Most of all, this reduces the following:
built on: built on: Wed Sep 8 19:41:55 2021 UTC
to:
built on: Wed Sep 8 19:41:55 2021 UTC
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16563)
(cherry picked from commit c1dc3536a8)
away the use of $(DEFINES), which does get populated with defines
given through configuration. This makes it impossible to configure
with extra defines on VMS. Uncommenting and moving $(DEFINES) to a
more proper spot gives the users back that ability.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16561)
(cherry picked from commit 1dc15a3330)
The MAN version was fine and so are kdf.dot and lifecycles.ods from doc/life-cycles
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16559)
This function tried to shave off the pre-release and build metadata
text from the the version number it gets, but didn't do that quite
right. Since this isn't even a documented behaviour, the easier, and
arguably more correct path is for that function not to try to shave
off anything, and for the callers to feed it the short version number,
"{MAJOR}.{MINOR}.{PATCH}", nothing more.
The build file templates are adjusted accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16556)
This affects bldtop_dir, bldtop_file, srctop_dir, srctop_file,
data_dir, data_file, result_dir, and result_file. They are all
enhanced to check that the resulting path really is a directory or a
file. They only do this if the path exists.
This allows the tests to catch if these functions are used
incorrectly, even on systems where the syntax for directories and
files is the same.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16523)
It used bldtop_dir(), which is incorrect for files.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16532)
The options -1 and -apr1 were mentioned in DESCRIPTION, not mentioning
any other options or even mentioning that there are more algorithms.
The simple fix is to remove that sentence and let the OPTIONS section
speak for itself.
Fixes#16529
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16531)
CLA:trivial
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16503)
Looks more like manpage format. :)
Also remove `{{..}}` notation and rewrite around it.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Belyavskiy <beldmit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16329)
This affects test/recipes/30-test_evp_data/evpkdf_scrypt.txt and
test/recipes/30-test_evp_data/evppkey_kdf_scrypt.txt, where the "Out
of memory" stanza weren't up to the task, as they didn't hit the
default scrypt memory limit like they did in OpenSSL 1.1.1.
We solve this by setting the |n| value to the next power of two, and
correcting the expected result.
Fixes#16519
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16521)
(cherry picked from commit 437d420221)
In one spot, files aren't properly closed, so the sub-process program
that's supposed to read them can't, because it's locked out.
In another spot, srctop_file() was used where srctop_dir() should be
used to properly format a directory specification.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16518)
(cherry picked from commit 7364545e07)
OpenVMS for x86_64 is currently out on a field test. Building
programs for it is currently done with cross compilation on Itanium.
The cross compilation tools are made available by running a script,
which makes cross-compilation variants of most commands available, and
adds the cross-compilation C compiler XCC.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16498)
Since EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo is a recognised structure, it's
reasonable to think that someone might want to specify it.
To be noted is that if someone specifies the structure PrivateKeyInfo
but has also passed a passphrase callback, the result will still
become a EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo structure.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16466)
The protected tests need to specify the structure EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo
rather than PrivateKeyInfo, since that's the outermost structure.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16466)
When the user expects to load a certificate or a CRL through the
OSSL_STORE loading function, the 'file:' implementation sets the
corresponding structure names in the internal decoder context.
This is especially geared for PEM files, which often contain a mix of
objects, and password prompting should be avoided for objects that
need them, but aren't what the caller is looking for.
Fixes#16224
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16466)
The data structure wasn't given for recognised certificates or CRLs.
It's better, though, to specify it for those objects as well, so they
can be used to filter what actually gets decoded, which will be
helpful for our OSSL_STORE 'file:' scheme implementation.
Fixes#16224
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16466)
In a chain of decoders, the first that specifies an input structure
gets it compared with the structure specified by the user, if there is
one. If they aren't the same, that decoder is skipped.
Because the first structure can appear anywhere along a chain of
decoders, not just the decoders associated with the resulting OpenSSL
type, the code that checked the structure name when building up the
chain of decoders is removed.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16466)
If the internal operations dupctx() fails then a free is done (e.g. EVP_KEYEXCH_free()). If this is not set to NULL the EVP_PKEY_CTX_free() will do a double free.
This was found by testing kdf_dupctx() in kdf_exch.c (Note this always
fails since the internal KDF's do not have a dup method).
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16495)
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16494)
The x86_64 cross compiler says that 'unsigned long long' isn't the
same as 'unsigned __int64'. Sure, and considering that
providers/implementations/rands/seeding/rand_vms.c is specific VMS
only code, it's easy to just change the type to the exact same as
what's specified in the system headers.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16497)
(cherry picked from commit 1ef526ef42)
Because we now have an openssl-3.0 branch, master is moved to be the
next potential minor version.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16484)
When building the certificate chain, prioritise any Cert(0) Full(0)
certificates from TLSA records over certificates received from the peer.
This is important when the server sends a cross cert, but TLSA records include
the underlying root CA cert. We want to construct a chain with the issuer from
the TLSA record, which can then match the TLSA records (while the associated
cross cert may not).
Reviewed-by: Tomáš Mráz <tomas@openssl.org>
There is no point using it becuase they are getting full quality entropy from
the primary DRBG (which remains using the d.f.).
Also cleaned up the parameter passing to the DRBGs to not pass parameters that
are unknown.
Fixes#16117
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16156)
Different tests may use unexpectedly different versions of perl,
depending on whether they hardcode the path to the perl executable or if
they resolve the path from the environment. This fixes it so that the
same perl is always used.
Fix some trailing whitespace and spelling mistakes as well.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16362)
(kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386). The error reported by the compiler
is:
../crypto/uid.c: In function 'OPENSSL_issetugid':
../crypto/uid.c:50:22: error: 'AT_SECURE' undeclared (first use in this function)
50 | return getauxval(AT_SECURE) != 0;
| ^~~~~~~~~
This commit changes the code to use the freebsd code in this case.
This fixes the compilation.
CLA: trivial
Reviewed-by: Ben Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16477)
The OTC voted today that the release branch for OpenSSL 3.0 should be
openssl-3.0 rather than openssl-3.0.x. The release script is changed
accordingly.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16481)
We should not assume that the type of an ASN.1 value is UTF8String as
expected. We must actually check it, otherwise we could get a NULL ptr
deref, or worse memory errors.
Reported by David Benjamin.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16443)
Fixes#16457
The ECDSA and DSA signature tests use Pairwise tests instead of KATS.
Note there is a seperate type used by the keygen for conditional Pairwise Tests.
Reviewed-by: Tim Hudson <tjh@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/16461)
