In order to minimize dependency on assembler version a number of
post-SSE2 instructions are encoded manually. But in order to simplify
the procedure only register operands are considered. Non-register
operands are passed down to assembler. Module in question uses pshufb
with memory operands, and old [GNU] assembler can't handle it.
Fortunately in this case it's possible skip just the problematic
segment without skipping SSSE3 support altogether.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
When configured no-dso, there are no DSO_{whatever} macros defined.
Therefore, before checking those, you have to check if OPENSSL_NO_DSO
is defined.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1902)
Now that we can link specifically with static libraries, the immediate
need to split ppccap.c (and eventually other *cap.c files) is no more.
This reverts commit e3fb4d3d52.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Don't set choice selector on parse failure: this can pass unexpected
values to the choice callback. Instead free up partial structure
directly.
CVE-2016-7053
Thanks to Tyler Nighswander of ForAllSecure for reporting this issue.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
The offset to the memory to clear was incorrect, causing a heap buffer
overflow.
CVE-2016-7054
Thanks to Robert Święcki for reporting this
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Some of stone-age assembler can't cope with r0 in address. It's actually
sensible thing to do, because r0 is shunted to 0 in address arithmetic
and by refusing r0 assembler effectively makes you understand that.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
At the moment you can only do an HKDF Extract and Expand in one go. For
TLS1.3 we need to be able to do an Extract first, and the subsequently do
a number of Expand steps on the same PRK.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
Having that code in one central object file turned out to cause
trouble when building test/modes_internal_test.
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1883)
BN_RECP_CTX_new direclty use bn_init to avoid twice memset calls
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1879)
RFC 3447, section 8.2.2, steps 3 and 4 states that verifiers must encode
the DigestInfo struct and then compare the result against the public key
operation result. This implies that one and only one encoding is legal.
OpenSSL instead parses with crypto/asn1, then checks that the encoding
round-trips, and allows some variations for the parameter. Sufficient
laxness in this area can allow signature forgeries, as described in
https://www.imperialviolet.org/2014/09/26/pkcs1.html
Although there aren't known attacks against OpenSSL's current scheme,
this change makes OpenSSL implement the algorithm as specified. This
avoids the uncertainty and, more importantly, helps grow a healthy
ecosystem. Laxness beyond the spec, particularly in implementations
which enjoy wide use, risks harm to the ecosystem for all. A signature
producer which only tests against OpenSSL may not notice bugs and
accidentally become widely deployed. Thus implementations have a
responsibility to honor the specification as tightly as is practical.
In some cases, the damage is permanent and the spec deviation and
security risk becomes a tax all implementors must forever pay, but not
here. Both BoringSSL and Go successfully implemented and deployed
RSASSA-PKCS1-v1_5 as specified since their respective beginnings, so
this change should be compatible enough to pin down in future OpenSSL
releases.
See also https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-00
As a bonus, by not having to deal with sign/verify differences, this
version is also somewhat clearer. It also more consistently enforces
digest lengths in the verify_recover codepath. The NID_md5_sha1 codepath
wasn't quite doing this right.
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rsalz@openssl.org>
GH: #1474
All of these don't compile cleanly any more, probably haven't for quite
some time
Reviewed-by: Emilia Käsper <emilia@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1789)
Instead of deliberately leaking a reference to ourselves, use nodelete
which does this more neatly. Only for Linux at the moment.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Because we use atexit() to cleanup after ourselves, this will cause a
problem if we have been dynamically loaded and then unloaded again: the
atexit() handler may no longer be there.
Most modern atexit() implementations can handle this, however there are
still difficulties if libssl gets unloaded before libcrypto, because of
the atexit() callback that libcrypto makes to libssl.
The most robust solution seems to be to ensure that libcrypto and libssl
never unload. This is done by simply deliberately leaking a dlopen()
reference to them.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
This works the same way as DSO_pathbyaddr() but instead returns a ptr to
the DSO that contains the provided symbol.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Commit 3d8b2ec42 removed various unused functions. However now we need to
use one of them! This commit resurrects DSO_pathbyaddr(). We're not going to
resurrect the Windows version though because what we need to achieve can be
done a different way on Windows.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
After the recent reworking, not everything matched up, and some
comments didn't catch up to the outl-->dlen and inl-->dlen renames
that happened during the development of the recent patches.
Try to make parameter names consistent across header, implementation,
and manual pages.
Also remove some trailing whitespace that was inadvertently introduced.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/1798)
In converting a new style BIO_read() call into an old one, read
as much data as we can (INT_MAX), if the size of the buffer is
>INT_MAX.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
