Server mode not implemented yet.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19703)
Ordinarily we should not allow ELs to be rekeyed as it makes no sense to
do so. However the INITIAL EL can need to be rekeyed if a connection
retry occurs. Modify the QRL to allow this.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19703)
This adds support for calculating and verifying retry integrity tags. In
order to support this, an 'unused' field is added to the QUIC packet
header structure so we can ensure that the serialization of the header
is bit-for-bit identical to what was decoded.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19703)
Previously, the QRX filled in a OSSL_QRX_PKT structure provided by the
caller. This necessitated the caller managing reference counting itself
using a OSSL_QRX_PKT_WRAP structure. The need for this structure has
been eliminated by adding refcounting support to the QRX itself. The QRX
now outputs a pointer to an OSSL_QRX_PKT instead of filling in a
structure provided by the caller. The OSSL_QRX_PKT_WRAP structure has
been eliminated.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19703)
This disables -Wtype-limits /
-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare. Since it generates
warnings for valid and reasonable code, IMO this actually encourages
people to write worse code.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19703)
This is required to support retries during connection establishment.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19703)
Fixes#6277
Description:
Make each of the five EdDSA instances defined in RFC 8032 -- Ed25519,
Ed25519ctx, Ed25519ph, Ed448, Ed448ph -- available via the EVP APIs.
The desired EdDSA instance is specified via an OSSL_PARAM.
All instances, except for Ed25519, allow context strings as input.
Context strings are passed via an OSSL_PARAM. For Ed25519ctx, the
context string must be nonempty.
Ed25519, Ed25519ctx, Ed448 are PureEdDSA instances, which means that
the full message (not a digest) must be passed to sign and verify
operations.
Ed25519ph, Ed448ph are HashEdDSA instances, which means that the input
message is hashed before sign and verify.
Testing:
All 21 test vectors from RFC 8032 have been added to evppkey_ecx.txt
(thanks to Shane Lontis for showing how to do that). Those 21 test
vectors are exercised by evp_test.c and cover all five instances.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19705)
The trace code assumes all categories are present and
the category numbers are equal to the index in the table.
Fixes#19915
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19917)
If the cipher being used in ossl_cms_EncryptedContent_init_bio() has no
associated OID then we should report an error rather than continuing on
regardless. Continuing on still ends up failing - but later on and with a
more cryptic error message.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19918)
The internal error reason is confusing and indicating an error
in OpenSSL and not a configuration problem.
Fixes#19867
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19875)
Define OSSL_SIGNATURE_PARAM_NONCE_TYPE as "nonce-type" (rather than
"nonce_type") so that it is consistent with the documentation.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19883)
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13817)
The RSA decryption as implemented before required very careful handling
of both the exit code returned by OpenSSL and the potentially returned
ciphertext. Looking at the recent security vulnerabilities
(CVE-2020-25659 and CVE-2020-25657) it is unlikely that most users of
OpenSSL do it correctly.
Given that correct code requires side channel secure programming in
application code, we can classify the existing RSA decryption methods
as CWE-676, which in turn likely causes CWE-208 and CWE-385 in
application code.
To prevent that, we can use a technique called "implicit rejection".
For that we generate a random message to be returned in case the
padding check fails. We generate the message based on static secret
data (the private exponent) and the provided ciphertext (so that the
attacker cannot determine that the returned value is randomly generated
instead of result of decryption and de-padding). We return it in case
any part of padding check fails.
The upshot of this approach is that then not only is the length of the
returned message useless as the Bleichenbacher oracle, so are the
actual bytes of the returned message. So application code doesn't have
to perform any operations on the returned message in side-channel free
way to remain secure against Bleichenbacher attacks.
Note: this patch implements a specific algorithm, shared with Mozilla
NSS, so that the attacker cannot use one library as an oracle against the
other in heterogeneous environments.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/13817)
FIPS 186-4 section 5 "The RSA Digital Signature Algorithm", subsection
5.5 "PKCS #1" says: "For RSASSA-PSS […] the length (in bytes) of the
salt (sLen) shall satisfy 0 <= sLen <= hLen, where hLen is the length of
the hash function output block (in bytes)."
Introduce a new option RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_AUTO_DIGEST_MAX and make it the
default. The new value will behave like RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_AUTO, but will
not use more than the digest length when signing, so that FIPS 186-4 is
not violated. This value has two advantages when compared with
RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_DIGEST: (1) It will continue to do auto-detection when
verifying signatures for maximum compatibility, where
RSA_PSS_SALTLEN_DIGEST would fail for other digest sizes. (2) It will
work for combinations where the maximum salt length is smaller than the
digest size, which typically happens with large digest sizes (e.g.,
SHA-512) and small RSA keys.
J.-S. Coron shows in "Optimal Security Proofs for PSS and Other
Signature Schemes. Advances in Cryptology – Eurocrypt 2002, volume 2332
of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 272 – 287. Springer Verlag,
2002." that longer salts than the output size of modern hash functions
do not increase security: "For example,for an application in which at
most one billion signatures will be generated, k0 = 30 bits of random
salt are actually sufficient to guarantee the same level of security as
RSA, and taking a larger salt does not increase the security level."
Signed-off-by: Clemens Lang <cllang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19724)
Do not accept password-based if expected signature-based and no secret is available and
do not accept signature-based if expected password-based and no trust anchors available.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19729)
This PR is based off the contributions in PR #9223 by Jemmy1228.
It has been modified and reworked to:
(1) Work with providers
(2) Support ECDSA and DSA
(3) Add a KDF HMAC_DRBG implementation that shares code with the RAND HMAC_DRBG.
A nonce_type is passed around inside the Signing API's, in order to support any
future deterministic algorithms.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18809)
Signed-off-by: Xu Yizhou <xuyizhou1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19619)
Add the following OID:
SM4-XTS: 1.2.156.10197.1.104.10
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19619)
This supports all the modes, suites and export mechanisms defined
in RFC9180 and should be relatively easily extensible if/as new
suites are added. The APIs are based on the pseudo-code from the
RFC, e.g. OSS_HPKE_encap() roughly maps to SetupBaseS(). External
APIs are defined in include/openssl/hpke.h and documented in
doc/man3/OSSL_HPKE_CTX_new.pod. Tests (test/hpke_test.c) include
verifying a number of the test vectors from the RFC as well as
round-tripping for all the modes and suites. We have demonstrated
interoperability with other HPKE implementations via a fork [1]
that implements TLS Encrypted ClientHello (ECH) which uses HPKE.
@slontis provided huge help in getting this done and this makes
extensive use of the KEM handling code from his PR#19068.
[1] https://github.com/sftcd/openssl/tree/ECH-draft-13c
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17172)
This is needed for building with '-march=i386 no-threads', on platforms
where libatomic is not available (djgpp, specifically). The
implementation now falls back to 'CRYPTO_atomic_add()', which performs
plain lock-free addition in a 'no-threads' build.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19751)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19216)
On this occasion, replace magic constants by mnemonic ones; update doc
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19205)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19230)
