to use those with older compilers.  There were
also a small number of cases where the enum type wasn't used anywhere
(but the enum values were), which ended up confusing pgindent a bit,
so I left those alone.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/386f8c45-c8ac-4681-8add-e3b0852c1620%40eisentraut.org
2023-10-26 09:20:54 +02:00
Michael Paquier
d61f2538a3 postgres_fdw: Replace WAIT_EVENT_EXTENSION with custom wait events
Three custom wait events are added here:
- "PostgresFdwCleanupResult", waiting while cleaning up PQgetResult() on
transaction abort.
- "PostgresFdwConnect", waiting to establish a connection to a remote
server.
- "PostgresFdwGetResult", waiting to receive a result from a remote
server.

Author: Masahiro Ikeda
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/197bce267fa691a0ac62c86c4ab904c4@oss.nttdata.com
2023-10-05 09:50:42 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita
05c821294e postgres_fdw: Fix test for parameterized foreign scan.
Commit e4106b252 should have updated this test, but did not; back-patch
to all supported branches.

Reviewed by Richard Guo.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15nR0NXLSCKQAcqbZbTzrzd5MozowWnTnGfPkayndF43Q%40mail.gmail.com
2023-08-30 17:15:00 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita
89be0b89ae Fix code indentation vioaltion introduced in commit 9e9931d2b.
Per buildfarm member koel
2023-08-15 17:45:00 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita
9e9931d2bf Re-allow FDWs and custom scan providers to replace joins with pseudoconstant quals.
This was disabled in commit 6f80a8d9c due to the lack of support for
handling of pseudoconstant quals assigned to replaced joins in
createplan.c.  To re-allow it, this patch adds the support by 1)
modifying the ForeignPath and CustomPath structs so that if they
represent foreign and custom scans replacing a join with a scan, they
store the list of RestrictInfo nodes to apply to the join, as in
JoinPaths, and by 2) modifying create_scan_plan() in createplan.c so
that it uses that list in that case, instead of the baserestrictinfo
list, to get pseudoconstant quals assigned to the join, as mentioned in
the commit message for that commit.

Important item for the release notes: this is non-backwards-compatible
since it modifies the ForeignPath and CustomPath structs, as mentioned
above, and changes the argument lists for FDW helper functions
create_foreignscan_path(), create_foreign_join_path(), and
create_foreign_upper_path().

Richard Guo, with some additional changes by me, reviewed by Nishant
Sharma, Suraj Kharage, and Richard Guo.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADrsxdbcN1vejBaf8a%2BQhrZY5PXL-04mCd4GDu6qm6FigDZd6Q%40mail.gmail.com
2023-08-15 16:45:00 +09:00
Etsuro Fujita
6f80a8d9c1 Disallow replacing joins with scans in problematic cases.
Commit e7cb7ee14, which introduced the infrastructure for FDWs and
custom scan providers to replace joins with scans, failed to add support
handling of pseudoconstant quals assigned to replaced joins in
createplan.c, leading to an incorrect plan without a gating Result node
when postgres_fdw replaced a join with such a qual.

To fix, we could add the support by 1) modifying the ForeignPath and
CustomPath structs to store the list of RestrictInfo nodes to apply to
the join, as in JoinPaths, if they represent foreign and custom scans
replacing a join with a scan, and by 2) modifying create_scan_plan() in
createplan.c to use that list in that case, instead of the
baserestrictinfo list, to get pseudoconstant quals assigned to the join;
but #1 would cause an ABI break.  So fix by modifying the infrastructure
to just disallow replacing joins with such quals.

Back-patch to all supported branches.

Reported by Nishant Sharma.  Patch by me, reviewed by Nishant Sharma and
Richard Guo.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADrsxdbcN1vejBaf8a%2BQhrZY5PXL-04mCd4GDu6qm6FigDZd6Q%40mail.gmail.com
2023-07-28 15:45:00 +09:00
Tomas Vondra
087a933b21 Remove expensive test of postgres_fdw batch inserts
The test inserted 70k rows into a foreign table, in order to verify
correct behavior with more than 65535 parameters, and was added in
response to a bug report.

However, this is rather expensive, especially when running the tests
under valgrind, CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS etc. It doesn't seem worth it to
keep running the test, so remove it from all branches (14+).

Backpatch-through: 14
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2131017.1623451468@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-07-03 18:16:58 +02:00
Michael Paquier
2aeaf80e57 Refactor some code related to wait events "BufferPin" and "Extension"
The following changes are done:
- Addition of WaitEventBufferPin and WaitEventExtension, that hold a
list of wait events related to each category.
- Addition of two functions that encapsulate the list of wait events for
each category.
- Rename BUFFER_PIN to BUFFERPIN (only this wait event class used an
underscore, requiring a specific rule in the automation script).

These changes make a bit easier the automatic generation of all the code
and documentation related to wait events, as all the wait event
categories are now controlled by consistent structures and functions.

Author: Bertrand Drouvot
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/c6f35117-4b20-4c78-1df5-d3056010dcf5@gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/77a86b3a-c4a8-5f5d-69b9-d70bbf2e9b98@gmail.com
2023-07-03 11:01:02 +09:00
Amit Langote
054ff3b33a Add a test case for a316a3bc
a316a3bc fixed the code in build_simpl_rel() that propagates
RelOptInfo.userid from parent to child rels so that it works
correctly for the child rels of a UNION ALL subquery rel, though
no tests were added in that commit.  So do so here.

As noted in the discussion, coming up with a test case in the core
regression suite for this fix has turned out to be tricky, so the
test case is added to the postgres_fdw's suite instead.
postgresGetForeignRelSize()'s use of user mapping for the user
specified in RelOptInfo.userid makes it relatively easier to craft
a test case around.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA%2BHiwqH91GaFNXcXbLAM9L%3DzBwUmSyv699Mtv3i1_xtk9Xec_A%40mail.gmail.com
Backpatch-through: 16
2023-06-30 15:51:34 +09:00
Tom Lane
991a3df227 Fix filtering of "cloned" outer-join quals some more.
We've had multiple issues with the clause_is_computable_at logic that
I introduced in 2489d76c4: it's been known to accept more than one
clone of the same qual at the same plan node, and also to accept no
clones at all.  It's looking impractical to get it 100% right on the
basis of the currently-stored information, so fix it by introducing a
new RestrictInfo field "incompatible_relids" that explicitly shows
which outer joins a given clone mustn't be pushed above.

In principle we could populate this field in every RestrictInfo, but
that would cost space and there doesn't presently seem to be a need
for it in general.  Also, while deconstruct_distribute_oj_quals can
easily fill the field with the remaining members of the commutative
join set that it's considering, computing it in the general case
seems again pretty complicated.  So for now, just fill it for
clone quals.

Along the way, fix a bug that may or may not be only latent:
equivclass.c was generating replacement clauses with is_pushed_down
and has_clone/is_clone markings that didn't match their
required_relids.  This led me to conclude that leaving the clone flags
out of make_restrictinfo's purview wasn't such a great idea after all,
so add them.

Per report from Richard Guo.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAMbWs48EYi_9-pSd0ORes1kTmTeAjT4Q3gu49hJtYCbSn2JyeA@mail.gmail.com
2023-05-25 10:28:33 -04:00
Tom Lane
a2eb99a01e Expand some more uses of "deleg" to "delegation" or "delegated".
Complete the task begun in 9c0a0e2ed: we don't want to use the
abbreviation "deleg" for GSS delegation in any user-visible places.
(For consistency, this also changes most internal uses too.)

Abhijit Menon-Sen and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/949048.1684639317@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-05-21 10:55:18 -04:00
Bruce Momjian
9c0a0e2ed9 rename "gss_accept_deleg" to "gss_accept_delegation".
This is more consistent with existing GUC spelling.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZGdnEsGtNj7+fZoa@momjian.us
2023-05-20 21:32:54 -04:00
Tom Lane
0245f8db36 Pre-beta mechanical code beautification.
Run pgindent, pgperltidy, and reformat-dat-files.

This set of diffs is a bit larger than typical.  We've updated to
pg_bsd_indent 2.1.2, which properly indents variable declarations that
have multi-line initialization expressions (the continuation lines are
now indented one tab stop).  We've also updated to perltidy version
20230309 and changed some of its settings, which reduces its desire to
add whitespace to lines to make assignments etc. line up.  Going
forward, that should make for fewer random-seeming changes to existing
code.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230428092545.qfb3y5wcu4cm75ur@alvherre.pgsql
2023-05-19 17:24:48 -04:00
Michael Paquier
806fad7573 Fix buffer refcount leak with FDW bulk inserts
The leak would show up when using batch inserts with foreign tables
included in a partition tree, as the slots used in the batch were not
reset once processed.  In order to fix this problem, some
ExecClearTuple() are added to clean up the slots used once a batch is
filled and processed, mapping with the number of slots currently in use
as tracked by the counter ri_NumSlots.

This buffer refcount leak has been introduced in b676ac4 with the
addition of the executor facility to improve bulk inserts for FDWs, so
backpatch down to 14.

Alexander has provided the patch (slightly modified by me).  The test
for postgres_fdw comes from me, based on the test case that the author
has sent in the report.

Author: Alexander Pyhalov
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b035780a740efd38dc30790c76927255@postgrespro.ru
Backpatch-through: 14
2023-04-25 09:42:19 +09:00
David Rowley
b4dbf3e924 Fix various typos
This fixes many spelling mistakes in comments, but a few references to
invalid parameter names, function names and option names too in comments
and also some in string constants

Also, fix an #undef that was undefining the incorrect definition

Author: Alexander Lakhin
Reviewed-by: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/d5f68d19-c0fc-91a9-118d-7c6a5a3f5fad@gmail.com
2023-04-18 13:23:23 +12:00
Stephen Frost
6633cfb216 De-Revert "Add support for Kerberos credential delegation"
This reverts commit 3d03b24c3 (Revert Add support for Kerberos
credential delegation) which was committed on the grounds of concern
about portability, but on further review and discussion, it's clear that
we are better off explicitly requiring MIT Kerberos as that appears to
be the only GSSAPI library currently that's under proper maintenance
and ongoing development.  The API used for storing credentials was added
to MIT Kerberos over a decade ago while for the other libraries which
appear to be mainly based on Heimdal, which exists explicitly to be a
re-implementation of MIT Kerberos, the API never made it to a released
version (even though it was added to the Heimdal git repo over 5 years
ago..).

This post-feature-freeze change was approved by the RMT.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ZDDO6jaESKaBgej0%40tamriel.snowman.net
2023-04-13 08:55:07 -04:00
Stephen Frost
3d03b24c35 Revert "Add support for Kerberos credential delegation"
This reverts commit 3d4fa227bc.

Per discussion and buildfarm, this depends on APIs that seem to not
be available on at least one platform (NetBSD).  Should be certainly
possible to rework to be optional on that platform if necessary but bit
late for that at this point.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/3286097.1680922218@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-04-08 07:21:35 -04:00
Stephen Frost
3d4fa227bc Add support for Kerberos credential delegation
Support GSSAPI/Kerberos credentials being delegated to the server by a
client.  With this, a user authenticating to PostgreSQL using Kerberos
(GSSAPI) credentials can choose to delegate their credentials to the
PostgreSQL server (which can choose to accept them, or not), allowing
the server to then use those delegated credentials to connect to
another service, such as with postgres_fdw or dblink or theoretically
any other service which is able to be authenticated using Kerberos.

Both postgres_fdw and dblink are changed to allow non-superuser
password-less connections but only when GSSAPI credentials have been
delegated to the server by the client and GSSAPI is used to
authenticate to the remote system.

Authors: Stephen Frost, Peifeng Qiu
Reviewed-By: David Christensen
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CO1PR05MB8023CC2CB575E0FAAD7DF4F8A8E29@CO1PR05MB8023.namprd05.prod.outlook.com
2023-04-07 21:58:04 -04:00
Etsuro Fujita
983ec23007 postgres_fdw: Add support for parallel abort.
postgres_fdw aborts remote (sub)transactions opened on remote server(s)
in a local (sub)transaction one by one when the local (sub)transaction
aborts.  This patch allows it to abort the remote (sub)transactions in
parallel to improve performance.  This is enabled by the server option
"parallel_abort".  The default is false.

Etsuro Fujita, reviewed by David Zhang.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK15FuPVGx3TGHKShsbPKKtF1y58-ZLcKoxfN-nqLj1dZ%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com
2023-04-06 17:30:00 +09:00
Daniel Gustafsson
fb6fad6ef1 Fix function reference in comment
Commit a61b1f748 renamed ExecCheckRTEPerms to ExecCheckPermissions
as part of a larger body of work, but missed this comment.  Fix by
updating the referenced function name to make the comment the same
as other occurrences.

Author: Koshi Shibagaki <shibagaki.koshi@fujitsu.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/OS3PR01MB653359ACBE8DBBE29EE2BC71FA909@OS3PR01MB6533.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
2023-04-05 09:06:32 +02:00
Etsuro Fujita
39a3bdc9eb postgres_fdw: Remove useless if-test in GetConnection().
Checking whether entry->conn is NULL after doing disconnect_pg_server()
for that entry is pointless, as that function ensures that it is NULL.

Thinko in commit 7fc1a81e4; this would be harmless, so patch HEAD only.

Reviewed-by: Richard Guo and Daniel Gustafsson
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK169vQ83PQwQkoxO-AK2EeK1EsgsxixedM%2BBLWEAhZ_AqQ%40mail.gmail.com
2023-03-17 18:15:00 +09:00
Tom Lane
71a75626d5 Drop test view when done with it.
The view just added by commit 53fe7e6cb decompiles differently
in v15 than HEAD (presumably as a consequence of 47bb9db75).
That causes failures in cross-version upgrade testing.

We could teach AdjustUpgrade.pm to compensate for that, but it
seems less painful to just drop the view after we're done with it.

Per buildfarm.
2023-02-27 20:27:48 -05:00
Tom Lane
53fe7e6cb8 Harden postgres_fdw tests against unexpected cache flushes.
postgres_fdw will close its remote session if an sinval cache reset
occurs, since it's possible that that means some FDW parameters
changed.  We had two tests that were trying to ensure that the
session remains alive by setting debug_discard_caches = 0; but
that's not sufficient.  Even though the tests seem stable enough
in the buildfarm, they flap a lot under CI.

In the first test, which is checking the ability to recover from
a lost connection, we can stabilize the results by just not
caring whether pg_terminate_backend() finds a victim backend.
If a reset did happen, there won't be a session to terminate
anymore, but the test can proceed anyway.  (Arguably, we are
then not testing the unintentional-disconnect case, but as long
as that scenario is exercised in most runs I think it's fine;
testing the reset-driven case is of value too.)

In the second test, which is trying to verify the application_name
displayed in pg_stat_activity by a remote session, we had a race
condition in that the remote session might go away before we can
fetch its pg_stat_activity entry.  We can close that race and make
the test more certainly test what it intends to by arranging things
so that the remote session itself fetches its pg_stat_activity entry
(based on PID rather than a somewhat-circular assumption about the
application name).

Both tests now demonstrably pass under debug_discard_caches = 1,
so we can remove that hack.

Back-patch into relevant back branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230226194340.u44bkfgyz64c67i6@awork3.anarazel.de
2023-02-27 16:29:51 -05:00
Peter Eisentraut
62d56f6720 Fix comment indentation and whitespace
The previous layout satisfied pgindent but failed the git whitespace
check.  Fix by not putting the comment first in the line, which
pgindent does not handle well.

Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/480e3c67-b703-46ff-a418-d3b481d68372%40enterprisedb.com
2023-02-24 14:54:41 +01:00
Michael Paquier
8427ce4c37 Fix handling of escape sequences in postgres_fdw.application_name
postgres_fdw.application_name relies on MyProcPort to define the data
that should be added to escape sequences %u (user name) or %d (database
name).  However this code could be run in processes that lack a
MyProcPort, like an autovacuum process, causing crashes.

The code generating the application name is made more flexible with this
commit, so as it now generates no data for %u and %d if MyProcPort is
missing, and a simple "unknown" if MyProcPort exists, but the expected
fields are not set.

Reported-by: Alexander Lakhin
Author: Kyotaro Horiguchi, Michael Paquier
Reviewed-by: Hayato Kuroda, Masahiko Sawada
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/17789-8b31c5a4672b74d9@postgresql.org
Backpatch-through: 15
2023-02-21 20:01:43 +09:00
Michael Paquier
ef7002dbe0 Fix various typos in code and tests
Most of these are recent, and the documentation portions are new as of
v16 so there is no need for a backpatch.

Author: Justin Pryzby
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20230208155644.GM1653@telsasoft.com
2023-02-09 14:43:53 +09:00
Peter Eisentraut
54a177a948 Remove useless casts to (void *) in hash_search() calls
Some of these appear to be leftovers from when hash_search() took a
char * argument (changed in 5999e78fc4).

Since after this there is some more horizontal space available, do
some light reformatting where suitable.

Reviewed-by: Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/fd9adf5d-b1aa-e82f-e4c7-263c30145807%40enterprisedb.com
2023-02-06 09:41:01 +01:00
Tom Lane
3bef56e116 Invent "join domains" to replace the below_outer_join hack.
EquivalenceClasses are now understood as applying within a "join
domain", which is a set of inner-joined relations (possibly underneath
an outer join).  We no longer need to treat an EC from below an outer
join as a second-class citizen.

I have hopes of eventually being able to treat outer-join clauses via
EquivalenceClasses, by means of only applying deductions within the
EC's join domain.  There are still problems in the way of that, though,
so for now the reconsider_outer_join_clause logic is still here.

I haven't been able to get rid of RestrictInfo.is_pushed_down either,
but I wonder if that could be recast using JoinDomains.

I had to hack one test case in postgres_fdw.sql to make it still test
what it was meant to, because postgres_fdw is inconsistent about
how it deals with quals containing non-shippable expressions; see
https://postgr.es/m/1691374.1671659838@sss.pgh.pa.us.  That should
be improved, but I don't think it's within the scope of this patch
series.

Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/830269.1656693747@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-30 13:50:25 -05:00
Tom Lane
b448f1c8d8 Do assorted mop-up in the planner.
Remove RestrictInfo.nullable_relids, along with a good deal of
infrastructure that calculated it.  One use-case for it was in
join_clause_is_movable_to, but we can now replace that usage with
a check to see if the clause's relids include any outer join
that can null the target relation.  The other use-case was in
join_clause_is_movable_into, but that test can just be dropped
entirely now that the clause's relids include outer joins.
Furthermore, join_clause_is_movable_into should now be
accurate enough that it will accept anything returned by
generate_join_implied_equalities, so we can restore the Assert
that was diked out in commit 95f4e59c3.

Remove the outerjoin_delayed mechanism.  We needed this before to
prevent quals from getting evaluated below outer joins that should
null some of their vars.  Now that we consider varnullingrels while
placing quals, that's taken care of automatically, so throw the
whole thing away.

Teach remove_useless_result_rtes to also remove useless FromExprs.
Having done that, the delay_upper_joins flag serves no purpose any
more and we can remove it, largely reverting 11086f2f2.

Use constant TRUE for "dummy" clauses when throwing back outer joins.
This improves on a hack I introduced in commit 6a6522529.  If we
have a left-join clause l.x = r.y, and a WHERE clause l.x = constant,
we generate r.y = constant and then don't really have a need for the
join clause.  But we must throw the join clause back anyway after
marking it redundant, so that the join search heuristics won't think
this is a clauseless join and avoid it.  That was a kluge introduced
under time pressure, and after looking at it I thought of a better
way: let's just introduce constant-TRUE "join clauses" instead,
and get rid of them at the end.  This improves the generated plans for
such cases by not having to test a redundant join clause.  We can also
get rid of the ugly hack used to mark such clauses as redundant for
selectivity estimation.

Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/830269.1656693747@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-30 13:44:36 -05:00
Tom Lane
2489d76c49 Make Vars be outer-join-aware.
Traditionally we used the same Var struct to represent the value
of a table column everywhere in parse and plan trees.  This choice
predates our support for SQL outer joins, and it's really a pretty
bad idea with outer joins, because the Var's value can depend on
where it is in the tree: it might go to NULL above an outer join.
So expression nodes that are equal() per equalfuncs.c might not
represent the same value, which is a huge correctness hazard for
the planner.

To improve this, decorate Var nodes with a bitmapset showing
which outer joins (identified by RTE indexes) may have nulled
them at the point in the parse tree where the Var appears.
This allows us to trust that equal() Vars represent the same value.
A certain amount of klugery is still needed to cope with cases
where we re-order two outer joins, but it's possible to make it
work without sacrificing that core principle.  PlaceHolderVars
receive similar decoration for the same reason.

In the planner, we include these outer join bitmapsets into the relids
that an expression is considered to depend on, and in consequence also
add outer-join relids to the relids of join RelOptInfos.  This allows
us to correctly perceive whether an expression can be calculated above
or below a particular outer join.

This change affects FDWs that want to plan foreign joins.  They *must*
follow suit when labeling foreign joins in order to match with the
core planner, but for many purposes (if postgres_fdw is any guide)
they'd prefer to consider only base relations within the join.
To support both requirements, redefine ForeignScan.fs_relids as
base+OJ relids, and add a new field fs_base_relids that's set up by
the core planner.

Large though it is, this commit just does the minimum necessary to
install the new mechanisms and get check-world passing again.
Follow-up patches will perform some cleanup.  (The README additions
and comments mention some stuff that will appear in the follow-up.)

Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/830269.1656693747@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-30 13:16:20 -05:00
Andres Freund
e4602483e9 dblink, postgres_fdw: Handle interrupts during connection establishment
Until now dblink and postgres_fdw did not process interrupts during connection
establishment. Besides preventing query cancellations etc, this can lead to
undetected deadlocks, as global barriers are not processed.

These aforementioned undetected deadlocks are the reason for the spate of CI
test failures in the FreeBSD 'test_running' step.

Fix the bug by using the helper from libpq-be-fe-helpers.h, introduced in a
prior commit. Besides fixing the bug, this also removes duplicated code
around reserving file descriptors.

As the change is relatively large and there are no field reports of the
problem, don't backpatch for now.

Reviewed-by: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20220925232237.p6uskba2dw6fnwj2@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch:
2023-01-23 19:25:23 -08:00
Tom Lane
47bb9db759 Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable.
The rule system needs "old" and/or "new" pseudo-RTEs in rule actions
that are ON INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE.  Historically it's put such entries
into the ON SELECT rules of views as well, but those are really quite
vestigial.  The only thing we've used them for is to carry the
view's relid forward to AcquireExecutorLocks (so that we can
re-lock the view to verify it hasn't changed before re-using a plan)
and to carry its relid and permissions data forward to execution-time
permissions checks.  What we can do instead of that is to retain
these fields of the RTE_RELATION RTE for the view even after we
convert it to an RTE_SUBQUERY RTE.  This requires a tiny amount of
extra complication in the planner and AcquireExecutorLocks, but on
the other hand we can get rid of the logic that moves that data from
one place to another.

The principal immediate benefit of doing this, aside from a small
saving in the pg_rewrite data for views, is that these pseudo-RTEs
no longer trigger ruleutils.c's heuristic about qualifying variable
names when the rangetable's length is more than 1.  That results
in quite a number of small simplifications in regression test outputs,
which are all to the good IMO.

Bump catversion because we need to dump a few more fields of
RTE_SUBQUERY RTEs.  While those will always be zeroes anyway in
stored rules (because we'd never populate them until query rewrite)
they are useful for debugging, and it seems like we'd better make
sure to transmit such RTEs accurately in plans sent to parallel
workers.  I don't think the executor actually examines these fields
after startup, but someday it might.

This is a second attempt at committing 1b4d280ea.  The difference
from the first time is that now we can add some filtering rules to
AdjustUpgrade.pm to allow cross-version upgrade testing to pass
despite all the cosmetic changes in CREATE VIEW outputs.

Amit Langote (filtering rules by me)

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEf7gPN4Hn+LoZ4tP2q_Qt7n3vw7-6fJKOf92tSEnX6Gg@mail.gmail.com
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/891521.1673657296@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-18 13:23:57 -05:00
Tom Lane
8d83a5d0a2 Remove redundant grouping and DISTINCT columns.
Avoid explicitly grouping by columns that we know are redundant
for sorting, for example we need group by only one of x and y in
	SELECT ... WHERE x = y GROUP BY x, y
This comes up more often than you might think, as shown by the
changes in the regression tests.  It's nearly free to detect too,
since we are just piggybacking on the existing logic that detects
redundant pathkeys.  (In some of the existing plans that change,
it's visible that a sort step preceding the grouping step already
didn't bother to sort by the redundant column, making the old plan
a bit silly-looking.)

To do this, build processed_groupClause and processed_distinctClause
lists that omit any provably-redundant sort items, and consult those
not the originals where relevant.  This means that within the
planner, one should usually consult root->processed_groupClause or
root->processed_distinctClause if one wants to know which columns
are to be grouped on; but to check whether grouping or distinct-ing
is happening at all, check non-NIL-ness of parse->groupClause or
parse->distinctClause.  This is comparable to longstanding rules
about handling the HAVING clause, so I don't think it'll be a huge
maintenance problem.

nodeAgg.c also needs minor mods, because it's now possible to generate
AGG_PLAIN and AGG_SORTED Agg nodes with zero grouping columns.

Patch by me; thanks to Richard Guo and David Rowley for review.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/185315.1672179489@sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-18 12:37:57 -05:00
Tom Lane
f0e6d6d3c9 Revert "Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable."
This reverts commit 1b4d280ea1.
It's broken the buildfarm members that run cross-version-upgrade tests,
because they're not prepared to deal with cosmetic differences between
CREATE VIEW commands emitted by older servers and HEAD.  Even if we had
a solution to that, which we don't, it'd take some time to roll it out
to the affected animals.  This improvement isn't valuable enough to
justify addressing that problem on an emergency basis, so revert it
for now.
2023-01-11 23:01:22 -05:00
Tom Lane
1b4d280ea1 Get rid of the "new" and "old" entries in a view's rangetable.
The rule system needs "old" and/or "new" pseudo-RTEs in rule actions
that are ON INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE.  Historically it's put such entries
into the ON SELECT rules of views as well, but those are really quite
vestigial.  The only thing we've used them for is to carry the
view's relid forward to AcquireExecutorLocks (so that we can
re-lock the view to verify it hasn't changed before re-using a plan)
and to carry its relid and permissions data forward to execution-time
permissions checks.  What we can do instead of that is to retain
these fields of the RTE_RELATION RTE for the view even after we
convert it to an RTE_SUBQUERY RTE.  This requires a tiny amount of
extra complication in the planner and AcquireExecutorLocks, but on
the other hand we can get rid of the logic that moves that data from
one place to another.

The principal immediate benefit of doing this, aside from a small
saving in the pg_rewrite data for views, is that these pseudo-RTEs
no longer trigger ruleutils.c's heuristic about qualifying variable
names when the rangetable's length is more than 1.  That results
in quite a number of small simplifications in regression test outputs,
which are all to the good IMO.

Bump catversion because we need to dump a few more fields of
RTE_SUBQUERY RTEs.  While those will always be zeroes anyway in
stored rules (because we'd never populate them until query rewrite)
they are useful for debugging, and it seems like we'd better make
sure to transmit such RTEs accurately in plans sent to parallel
workers.  I don't think the executor actually examines these fields
after startup, but someday it might.

Amit Langote

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqEf7gPN4Hn+LoZ4tP2q_Qt7n3vw7-6fJKOf92tSEnX6Gg@mail.gmail.com
2023-01-11 19:41:09 -05:00
Tomas Vondra
57d11ef028 Check relkind before using TABLESAMPLE in postgres_fdw
Check the remote relkind before trying to use TABLESAMPLE to acquire
sample from the remote relation. Even if the remote server version has
TABLESAMPLE support, the foreign table may point to incompatible relkind
(e.g. a view or a sequence).

If the relkind does not support TABLESAMPLE, error out if TABLESAMPLE
was requested specifically (as system/bernoulli), or fallback to random
just like we do for old server versions.

We currently end up disabling sampling for such relkind values anyway,
due to reltuples being -1 or 1, but that seems rather accidental, and
might get broken by improving reltuples estimates, etc.  So better to
make the check explicit.

Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/951485.1672461744%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-07 14:39:33 +01:00
Tomas Vondra
211d80c065 Fix stale comment about sample_frac adjustment
A comment was left behind referencing sample rate adjustment removed
from 8ad51b5f44. So clean that up. While at it also remove the sample
rate clamping which should not be necessary without the clamping, and
just check that with an assert.

Reported-by: Tom Lane
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/951485.1672461744%40sss.pgh.pa.us
2023-01-06 14:47:23 +01:00
Bruce Momjian
c8e1ba736b Update copyright for 2023
Backpatch-through: 11
2023-01-02 15:00:37 -05:00
Tomas Vondra
8ad51b5f44 Sample postgres_fdw tables remotely during ANALYZE
When collecting ANALYZE sample on foreign tables, postgres_fdw fetched
all rows and performed the sampling locally. For large tables this means
transferring and immediately discarding large amounts of data.

This commit allows the sampling to be performed on the remote server,
transferring only the much smaller sample. The sampling is performed
using the built-in TABLESAMPLE methods (system, bernoulli) or random()
function, depending on the remote server version.

Remote sampling can be enabled by analyze_sampling on the foreign server
and/or foreign table, with supported values 'off', 'auto', 'system',
'bernoulli' and 'random'. The default value is 'auto' which uses either
'bernoulli' (TABLESAMPLE method) or 'random' (for remote servers without
TABLESAMPLE support).
2022-12-30 23:16:01 +01:00
David Rowley
bbfdf7180d Fix bug in translate_col_privs_multilevel
Fix incorrect code which was trying to convert a Bitmapset of columns at
the attnums according to a parent table and transform them into the
equivalent Bitmapset with same attnums according to the given child table.
This code is new as of a61b1f748 and was failing to do the correct
translation when there was an intermediate parent table between 'rel' and
'top_parent_rel'.

Reported-by: Ranier Vilela
Author: Richard Guo, Amit Langote
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAEudQArohfB_Gy%2BhcH2-bANUkxgjJiP%3DABq01_LgTNTbcNijag%40mail.gmail.com
2022-12-24 00:58:34 +13:00
Andrew Dunstan
8284cf5f74 Add copyright notices to meson files
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/222b43a5-2fb3-2c1b-9cd0-375d376c8246@dunslane.net
2022-12-20 07:54:39 -05:00
Etsuro Fujita
594f8d3776 Allow batching of inserts during cross-partition updates.
Commit 927f453a9 disallowed batching added by commit b663a4136 to be
used for the inserts performed as part of cross-partition updates of
partitioned tables, mainly because the previous code in
nodeModifyTable.c couldn't handle pending inserts into foreign-table
partitions that are also UPDATE target partitions.  But we don't have
such a limitation anymore (cf. commit ffbb7e65a), so let's allow for
this by removing from execPartition.c the restriction added by commit
927f453a9 that batching is only allowed if the query command type is
CMD_INSERT.

In postgres_fdw, since commit 86dc90056 changed it to effectively
disable cross-partition updates in the case where a foreign-table
partition chosen to insert rows into is also an UPDATE target partition,
allow batching in the case where a foreign-table partition chosen to
do so is *not* also an UPDATE target partition.  This is enabled by the
"batch_size" option added by commit b663a4136, which is disabled by
default.

This patch also adjusts the test case added by commit 927f453a9 to
confirm that the inserts performed as part of a cross-partition update
of a partitioned table indeed uses batching.

Amit Langote, reviewed and/or tested by Georgios Kokolatos, Zhihong Yu,
Bharath Rupireddy, Hou Zhijie, Vignesh C, and me.

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CA%2BHiwqH1Lz1yJmPs%3DaD-pzd_HLLynLHvq5iYeT9mB0bBV7oJ6w%40mail.gmail.com
2022-12-20 19:05:00 +09:00
Bruce Momjian
59346209a8 C comment: fix wording
Backpatch-through: master
2022-12-16 12:15:54 -05:00
David Rowley
4a29eabd1d Remove pessimistic cost penalization from Incremental Sort
When incremental sorts were added in v13 a 1.5x pessimism factor was added
to the cost modal.  Seemingly this was done because the cost modal only
has an estimate of the total number of input rows and the number of
presorted groups.  It assumes that the input rows will be evenly
distributed throughout the presorted groups.  The 1.5x pessimism factor
was added to slightly reduce the likelihood of incremental sorts being
used in the hope to avoid performance regressions where an incremental
sort plan was picked and turned out slower due to a large skew in the
number of rows in the presorted groups.

An additional quirk with the path generation code meant that we could
consider both a sort and an incremental sort on paths with presorted keys.
This meant that with the pessimism factor, it was possible that we opted
to perform a sort rather than an incremental sort when the given path had
presorted keys.

Here we remove the 1.5x pessimism factor to allow incremental sorts to
have a fairer chance at being chosen against a full sort.

Previously we would generally create a sort path on the cheapest input
path (if that wasn't sorted already) and incremental sort paths on any
path which had presorted keys.  This meant that if the cheapest input path
wasn't completely sorted but happened to have presorted keys, we would
create a full sort path *and* an incremental sort path on that input path.
Here we change this logic so that if there are presorted keys, we only
create an incremental sort path, and create sort paths only when a full
sort is required.

Both the removal of the cost pessimism factor and the changes made to the
path generation make it more likely that incremental sorts will now be
chosen.  That, of course, as with teaching the planner any new tricks,
means an increased likelihood that the planner will perform an incremental
sort when it's not the best method.  Our standard escape hatch for these
cases is an enable_* GUC.  enable_incremental_sort already exists for
this.

This came out of a report by Pavel Luzanov where he mentioned that the
master branch was choosing to perform a Seq Scan -> Sort -> Group
Aggregate for his query with an ORDER BY aggregate function.  The v15 plan
for his query performed an Index Scan -> Group Aggregate, of course, the
aggregate performed the final sort internally in nodeAgg.c for the
aggregate's ORDER BY.  The ideal plan would have been to use the index,
which provided partially sorted input then use an incremental sort to
provide the aggregate with the sorted input.  This was not being chosen
due to the pessimism in the incremental sort cost modal, so here we remove
that and rationalize the path generation so that sort and incremental sort
plans don't have to needlessly compete.  We assume that it's senseless
to ever use a full sort on a given input path where an incremental sort
can be performed.

Reported-by: Pavel Luzanov
Reviewed-by: Richard Guo
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/9f61ddbf-2989-1536-b31e-6459370a6baa%40postgrespro.ru
2022-12-16 15:22:23 +13:00
Alvaro Herrera
a61b1f7482
Rework query relation permission checking
Currently, information about the permissions to be checked on relations
mentioned in a query is stored in their range table entries.  So the
executor must scan the entire range table looking for relations that
need to have permissions checked.  This can make the permission checking
part of the executor initialization needlessly expensive when many
inheritance children are present in the range range.  While the
permissions need not be checked on the individual child relations, the
executor still must visit every range table entry to filter them out.

This commit moves the permission checking information out of the range
table entries into a new plan node called RTEPermissionInfo.  Every
top-level (inheritance "root") RTE_RELATION entry in the range table
gets one and a list of those is maintained alongside the range table.
This new list is initialized by the parser when initializing the range
table.  The rewriter can add more entries to it as rules/views are
expanded.  Finally, the planner combines the lists of the individual
subqueries into one flat list that is passed to the executor for
checking.

To make it quick to find the RTEPermissionInfo entry belonging to a
given relation, RangeTblEntry gets a new Index field 'perminfoindex'
that stores the corresponding RTEPermissionInfo's index in the query's
list of the latter.

ExecutorCheckPerms_hook has gained another List * argument; the
signature is now:
typedef bool (*ExecutorCheckPerms_hook_type) (List *rangeTable,
					      List *rtePermInfos,
					      bool ereport_on_violation);
The first argument is no longer used by any in-core uses of the hook,
but we leave it in place because there may be other implementations that
do.  Implementations should likely scan the rtePermInfos list to
determine which operations to allow or deny.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGjJDmUhDSfv-U2qhKJjt9ST7Xh9JXC_irsAQ1TAUsJYg@mail.gmail.com
2022-12-06 16:09:24 +01:00
Alvaro Herrera
599b33b949
Stop accessing checkAsUser via RTE in some cases
A future commit will move the checkAsUser field from RangeTblEntry
to a new node that, unlike RTEs, will only be created for tables
mentioned in the query but not for the inheritance child relations
added to the query by the planner.  So, checkAsUser value for a
given child relation will have to be obtained by referring to that
for its ancestor mentioned in the query.

In preparation, it seems better to expand the use of RelOptInfo.userid
during planning in place of rte->checkAsUser so that there will be
fewer places to adjust for the above change.

Given that the child-to-ancestor mapping is not available during the
execution of a given "child" ForeignScan node, add a checkAsUser
field to ForeignScan to carry the child relation's RelOptInfo.userid.

Author: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CA+HiwqGFCs2uq7VRKi7g+FFKbP6Ea_2_HkgZb2HPhUfaAKT3ng@mail.gmail.com
2022-11-30 12:07:03 +01:00
Etsuro Fujita
ffbb7e65a8 Fix handling of pending inserts in nodeModifyTable.c.
Commit b663a4136, which allowed FDWs to INSERT rows in bulk, added to
nodeModifyTable.c code to flush pending inserts to the foreign-table
result relation(s) before completing processing of the ModifyTable node,
but the code failed to take into account the case where the INSERT query
has modifying CTEs, leading to incorrect results.

Also, that commit failed to flush pending inserts before firing BEFORE
ROW triggers so that rows are visible to such triggers.

In that commit we scanned through EState's
es_tuple_routing_result_relations or es_opened_result_relations list to
find the foreign-table result relations to which pending inserts are
flushed, but that would be inefficient in some cases.  So to fix, 1) add
a List member to EState to record the insert-pending result relations,
and 2) modify nodeModifyTable.c so that it adds the foreign-table result
relation to the list in ExecInsert() if appropriate, and flushes pending
inserts properly using the list where needed.

While here, fix a copy-and-pasteo in a comment in ExecBatchInsert(),
which was added by that commit.

Back-patch to v14 where that commit appeared.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPmGK16qutyCmyJJzgQOhfBq%3DNoGDqTB6O0QBZTihrbqre%2BoxA%40mail.gmail.com
2022-11-25 17:45:00 +09:00
Tom Lane
a5fc46414d Avoid making commutatively-duplicate clauses in EquivalenceClasses.
When we decide we need to make a derived clause equating a.x and
b.y, we already will re-use a previously-made clause "a.x = b.y".
But we might instead have "b.y = a.x", which is perfectly usable
because equivclass.c has never promised anything about the
operand order in clauses it builds.  Saving construction of a
new RestrictInfo doesn't matter all that much in itself --- but
because we cache selectivity estimates and so on per-RestrictInfo,
there's a possibility of saving a fair amount of duplicative
effort downstream.

Hence, check for commutative matches as well as direct ones when
seeing if we have a pre-existing clause.  This changes the visible
clause order in several regression test cases, but they're all
clearly-insignificant changes.

Checking for the reverse operand order is simple enough, but
if we wanted to check for operator OID match we'd need to call
get_commutator here, which is not so cheap.  I concluded that
we don't really need the operator check anyway, so I just
removed it.  It's unlikely that an opfamily contains more than
one applicable operator for a given pair of operand datatypes;
and if it does they had better give the same answers, so there
seems little need to insist that we use exactly the one
select_equality_operator chose.

Using the current core regression suite as a test case, I see
this change reducing the number of new join clauses built by
create_join_clause from 9673 to 5142 (out of 26652 calls).
So not quite 50% savings, but pretty close to it.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/78062.1666735746@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-10-27 14:42:18 -04:00
Tom Lane
8bf66dedd8 Fix confusion about havingQual vs hasHavingQual in planner.
Preprocessing of the HAVING clause will reduce havingQual to NIL
if the clause is constant-TRUE.  This is one case where that
convention is rather unfortunate, because "HAVING TRUE" is not at all
the same as not having any HAVING clause at all.  (Per the SQL spec,
it still forces the query to be grouped.)  The planner deals with this
by having a boolean hasHavingQual that records whether havingQual was
originally nonempty; places that just want to check whether HAVING
was specified are supposed to consult that.

I found three places that got that wrong.  Fortunately, these could
only affect cost estimates not correctness.  It'd be hard even
to demonstrate the errors; for example, the one in allpaths.c would
only matter in a query that has HAVING TRUE but no GROUP BY and no
aggregates, which would require a completely variable-free SELECT
list, making the case probably of only academic interest.  Hence,
while these are worth fixing before someone copies the incorrect
coding somewhere more critical, they don't seem worth back-patching.
I didn't bother trying to devise regression tests, either.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2503888.1666042643@sss.pgh.pa.us
2022-10-18 10:44:34 -04:00
Michael Paquier
a19e5cee63 Rename SetSingleFuncCall() to InitMaterializedSRF()
Per discussion, the existing routine name able to initialize a SRF
function with materialize mode is unpopular, so rename it.  Equally, the
flags of this function are renamed, as of:
- SRF_SINGLE_USE_EXPECTED -> MAT_SRF_USE_EXPECTED_DESC
- SRF_SINGLE_BLESS -> MAT_SRF_BLESS
The previous function and flags introduced in 9e98583 are kept around
for compatibility purposes, so as any extension code already compiled
with v15 continues to work as-is.  The declarations introduced here for
compatibility will be removed from HEAD in a follow-up commit.

The new names have been suggested by Andres Freund and Melanie
Plageman.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221013194820.ciktb2sbbpw7cljm@awork3.anarazel.de
Backpatch-through: 15
2022-10-18 10:22:35 +09:00