Those fields are no longer used. Their previous function is now in the new
record layer.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
Otherwise, this causes a warning on platforms where 'uint32_t' is
defined as 'unsigned long int' instead of 'unsigned int'.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19322)
For some reason djgpp uses '(unsigned) long int' for (u)int32_t. This
causes errors with -Werror=format, even though these types are in
practice identical.
Obvious solution: cast to the types indicated by the format string.
For asn1_time_test.c I changed the format string to %lli since time_t
may be 'long long' some platforms.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19322)
We had two different macros for calculating the potential growth due to
encryption. The macro we use for allocating the underlying buffer should be
the same one that we use for reserving bytes for encryption growth.
Also if we are adding the MAC independently of the cipher algorithm then
the encryption growth will not include that MAC so we should remove it
from the amount of bytes that we reserve for that growth. Otherwise we
might exceed our buffer size and the WPACKET_reserve operation will
fail.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19622)
We fix dtls_get_max_record_overhead() to give a better value for the max
record overhead. We can't realistically handle the compression case so we
just ignore that.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19516)
Stitched ciphersuites can grow by more during encryption than the code
allowed for. We fix the calculation and add an assert to check we go it
right.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19516)
|uclen| is created from three byte values, so this seems a bit
redundant, but if it makes coverity happy
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19519)
During read pipelining we must ensure that the buffer is sufficiently large
to read enough data to fill our pipelines. We also remove some code that
moved data to the start of the packet if we can. This was unnecessary
because of later code which would end up moving it anyway. The earlier move
was also incorrect in the case that |clearold| was 0. This would cause the
read pipelining code to fail with sufficiently large records.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
The pipeline input/output buf arrays must remain accessible to the
EVP_CIPHER_CTX until EVP_Cipher is subsequently called. This fixes an
asan error discovered by the newly added pipeline test.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
TLS pipelining provides the ability for libssl to read or write multiple
records in parallel. It requires special ciphers to do this, and there are
currently no built-in ciphers that provide this capability. However, the
dasync engine does have such a cipher, so we add a test for this capability
using that engine.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
Remove two function pointers from the OSSL_RECORD_METHOD. Those functions
were no-ops and were never called.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19472)
If rule_str ended in a "-", "l" was incremented one byte past the
end of the buffer. This resulted in an out-of-bounds read when "l"
is dereferenced at the end of the loop. It is safest to just return
early in this case since the condition occurs inside a nested loop.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19166)
The re-occuring surprise is that in Win32, size_t is 32 bits...
Fixed by changing size_t to uint64_t in QUIC_CC
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19345)
This test was disabled during the record write record layer refactor.
We can now enable it again.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19470)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19464)
This partially reverts commit 30eba7f359.
This is legitimate use of the stack functions and no error
should be reported apart from the NULL return value.
Fixes#19389
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19400)
Calling SSL_free() will call BIO_free_all() on the rbio and wbio. We
keep references to the rbio and wbio inside the record layer object.
References to that object are held directly, as well as in fragment
retransmission queues. We need to ensure all record layer objects are
cleaned up before we call BIO_free_all() on rbio/wbio - otherwise the
"top" BIO may not have its reference count drop to 0 when BIO_free_all()
is called. This means that the rest of the BIOs in the chain don't get
freed and a memory leak can occur.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We no longer use the old buffer management code now that it has all been
moved to the new record layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
The dtls_write_records function, after the previous series of commits,
was functionally equivalent to tls_write_records_default - so it can be
removed completely.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
This change make dtls_write_records virtuall the same as
tls_write_records_default, which will enable us to merge them in a
subsequent commit.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We already set the record type on the SSL3_RECORD structure. We don't
need to do it again (inconsistently).
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
The sequence counter was incremented in numerous different ways in
numerous different locations. We introduce a single function to do this
inside the record layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Don't calculate the potential record layer expansion outside of the
record layer. We move some code that was doing that into the record
layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We have standard functions for most of the work that dtls_write_records
does - so we convert it to use those functions instead.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Previously this was writing to the buffers directly. We use the safer
WPACKET instead
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
In practice this just means have a DTLS specific write_records that the
common tls_write_records() just calls. We also replace the use of
ssl3_write_pending() with tls_retry_write_records().
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We now use standard record layer return values for this function. We
also convert the code to use RLAYERfatal instead of SSLfatal.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
At the this stage we just move the code and don't restructure it to do it
the record layer way yet.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
In preparation for moving the DTLS code to use the new write record layer
architecture we first restructure the code to create a dtls_write_records()
function that mirrors the functionality that the record layer will provide.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
do_dtls1_write() was never called with a value for create_empty_fragment
that was ever non-zero - so this is dead code and can be removed. The
equivalent code in the TLS processing is used for TLS1.0/SSLv3 to protect
against known IV weaknesses because those protocol versions do not have
an explicit IV. However DTLS1.0 is based on TLSv1.1 and *does* have an
explicit IV - so this is not useful there.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
size_t-ify the COMP_METHOD structure and functions.
Get rid of the non-functional COMP_METHODS and return NULL instead.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18186)
Fixes#19371
running config with 'enable-sctp' gave compiler errors.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19398)
