mirror of
https://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
synced 2025-02-05 19:09:58 +08:00
Increase maximum number of clog buffers.
Benchmarking has shown that the current number of clog buffers limits
scalability. We've previously increased the number in 33aaa139
, but
that's not sufficient with a large number of clients.
We've benchmarked the cost of increasing the limit by benchmarking worst
case scenarios; testing showed that 128 buffers don't cause a
regression, even in contrived scenarios, whereas 256 does
There are a number of more complex patches flying around to address
various clog scalability problems, but this is simple enough that we can
get it into 9.6; and is beneficial even after those patches have been
applied.
It is a bit unsatisfactory to increase this in small steps every few
releases, but a better solution seems to require a rewrite of slru.c;
not something done quickly.
Author: Amit Kapila and Andres Freund
Discussion: CAA4eK1+-=18HOrdqtLXqOMwZDbC_15WTyHiFruz7BvVArZPaAw@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
25fe8b5f1a
commit
5364b357fb
@ -417,30 +417,23 @@ TransactionIdGetStatus(TransactionId xid, XLogRecPtr *lsn)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Number of shared CLOG buffers.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Testing during the PostgreSQL 9.2 development cycle revealed that on a
|
||||
* large multi-processor system, it was possible to have more CLOG page
|
||||
* requests in flight at one time than the number of CLOG buffers which existed
|
||||
* at that time, which was hardcoded to 8. Further testing revealed that
|
||||
* performance dropped off with more than 32 CLOG buffers, possibly because
|
||||
* the linear buffer search algorithm doesn't scale well.
|
||||
* On larger multi-processor systems, it is possible to have many CLOG page
|
||||
* requests in flight at one time which could lead to disk access for CLOG
|
||||
* page if the required page is not found in memory. Testing revealed that we
|
||||
* can get the best performance by having 128 CLOG buffers, more than that it
|
||||
* doesn't improve performance.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Unconditionally increasing the number of CLOG buffers to 32 did not seem
|
||||
* like a good idea, because it would increase the minimum amount of shared
|
||||
* memory required to start, which could be a problem for people running very
|
||||
* small configurations. The following formula seems to represent a reasonable
|
||||
* Unconditionally keeping the number of CLOG buffers to 128 did not seem like
|
||||
* a good idea, because it would increase the minimum amount of shared memory
|
||||
* required to start, which could be a problem for people running very small
|
||||
* configurations. The following formula seems to represent a reasonable
|
||||
* compromise: people with very low values for shared_buffers will get fewer
|
||||
* CLOG buffers as well, and everyone else will get 32.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It is likely that some further work will be needed here in future releases;
|
||||
* for example, on a 64-core server, the maximum number of CLOG requests that
|
||||
* can be simultaneously in flight will be even larger. But that will
|
||||
* apparently require more than just changing the formula, so for now we take
|
||||
* the easy way out.
|
||||
* CLOG buffers as well, and everyone else will get 128.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Size
|
||||
CLOGShmemBuffers(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return Min(32, Max(4, NBuffers / 512));
|
||||
return Min(128, Max(4, NBuffers / 512));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user