Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18668)
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18480)
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18480)
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18480)
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18480)
Longer private key sizes unnecessarily raise the cycles needed to
compute the shared secret without any increase of the real security.
We use minimum key sizes as defined in RFC7919.
For arbitrary parameters we cannot know whether they are safe
primes (we could test but that would be too inefficient) we have
to keep generating large keys.
However we now set a small dh->length when we are generating safe prime
parameters because we know it is safe to use small keys with them.
That means users need to regenerate the parameters if they
want to take the performance advantage of small private key.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18480)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18667)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18667)
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18774)
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18758)
Fixes test error in #18714
This only happens currently during minimal builds.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18737)
Add test vectors for AES OCB for x86 AES-NI multiple of 96 byte issue.
Co-authored-by: Alejandro Sedeño <asedeno@google.com>
Co-authored-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
The -provider and -propquery options did not work on dsaparam and
gendsa. Fix this and add tests that check that operations that are not
supported by the FIPS provider work when run with
| -provider default -propquery '?fips!=yes'
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094956, where this
was initially reported.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Lang <cllang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18576)
range_should_be_prefix() was misidentifying whether an IP address range
should in fact be represented as a prefix. This was due to a bug introduced
in commit 42d7d7dd which made this incorrect change:
- OPENSSL_assert(memcmp(min, max, length) <= 0);
+ if (memcmp(min, max, length) <= 0)
+ return -1;
This error leads to incorrect DER being encoded/accepted.
Reported by Theo Buehler (@botovq)
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18524)
Test that if we receive a packet from the next epoch, we can buffer it
and still use it.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18601)
Testing a key with all values set to 0.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18651)
```
test/test_test.c:58:9: note: cast one or both operands to int to silence this warning
test/test_test.c:58:9: error: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands [-Werror,-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
if (!TEST(1, TEST_uint_eq(3u, 3u))
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
test/test_test.c:58:9: note: cast one or both operands to int to silence this warning
```
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18639)
There are no ASIdentifiers if OPENSSL_NO_RFC3779 is defined,
therefore the test cannot be compiled.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18634)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_malloc(),
it should be better to add the check and return
error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18573)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_strdup(),
it should be better to check the return value and
return error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18592)
Test makes sure, that both time stamping certificate according to rfc3161 (no
requirements for keyUsage extension) and according to CAB forum (keyUsage
extension must be digitalSignature and be set critical) are accepted. Misuse
cases as stated in CAB forum are rejected, only exeption is a missing
"critial" flag on keyUsage.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18597)
The argument translates into a directory name, and there are platforms
that don't allow spaces (at least not easily), which makes the test fail.
This modifies it to conform a bit better to the usual form for that arg.
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18531)
Inspired by BoringSSL fix by David Benjamin.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18510)
This partially fixes a bug where, on x86_64, BN_mod_exp_mont_consttime
would sometimes return m, the modulus, when it should have returned
zero. Thanks to Guido Vranken for reporting it. It is only a partial fix
because the same bug also exists in the "rsaz" codepath.
The bug only affects zero outputs (with non-zero inputs), so we believe
it has no security impact on our cryptographic functions.
The fx is to delete lowercase bn_from_montgomery altogether, and have the
mont5 path use the same BN_from_montgomery ending as the non-mont5 path.
This only impacts the final step of the whole exponentiation and has no
measurable perf impact.
See the original BoringSSL commit
https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl/+/13c9d5c69d04485a7a8840c12185c832026c8315
for further analysis.
Original-author: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18510)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_malloc(),
it should be better to add the check and return
error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18555)
As the potential failure of the OPENSSL_zalloc(),
it should be better to add the check and return
error if fails.
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18552)
If keymgmt is NULL, tmp_keymgmt is allocated and will not be freed.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18499)
If the asnum or rdi fields are NULL and the ASIdentifiers are otherwise
subsets then this will result in a crash. Of note is that rdi will usually
be NULL.
Reported by Theo Buehler (@botovq)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18514)
EVP_PKEY_derive() should be able to cope with a too big buffer for fixed
size outputs. However, we don't test that.
This change modifies the PKEYKDF tests to ask EVP_PKEY_derive() what the
desired output buffer size is, and as long as the returned value isn't
absurd (indicating that anything goes), the output buffer is made to be
twice as big as what is expected.
Tests #18517
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18533)
(cherry picked from commit a0587aaeff)
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18518)
Namely the smime certificates used in test_cms and the
SM2 certificates will expire soon and affect tests.
Fixes#15179
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18467)
This avoids the need to use SECLEVEL=1 in 12-ct.cnf.in.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18450)
This requires some code being pulled into the empty protocol
implementation so the state machinery works.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18307)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18424)
