It's called with 0 when it's already locked, with 1 when it's not.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1500
In non-__KERNEL__ context 32-bit-style __ARMEB__/__ARMEL__ macros were
set in arm_arch.h, which is shared between 32- and 64-bit builds. Since
it's not included in __KERNEL__ case, we have to adhere to official
64-bit pre-defines, __AARCH64EB__/__AARCH64EL__.
[If we are to share more code, it would need similar adjustment.]
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Both strdup or malloc failure should raise à err.
Reviewed-by: Andy Polyakov <appro@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1905)
This reflects its position in include/openssl/ct.h.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
Otherwise, |dec| gets moved past the end of the signature by
o2i_SCT_signature and then can't be correctly freed afterwards.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1548)
Factorise multiple bn_get_top(group->field) calls
Add missing checks on some conditional BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on some BN_copy return value
Add missing checks on a few bn_wexpand return value
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1626)
Do not call the time "current", as a different time can be provided.
For example, a time slightly in the future, to provide tolerance for
CT logs with a clock that is running fast.
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1554)
Under certain circumstances, the libcrypto init code would loop,
causing a deadlock. This would typically happen if something in
ossl_init_base() caused an OpenSSL error, and the error stack routines
would recurse into the init code before the flag that ossl_init_base()
had been run was checked.
This change makes sure ossl_init_base isn't run once more of the base
is initiated.
Thanks to Dmitry Kostjuchenko for the idea.
Fixes Github issue #1899
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1922)
prio openssl 1.1.0 seed_len < q was accepted and the seed argument was
then ignored. Now DSA_generate_parameters_ex() returns an error in such
a case but no error string.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1657)
This reverts commit 349d1cfddc.
The proposed fix is incorrect. It marks the "run_once" code as having
finished before it has. The intended semantics of run_once is that no
threads should proceed until the code has run exactly once. With this
change the "second" thread will think the run_once code has already been
run and will continue, even though it is still in progress. This could
result in a crash or other incorrect behaviour.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Fixed deadlock in CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once() if call to init() is causing
a recursive call to CRYPTO_THREAD_run_once() again that is causing a hot
deadloop inside do { } while (result == ONCE_ININIT); section.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1913)
llvm's ubsan reported:
runtime error: negation of -9223372036854775808 cannot be represented in
type 'int64_t' (aka 'long'); cast to an unsigned type to negate this
value to itself
Found using libfuzzer
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1908
In order to minimize dependency on assembler version a number of
post-SSE2 instructions are encoded manually. But in order to simplify
the procedure only register operands are considered. Non-register
operands are passed down to assembler. Module in question uses pshufb
with memory operands, and old [GNU] assembler can't handle it.
Fortunately in this case it's possible skip just the problematic
segment without skipping SSSE3 support altogether.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
When configured no-dso, there are no DSO_{whatever} macros defined.
Therefore, before checking those, you have to check if OPENSSL_NO_DSO
is defined.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1902)
Now that we can link specifically with static libraries, the immediate
need to split ppccap.c (and eventually other *cap.c files) is no more.
This reverts commit e3fb4d3d52.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Don't set choice selector on parse failure: this can pass unexpected
values to the choice callback. Instead free up partial structure
directly.
CVE-2016-7053
Thanks to Tyler Nighswander of ForAllSecure for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
The offset to the memory to clear was incorrect, causing a heap buffer
overflow.
CVE-2016-7054
Thanks to Robert Święcki for reporting this
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Some of stone-age assembler can't cope with r0 in address. It's actually
sensible thing to do, because r0 is shunted to 0 in address arithmetic
and by refusing r0 assembler effectively makes you understand that.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
At the moment you can only do an HKDF Extract and Expand in one go. For
TLS1.3 we need to be able to do an Extract first, and the subsequently do
a number of Expand steps on the same PRK.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Having that code in one central object file turned out to cause
trouble when building test/modes_internal_test.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1883)
BN_RECP_CTX_new direclty use bn_init to avoid twice memset calls
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1879)
RFC 3447, section 8.2.2, steps 3 and 4 states that verifiers must encode
the DigestInfo struct and then compare the result against the public key
operation result. This implies that one and only one encoding is legal.
OpenSSL instead parses with crypto/asn1, then checks that the encoding
round-trips, and allows some variations for the parameter. Sufficient
laxness in this area can allow signature forgeries, as described in
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/09/26/pkcs1.html
Although there aren't known attacks against OpenSSL's current scheme,
this change makes OpenSSL implement the algorithm as specified. This
avoids the uncertainty and, more importantly, helps grow a healthy
ecosystem. Laxness beyond the spec, particularly in implementations
which enjoy wide use, risks harm to the ecosystem for all. A signature
producer which only tests against OpenSSL may not notice bugs and
accidentally become widely deployed. Thus implementations have a
responsibility to honor the specification as tightly as is practical.
In some cases, the damage is permanent and the spec deviation and
security risk becomes a tax all implementors must forever pay, but not
here. Both BoringSSL and Go successfully implemented and deployed
RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 as specified since their respective beginnings, so
this change should be compatible enough to pin down in future OpenSSL
releases.
See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-00
As a bonus, by not having to deal with sign/verify differences, this
version is also somewhat clearer. It also more consistently enforces
digest lengths in the verify_recover codepath. The NID_md5_sha1 codepath
wasn't quite doing this right.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1474
All of these don't compile cleanly any more, probably haven't for quite
some time
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1789)
