mirror of
https://github.com/openssl/openssl.git
synced 2024-12-27 06:21:43 +08:00
e604b7c915
Also discuss reference-counting, mutability and safety. Thanks to David Benjamin for pointing to comment text he added to boringSSL's header files. Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13788)
106 lines
4.4 KiB
Plaintext
106 lines
4.4 KiB
Plaintext
=pod
|
|
|
|
=head1 NAME
|
|
|
|
openssl-threads - Overview of thread safety in OpenSSL
|
|
|
|
=head1 DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
In this man page, we use the term B<thread-safe> to indicate that an
|
|
object or function can be used by multiple threads at the same time.
|
|
|
|
OpenSSL can be built with or without threads support. The most important
|
|
use of this support is so that OpenSSL itself can use a single consistent
|
|
API, as shown in L<CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once(3)/EXAMPLES>.
|
|
Multi-platform applications can also use this API.
|
|
|
|
In particular, being configured for threads support does not imply that
|
|
all OpenSSL objects are thread-safe.
|
|
To emphasize: I<most objects are not safe for simultaneous use>.
|
|
Exceptions to this should be documented on the specific manual pages, and
|
|
some general high-level guidance is given here.
|
|
|
|
One major use of the OpenSSL thread API is to implement reference counting.
|
|
Many objects within OpenSSL are reference-counted, so resources are not
|
|
released, until the last reference is removed.
|
|
References are often increased automatically (such as when an B<X509>
|
|
certificate object is added into an B<X509_STORE> trust store).
|
|
There is often an B<I<object>_up_ref>() function that can be used to increase
|
|
the reference count.
|
|
Failure to match B<I<object>_up_ref>() calls with the right number of
|
|
B<I<object>_free>() calls is a common source of memory leaks when a program
|
|
exits.
|
|
|
|
Many objects have set and get API's to set attributes in the object.
|
|
A C<set0> passes ownership from the caller to the object and a
|
|
C<get0> returns a pointer but the attribute ownership
|
|
remains with the object and a reference to it is returned.
|
|
A C<set1> or C<get1> function does not change the ownership, but instead
|
|
updates the attribute's reference count so that the object is shared
|
|
between the caller and the object; the caller must free the returned
|
|
attribute when finished.
|
|
Functions that involve attributes that have reference counts themselves,
|
|
but are named with just C<set> or C<get> are historical; and the documentation
|
|
must state how the references are handled.
|
|
Get methods are often thread-safe as long as the ownership requirements are
|
|
met and shared objects are not modified.
|
|
Set methods, or modifying shared objects, are generally not thread-safe
|
|
as discussed below.
|
|
|
|
Objects are thread-safe
|
|
as long as the API's being invoked don't modify the object; in this
|
|
case the parameter is usually marked in the API as C<const>.
|
|
Not all parameters are marked this way.
|
|
Note that a C<const> declaration does not mean immutable; for example
|
|
L<X509_cmp(3)> takes pointers to C<const> objects, but the implementation
|
|
uses a C cast to remove that so it can lock objects, generate and cache
|
|
a DER encoding, and so on.
|
|
|
|
Another instance of thread-safety is when updates to an object's
|
|
internal state, such as cached values, are done with locks.
|
|
One example of this is the reference counting API's described above.
|
|
|
|
In all cases, however, it is generally not safe for one thread to
|
|
mutate an object, such as setting elements of a private or public key,
|
|
while another thread is using that object, such as verifying a signature.
|
|
|
|
The same API's can usually be used simultaneously on different objects
|
|
without interference.
|
|
For example, two threads can calculate a signature using two different
|
|
B<EVP_PKEY_CTX> objects.
|
|
|
|
For implicit global state or singletons, thread-safety depends on the facility.
|
|
The L<CRYPTO_secure_malloc(3)> and related API's have their own lock,
|
|
while L<CRYPTO_malloc(3)> assumes the underlying platform allocation
|
|
will do any necessary locking.
|
|
Some API's, such as L<NCONF_load(3)> and related, or L<OBJ_create(3)>
|
|
do no locking at all; this can be considered a bug.
|
|
|
|
A separate, although related, issue is modifying "factory" objects
|
|
when other objects have been created from that.
|
|
For example, an B<SSL_CTX> object created by L<SSL_CTX_new(3)> is used
|
|
to create per-connection B<SSL> objects by calling L<SSL_new(3)>.
|
|
In this specific case, and probably for factory methods in general, it is
|
|
not safe to modify the factory object after it has been used to create
|
|
other objects.
|
|
|
|
=head1 SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once(3),
|
|
local system threads documentation.
|
|
|
|
=head1 BUGS
|
|
|
|
This page is admittedly very incomplete.
|
|
|
|
=head1 COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2021 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
Licensed under the Apache License 2.0 (the "License"). You may not use
|
|
this file except in compliance with the License. You can obtain a copy
|
|
in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at
|
|
L<https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html>.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|