mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2025-01-06 15:24:56 +08:00
Fix locking while setting flags in MySerializableXact.
Even if a flag is modified only by the backend owning the transaction, it's not safe to modify it without a lock. Another backend might be setting or clearing a different flag in the flags field concurrently, and that operation might be lost because setting or clearing a bit in a word is not atomic. Make did-write flag a simple backend-private boolean variable, because it was only set or tested in the owning backend (except when committing a prepared transaction, but it's not worthwhile to optimize for the case of a read-only prepared transaction). This also eliminates the need to add locking where that flag is set. Also, set the did-write flag when doing DDL operations like DROP TABLE or TRUNCATE -- that was missed earlier.
This commit is contained in:
parent
d69149ed71
commit
cb2d158c58
@ -392,10 +392,11 @@ static HTAB *LocalPredicateLockHash = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Keep a pointer to the currently-running serializable transaction (if any)
|
||||
* for quick reference.
|
||||
* TODO SSI: Remove volatile qualifier and the then-unnecessary casts?
|
||||
* for quick reference. Also, remember if we have written anything that could
|
||||
* cause a rw-conflict.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static volatile SERIALIZABLEXACT *MySerializableXact = InvalidSerializableXact;
|
||||
static SERIALIZABLEXACT *MySerializableXact = InvalidSerializableXact;
|
||||
static bool MyXactDidWrite = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* local functions */
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1424,20 +1425,30 @@ GetSafeSnapshot(Snapshot origSnapshot)
|
||||
if (MySerializableXact == InvalidSerializableXact)
|
||||
return snapshot; /* no concurrent r/w xacts; it's safe */
|
||||
|
||||
MySerializableXact->flags |= SXACT_FLAG_DEFERRABLE_WAITING;
|
||||
LWLockAcquire(SerializableXactHashLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Wait for concurrent transactions to finish. Stop early if one of
|
||||
* them marked us as conflicted.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
MySerializableXact->flags |= SXACT_FLAG_DEFERRABLE_WAITING;
|
||||
while (!(SHMQueueEmpty((SHM_QUEUE *)
|
||||
&MySerializableXact->possibleUnsafeConflicts) ||
|
||||
SxactIsROUnsafe(MySerializableXact)))
|
||||
{
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
ProcWaitForSignal();
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockAcquire(SerializableXactHashLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
MySerializableXact->flags &= ~SXACT_FLAG_DEFERRABLE_WAITING;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!SxactIsROUnsafe(MySerializableXact))
|
||||
{
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
break; /* success */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* else, need to retry... */
|
||||
ereport(DEBUG2,
|
||||
@ -1600,6 +1611,7 @@ RegisterSerializableTransactionInt(Snapshot snapshot)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
MySerializableXact = sxact;
|
||||
MyXactDidWrite = false; /* haven't written anything yet */
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1635,24 +1647,24 @@ RegisterPredicateLockingXid(const TransactionId xid)
|
||||
if (MySerializableXact == InvalidSerializableXact)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* This should only be done once per transaction. */
|
||||
Assert(MySerializableXact->topXid == InvalidTransactionId);
|
||||
|
||||
/* We should have a valid XID and be at the top level. */
|
||||
Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(xid));
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockAcquire(SerializableXactHashLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
|
||||
/* This should only be done once per transaction. */
|
||||
Assert(MySerializableXact->topXid == InvalidTransactionId);
|
||||
|
||||
MySerializableXact->topXid = xid;
|
||||
|
||||
sxidtag.xid = xid;
|
||||
LWLockAcquire(SerializableXactHashLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
sxid = (SERIALIZABLEXID *) hash_search(SerializableXidHash,
|
||||
&sxidtag,
|
||||
HASH_ENTER, &found);
|
||||
Assert(sxid != NULL);
|
||||
Assert(!found);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize the structure. */
|
||||
sxid->myXact = (SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact;
|
||||
sxid->myXact = MySerializableXact;
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1881,7 +1893,7 @@ DeleteChildTargetLocks(const PREDICATELOCKTARGETTAG *newtargettag)
|
||||
PREDICATELOCK *predlock;
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockAcquire(SerializablePredicateLockListLock, LW_SHARED);
|
||||
sxact = (SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact;
|
||||
sxact = MySerializableXact;
|
||||
predlock = (PREDICATELOCK *)
|
||||
SHMQueueNext(&(sxact->predicateLocks),
|
||||
&(sxact->predicateLocks),
|
||||
@ -2200,8 +2212,7 @@ PredicateLockAcquire(const PREDICATELOCKTARGETTAG *targettag)
|
||||
locallock->childLocks = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Actually create the lock */
|
||||
CreatePredicateLock(targettag, targettaghash,
|
||||
(SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact);
|
||||
CreatePredicateLock(targettag, targettaghash, MySerializableXact);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Lock has been acquired. Check whether it should be promoted to a
|
||||
@ -3042,7 +3053,7 @@ ReleasePredicateLocks(const bool isCommit)
|
||||
Assert(IsolationIsSerializable());
|
||||
|
||||
/* We'd better not already be on the cleanup list. */
|
||||
Assert(!SxactIsOnFinishedList((SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact));
|
||||
Assert(!SxactIsOnFinishedList(MySerializableXact));
|
||||
|
||||
topLevelIsDeclaredReadOnly = SxactIsReadOnly(MySerializableXact);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3070,7 +3081,7 @@ ReleasePredicateLocks(const bool isCommit)
|
||||
MySerializableXact->flags |= SXACT_FLAG_COMMITTED;
|
||||
MySerializableXact->commitSeqNo = ++(PredXact->LastSxactCommitSeqNo);
|
||||
/* Recognize implicit read-only transaction (commit without write). */
|
||||
if (!(MySerializableXact->flags & SXACT_FLAG_DID_WRITE))
|
||||
if (!MyXactDidWrite)
|
||||
MySerializableXact->flags |= SXACT_FLAG_READ_ONLY;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
@ -3218,7 +3229,7 @@ ReleasePredicateLocks(const bool isCommit)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Mark conflicted if necessary. */
|
||||
if (isCommit
|
||||
&& (MySerializableXact->flags & SXACT_FLAG_DID_WRITE)
|
||||
&& MyXactDidWrite
|
||||
&& SxactHasConflictOut(MySerializableXact)
|
||||
&& (MySerializableXact->SeqNo.earliestOutConflictCommit
|
||||
<= roXact->SeqNo.lastCommitBeforeSnapshot))
|
||||
@ -3282,8 +3293,7 @@ ReleasePredicateLocks(const bool isCommit)
|
||||
(SHM_QUEUE *) &(MySerializableXact->finishedLink));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!isCommit)
|
||||
ReleaseOneSerializableXact((SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact,
|
||||
false, false);
|
||||
ReleaseOneSerializableXact(MySerializableXact, false, false);
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableFinishedListLock);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3291,6 +3301,7 @@ ReleasePredicateLocks(const bool isCommit)
|
||||
ClearOldPredicateLocks();
|
||||
|
||||
MySerializableXact = InvalidSerializableXact;
|
||||
MyXactDidWrite = false;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Delete per-transaction lock table */
|
||||
if (LocalPredicateLockHash != NULL)
|
||||
@ -3851,7 +3862,7 @@ CheckForSerializableConflictOut(const bool visible, const Relation relation,
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (RWConflictExists((SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact, sxact))
|
||||
if (RWConflictExists(MySerializableXact, sxact))
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* We don't want duplicate conflict records in the list. */
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
@ -3862,7 +3873,7 @@ CheckForSerializableConflictOut(const bool visible, const Relation relation,
|
||||
* Flag the conflict. But first, if this conflict creates a dangerous
|
||||
* structure, ereport an error.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
FlagRWConflict((SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact, sxact);
|
||||
FlagRWConflict(MySerializableXact, sxact);
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3944,7 +3955,7 @@ CheckTargetForConflictsIn(PREDICATELOCKTARGETTAG *targettag)
|
||||
&& (!SxactIsCommitted(sxact)
|
||||
|| TransactionIdPrecedes(GetTransactionSnapshot()->xmin,
|
||||
sxact->finishedBefore))
|
||||
&& !RWConflictExists(sxact, (SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact))
|
||||
&& !RWConflictExists(sxact, MySerializableXact))
|
||||
{
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
LWLockAcquire(SerializableXactHashLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
|
||||
@ -3957,10 +3968,9 @@ CheckTargetForConflictsIn(PREDICATELOCKTARGETTAG *targettag)
|
||||
&& (!SxactIsCommitted(sxact)
|
||||
|| TransactionIdPrecedes(GetTransactionSnapshot()->xmin,
|
||||
sxact->finishedBefore))
|
||||
&& !RWConflictExists(sxact,
|
||||
(SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact))
|
||||
&& !RWConflictExists(sxact, MySerializableXact))
|
||||
{
|
||||
FlagRWConflict(sxact, (SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact);
|
||||
FlagRWConflict(sxact, MySerializableXact);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LWLockRelease(SerializableXactHashLock);
|
||||
@ -4065,7 +4075,11 @@ CheckForSerializableConflictIn(const Relation relation, const HeapTuple tuple,
|
||||
errdetail("Cancelled on identification as a pivot, during conflict in checking."),
|
||||
errhint("The transaction might succeed if retried.")));
|
||||
|
||||
MySerializableXact->flags |= SXACT_FLAG_DID_WRITE;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We're doing a write which might cause rw-conflicts now or later.
|
||||
* Memorize that fact.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
MyXactDidWrite = true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It is important that we check for locks from the finest granularity to
|
||||
@ -4150,6 +4164,12 @@ CheckTableForSerializableConflictIn(const Relation relation)
|
||||
if (SkipSerialization(relation))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We're doing a write which might cause rw-conflicts now or later.
|
||||
* Memorize that fact.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
MyXactDidWrite = true;
|
||||
|
||||
Assert(relation->rd_index == NULL); /* not an index relation */
|
||||
|
||||
dbId = relation->rd_node.dbNode;
|
||||
@ -4192,10 +4212,10 @@ CheckTableForSerializableConflictIn(const Relation relation)
|
||||
offsetof(PREDICATELOCK, targetLink));
|
||||
|
||||
if (predlock->tag.myXact != MySerializableXact
|
||||
&& !RWConflictExists(predlock->tag.myXact,
|
||||
(SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact))
|
||||
FlagRWConflict(predlock->tag.myXact,
|
||||
(SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact);
|
||||
&& !RWConflictExists(predlock->tag.myXact, MySerializableXact))
|
||||
{
|
||||
FlagRWConflict(predlock->tag.myXact, MySerializableXact);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
predlock = nextpredlock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -4506,7 +4526,7 @@ AtPrepare_PredicateLocks(void)
|
||||
TwoPhasePredicateXactRecord *xactRecord;
|
||||
TwoPhasePredicateLockRecord *lockRecord;
|
||||
|
||||
sxact = (SERIALIZABLEXACT *) MySerializableXact;
|
||||
sxact = MySerializableXact;
|
||||
xactRecord = &(record.data.xactRecord);
|
||||
lockRecord = &(record.data.lockRecord);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4583,6 +4603,7 @@ PostPrepare_PredicateLocks(TransactionId xid)
|
||||
LocalPredicateLockHash = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
MySerializableXact = InvalidSerializableXact;
|
||||
MyXactDidWrite = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -4609,6 +4630,8 @@ PredicateLockTwoPhaseFinish(TransactionId xid, bool isCommit)
|
||||
|
||||
/* Release its locks */
|
||||
MySerializableXact = sxid->myXact;
|
||||
MyXactDidWrite = true; /* conservatively assume that we wrote
|
||||
* something */
|
||||
ReleasePredicateLocks(isCommit);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -99,14 +99,13 @@ typedef struct SERIALIZABLEXACT
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_CONFLICT_OUT 0x00000004
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_READ_ONLY 0x00000008
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_DID_WRITE 0x00000010
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_MARKED_FOR_DEATH 0x00000020
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_DEFERRABLE_WAITING 0x00000040
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_RO_SAFE 0x00000080
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_RO_UNSAFE 0x00000100
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_SUMMARY_CONFLICT_IN 0x00000200
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_SUMMARY_CONFLICT_OUT 0x00000400
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_PREPARED 0x00000800
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_MARKED_FOR_DEATH 0x00000010
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_DEFERRABLE_WAITING 0x00000020
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_RO_SAFE 0x00000040
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_RO_UNSAFE 0x00000080
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_SUMMARY_CONFLICT_IN 0x00000100
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_SUMMARY_CONFLICT_OUT 0x00000200
|
||||
#define SXACT_FLAG_PREPARED 0x00000400
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The following types are used to provide an ad hoc list for holding
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user