The data argument of SSL_dane_tlsa_add is used read-only, so it
should be const.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5056)
- Avoid creating repeated year ranges <current_year>-<current_year> for
documents which were added in the current year.
- Use extended regular expressions for better readability (less quoting)
- Use a shebang line which is more portable
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5044)
In the case of a protocol version alert being sent by a peer the record
version number may not be what we are expecting. In DTLS records with an
unexpected version number are silently discarded. This probably isn't
appropriate for alerts, so we tolerate a mismatch in the minor version
number.
This resolves an issue reported on openssl-users where an OpenSSL server
chose DTLS1.0 but the client was DTLS1.2 only and sent a protocol_version
alert with a 1.2 record number. This was silently ignored by the server.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5018)
This avoids situations where third party client is unable to recognize
that the client certificate was issued by the same CA with name differring
only by case or insignificant characters.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4731)
In man1/engine.pod and man3/ENGINE_add.pod
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4956)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4958)
Many of the sub-commands under apps/ accept cipher or digest arguments like
"-sha256". These are implemented using a catchall flag that runs the result
through opt_md() or opt_cipher(). That means any unrecognized flag, including
typos, gets sent to those two functions, producing confusing error messages like
below:
$ ./apps/openssl req -x590
req: Unrecognized digest x590
req: Use -help for summary.
This change switches these two functions to say "Unrecognized flag X" instead.
The new message deliberately leaves off the "-" from the flag name, because
there are some cases where opt_md() and opt_cipher() are passed a flag value
instead (for instance, openssl ca -md). I think the new message is generic
enough that it can serve both cases with improved clarity.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4972)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5000)
Extract the RSA key using EVP_PKEY_get0. Type is checked externally to be either EVP_PKEY_RSA_PSS or EVP_PKEY_RSA.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4389)
usage: openssl-update-copyright [-h|--help] [file|directory] ...
Updates the year ranges of all OpenSSL copyright statements in the given
files or directories. (Directories are traversed recursively.)
Only copyright statements containing the string 'The OpenSSL Project' are
affected. The copyright time range is adjusted to include the current year.
If only a single year was specified, it is replaced by a time range starting
at that year and ending at the current year. All '(c)' and '(C)' signs are
preserved.
Signed-off-by: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5027)
So far, we've placed all extra library related flags together, ending
up in the make variable EX_LIBS. This turns out to be problematic, as
for example, some compilers don't quite agree with something like
this:
cc -o foo foo.o -L/whatever -lsomething
They prefer this:
cc -L/whatever -o foo foo.o -lsomething
IBM's compiler on OS/390 is such a compiler that we know of, and we
have previously handled that as a previous case.
The answer here is to make a more general solution, where linking
options are divided in two parts, where one ends up in LDFLAGS and
the other in EX_LIBS (they corresponds to what is called LDFLAGS and
LDLIBS in the GNU world)
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5033)
The uClinux targets included some attributes that would result in
circular references of CFLAGS and LDCLAGS.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5034)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4634)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4634)
Signed-off-by: Patrick Steuer <patrick.steuer@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4634)
SPARC ISA doesn't have provisions to back up 128-bit multiplications
and additions. And so multiplications are done with library calls
and carries with comparisons and conditional moves. As result base
2^51 code is >40% slower...
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
This is based on RT#3810, which added dedicated modular inversion.
ECDSA verify results improves as well, but not as much.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5001)
The changes are analogous to the ones made in commit 0bf340e135
to x509.pod, see PR #4924.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5012)
The DRGB concept described in NIST SP 800-90A provides for having different
algorithms to generate random output. In fact, the FIPS object module used to
implement three of them, CTR DRBG, HASH DRBG and HMAC DRBG.
When the FIPS code was ported to master in #4019, two of the three algorithms
were dropped, and together with those the entire code that made RAND_DRBG
generic was removed, since only one concrete implementation was left.
This commit restores the original generic implementation of the DRBG, making it
possible again to add additional implementations using different algorithms
(like RAND_DRBG_CHACHA20) in the future.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4998)
The generic part of the FIPS DRBG was implemented in fips_drbg_lib.c and the
algorithm specific parts in fips_drbg_<alg>.c for <alg> in {ctr, hash, hmac}.
Additionally, there was the module fips_drbg_rand.c which contained 'gluing'
code between the RAND_METHOD api and the FIPS DRBG.
When the FIPS code was ported to master in #4019, for some reason the ctr-drbg
implementation from fips_drbg_ctr.c ended up in drbg_rand.c instead of drbg_ctr.c.
This commit renames the module drbg_rand.c back to drbg_ctr.c, thereby restoring
a simple relationship between the original fips modules and the drbg modules
in master:
fips_drbg_lib.c => drbg_lib.c /* generic part of implementation */
fips_drbg_<alg>.c => drbg_<alg>.c /* algorithm specific implementations */
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <paul.dale@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4998)
Add a regression test for the functionality enabled in the
previous commit.
[extended tests]
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4463)
Although this is forbidden by all three(!) relevant specifications,
there seem to be multiple server implementations in the wild that
send it. Since we didn't check for unexpected extensions in any
given message type until TLS 1.3 support was added, our previous
behavior was to silently accept these extensions and pass them over
to the custom extension callback (if any). In order to avoid
regression of functionality, relax the check for "extension in
unexpected context" for this specific case, but leave the protocol
enforcment mechanism unchanged for other extensions and in other
extension contexts.
Leave a detailed comment to indicate what is going on.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4463)
A TLSv1.3 Certificate Request message was issuing a "Message length parse
error" using the -trace option to s_server/s_client.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/5008)
Similar to commit 17b602802114d53017ff7894319498934a580b17(
"Remove extra `the` in SSL_SESSION_set1_id.pod"), this commit removes
typos where additional 'the' have been added.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4999)
Following the changes that removed Makefile.shared, we also changed
the generation of .def / .map / .opt files from ordinals more
explicit, removing the need to the "magic" ORDINALS declaration.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/4993)
"Double" is in quotes because improvement coefficient varies
significantly depending on platform and compiler. You're likely
to measure ~2x improvement on popular desktop and server processors,
but not so much on mobile ones, even minor regression on ARM
Cortex series. Latter is because they have rather "weak" umulh
instruction. On low-end x86_64 problem is that contemporary gcc
and clang tend to opt for double-precision shift for >>51, which
can be devastatingly slow on some processors.
Just in case for reference, trick is to use 2^51 radix [currently
only for DH].
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
