mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2024-11-27 07:21:09 +08:00
Don't bother to lock bufmgr partitions in pg_buffercache.
That makes the view a lot less disruptive to use on a production system. Without the locks, you don't get a consistent snapshot across all buffers, but that's OK. It wasn't a very useful guarantee in practice. Ivan Kartyshov, reviewed by Tomas Vondra and Robert Haas. Discusssion: <f9d6cab2-73a7-7a84-55a8-07dcb8516ae5@postgrespro.ru>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ad8ac6026
commit
6e654546fb
@ -135,18 +135,13 @@ pg_buffercache_pages(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
/* Return to original context when allocating transient memory */
|
||||
MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* To get a consistent picture of the buffer state, we must lock all
|
||||
* partitions of the buffer map. Needless to say, this is horrible
|
||||
* for concurrency. Must grab locks in increasing order to avoid
|
||||
* possible deadlocks.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS; i++)
|
||||
LWLockAcquire(BufMappingPartitionLockByIndex(i), LW_SHARED);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Scan through all the buffers, saving the relevant fields in the
|
||||
* fctx->record structure.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We don't hold the partition locks, so we don't get a consistent
|
||||
* snapshot across all buffers, but we do grab the buffer header
|
||||
* locks, so the information of each buffer is self-consistent.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < NBuffers; i++)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -179,16 +174,6 @@ pg_buffercache_pages(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
|
||||
UnlockBufHdr(bufHdr, buf_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* And release locks. We do this in reverse order for two reasons:
|
||||
* (1) Anyone else who needs more than one of the locks will be trying
|
||||
* to lock them in increasing order; we don't want to release the
|
||||
* other process until it can get all the locks it needs. (2) This
|
||||
* avoids O(N^2) behavior inside LWLockRelease.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS; --i >= 0;)
|
||||
LWLockRelease(BufMappingPartitionLockByIndex(i));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
funcctx = SRF_PERCALL_SETUP();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user