Remove unnecessary variables in _hash_splitbucket().

Commit ed9cc2b5df made it unnecessary to pass
start_nblkno to _hash_splitbucket(), and for that matter unnecessary to
have the internal nblkno variable either.  My compiler didn't complain
about that, but some did.  I also rearranged the use of oblkno a bit to
make that case more parallel.

Report and initial patch by Petr Jelinek, rearranged a bit by me.
Back-patch to all branches, like the previous patch.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane 2015-04-03 16:49:11 -04:00
parent 9550e8348b
commit b7e1652d5d

View File

@ -37,10 +37,9 @@
static bool _hash_alloc_buckets(Relation rel, BlockNumber firstblock,
uint32 nblocks);
static void _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel, Buffer metabuf,
Buffer nbuf,
Bucket obucket, Bucket nbucket,
BlockNumber start_oblkno,
BlockNumber start_nblkno,
Buffer nbuf,
uint32 maxbucket,
uint32 highmask, uint32 lowmask);
@ -664,9 +663,9 @@ _hash_expandtable(Relation rel, Buffer metabuf)
_hash_chgbufaccess(rel, metabuf, HASH_WRITE, HASH_NOLOCK);
/* Relocate records to the new bucket */
_hash_splitbucket(rel, metabuf, buf_nblkno,
_hash_splitbucket(rel, metabuf,
old_bucket, new_bucket,
start_oblkno, start_nblkno,
start_oblkno, buf_nblkno,
maxbucket, highmask, lowmask);
/* Release bucket locks, allowing others to access them */
@ -747,24 +746,22 @@ _hash_alloc_buckets(Relation rel, BlockNumber firstblock, uint32 nblocks)
* touched if it becomes necessary to add or remove overflow pages.)
*
* In addition, the caller must have created the new bucket's base page,
* which is passed in buffer nbuf, pinned and write-locked. The lock
* and pin are released here. (The API is set up this way because we must
* do _hash_getnewbuf() before releasing the metapage write lock.)
* which is passed in buffer nbuf, pinned and write-locked. That lock and
* pin are released here. (The API is set up this way because we must do
* _hash_getnewbuf() before releasing the metapage write lock. So instead of
* passing the new bucket's start block number, we pass an actual buffer.)
*/
static void
_hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
Buffer metabuf,
Buffer nbuf,
Bucket obucket,
Bucket nbucket,
BlockNumber start_oblkno,
BlockNumber start_nblkno,
Buffer nbuf,
uint32 maxbucket,
uint32 highmask,
uint32 lowmask)
{
BlockNumber oblkno;
BlockNumber nblkno;
Buffer obuf;
Page opage;
Page npage;
@ -776,13 +773,10 @@ _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
* since no one else can be trying to acquire buffer lock on pages of
* either bucket.
*/
oblkno = start_oblkno;
obuf = _hash_getbuf(rel, oblkno, HASH_WRITE, LH_BUCKET_PAGE);
obuf = _hash_getbuf(rel, start_oblkno, HASH_WRITE, LH_BUCKET_PAGE);
opage = BufferGetPage(obuf);
oopaque = (HashPageOpaque) PageGetSpecialPointer(opage);
nblkno = start_nblkno;
Assert(nblkno == BufferGetBlockNumber(nbuf));
npage = BufferGetPage(nbuf);
/* initialize the new bucket's primary page */
@ -801,6 +795,7 @@ _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
*/
for (;;)
{
BlockNumber oblkno;
OffsetNumber ooffnum;
OffsetNumber omaxoffnum;
OffsetNumber deletable[MaxOffsetNumber];
@ -847,7 +842,7 @@ _hash_splitbucket(Relation rel,
/* chain to a new overflow page */
nbuf = _hash_addovflpage(rel, metabuf, nbuf);
npage = BufferGetPage(nbuf);
/* we don't need nblkno or nopaque within the loop */
/* we don't need nopaque within the loop */
}
/*