Commit Graph

13 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Matt Caswell
59a783d05a Fix a race in ossl_provider_add_to_store()
If two threads both attempt to load the same provider at the same time,
they will first both check to see if the provider already exists. If it
doesn't then they will both then create new provider objects and call the
init function. However only one of the threads will be successful in adding
the provider to the store. For the "losing" thread we should still return
"success", but we should deinitialise and free the no longer required
provider object, and return the object that exists in the store.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
2021-06-24 14:48:15 +01:00
Matt Caswell
814c2018e1 Merge ossl_provider_activate() and ossl_provider_activate_child()
These 2 functions have become so close to each other that they may as well
be just one function.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
2021-06-24 14:48:14 +01:00
Matt Caswell
eb2263da9a Set use_fallbacks to zero when we add a provider to the store
Update use_fallbacks to zero when we add a provider to the store rather
than when we activate it. Its only at the point that we add it to the store
that it is actually usable and visible to other threads.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
2021-06-24 14:48:14 +01:00
Matt Caswell
d5fbd5b4ed Remove flag_couldbechild
Now that a provider is no longer put into the store until after it has
been activated we don't need flag_couldbechild any more. This flag was
used to indicate whether a provider was eligible for conversion into a
child provider or not. This was only really interesting for predefined
providers that were automatically created.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
2021-06-24 14:48:14 +01:00
Matt Caswell
29aff65315 Add a new provider to the store only after we activate it
Rather than creating the provider, adding to the store and then activating
it, we do things the other way around, i.e. activate first and then add to
the store. This means that the activation should occur before other threads
are aware of the provider.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15854)
2021-06-24 14:48:14 +01:00
Matt Caswell
b1c053acda Ensure mirroring of properties works for subsequent updates
If the global properties are updated after a provider with a child libctx
has already started we need to make sure those updates are mirrored in
that child.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15242)
2021-05-20 09:35:41 +01:00
Matt Caswell
447588b69a Add a callback for providers to know about global properties changes
Where a child libctx is in use it needs to know what the current global
properties are.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15242)
2021-05-20 09:32:40 +01:00
Matt Caswell
a227ff336f Fix a use-after-free in the child provider code
If the child provider context data gets cleaned up before all usage of
providers has finished then a use-after-free can occur. We change the
priority of this data so that it gets freed later.

Fixes #15284

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15286)
2021-05-17 10:36:03 +01:00
Matt Caswell
36a89c0439 Init the child providers immediately on creation of the child libctx
We were deferring the initial creation of the child providers until the
first fetch. This is a carry over from an earlier iteration of the child
lib ctx development and is no longer necessary. In fact we need to init
the child providers immediately otherwise not all providers quite init
correctly.

Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/15270)
2021-05-15 10:33:42 +01:00
Matt Caswell
abaa2dd298 Don't convert pre-existing providers into children
If a provider explicitly loads another provider into a child libctx where
it wasn't previously loaded then we don't start treating it like a child
if the parent libctx subsequently loads the same provider.

Fixes #14925

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
2021-05-11 15:03:13 +01:00
Matt Caswell
8c62707565 Add support for child provider to up_ref/free their parent
If the ref counts on a child provider change, then this needs to be
reflected in the parent so we add callbacks to do this.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
2021-05-11 14:59:43 +01:00
Matt Caswell
7b88c184b6 Register callbacks with core for child provider creation/deletion
By adding callbacks to the core this will enable (in future commits) the
ability to add/remove child providers as the providers are added/removed
from the parent libctx.

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
2021-05-11 14:59:43 +01:00
Matt Caswell
f12a5690de Add the concept of a child OSSL_LIB_CTX
Add a child OSSL_LIB_CTX that will mirror the providers loaded into the
parent libctx. This is useful for providers that want to use algorithms
from other providers and just need to inherit the providers used by the
application.

Fixes #14925

Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/14991)
2021-05-11 14:56:55 +01:00