Fix old, misleading comment for PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE.

The comment implies that we can eventually remove this, but per
discussion, we actually don't want to do that ever, in order to
maintain compatibility.

Jelte Fennema-Nio, reviewed by Tristan Partin

Discussion: http://postgr.es/m/CAGECzQTO72jKed5461W8cytV2Msh_e+WUZjOyX_RUQCbjk4LRA@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Robert Haas 2024-04-04 15:55:53 -04:00
parent 12b964d781
commit e57fe3824e

View File

@ -91,8 +91,7 @@ typedef enum
PGRES_POLLING_READING, /* These two indicate that one may */ PGRES_POLLING_READING, /* These two indicate that one may */
PGRES_POLLING_WRITING, /* use select before polling again. */ PGRES_POLLING_WRITING, /* use select before polling again. */
PGRES_POLLING_OK, PGRES_POLLING_OK,
PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE /* unused; keep for awhile for backwards PGRES_POLLING_ACTIVE /* unused; keep for backwards compatibility */
* compatibility */
} PostgresPollingStatusType; } PostgresPollingStatusType;
typedef enum typedef enum