Heiko Stuebner 3e76b38852 riscv: Clarify dual-licensing wording for GCM and AES ... The original text for the Apache + BSD dual licensing for riscv GCM and AES perlasm was taken from other openSSL users like crypto/crypto/LPdir_unix.c . Though Eric pointed out that the dual-licensing text could be read in a way negating the second license [0] and suggested to clarify the text even more. So do this here for all of the GCM, AES and shared riscv.pm . We already had the agreement of all involved developers for the actual dual licensing in [0] and [1], so this is only a better clarification for this. [0] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20649#issuecomment-1589558790 [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21018 Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu> Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org> (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21357)		2023-07-06 12:53:27 +10:00
..
asm	riscv: Clarify dual-licensing wording for GCM and AES	2023-07-06 12:53:27 +10:00
aes_cbc.c
aes_cfb.c
aes_core.c	Update copyright year	2022-05-03 13:34:51 +01:00
aes_ecb.c
aes_ige.c
aes_local.h
aes_misc.c
aes_ofb.c
aes_wrap.c
aes_x86core.c
build.info	Add vpaes-loongarch64.pl module.	2022-10-12 18:02:12 +11:00