Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20023)
The other implementations of i2r return 0 in case of an error, but
i2r_ADMISSION_SYNTAX() returns -1. That means the check on i2r does not
catch the error. Change it to return 0 like the others do.
Fixes: #20066
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20068)
Fixes#19718Fixes#19716
Added PKCS12_SAFEBAG_get1_cert_ex(), PKCS12_SAFEBAG_get1_crl_ex() and
ASN1_item_unpack_ex().
parse_bag and parse_bags now use the libctx/propq stored in the P7_CTX.
PKCS12_free() needed to be manually constructed in order to free the propq.
pkcs12_api_test.c changed so that it actually tests the libctx, propq.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19942)
Otherwise the alloca can cause an exception.
Issue reported by Jiayi Lin.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20005)
Fixes#6277
Description:
Make each of the five EdDSA instances defined in RFC 8032 -- Ed25519,
Ed25519ctx, Ed25519ph, Ed448, Ed448ph -- available via the EVP APIs.
The desired EdDSA instance is specified via an OSSL_PARAM.
All instances, except for Ed25519, allow context strings as input.
Context strings are passed via an OSSL_PARAM. For Ed25519ctx, the
context string must be nonempty.
Ed25519, Ed25519ctx, Ed448 are PureEdDSA instances, which means that
the full message (not a digest) must be passed to sign and verify
operations.
Ed25519ph, Ed448ph are HashEdDSA instances, which means that the input
message is hashed before sign and verify.
Testing:
All 21 test vectors from RFC 8032 have been added to evppkey_ecx.txt
(thanks to Shane Lontis for showing how to do that). Those 21 test
vectors are exercised by evp_test.c and cover all five instances.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19705)
This is not a big problem for higher level keygen, as these set e
beforehand to a default value. But the logic at the lower level is
incorrect since it was doing a NULL check in one place but then
segfaulting during a later BN_copy().
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20025)
The condition evaluation in #if conditions does not tolerate this
if the macro is not defined.
Fixes#19628
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20018)
A zero BIGNUM contains zero bytes, while OSSL_PARAMs with an INTEGER (or
UNSIGNED INTEGER) data type are expected to have at least one data byte
allocated, containing a zero. This wasn't handled correctly.
Fixes#20011
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20013)
This way, we guarantee that a zero is represented with one byte of data
that's set to zero.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20013)
Fixes: #19996
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20001)
Signed-off-by: Xu Yizhou <xuyizhou1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Yang <kaishen.yy@antfin.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19910)
"openssl version -c" may create undefined behavior in the shift:
crypto/info.c:42:50: runtime error: left shift of 4275712515
by 32 places cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19668)
The trace code assumes all categories are present and
the category numbers are equal to the index in the table.
Fixes#19915
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19917)
If the cipher being used in ossl_cms_EncryptedContent_init_bio() has no
associated OID then we should report an error rather than continuing on
regardless. Continuing on still ends up failing - but later on and with a
more cryptic error message.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
Some things that may go wrong in asn1_bio_write() are serious errors
that should be reported as -1, rather than 0 (which just means "we wrote
no data").
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
If the BIO unexpectedly fails to flush then SMIME_crlf_copy() was not
correctly reporting the error. We modify it to properly propagate the
error condition.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
If an error occurs during a flush on a BIO_f_cipher() then in some cases
we could get into an infinite loop. We add a check to make sure we are
making progress during flush and exit if not.
This issue was reported by Octavio Galland who also demonstrated an
infinite loop in CMS encryption as a result of this bug.
The security team has assessed this issue as not a CVE. This occurs on
*encryption* only which is typically processing trusted data. We are not
aware of a way to trigger this with untrusted data.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
The code path for this resource leak indicates that this is a false
positive (if you look at the callers).
Rather than ignoring the warning an extra check has been added, in case
future callers do the wrong thing.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19799)
We already permit this in crypto/objects/objects.txt, but not programatically,
although being able to do so programatically would be beneficial.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19876)
The internal error reason is confusing and indicating an error
in OpenSSL and not a configuration problem.
Fixes#19867
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19875)
Fixes#19858
During decryption, the last ciphertext is not fed to next block
correctly when the number of input blocks is exactly 4. Fix this
and add the corresponding test cases.
Thanks xu-yi-zhou for reporting this issue and proposing the fix.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19872)
Signed-off-by: Čestmír Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19823)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13817)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13817)
The RSA decryption as implemented before required very careful handling
of both the exit code returned by OpenSSL and the potentially returned
ciphertext. Looking at the recent security vulnerabilities
(CVE-2020-25659 and CVE-2020-25657) it is unlikely that most users of
OpenSSL do it correctly.
Given that correct code requires side channel secure programming in
application code, we can classify the existing RSA decryption methods
as CWE-676, which in turn likely causes CWE-208 and CWE-385 in
application code.
To prevent that, we can use a technique called "implicit rejection".
For that we generate a random message to be returned in case the
padding check fails. We generate the message based on static secret
data (the private exponent) and the provided ciphertext (so that the
attacker cannot determine that the returned value is randomly generated
instead of result of decryption and de-padding). We return it in case
any part of padding check fails.
The upshot of this approach is that then not only is the length of the
returned message useless as the Bleichenbacher oracle, so are the
actual bytes of the returned message. So application code doesn't have
to perform any operations on the returned message in side-channel free
way to remain secure against Bleichenbacher attacks.
Note: this patch implements a specific algorithm, shared with Mozilla
NSS, so that the attacker cannot use one library as an oracle against the
other in heterogeneous environments.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13817)
This reverts commit 9aa4be691f and removed the
redundant flag setting.
Fixes#19643
Fixes LOW CVE-2022-3996
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19652)
FIPS 186-4 section 5 "The RSA Digital Signature Algorithm", subsection
5.5 "PKCS #1" says: "For RSASSA-PSS […] the length (in bytes) of the
salt (sLen) shall satisfy 0 <= sLen <= hLen, where hLen is the length of
the hash function output block (in bytes)."
Introduce a new option RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_AUTO_DIGEST_MAX and make it the
default. The new value will behave like RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_AUTO, but will
not use more than the digest length when signing, so that FIPS 186-4 is
not violated. This value has two advantages when compared with
RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_DIGEST: (1) It will continue to do auto-detection when
verifying signatures for maximum compatibility, where
RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_DIGEST would fail for other digest sizes. (2) It will
work for combinations where the maximum salt length is smaller than the
digest size, which typically happens with large digest sizes (e.g.,
SHA-512) and small RSA keys.
J.-S. Coron shows in "Optimal Security Proofs for PSS and Other
Signature Schemes. Advances in Cryptology – Eurocrypt 2002, volume 2332
of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 272 – 287. Springer Verlag,
2002." that longer salts than the output size of modern hash functions
do not increase security: "For example,for an application in which at
most one billion signatures will be generated, k0 = 30 bits of random
salt are actually sufficient to guarantee the same level of security as
RSA, and taking a larger salt does not increase the security level."
Signed-off-by: Clemens Lang <cllang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19724)
Rather than computing the PSS salt length again in core using
ossl_rsa_ctx_to_pss_string, which calls rsa_ctx_to_pss and computes the
salt length, obtain it from the provider using the
OSSL_SIGNATURE_PARAM_ALGORITHM_ID param to handle the case where the
interpretation of the magic constants in the provider differs from that
of OpenSSL core.
Add tests that verify that the rsa_pss_saltlen:max,
rsa_pss_saltlen:<integer> and rsa_pss_saltlen:digest options work and
put the computed digest length into the CMS_ContentInfo struct when
using CMS. Do not add a test for the salt length generated by a provider
when no specific rsa_pss_saltlen option is defined, since that number
could change between providers and provider versions, and we want to
preserve compatibility with older providers.
Signed-off-by: Clemens Lang <cllang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19724)
Do not accept password-based if expected signature-based and no secret is available and
do not accept signature-based if expected password-based and no trust anchors available.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19729)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16006)
Fixes openssl#19771
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19787)
In addition to a missing prototype there was also a missing closing brace '}'.
Fixes#19825.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19833)
