```
test/test_test.c:58:9: note: cast one or both operands to int to silence this warning
test/test_test.c:58:9: error: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands [-Werror,-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
if (!TEST(1, TEST_uint_eq(3u, 3u))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test/test_test.c:58:9: note: cast one or both operands to int to silence this warning
```
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18639)
Notably, this might have caught #18225, as Clang 14 wasn't - and is not yet
until this commit - in OpenSSL's CI.
It makes sense to ensure CI tests compilers used in newer Linux distributions:
* Fedora 36 ships with GCC 12
* Ubuntu 22.04 ships with Clang 14
We switch from 'ubuntu-latest' (which can change meaning but currently points
to ubuntu-20.04) to ubuntu-20.04 for the older existing compilers, and
ubuntu-22.04 for the newer ones added by this commit.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18639)
This can be reproduced with my error injection patch.
The test vector has been validated on the 1.1.1 branch
but the issue is of course identical in all branches.
$ ERROR_INJECT=1656112173 ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./x509-test ./corpora/x509/fe543a8d7e09109a9a08114323eefec802ad79e2
#0 0x7fb61945eeba in __sanitizer_print_stack_trace ../../../../gcc-trunk/libsanitizer/asan/asan_stack.cpp:87
#1 0x402f84 in my_malloc fuzz/test-corpus.c:114
#2 0x7fb619092430 in CRYPTO_zalloc crypto/mem.c:230
#3 0x7fb618ef7561 in bn_expand_internal crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:280
#4 0x7fb618ef7561 in bn_expand2 crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:304
#5 0x7fb618ef819d in BN_bin2bn crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:454
#6 0x7fb618e7aa13 in asn1_string_to_bn crypto/asn1/a_int.c:503
#7 0x7fb618e7aa13 in ASN1_INTEGER_to_BN crypto/asn1/a_int.c:559
#8 0x7fb618fd8e79 in EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:814
#9 0x7fb618fd98e8 in EC_GROUP_new_from_ecpkparameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:935
#10 0x7fb618fd9aec in d2i_ECPKParameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:966
#11 0x7fb618fdace9 in d2i_ECParameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:1184
#12 0x7fb618fd1fc7 in eckey_type2param crypto/ec/ec_ameth.c:119
#13 0x7fb618fd57b4 in eckey_pub_decode crypto/ec/ec_ameth.c:165
#14 0x7fb6191a9c62 in x509_pubkey_decode crypto/x509/x_pubkey.c:124
#15 0x7fb6191a9e42 in pubkey_cb crypto/x509/x_pubkey.c:46
#16 0x7fb618eac032 in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:432
#17 0x7fb618eacaf5 in asn1_template_noexp_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:643
#18 0x7fb618ead288 in asn1_template_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:518
#19 0x7fb618eab9ce in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:382
#20 0x7fb618eacaf5 in asn1_template_noexp_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:643
#21 0x7fb618ead288 in asn1_template_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:518
#22 0x7fb618eab9ce in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:382
#23 0x7fb618eadd1f in ASN1_item_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:124
#24 0x7fb618eade35 in ASN1_item_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:114
#25 0x40310c in FuzzerTestOneInput fuzz/x509.c:33
#26 0x402afb in testfile fuzz/test-corpus.c:182
#27 0x402656 in main fuzz/test-corpus.c:226
#28 0x7fb618551f44 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21f44)
#29 0x402756 (/home/ed/OPC/openssl/fuzz/x509-test+0x402756)
=================================================================
==12221==ERROR: LeakSanitizer: detected memory leaks
Direct leak of 24 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fb61945309f in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../gcc-trunk/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:69
#1 0x7fb619092430 in CRYPTO_zalloc crypto/mem.c:230
#2 0x7fb618ef5f11 in BN_new crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:246
#3 0x7fb618ef82f4 in BN_bin2bn crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:440
#4 0x7fb618fd8933 in EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:618
#5 0x7fb618fd98e8 in EC_GROUP_new_from_ecpkparameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:935
#6 0x7fb618fd9aec in d2i_ECPKParameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:966
#7 0x7fb618fdace9 in d2i_ECParameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:1184
#8 0x7fb618fd1fc7 in eckey_type2param crypto/ec/ec_ameth.c:119
#9 0x7fb618fd57b4 in eckey_pub_decode crypto/ec/ec_ameth.c:165
#10 0x7fb6191a9c62 in x509_pubkey_decode crypto/x509/x_pubkey.c:124
#11 0x7fb6191a9e42 in pubkey_cb crypto/x509/x_pubkey.c:46
#12 0x7fb618eac032 in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:432
#13 0x7fb618eacaf5 in asn1_template_noexp_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:643
#14 0x7fb618ead288 in asn1_template_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:518
#15 0x7fb618eab9ce in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:382
#16 0x7fb618eacaf5 in asn1_template_noexp_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:643
#17 0x7fb618ead288 in asn1_template_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:518
#18 0x7fb618eab9ce in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:382
#19 0x7fb618eadd1f in ASN1_item_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:124
#20 0x7fb618eade35 in ASN1_item_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:114
#21 0x40310c in FuzzerTestOneInput fuzz/x509.c:33
#22 0x402afb in testfile fuzz/test-corpus.c:182
#23 0x402656 in main fuzz/test-corpus.c:226
#24 0x7fb618551f44 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21f44)
Indirect leak of 56 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
#0 0x7fb61945309f in __interceptor_malloc ../../../../gcc-trunk/libsanitizer/asan/asan_malloc_linux.cpp:69
#1 0x7fb619092430 in CRYPTO_zalloc crypto/mem.c:230
#2 0x7fb618ef7561 in bn_expand_internal crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:280
#3 0x7fb618ef7561 in bn_expand2 crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:304
#4 0x7fb618ef819d in BN_bin2bn crypto/bn/bn_lib.c:454
#5 0x7fb618fd8933 in EC_GROUP_new_from_ecparameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:618
#6 0x7fb618fd98e8 in EC_GROUP_new_from_ecpkparameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:935
#7 0x7fb618fd9aec in d2i_ECPKParameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:966
#8 0x7fb618fdace9 in d2i_ECParameters crypto/ec/ec_asn1.c:1184
#9 0x7fb618fd1fc7 in eckey_type2param crypto/ec/ec_ameth.c:119
#10 0x7fb618fd57b4 in eckey_pub_decode crypto/ec/ec_ameth.c:165
#11 0x7fb6191a9c62 in x509_pubkey_decode crypto/x509/x_pubkey.c:124
#12 0x7fb6191a9e42 in pubkey_cb crypto/x509/x_pubkey.c:46
#13 0x7fb618eac032 in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:432
#14 0x7fb618eacaf5 in asn1_template_noexp_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:643
#15 0x7fb618ead288 in asn1_template_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:518
#16 0x7fb618eab9ce in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:382
#17 0x7fb618eacaf5 in asn1_template_noexp_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:643
#18 0x7fb618ead288 in asn1_template_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:518
#19 0x7fb618eab9ce in asn1_item_embed_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:382
#20 0x7fb618eadd1f in ASN1_item_ex_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:124
#21 0x7fb618eade35 in ASN1_item_d2i crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c:114
#22 0x40310c in FuzzerTestOneInput fuzz/x509.c:33
#23 0x402afb in testfile fuzz/test-corpus.c:182
#24 0x402656 in main fuzz/test-corpus.c:226
#25 0x7fb618551f44 in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x21f44)
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: 80 byte(s) leaked in 2 allocation(s).
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18633)
Fixes#18342
Fixes <propq> to I<propq>
Updated copyright year
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18623)
Fixes#18618
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18630)
(cherry picked from commit b07db93f6b)
There are no ASIdentifiers if OPENSSL_NO_RFC3779 is defined,
therefore the test cannot be compiled.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18634)
Currently this configurations seem to be failing.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18634)
Otherwise the information that the EC group was imported from
explicit parameters is lost when the key is moved across providers.
Fixes#18600
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18609)
This fixes a warning from latest gcc.
There is no point in using strncpy here as we
intentionally copy only the string contents without
the terminating NUL. The len is set from strlen().
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18627)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_strdup(), it should
be better to check the return value and return error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18624)
bn_reduce_once_in_place expects the number of BN_ULONG, but factor_size
is moduli bit size.
Fixes#18625.
Signed-off-by: Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18626)
And move ROTATE inline asm to header.
Now this benefits SM3, SHA (when with Zbb only and no Zknh)
and other hash functions
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18287)
This works for both RV32 and RV64
Signed-off-by: Hongren (Zenithal) Zheng <i@zenithal.me>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18287)
This patch improves existing chacha20 SVE patch by using SVE2,
which is an optional architecture feature of aarch64, with XAR
instruction that can improve the performance of chacha20.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hu <Daniel.Hu@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18522)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_malloc(),
it should be better to add the check and return
error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18573)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_strdup(),
it should be better to check the return value and
return error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18592)
- If keymgmmt is not available, it's not an error but the error message
persists in stack
- when setting groups, it's worth saying which group is not available
Fixes#18585
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18591)
Test makes sure, that both time stamping certificate according to rfc3161 (no
requirements for keyUsage extension) and according to CAB forum (keyUsage
extension must be digitalSignature and be set critical) are accepted. Misuse
cases as stated in CAB forum are rejected, only exeption is a missing
"critial" flag on keyUsage.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18597)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_strdup(),
it should be better to check the return value and
return error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18595)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_strdup(),
it should be better to check the return value and
return error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18593)
SIZE_MAX is used in a recent fix of this file, but without including
internal/numbers.h, so that macro ends up not existing on some platforms,
resulting in build failures.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18605)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_malloc(),
timestamp_tm could be NULL and be used in ASN1_TIME_to_tm()
without check.
Therefore, it should be better to check the return value of
OPENSSL_malloc() and return error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18575)
Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <randall.becker@nexbridge.ca>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18566)
Commit 8bfb7506d2 updated
`BIO_f_base64(3)` to improve the documentation of the
`BIO_FLAGS_BASE64_NO_NL` flag. In particular, the updated text
states that when this flag is used, all newlines in the input are
ignored. This is incorrect, as the following program proves:
```c
unsigned char *in_buf =
"IlRoZSBxdWljayBicm93biBmb3gganVt\ncHMgb3ZlciBhIGxhenkgZG9nLiI=\n";
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
BIO *b64 = BIO_new(BIO_f_base64());
if (b64 == NULL) return 1;
BIO_set_flags(b64, BIO_get_flags(b64) | BIO_FLAGS_BASE64_NO_NL);
int in_len = strlen(in_buf);
BIO *in = BIO_new_mem_buf(in_buf, in_len);
if (in == NULL) return 2;
in = BIO_push(b64, in);
unsigned char *out_buf = calloc(in_len, sizeof(unsigned char));
if (out_buf == NULL) return 3;
size_t out_len;
int r = BIO_read_ex(in, out_buf, in_len, &out_len);
printf("rv = %d\n", r);
printf("decoded = %s\n", out_buf);
return 0;
}
```
Update the text of `BIO_f_base64(3)` to clarify that when the flag
is set, the data must be all on one line (with or without a trailing
newline character).
Signed-off-by: Fraser Tweedale <ftweedal@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18568)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18571)
The argument translates into a directory name, and there are platforms
that don't allow spaces (at least not easily), which makes the test fail.
This modifies it to conform a bit better to the usual form for that arg.
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18531)
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18490)
Inspired by BoringSSL fix by David Benjamin.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18510)
This partially fixes a bug where, on x86_64, BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime
would sometimes return m, the modulus, when it should have returned
zero. Thanks to Guido Vranken for reporting it. It is only a partial fix
because the same bug also exists in the "rsaz" codepath.
The bug only affects zero outputs (with non-zero inputs), so we believe
it has no security impact on our cryptographic functions.
The fx is to delete lowercase bn_from_montgomery altogether, and have the
mont5 path use the same BN_from_montgomery ending as the non-mont5 path.
This only impacts the final step of the whole exponentiation and has no
measurable perf impact.
See the original BoringSSL commit
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/13c9d5c69d04485a7a8840c12185c832026c8315
for further analysis.
Original-author: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18510)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_malloc(),
it should be better to add the check and return
error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18555)
