Fixes#14013
Coverage reports were no longer generated when travis stopped being used.
This github action workflow schedules a coverage report once a week.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14526)
The memleak test otherwise fails.
Also disable async, dtls, and old tls versions to test some
different combination of disableables and speed up tests.
Fixes#14337
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14536)
'check-update' runs a 'make update' to check that it wasn't forgotten.
'check-docs' runs 'make doc-nits'. We have that as a separate job to
make it more prominent.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13701)
no-asm has proven to be too slow, therefore we don't use it in the Github
CI builds and instead rely on it being covered by run-checker.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13607)
As an interim measure until we work out our longer term CI strategy
this PR enables some basic CI tests using the Github CI capability.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13489)
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12320)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11140)
The file was converted to Markdown and renamed appropriately in
2e07506a12.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11223)
In the first step, we just add the .md extension and move some
files around, without changing any content. These changes will
occur in the following commits.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10545)
This template automatically adds the [issue: documentation] label.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10051)
Actually, we would rather see general questions posted to the
openssl-users mailing list. But habits have changed and more and
more users ask questions on GitHub. Many of them are currently tagged
as bug reports or feature requests, because there is no appropriate
template for questions. This commit adds the missing template.
This template automatically adds the [issue: question] label.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10051)
HTML comments aren't rendered, so markdown link syntax is irrelevant
inside them, and more confusing than useful.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/7632)
It's of course also possible to just add them to the PR description,
but having these lines in the commit messages provide better
automation.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3104)
When creating a single commit PR, github will now automatically
include the commit comment first in the pull request description, and
add the template content last. That makes the description section at
the end useless.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3104)
