Heiko Stuebner 3e76b38852 riscv: Clarify dual-licensing wording for GCM and AES ... The original text for the Apache + BSD dual licensing for riscv GCM and AES perlasm was taken from other openSSL users like crypto/crypto/LPdir_unix.c . Though Eric pointed out that the dual-licensing text could be read in a way negating the second license [0] and suggested to clarify the text even more. So do this here for all of the GCM, AES and shared riscv.pm . We already had the agreement of all involved developers for the actual dual licensing in [0] and [1], so this is only a better clarification for this. [0] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20649#issuecomment-1589558790 [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21018 Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu> Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21357)		2023-07-06 12:53:27 +10:00
..
asm	riscv: Clarify dual-licensing wording for GCM and AES	2023-07-06 12:53:27 +10:00
build.info	Do not use stitched AES-GCM implementation on PPC32	2023-06-30 08:31:49 +10:00
cbc128.c
ccm128.c
cfb128.c
ctr128.c
cts128.c
gcm128.c	Fix typos found by codespell	2023-06-15 10:11:46 +10:00
ocb128.c
ofb128.c
siv128.c
wrap128.c
xts128.c
xts128gb.c