Rich Salz 28f298e70a Undo commit cd359b2 ... Original text: Clarify use of |$end0| in stitched x86-64 AES-GCM code. There was some uncertainty about what the code is doing with |$end0| and whether it was necessary for |$len| to be a multiple of 16 or 96. Hopefully these added comments make it clear that the code is correct except for the caveat regarding low memory addresses. Change-Id: Iea546a59dc7aeb400f50ac5d2d7b9cb88ace9027 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7194 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3700)		2017-07-05 17:06:57 -04:00
..
asm	Undo commit cd359b2	2017-07-05 17:06:57 -04:00
build.info
cbc128.c
ccm128.c
cfb128.c
ctr128.c
cts128.c
gcm128.c
modes_lcl.h
ocb128.c
ofb128.c
wrap128.c
xts128.c