Discovered during coverage testing.
Remove unneccesary check when using ossl_dh_get0_params() and
ossl_dsa_get0_params(). These point to addresses and can not fail
for any existing calls.
Make dsa keygen tests only available in the FIPS module - as they are
not used in the default provider.
Change ossl_ffc_set_digest() to return void as it cannot fail.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20359)
Fixes a "Incompatible function pointer types" error.
In prior versions, this was a warning, but is now an error.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20654)
Related to #20268
DSA_sign() assumes that the signature passed in is related to DSA_size().
If q is negative then DSA_size() actually fails and returns 0.
A test that tries to allocate the signature buffer using DSA_size() and then
pass it to DSA_sign() will then either.
(1) Have a signature buffer of NULL. In this case it was leaking data
returned via i2d_DSA_SIG.
(2) Cause a seg fault because we created a buffer that was not large
enough to hold the signature. As it already checked zero we also now
check for negative values also.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20553)
CLA: trivial
There is an incorrect null pointer check and this ccommit resolves it.
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20646)
Similiar to the issue found in PR #20553 for DSA_sign().
ECDSA_sign() leaked memory if the signature was NULL
when i2d_ECDSA_SIG was called.
Note that this does not affect the higher level EVP
functions as they correctly handle NULL.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20554)
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20629)
Change-Id: Ia94e528a2d55934435de6a2949784c52eb38d82f
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20621)
Add support for the RFC7250 certificate-type extensions.
Alows the use of only private keys for connection (i.e. certs not needed).
Add APIs
Add unit tests
Add documentation
Add s_client/s_server support
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Viktor Dukhovni <viktor@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18185)
Even though we check the leaf cert to confirm it is valid, we
later ignored the invalid flag and did not notice that the leaf
cert was bad.
Fixes: CVE-2023-0465
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20585)
CLA: trivial
The the provider, context duplication method for signature, key
exchange, asymmetric cipher, and key encapsulation is optional. But if
they are missing, we will get a segmentation fault in `EVP_PKEY_CTX_dup`
because they are called without null pointer checking.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20581)
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20204)
Fixes a regression from 3.0 from the obj creation refactoring.
Fixes#20555
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20556)
The changes from the following commit should also apply to
Visual Studio 2010
2d46a44ff2 (r104867505)
Fixes build errors: undefined symbol InterlockedOr64
on Windows 2003, Visual Studio 2010 for x86 target.
CLA: trivial
Signed-off-by: Georgi Valkov <gvalkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20557)
A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions
of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains
that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this
vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers
exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service
(DoS) attack on affected systems.
Fixes CVE-2023-0464
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis <shane.lontis@oracle.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20571)
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthias St. Pierre <Matthias.St.Pierre@ncp-e.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20436)
Commit ac21c1780a VMS knows POSIX threads too!
removed ossl_crypto_mem_barrier for POSIX systems.
Remove it for Win32 and other architectures as well.
Resolves issue #19506 Unable to build under bcc32c environment (Embarcadero
clang compiler).
Signed-off-by: Čestmír Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20538)
For example if would be helpful if we got more useful information if the
caller forgot to set the peer address.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20514)
As the sleep() call is interruptible, it is not even a good idea to call
it in a loop if the caller uses some ridiculously large value as an
infinity just waiting for an interrupt.
Fixes#20524
Reviewed-by: David von Oheimb <david.von.oheimb@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20533)
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20519)
(cherry picked from commit d4765408c7)
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20519)
(cherry picked from commit 110dac5783)
Signed-off-by: Čestmír Kalina <ckalina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/12256)
The mention of the GPL shouldn't have been there.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20517)
RISC-V currently only offers a GMULT() callback for accelerated
processing. Let's implement the missing piece to have GHASH()
available as well. Like GMULT(), we provide a variant for
systems with the Zbkb extension (including brev8).
The integration follows the existing pattern for GMULT()
in RISC-V. We keep the C implementation as we need to decide
if we can call an optimized routine at run-time.
The C implementation is the fall-back in case we don't have
any extensions available that can be used to accelerate
the calculation.
Tested with all combinations of possible extensions
on QEMU (limiting the available instructions accordingly).
No regressions observed.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078)
The existing GCM calculation provides some potential
for further optimizations. Let's use the demo code
from the RISC-V cryptography extension groups
(https://github.com/riscv/riscv-crypto), which represents
the extension architect's intended use of the clmul instruction.
The GCM calculation depends on bit and byte reversal.
Therefore, we use the corresponding instructions to do that
(if available at run-time).
The resulting computation becomes quite compact and passes
all tests.
Note, that a side-effect of this change is a reduced register
usage in .gmult(), which opens the door for an efficient .ghash()
implementation.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078)
A recent commit introduced a Perl module for common code.
This patch changes the GCM code to use this module, removes duplicated code,
and moves the instruction encoding functions into the module.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078)
On systems where Devel::StackTrace is available, we can use this module
to create more usable error messages. Further, don't print error
messages in case of official register aliases, but simply accept them.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078)
Move helper functions and instruction encoding functions
into a riscv.pm Perl module to avoid pointless code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078)
In RISC-V we have multiple extensions, that can be
used to accelerate processing.
The known extensions are defined in riscv_arch.def.
From that file test functions of the following
form are generated: RISCV_HAS_$ext().
In recent commits new ways to define the availability
of these test macros have been defined. E.g.:
#define RV32I_ZKND_ZKNE_CAPABLE \
(RISCV_HAS_ZKND() && RISCV_HAS_ZKNE())
[...]
#define RV64I_ZKND_ZKNE_CAPABLE \
(RISCV_HAS_ZKND() && RISCV_HAS_ZKNE())
This leaves us with two different APIs to test capabilities.
Further, creating the same macros for RV32 and RV64 results
in duplicated code (see example above).
This inconsistent situation makes it hard to integrate
further code. So let's clean this up with the following steps:
* Replace RV32I_* and RV64I_* macros by RICSV_HAS_* macros
* Move all test macros into riscv_arch.h
* Use "AND" and "OR" to combine tests with more than one extension
* Rename include files for accelerated processing (remove extension
postfix).
We end up with compile time tests for RV32/RV64 and run-time tests
for available extensions. Adding new routines (e.g. for vector crypto
instructions) should be straightforward.
Testing showed no regressions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20078)
Fixes#19092
The code looks like it was written to work with PBES1.
As it had no tests, this would of then broken when PBES2
was introduced at a later point.
Also added libctx and propq support.
This affects the shroudedkeybag object.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20134)
The EVP layer should not rely on the underlying low level code to
handle catching incorrect reuse of contexts.
Add a flag to mark a context as finalised as needed and then catch and
immediately error on Update/Final operations if called improperly.
Signed-off-by: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20375)
If the ctx was *really* needed we'll probably fail later with an error
anyway, so no point in failing immediately.
Document that this behavior is dependent on the provider used to
implement the signature/verification.
Signed-off-by: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20375)
Probe first to see if we have a PKCS8 file to improve decoder performance.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20416)
The assignment of the result of EVP_get_digestbynid() did not happen
which made the fallback not actually perform the fallback.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20447)
"adrl" is a pseudo-instruction used to calculate an address relative
to PC. It's not recognized by clang resulting in a compilation error.
I've stumbled upon it when trying to integrate the bsaes-armv7 assmebly
logic into FreeBSD kernel, which uses clang as it's default compiler.
Note that this affect the build only if BSAES_ASM_EXTENDED_KEY is
defined, which is not the default option in OpenSSL.
The solution here is to replace it with an add instruction.
This mimics what has already been done in !BSAES_ASM_EXTENDED_KEY logic.
Because of that I've marked this as trivial CLA.
CLA: trivial
Signed-off-by: Kornel Dulęba <mindal@semihalf.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Cosgrove <tom.cosgrove@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20458)
This file was only recently introduced and the missing header slipped through
the review process.
Fixes#20461
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20470)
