Revise DTLS code. There was a *lot* of code duplication in the
DTLS code that generates records. This makes it harder to maintain and
sometimes a TLS update is omitted by accident from the DTLS code.
Specifically almost all of the record generation functions have code like
this:
some_pointer = buffer + HANDSHAKE_HEADER_LENGTH;
... Record creation stuff ...
set_handshake_header(ssl, SSL_MT_SOMETHING, message_len);
...
write_handshake_message(ssl);
Where the "Record creation stuff" is identical between SSL/TLS and DTLS or
in some cases has very minor differences.
By adding a few fields to SSL3_ENC to include the header length, some flags
and function pointers for handshake header setting and handshake writing the
code can cope with both cases.
Note: although this passes "make test" and some simple DTLS tests there may
be some minor differences in the DTLS code that have to be accounted for.
This change adds CRYPTO_memcmp, which compares two vectors of bytes in
an amount of time that's independent of their contents. It also changes
several MAC compares in the code to use this over the standard memcmp,
which may leak information about the size of a matching prefix.
(cherry picked from commit 2ee798880a)
some invalid operations for testing purposes. Currently this can be used
to sign using digests the peer doesn't support, EC curves the peer
doesn't support and use certificates which don't match the type associated
with a ciphersuite.
by a certificate chain. Add additional tests to handle client
certificates: checks for matching certificate type and issuer name
comparison.
Print out results of checks for each candidate chain tested in
s_server/s_client.
the permitted signature algorithms for server and client authentication
are the same but it is now possible to set different algorithms for client
authentication only.
is required by client or server. An application can decide which
certificate chain to present based on arbitrary criteria: for example
supported signature algorithms. Add very simple example to s_server.
This fixes many of the problems and restrictions of the existing client
certificate callback: for example you can now clear existing certificates
and specify the whole chain.
the certificate can be used for (if anything). Set valid_flags field
in new tls1_check_chain function. Simplify ssl_set_cert_masks which used
to have similar checks in it.
Add new "cert_flags" field to CERT structure and include a "strict mode".
This enforces some TLS certificate requirements (such as only permitting
certificate signature algorithms contained in the supported algorithms
extension) which some implementations ignore: this option should be used
with caution as it could cause interoperability issues.
Only store encoded versions of peer and configured signature algorithms.
Determine shared signature algorithms and cache the result along with NID
equivalents of each algorithm.
TLS v1.2. These are sent as an extension for clients and during a certificate
request for servers.
TODO: add support for shared signature algorithms, respect shared algorithms
when deciding which ciphersuites and certificates to permit.
enabled instead of requiring an application to hard code a (possibly
inappropriate) parameter set and delve into EC internals we just
automatically use the preferred curve.
Tidy some code up.
Don't allocate a structure to handle ECC extensions when it is used for
default values.
Make supported curves configurable.
Add ctrls to retrieve shared curves: not fully integrated with rest of
ECC code yet.
algorithms extension (including everything we support). Swicth to new
signature format where needed and relax ECC restrictions.
Not TLS v1.2 client certifcate support yet but client will handle case
where a certificate is requested and we don't have one.
signature algorithms extension and correct signature format for
server key exchange.
All ciphersuites should now work on the server but no client support and
no client certificate support yet.
Submitted by: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@randombit.net>, "Mounir IDRASSI" <mounir.idrassi@idrix.net>, steve
Reviewed by: steve
As required by RFC4492 an absent supported points format by a server is
not an error: it should be treated as equivalent to an extension only
containing uncompressed.
initial connection to unpatched servers. There are no additional security
concerns in doing this as clients don't see renegotiation during an
attack anyway.
work in SSLv3: initial handshake has no extensions but includes MCSV, if
server indicates RI support then renegotiation handshakes include RI.
NB: current MCSV value is bogus for testing only, will be updated when we
have an official value.
Change mismatch alerts to handshake_failure as required by spec.
Also have some debugging fprintfs so we can clearly see what is going on
if OPENSSL_RI_DEBUG is set.
Fix double-free in TLS server name extensions which could lead to a remote
crash found by Codenomicon TLS test suite (CVE-2008-0891)
Reviewed by: openssl-security@openssl.org
Obtained from: jorton@redhat.com
