is used.
Fixes#19934
The existing code was looking for the digest size, and then returned
zero.
The example code in EVP_KDF-SS.pod has been corrected to not use a
digest.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19935)
The condition evaluation in #if conditions does not tolerate this
if the macro is not defined.
Fixes#19628
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20018)
A zero BIGNUM contains zero bytes, while OSSL_PARAMs with an INTEGER (or
UNSIGNED INTEGER) data type are expected to have at least one data byte
allocated, containing a zero. This wasn't handled correctly.
Fixes#20011
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20013)
This way, we guarantee that a zero is represented with one byte of data
that's set to zero.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20013)
We also add tests where the zero bignum is the only parameter, to test what
that does with the allocated blocks that the OSSL_PARAM_BLD functionality
handles.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20013)
Fixes#19953
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20008)
Fixes#8630
The remaining functions are at least as old as 0.9.8 so it is
not worth documenting this.
Reviewed-by: Nicola Tuveri <nic.tuv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19956)
Fixes: #19996
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20001)
Signed-off-by: Xu Yizhou <xuyizhou1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19910)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19985)
This is needed to pass the test on MinGW.
Fixes#19921
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19957)
This change parallels the implementation of multilib and initially
only applies to the NonStop platform's DLL loader limitations.
Fixes: #16460
Signed-off-by: Randall S. Becker <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16472)
Fixes#19829
Examples added for setting/getting ECDSA SIG related r and s values
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19936)
Fixes#19909
I have enforced a maximum bound still but it is much higher.
Note also that TLS13 still uses the 2048 buffer size.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19923)
If x and y are all NULL, then it is unnecessary to do subsequent operations.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19905)
CLA:trivial
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19882)
"openssl version -c" may create undefined behavior in the shift:
crypto/info.c:42:50: runtime error: left shift of 4275712515
by 32 places cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19668)
Also test the OSSL_TRACE_CATEGORY_TRACE tracing - this fails
on address sanitizer runs without the fix for #19915
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19917)
The trace code assumes all categories are present and
the category numbers are equal to the index in the table.
Fixes#19915
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19917)
If the cipher being used in ossl_cms_EncryptedContent_init_bio() has no
associated OID then we should report an error rather than continuing on
regardless. Continuing on still ends up failing - but later on and with a
more cryptic error message.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
Some things that may go wrong in asn1_bio_write() are serious errors
that should be reported as -1, rather than 0 (which just means "we wrote
no data").
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
If the BIO unexpectedly fails to flush then SMIME_crlf_copy() was not
correctly reporting the error. We modify it to properly propagate the
error condition.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
If an error occurs during a flush on a BIO_f_cipher() then in some cases
we could get into an infinite loop. We add a check to make sure we are
making progress during flush and exit if not.
This issue was reported by Octavio Galland who also demonstrated an
infinite loop in CMS encryption as a result of this bug.
The security team has assessed this issue as not a CVE. This occurs on
*encryption* only which is typically processing trusted data. We are not
aware of a way to trigger this with untrusted data.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
Due to the logic flaw, possible test failures
in this test case might be ignored.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19929)
This also links back to the new location that lists the cert and
security policy.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19617)
The code path for this resource leak indicates that this is a false
positive (if you look at the callers).
Rather than ignoring the warning an extra check has been added, in case
future callers do the wrong thing.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19799)
Fixes#19782
Clarify that EVP_Q_MAC() can be used as an alternative that allows
setting of the libctx.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19855)
Now that ACVP test vectors exist, support has been added for this mode.
See https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-108r1.pdf
Note that the test vectors used fairly large values for the input key
and the context, so the contraints for these has been increased from
256 to 512 bytes.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19916)
