From ee68a44106fa89b8efb2f21b71c3fcafaaf48851 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2012 22:37:34 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Improve comment. --- src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c b/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c index 94051aa1c3..388589beac 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c +++ b/src/backend/access/gin/ginxlog.c @@ -671,9 +671,10 @@ gin_redo(XLogRecPtr lsn, XLogRecord *record) uint8 info = record->xl_info & ~XLR_INFO_MASK; /* - * GIN indexes do not require any conflict processing. + * GIN indexes do not require any conflict processing. NB: If we ever + * implement a similar optimization as we have in b-tree, and remove + * killed tuples outside VACUUM, we'll need to handle that here. */ - RestoreBkpBlocks(lsn, record, false); topCtx = MemoryContextSwitchTo(opCtx);