comparison functions), replacing the highly bogus bitwise array_eq. Create
a btree index opclass for ANYARRAY --- it is now possible to create indexes
on array columns.
Arrange to cache the results of catalog lookups across multiple array
operations, instead of repeating the lookups on every call.
Add string_to_array and array_to_string functions.
Remove singleton_array, array_accum, array_assign, and array_subscript
functions, since these were for proof-of-concept and not intended to become
supported functions.
Minor adjustments to behavior in some corner cases with empty or
zero-dimensional arrays.
Joe Conway (with some editorializing by Tom Lane).
HH:MM:SS.SSS... when there is a nonzero part-of-a-day field in an
interval value. The seconds part used to be suppressed if zero,
but there's no equivalent behavior for timestamp, and since we're
modeling this format on timestamp it's probably wrong. Per complaint
and patch from Larry Rosenman.
This is no longer necessary or appropriate since we don't use zero typeid
as a wildcard anymore, and it fixes a nasty performance problem with
functions with many parameters. Per recent example from Reuven Lerner.
The attached fixes select_common_type() to support the below case:
create table t1( c1 int);
create domain dom_c1 int;
create table t2(c1 dom_c1);
select * from t1 join t2 using( c1 );
I didn't see a need for maintaining the domain as the preferred type. A
simple getBaseType() call on all elements of the list seems to be
enough.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
after the CHECK. Cluster depends on the index name, so I thought it
wise to ensure all names are available, rather than leaving off the
CONSTRAINT "$n" portion for internally named constraints.
CREATE TABLE jkey (col integer primary key);
CREATE TABLE j (col integer REFERENCES jkey);
ALTER TABLE j ADD CHECK(col > 5);
This is a problem in 7.3 series as well as -Tip.
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
- LIKE <subtable> [ INCLUDING DEFAULTS | EXCLUDING DEFAULTS ]
- Quick cleanup of analyze.c function prototypes.
- New non-reserved keywords (INCLUDING, EXCLUDING, DEFAULTS), SQL 200X
Opted not to extend for check constraints at this time.
As per the definition that it's user defined columns, OIDs are NOT
inherited.
Doc and Source patches attached.
--
Rod Taylor <rbt@rbt.ca>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h.diff?r1=1.85&r2=1.86
>
> modified SockAddr, but no corresponding change was made here
> (fe-auth.c:612):
>
> case AUTH_REQ_KRB5:
> #ifdef KRB5
> if (pg_krb5_sendauth(PQerrormsg, conn->sock, &conn->laddr.in,
> &conn->raddr.in,
> hostname) != STATUS_OK)
>
> It's not obvious to me what the change ought to be though.
This patch should hopefully fix both kerberos 4 and 5.
Kurt Roeckx
> rexec and making it an untrusted language. Last time I looked, it didn't
> look particularly difficult. I've set aside some time next week, so stay
> tuned.
Attached is a patch that removes all of the RExec code from plpython from
the current PostgreSQL CVS. In addition, plpython needs to be changed to an
untrusted language in createlang. Please let me know if there are any
problems.
Kevin Jacobs
slave
servers. I haven't tested it very well, so use at your own risk (and I
recommend against using it in production).
Basically, I have a central database server that has 4 summary tables
inside
it replicated to a remote slave (these database tables are for my mail
server
authentication, so these are replicated to another server tuned for many
connections, and so I don't have postgres connections opened straight to
my
back-end database server).
Unfortunately, I also wanted to implement a replication database server
for
hot-backups. I realized, too late, that the replication process is
pretty
greedy and will try to replicate all tables marked as a
"MasterAddTable".
To make a long story, I made a patch to RServ.pm and Replicate that
allows you
to specify, on the command line, a list of tables that you want to
replicate...it'll ignore all others.
I haven't finished, since this has to be integrated with CleanLog for
instance, but this should (and does) suffice for the moment.
I have yet to test it with two slaves, but at least my mail server
replication
database now works (it was failing every time it tried to replicate, for
a
variety of reasons).
Anyone have any suggestions on how to improve on this? (or, if someone
more
familiar with this code wants to take the ball and run with it, you're
welcome to).
--
Michael A Nachbaur <mike@nachbaur.com>
