standard convention the 21st century runs from 2001-2100, not 2000-2099,
so make it work like that. Per bug #2885 from Akio Iwaasa.
Backpatch to 8.2, but no further, since this is really a definitional
change; users of older branches are probably more interested in stability.
< * Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending
> * -Allow the creation of indexes with mixed ascending/descending
<
< This is possible now by creating an operator class with reversed sort
< operators. One complexity is that NULLs would then appear at the start
< of the result set, and this might affect certain sort types, like
< merge join.
<
per-column options for btree indexes. The planner's support for this is still
pretty rudimentary; it does not yet know how to plan mergejoins with
nondefault ordering options. The documentation is pretty rudimentary, too.
I'll work on improving that stuff later.
Note incompatible change from prior behavior: ORDER BY ... USING will now be
rejected if the operator is not a less-than or greater-than member of some
btree opclass. This prevents less-than-sane behavior if an operator that
doesn't actually define a proper sort ordering is selected.
< * Improve the MONEY data type
> * -Make 64-bit version of the MONEY data type
> * Add locale-aware MONEY type, and support multiple currencies
< Change the MONEY data type to use DECIMAL internally, with special
< locale-aware output formatting.
< http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-09/msg01107.php
>
> * Make consistent use of long/short command options --- pg_ctl needs
> long ones, pg_config doesn't have short ones, postgres doesn't have
> enough long ones, etc.
> o Consider parsing the -c string into individual queries so each
> is run in its own transaction
>
> o Consider disallowing multiple queries in PQexec() as an
> additional barrier to SQL injection attacks
< * Allow inherited tables to inherit index, UNIQUE constraint, and primary
< key, foreign key
< * UNIQUE INDEX on base column not honored on INSERTs/UPDATEs from
< inherited table: INSERT INTO inherit_table (unique_index_col) VALUES
< (dup) should fail
<
< The main difficulty with this item is the problem of creating an index
< that can span more than one table.
<
< * Allow SELECT ... FOR UPDATE on inherited tables
> * Inheritance
>
> o Allow inherited tables to inherit indexes, UNIQUE constraints,
> and primary/foreign keys
> o Honor UNIQUE INDEX on base column in INSERTs/UPDATEs
> on inherited table, e.g. INSERT INTO inherit_table
> (unique_index_col) VALUES (dup) should fail
>
> The main difficulty with this item is the problem of
> creating an index that can span multiple tables.
>
> o Allow SELECT ... FOR UPDATE on inherited tables
>
>
>
an optarg). Add some comments noting that code in three different files has
to be kept in sync. Fix erroneous description of -S switch (it sets work_mem
not silent_mode), and do some light copy-editing elsewhere in postgres-ref.
