Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pauli
7d6766cb53 prov: prefix provider internal functions with ossl_
Also convert the names to lower case.

Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13014)
2020-09-29 16:33:16 +10:00
Matt Caswell
33388b44b6 Update copyright year
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/11616)
2020-04-23 13:55:52 +01:00
Richard Levitte
7c66ad65f9 PROV: Fix mixup between general and specialized GCM implementations
providers/implementations/ciphers/ciphercommon_gcm_hw.c had an AES
specific GCM update function, while
providers/implementations/ciphers/cipher_aria_gcm_hw.c had the more
general implementation.

This moves them around to have the more general implementation in the
common source, and place the AES specialiation where it belongs.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10783)
2020-01-14 14:57:05 +01:00
Matt Caswell
c72fa2554f Deprecate the low level AES functions
Use of the low level AES functions has been informally discouraged for a
long time. We now formally deprecate them.

Applications should instead use the EVP APIs, e.g. EVP_EncryptInit_ex,
EVP_EncryptUpdate, EVP_EncryptFinal_ex, and the equivalently named decrypt
functions.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tmraz@fedoraproject.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10580)
2020-01-06 15:09:57 +00:00
Fangming.Fang
31b59078c8 Optimize AES-GCM implementation on aarch64
Comparing to current implementation, this change can get more
performance improved by tunning the loop-unrolling factor in
interleave implementation as well as by enabling high level parallelism.

Performance(A72)

new
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes   16384 bytes
aes-128-gcm     113065.51k   375743.00k   848359.51k  1517865.98k  1964040.19k  1986663.77k
aes-192-gcm     110679.32k   364470.63k   799322.88k  1428084.05k  1826917.03k  1848967.17k
aes-256-gcm     104919.86k   352939.29k   759477.76k  1330683.56k  1663175.34k  1670430.72k

old
type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes   16384 bytes
aes-128-gcm     115595.32k   382348.65k   855891.29k  1236452.35k  1425670.14k  1429793.45k
aes-192-gcm     112227.02k   369543.47k   810046.55k  1147948.37k  1286288.73k  1296941.06k
aes-256-gcm     111543.90k   361902.36k   769543.59k  1070693.03k  1208576.68k  1207511.72k

Change-Id: I28a2dca85c001a63a2a942e80c7c64f7a4fdfcf7

Reviewed-by: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/9818)
2019-12-19 12:36:07 +10:00
Richard Levitte
dc7aa02900 PROV: Move AES_GCM specialisation away from common cipher header
The AES_GCM specialisation was defined in the common cipher header
providers/implementations/include/prov/ciphercommon_gcm.h, when it
should in fact be in a local providers/implementations/ciphers/
header.

Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10606)
2019-12-12 14:59:24 +01:00
Richard Levitte
68a51d59a2 Move providers/common/{ciphers,digests}/* to providers/implementations
The idea to have all these things in providers/common was viable as
long as the implementations was spread around their main providers.
This is, however, no longer the case, so we move the common blocks
closer to the source that use them.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10564)
2019-12-11 12:55:48 +01:00
Richard Levitte
604e884bb8 Providers: move all ciphers
From providers/{common,default}/ to providers/implementations/

Except for common code, which remains in providers/common/ciphers/.
However, we do move providers/common/include/internal/ciphers/*.h
to providers/common/include/prov/, and adjust all source including
any of those header files.

Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10088)
2019-10-10 14:12:15 +02:00