If the call to X509_ALGOR_set0 fails then the allocated ASN1_STRING
variable passed as parameter leaks. Fix by explicitly freeing like
how all other codepaths with X509_ALGOR_set0 do.
Fixes#22680
Reviewed-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/24868)
If a call to EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_rsa_mgf1_md() fails then the caller
needs to free the label.
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20319)
When successful, ossl_X509_ALGOR_from_nid() returns a pointer to an
X509_ALGOR object. Inside ossl_X509_ALGOR_from_nid(),
X509_ALGOR_set0() is called, and this passes ownership of the ASN1
object "los" (label octet string) to the X509_ALGOR object. When
ossl_X509_ALGOR_from_nid() fails, ownership has not been passed on and
we need to free "los".
Change the scope of "los" and ensure it is freed on failure (on
success, set it to NULL so it is not freed inside the function).
Fixes#22336
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/22495)
Fixes regression of RSA signatures for legacy keys caused
by quering the provider for the algorithm id with parameters.
Legacy keys do not have a method that would create the
algorithm id. So we revert to what was done in 3.0.7 and
earlier versions for these keys.
Fixes#21008
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/21019)
Rather than computing the PSS salt length again in core using
ossl_rsa_ctx_to_pss_string, which calls rsa_ctx_to_pss and computes the
salt length, obtain it from the provider using the
OSSL_SIGNATURE_PARAM_ALGORITHM_ID param to handle the case where the
interpretation of the magic constants in the provider differs from that
of OpenSSL core.
Add tests that verify that the rsa_pss_saltlen:max,
rsa_pss_saltlen:<integer> and rsa_pss_saltlen:digest options work and
put the computed digest length into the CMS_ContentInfo struct when
using CMS. Do not add a test for the salt length generated by a provider
when no specific rsa_pss_saltlen option is defined, since that number
could change between providers and provider versions, and we want to
preserve compatibility with older providers.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Lang <cllang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19724)
Also update and slightly extend the respective documentation and simplify some code.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16251)
This includes error reporting for libcrypto sub-libraries in surprising
places.
This was done using util/err-to-raise
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13318)
There is a large amount of CMS sepcific code in the algorithms. This is in
the wrong place and breaks layering. This code should be in the CMS layer.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13088)
There is quite a large amount of algorithm specific CMS code sitting in
the algorithm directories. However, this seems to break layering.
Algorithms really have no business knowing anything about CMS. Really it
should be the other way around. Where there is algorithm specific CMS code
it is the CMS layer that should know how to handle different algorithms.
Therefore we move this code into the CMS layer.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13088)
