openssl/crypto/modes/asm
Heiko Stuebner 3e76b38852 riscv: Clarify dual-licensing wording for GCM and AES
The original text for the Apache + BSD dual licensing for riscv GCM and AES
perlasm was taken from other openSSL users like crypto/crypto/LPdir_unix.c .

Though Eric pointed out that the dual-licensing text could be read in a
way negating the second license [0] and suggested to clarify the text
even more.

So do this here for all of the GCM, AES and shared riscv.pm .

We already had the agreement of all involved developers for the actual
dual licensing in [0] and [1], so this is only a better clarification
for this.

[0] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20649#issuecomment-1589558790
[1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21018

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>

Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21357)
2023-07-06 12:53:27 +10:00
..
aes-gcm-armv8_64.pl Fix function signatures in aes-gcm-armv8 comments. 2023-06-16 20:15:24 +10:00
aes-gcm-armv8-unroll8_64.pl Fix function signatures in aes-gcm-armv8 comments. 2023-06-16 20:15:24 +10:00
aes-gcm-avx512.pl Fix typos found by codespell 2023-06-15 10:11:46 +10:00
aes-gcm-ppc.pl
aesni-gcm-x86_64.pl
ghash-alpha.pl
ghash-armv4.pl
ghash-c64xplus.pl
ghash-ia64.pl
ghash-parisc.pl
ghash-riscv64.pl riscv: Clarify dual-licensing wording for GCM and AES 2023-07-06 12:53:27 +10:00
ghash-s390x.pl
ghash-sparcv9.pl
ghash-x86_64.pl
ghash-x86.pl
ghashp8-ppc.pl
ghashv8-armx.pl