mirror of
https://github.com/openssl/openssl.git
synced 2024-12-21 06:09:35 +08:00
355fd1f45b
We move some of the "why QUIC" content into the guide and just provide a summary in README-QUIC.md. We also clarify how to use s_client with QUIC. Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22505)
190 lines
8.8 KiB
Plaintext
190 lines
8.8 KiB
Plaintext
=pod
|
|
|
|
=head1 NAME
|
|
|
|
ossl-guide-quic-introduction
|
|
- OpenSSL Guide: An introduction to QUIC in OpenSSL
|
|
|
|
=head1 INTRODUCTION
|
|
|
|
This page will provide an introduction to some basic QUIC concepts and
|
|
background and how it is used within OpenSSL. It assumes that you have a basic
|
|
understanding of UDP/IP and sockets. It also assumes that you are familiar with
|
|
some OpenSSL and TLS fundamentals (see L<ossl-guide-libraries-introduction(7)>
|
|
and L<ossl-guide-tls-introduction(7)>).
|
|
|
|
=head1 WHAT IS QUIC?
|
|
|
|
QUIC is a general purpose protocol for enabling applications to securely
|
|
communicate over a network. It is defined in RFC9000 (see
|
|
L<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9000/>). QUIC integrates parts of the
|
|
TLS protocol for connection establishment but independently protects packets.
|
|
It provides similar security guarantees to TLS such as confidentiality,
|
|
integrity and authentication (see L<ossl-guide-tls-introduction(7)>).
|
|
|
|
QUIC delivers a number of advantages:
|
|
|
|
=over 4
|
|
|
|
=item Multiple streams
|
|
|
|
It supports multiple streams of communication (see L</QUIC STREAMS> below),
|
|
allowing application protocols built on QUIC to create arbitrarily many
|
|
bytestreams for communication between a client and server. This allows an
|
|
application protocol to avoid problems where one packet of data is held up
|
|
waiting on another packet being delivered (commonly referred to as
|
|
"head-of-line blocking"). It also enables an application to open additional
|
|
logical streams without requiring a round-trip exchange of packets between the
|
|
client and server as is required when opening an additional TLS/TCP
|
|
connection.
|
|
|
|
=item HTTP/3
|
|
|
|
Since QUIC is the basis of HTTP/3, support for QUIC also enables applications
|
|
to use HTTP/3 using a suitable third-party library.
|
|
|
|
=item Fast connection initiation
|
|
|
|
Future versions of OpenSSL will offer support for 0-RTT connection initiation,
|
|
allowing a connection to be initiated to a server and application data to be
|
|
transmitted without any waiting time. This is similar to TLS 1.3's 0-RTT
|
|
functionality but also avoids the round trip needed to open a TCP socket; thus,
|
|
it is similar to a combination of TLS 1.3 0-RTT and TCP Fast Open.
|
|
|
|
=item Connection migration
|
|
|
|
Future versions of OpenSSL will offer support for connection migration, allowing
|
|
connections to seamlessly survive IP address changes.
|
|
|
|
=item Datagram based use cases
|
|
|
|
Future versions of OpenSSL will offer support for the QUIC datagram extension,
|
|
allowing support for both TLS and DTLS-style use cases on a single connection.
|
|
|
|
=item Implemented as application library
|
|
|
|
Because most QUIC implementations, including OpenSSL's implementation, are
|
|
implemented as an application library rather than by an operating system, an
|
|
application can gain the benefit of QUIC without needing to wait for an OS
|
|
update to be deployed. Future evolutions and enhancements to the QUIC protocol
|
|
can be delivered as quickly as an application can be updated without dependency
|
|
on an OS update cadence.
|
|
|
|
=item Multiplexing over a single UDP socket
|
|
|
|
Because QUIC is UDP-based, it is possible to multiplex a QUIC connection on the
|
|
same UDP socket as some other UDP-based protocols, such as RTP.
|
|
|
|
=back
|
|
|
|
=head1 QUIC TIME BASED EVENTS
|
|
|
|
A key difference between the TLS implementation and the QUIC implementation in
|
|
OpenSSL is how time is handled. The QUIC protocol requires various actions to be
|
|
performed on a regular basis regardless of whether application data is being
|
|
transmitted or received.
|
|
|
|
OpenSSL introduces a new function L<SSL_handle_events(3)> that will
|
|
automatically process any outstanding time based events that must be handled.
|
|
Alternatively calling any I/O function such as L<SSL_read_ex(3)> or
|
|
L<SSL_write_ex(3)> will also process these events. There is also
|
|
L<SSL_get_event_timeout(3)> which tells an application the amount of time that
|
|
remains until L<SSL_handle_events(3)> (or any I/O function) must be called.
|
|
|
|
Fortunately a blocking application that does not leave the QUIC connection idle,
|
|
and is regularly calling I/O functions does not typically need to worry about
|
|
this. However if you are developing a nonblocking application or one that may
|
|
leave the QUIC connection idle for a period of time then you will need to
|
|
arrange to call these functions.
|
|
|
|
OpenSSL provides an optional "thread assisted mode" that will automatically
|
|
create a background thread and will regularly call L<SSL_handle_events(3)> in a
|
|
thread safe manner. This provides a simple way for an application to satisfy the
|
|
QUIC requirements for time based events without having to implement special
|
|
logic to accomplish it.
|
|
|
|
=head1 QUIC AND TLS
|
|
|
|
QUIC reuses parts of the TLS protocol in its implementation. Specifically the
|
|
TLS handshake also exists in QUIC. The TLS handshake messages are wrapped up in
|
|
QUIC protocol messages in order to send them to the peer. Once the TLS handshake
|
|
is complete all application data is sent entirely using QUIC protocol messages
|
|
without using TLS - although some TLS handshake messages may still be sent in
|
|
some circumstances.
|
|
|
|
This relationship between QUIC and TLS means that many of the API functions in
|
|
OpenSSL that apply to TLS connections also apply to QUIC connections and
|
|
applications can use them in exactly the same way. Some functions do not apply
|
|
to QUIC at all, and others have altered semantics. You should refer to the
|
|
documentation pages for each function for information on how it applies to QUIC.
|
|
Typically if QUIC is not mentioned in the manual pages then the functions apply
|
|
to both TLS and QUIC.
|
|
|
|
=head1 QUIC STREAMS
|
|
|
|
QUIC introduces the concept of "streams". A stream provides a reliable
|
|
mechanism for sending and receiving application data between the endpoints. The
|
|
bytes transmitted are guaranteed to be received in the same order they were sent
|
|
without any loss of data or reordering of the bytes. A TLS application
|
|
effectively has one bi-directional stream available to it per TLS connection. A
|
|
QUIC application can have multiple uni-directional or bi-directional streams
|
|
available to it for each connection.
|
|
|
|
In OpenSSL an B<SSL> object is used to represent both connections and streams.
|
|
A QUIC application creates an initial B<SSL> object to represent the connection
|
|
(known as the connection B<SSL> object). Once the connection is complete
|
|
additional B<SSL> objects can be created to represent streams (known as stream
|
|
B<SSL> objects). Unless configured otherwise, a "default" stream is also
|
|
associated with the connection B<SSL> object so you can still write data and
|
|
read data to/from it. Some OpenSSL API functions can only be used with
|
|
connection B<SSL> objects, and some can only be used with stream B<SSL> objects.
|
|
Check the documentation for each function to confirm what type of B<SSL> object
|
|
can be used in any particular context. A connection B<SSL> object that has a
|
|
default stream attached to it can be used in contexts that require a connection
|
|
B<SSL> object or in contexts that require a stream B<SSL> object.
|
|
|
|
=head1 SOCKETS AND BLOCKING
|
|
|
|
TLS assumes "stream" type semantics for its underlying transport layer protocol
|
|
(usually achieved by using TCP). However QUIC assumes "datagram" type semantics
|
|
by using UDP. An OpenSSL application using QUIC is responsible for creating a
|
|
BIO to represent the underlying transport layer. This BIO must support datagrams
|
|
and is typically L<BIO_s_datagram(3)>, but other B<BIO> choices are available.
|
|
See L<bio(7)> for an introduction to OpenSSL's B<BIO> concept.
|
|
|
|
A significant difference between OpenSSL TLS applications and OpenSSL QUIC
|
|
applications is the way that blocking is implemented. In TLS if your application
|
|
expects blocking behaviour then you configure the underlying socket for
|
|
blocking. Conversely if your application wants nonblocking behaviour then the
|
|
underlying socket is configured to be nonblocking.
|
|
|
|
With an OpenSSL QUIC application the underlying socket must always be configured
|
|
to be nonblocking. Howevever the B<SSL> object will, by default, still operate
|
|
in blocking mode. So, from an application's perspective, calls to functions such
|
|
as L<SSL_read_ex(3)>, L<SSL_write_ex(3)> and other I/O functions will still
|
|
block. OpenSSL itself provides that blocking capability for QUIC instead of the
|
|
socket. If nonblocking behaviour is desired then the application must call
|
|
L<SSL_set_blocking_mode(3)>.
|
|
|
|
=head1 FURTHER READING
|
|
|
|
See L<ossl-guide-quic-client-block(7)> to see an example of applying these
|
|
concepts in order to write a simple blocking QUIC client.
|
|
|
|
=head1 SEE ALSO
|
|
|
|
L<ossl-guide-introduction(7)>, L<ossl-guide-libraries-introduction(7)>,
|
|
L<ossl-guide-libssl-introduction(7)>, L<ossl-guide-tls-introduction(7)>,
|
|
L<ossl-guide-tls-client-block(7)>, L<ossl-guide-quic-client-block(7)>, L<bio(7)>
|
|
|
|
=head1 COPYRIGHT
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2023 The OpenSSL Project Authors. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
|
|
Licensed under the Apache License 2.0 (the "License"). You may not use
|
|
this file except in compliance with the License. You can obtain a copy
|
|
in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at
|
|
L<https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html>.
|
|
|
|
=cut
|