openssl/crypto/dso
Richard Levitte 4e20a4e688 'ranlib' doesn't always run on some systems. That's actually
acceptable, since all that happens if it fails is a library with
an index, which makes linking slower, but still working correctly.
2000-09-25 08:53:15 +00:00
..
.cvsignore Ignore lib and Makefile.save. 2000-04-14 23:37:44 +00:00
dso_dl.c Currently the DSO_METHOD interface has one entry point to bind all 2000-06-16 10:45:36 +00:00
dso_dlfcn.c * This adds some checking to the 'dlfcn' DSO_METHOD that at least lets 2000-06-21 14:12:25 +00:00
dso_err.c A DSO method for VMS was missing, and I had the code lying around... 2000-09-15 21:22:50 +00:00
dso_lib.c Use sk_*_new_null() instead of sk_*_new(NULL), since that takes care 2000-09-17 18:21:27 +00:00
dso_null.c Currently the DSO_METHOD interface has one entry point to bind all 2000-06-16 10:45:36 +00:00
dso_openssl.c A DSO method for VMS was missing, and I had the code lying around... 2000-09-15 21:22:50 +00:00
dso_vms.c Unless we cast, thorough compilers will complain 2000-09-18 08:40:55 +00:00
dso_win32.c Steve fixed up some strange errors introduced into dso_win32.c, and I'm 2000-06-23 17:29:05 +00:00
dso.h A DSO method for VMS was missing, and I had the code lying around... 2000-09-15 21:22:50 +00:00
Makefile.ssl 'ranlib' doesn't always run on some systems. That's actually 2000-09-25 08:53:15 +00:00
README Currently the DSO_METHOD interface has one entry point to bind all 2000-06-16 10:45:36 +00:00

TODO
----

Find a way where name-translation can be done in a way that is
sensitive to particular methods (ie. generic code could still do
different path/filename substitutions on win32 to what it does on
*nix) but doesn't assume some canonical form. Already one case
exists where the "blah -> (libblah.so,blah.dll)" mapping doesn't
suffice. I suspect a callback with an enumerated (or string?)
parameter could be the way to go here ... DSO_ctrl the callback
into place and it can be invoked to handle name translation with
some clue to the calling code as to what kind of system it is.

NOTES
-----

I've checked out HPUX (well, version 11 at least) and shl_t is
a pointer type so it's safe to use in the way it has been in
dso_dl.c. On the other hand, HPUX11 support dlfcn too and
according to their man page, prefer developers to move to that.
I'll leave Richard's changes there as I guess dso_dl is needed
for HPUX10.20.