Avoid spurious Hot Standby conflicts from btree delete records.

Similar conflicts were already avoided for related record types.
Massive over-caution resulted in a usability bug. Clear theoretical
basis for doing this is now confirmed by me.
Request to remove from Heikki (twice), over-caution by me.
This commit is contained in:
Simon Riggs 2010-11-15 09:30:13 +00:00
parent 357edc9a99
commit 52010027ef

View File

@ -266,21 +266,13 @@ ResolveRecoveryConflictWithSnapshot(TransactionId latestRemovedXid, RelFileNode
/*
* If we get passed InvalidTransactionId then we are a little surprised,
* but it is theoretically possible, so spit out a DEBUG1 message, but not
* one that needs translating.
*
* We grab latestCompletedXid instead because this is the very latest
* value it could ever be.
* but it is theoretically possible in normal running. It also happens
* when replaying already applied WAL records after a standby crash or
* restart. If latestRemovedXid is invalid then there is no conflict. That
* rule applies across all record types that suffer from this conflict.
*/
if (!TransactionIdIsValid(latestRemovedXid))
{
elog(DEBUG1, "invalid latestremovexXid reported, using latestcompletedxid instead");
LWLockAcquire(ProcArrayLock, LW_SHARED);
latestRemovedXid = ShmemVariableCache->latestCompletedXid;
LWLockRelease(ProcArrayLock);
}
Assert(TransactionIdIsValid(latestRemovedXid));
return;
backends = GetConflictingVirtualXIDs(latestRemovedXid,
node.dbNode);