From fc7e99872cb3595638fc00ab96cf433bfa77fb14 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:20:52 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Mention DROP TABLE as well as ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT

... when talking about how good they are in replacement of bulk DELETE
in partitioned setups.

The original wording was a bit confusing.

Per an observation from David Wheeler.
---
 doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
index 4c9fc5d57a..c250faec4e 100644
--- a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
@@ -2332,7 +2332,8 @@ VALUES ('New York', NULL, NULL, 'NY');
      <para>
       Bulk loads and deletes can be accomplished by adding or removing
       partitions, if that requirement is planned into the partitioning design.
-      <command>ALTER TABLE</> is far faster than a bulk operation.
+      <command>ALTER TABLE NO INHERIT</> and <command>DROP TABLE</> are
+      both far faster than a bulk operation.
       It also entirely avoids the <command>VACUUM</command>
       overhead caused by a bulk <command>DELETE</>.
      </para>