mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2025-01-30 19:00:29 +08:00
Ensure that pg_get_ruledef()'s output matches pg_get_viewdef()'s.
Various cases involving renaming of view columns are handled by having make_viewdef pass down the view's current relation tupledesc to get_query_def, which then takes care to use the column names from the tupledesc for the output column names of the SELECT. For some reason though, we'd missed teaching make_ruledef to do similarly when it is printing an ON SELECT rule, even though this is exactly the same case. The results from pg_get_ruledef would then be different and arguably wrong. In particular, this breaks pre-v10 versions of pg_dump, which in some situations would define views by means of emitting a CREATE RULE ... ON SELECT command. Third-party tools might not be happy either. In passing, clean up some crufty code in make_viewdef; we'd apparently modernized the equivalent code in make_ruledef somewhere along the way, and missed this copy. Per report from Gilles Darold. Back-patch to all supported versions. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ec05659a-40ff-4510-fc45-ca9d965d0838@dalibo.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
278cb43411
commit
b4af9e3f37
@ -4590,6 +4590,8 @@ make_ruledef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc,
|
||||
char *ev_qual;
|
||||
char *ev_action;
|
||||
List *actions = NIL;
|
||||
Relation ev_relation;
|
||||
TupleDesc viewResultDesc = NULL;
|
||||
int fno;
|
||||
Datum dat;
|
||||
bool isnull;
|
||||
@ -4626,6 +4628,8 @@ make_ruledef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc,
|
||||
if (ev_action != NULL)
|
||||
actions = (List *) stringToNode(ev_action);
|
||||
|
||||
ev_relation = heap_open(ev_class, AccessShareLock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Build the rules definition text
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -4642,6 +4646,7 @@ make_ruledef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc,
|
||||
{
|
||||
case '1':
|
||||
appendStringInfoString(buf, "SELECT");
|
||||
viewResultDesc = RelationGetDescr(ev_relation);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
case '2':
|
||||
@ -4731,7 +4736,7 @@ make_ruledef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc,
|
||||
foreach(action, actions)
|
||||
{
|
||||
query = (Query *) lfirst(action);
|
||||
get_query_def(query, buf, NIL, NULL,
|
||||
get_query_def(query, buf, NIL, viewResultDesc,
|
||||
prettyFlags, WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT, 0);
|
||||
if (prettyFlags)
|
||||
appendStringInfoString(buf, ";\n");
|
||||
@ -4749,10 +4754,12 @@ make_ruledef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc,
|
||||
Query *query;
|
||||
|
||||
query = (Query *) linitial(actions);
|
||||
get_query_def(query, buf, NIL, NULL,
|
||||
get_query_def(query, buf, NIL, viewResultDesc,
|
||||
prettyFlags, WRAP_COLUMN_DEFAULT, 0);
|
||||
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ';');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
heap_close(ev_relation, AccessShareLock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@ -4774,20 +4781,28 @@ make_viewdef(StringInfo buf, HeapTuple ruletup, TupleDesc rulettc,
|
||||
List *actions = NIL;
|
||||
Relation ev_relation;
|
||||
int fno;
|
||||
Datum dat;
|
||||
bool isnull;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Get the attribute values from the rules tuple
|
||||
*/
|
||||
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_type");
|
||||
ev_type = (char) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
|
||||
dat = SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
|
||||
Assert(!isnull);
|
||||
ev_type = DatumGetChar(dat);
|
||||
|
||||
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_class");
|
||||
ev_class = (Oid) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
|
||||
dat = SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
|
||||
Assert(!isnull);
|
||||
ev_class = DatumGetObjectId(dat);
|
||||
|
||||
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "is_instead");
|
||||
is_instead = (bool) SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
|
||||
dat = SPI_getbinval(ruletup, rulettc, fno, &isnull);
|
||||
Assert(!isnull);
|
||||
is_instead = DatumGetBool(dat);
|
||||
|
||||
/* these could be nulls */
|
||||
fno = SPI_fnumber(rulettc, "ev_qual");
|
||||
ev_qual = SPI_getvalue(ruletup, rulettc, fno);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1677,6 +1677,35 @@ select pg_get_viewdef('tt22v', true);
|
||||
LEFT JOIN tt6 ON TRUE;
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
-- check handling of views with immediately-renamed columns
|
||||
create view tt23v (col_a, col_b) as
|
||||
select q1 as other_name1, q2 as other_name2 from int8_tbl
|
||||
union
|
||||
select 42, 43;
|
||||
select pg_get_viewdef('tt23v', true);
|
||||
pg_get_viewdef
|
||||
-------------------------------
|
||||
SELECT int8_tbl.q1 AS col_a,+
|
||||
int8_tbl.q2 AS col_b +
|
||||
FROM int8_tbl +
|
||||
UNION +
|
||||
SELECT 42 AS col_a, +
|
||||
43 AS col_b;
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
select pg_get_ruledef(oid, true) from pg_rewrite
|
||||
where ev_class = 'tt23v'::regclass and ev_type = '1';
|
||||
pg_get_ruledef
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS +
|
||||
ON SELECT TO tt23v DO INSTEAD SELECT int8_tbl.q1 AS col_a,+
|
||||
int8_tbl.q2 AS col_b +
|
||||
FROM int8_tbl +
|
||||
UNION +
|
||||
SELECT 42 AS col_a, +
|
||||
43 AS col_b;
|
||||
(1 row)
|
||||
|
||||
-- clean up all the random objects we made above
|
||||
set client_min_messages = warning;
|
||||
DROP SCHEMA temp_view_test CASCADE;
|
||||
|
@ -569,6 +569,17 @@ create view tt22v as
|
||||
select * from tt5 natural left join tt6;
|
||||
select pg_get_viewdef('tt22v', true);
|
||||
|
||||
-- check handling of views with immediately-renamed columns
|
||||
|
||||
create view tt23v (col_a, col_b) as
|
||||
select q1 as other_name1, q2 as other_name2 from int8_tbl
|
||||
union
|
||||
select 42, 43;
|
||||
|
||||
select pg_get_viewdef('tt23v', true);
|
||||
select pg_get_ruledef(oid, true) from pg_rewrite
|
||||
where ev_class = 'tt23v'::regclass and ev_type = '1';
|
||||
|
||||
-- clean up all the random objects we made above
|
||||
set client_min_messages = warning;
|
||||
DROP SCHEMA temp_view_test CASCADE;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user