If we are processing a hanshake fragment and we end up with a
zero length record, then we still need to release it to avoid an
infinite loop.
Fixes#20821
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20824)
We initialise the record layer rstate variable to ensure the
SSL_rstate_string*() APIs return values that are consistent with
previous versions.
Fixes#20808
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20827)
Fixes#20710
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20745)
This enables the cleansing of plaintext to occur in the record layer and
avoids the need to cast away const above the record layer.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20404)
Improves consistency with the QUIC rstream implementation - and improves
the abstraction between the TLS implementation and the abstract record
layer. We should not expect that the TLS implementation should be able to
change the underlying buffer. Future record layers may not expect that.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20404)
It is possible that DTLS records are received out of order such that
records from the next epoch arrive before we have finished processing the
current epoch. We are supposed to buffer such records but for some reason
we only did that for handshake and alert records. This is incorrect since
it is perfectly possible for app data records to arrive early too.
Fixes#20597
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20628)
Early data decryption is expected to fail sometimes. If it does we should
not leave spurious error entries on the queue.
Fixes#20377
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20401)
It causes problems with some compilation options
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20030)
Avoid including QUIC related stuff in the FIPS sources.
Also avoid including libssl headers in ssl3_cbc.c.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19658)
So that CVE-2021-3449 can be found through fuzzing
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20128)
Add the ability to pass the main secret and length, as well as the
digest used for the KDF.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19748)
This is just an internal API for now. Something like this will be made
public API at some point - but it is likely to be based on the provider
interface rather that a direct setting of a METHOD like we do for now.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19748)
The reset() function was never called so it can be removed.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19748)
Some ciphers/protocol versions have an explicit IV. We need to make sure we
have sufficient room for it in the underlying buffer.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20085)
TLS device offload allows to perform zerocopy sendfile transmissions.
FreeBSD provides this feature by default, and Linux 5.19 introduced it
as an opt-in. Zerocopy improves the TX rate significantly, but has a
side effect: if the underlying file is changed while being transmitted,
and a TCP retransmission happens, the receiver may get a TLS record
containing both new and old data, which leads to an authentication
failure and termination of connection. This effect is the reason Linux
makes a copy on sendfile by default.
This commit adds support for TLS zerocopy sendfile on Linux disabled by
default to avoid any unlikely backward compatibility issues on Linux,
although sacrificing consistency in OpenSSL's behavior on Linux and
FreeBSD. A new option called KTLSTxZerocopySendfile is added to enable
the new zerocopy behavior on Linux. This option should be used when the
the application guarantees that the file is not modified during
transmission, or it doesn't care about breaking the connection.
The related documentation is also added in this commit. The unit test
added doesn't test the actual functionality (it would require specific
hardware and a non-local peer), but solely checks that it's possible to
set the new option flag.
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/18650)
The latest kernel (including stable kernel) has fixed the issue
of decryption failure in CCM mode in TLS 1.3. It is necessary to
reenable CCM mode for KTLS.
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <matt@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/17207)
Properly handle the case where there is pending write data and we want
to send an alert.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19550)
We need to check whether the sent_messages has actually buffered any
messages in it. If not we won't free the old record layer later when we
clear out the old buffered messages and a memory leak will result.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
The SSL3 prefix no longer seems appropriate. We choose TLS_RL_RECORD instead
of TLS_RECORD because that type already exists elsewhere.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
The SSL3 prefix no longer seems appropriate.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
We move many of the declarations in record.h and record_local.h into
locations inside ssl/record/methods instead. Also many declarations were
no longer required and could be removed completely.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
This file is used by libssl record layer methods and therefore should now
be in the methods subdir
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
Those fields are no longer used. Their previous function is now in the new
record layer.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
Otherwise, this causes a warning on platforms where 'uint32_t' is
defined as 'unsigned long int' instead of 'unsigned int'.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19322)
We had two different macros for calculating the potential growth due to
encryption. The macro we use for allocating the underlying buffer should be
the same one that we use for reserving bytes for encryption growth.
Also if we are adding the MAC independently of the cipher algorithm then
the encryption growth will not include that MAC so we should remove it
from the amount of bytes that we reserve for that growth. Otherwise we
might exceed our buffer size and the WPACKET_reserve operation will
fail.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19622)
We fix dtls_get_max_record_overhead() to give a better value for the max
record overhead. We can't realistically handle the compression case so we
just ignore that.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19516)
Stitched ciphersuites can grow by more during encryption than the code
allowed for. We fix the calculation and add an assert to check we go it
right.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19516)
During read pipelining we must ensure that the buffer is sufficiently large
to read enough data to fill our pipelines. We also remove some code that
moved data to the start of the packet if we can. This was unnecessary
because of later code which would end up moving it anyway. The earlier move
was also incorrect in the case that |clearold| was 0. This would cause the
read pipelining code to fail with sufficiently large records.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
The pipeline input/output buf arrays must remain accessible to the
EVP_CIPHER_CTX until EVP_Cipher is subsequently called. This fixes an
asan error discovered by the newly added pipeline test.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
TLS pipelining provides the ability for libssl to read or write multiple
records in parallel. It requires special ciphers to do this, and there are
currently no built-in ciphers that provide this capability. However, the
dasync engine does have such a cipher, so we add a test for this capability
using that engine.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
Remove two function pointers from the OSSL_RECORD_METHOD. Those functions
were no-ops and were never called.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19472)
This test was disabled during the record write record layer refactor.
We can now enable it again.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19470)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We no longer use the old buffer management code now that it has all been
moved to the new record layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
The dtls_write_records function, after the previous series of commits,
was functionally equivalent to tls_write_records_default - so it can be
removed completely.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
This change make dtls_write_records virtuall the same as
tls_write_records_default, which will enable us to merge them in a
subsequent commit.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We already set the record type on the SSL3_RECORD structure. We don't
need to do it again (inconsistently).
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
The sequence counter was incremented in numerous different ways in
numerous different locations. We introduce a single function to do this
inside the record layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Don't calculate the potential record layer expansion outside of the
record layer. We move some code that was doing that into the record
layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We have standard functions for most of the work that dtls_write_records
does - so we convert it to use those functions instead.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Previously this was writing to the buffers directly. We use the safer
WPACKET instead
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
In practice this just means have a DTLS specific write_records that the
common tls_write_records() just calls. We also replace the use of
ssl3_write_pending() with tls_retry_write_records().
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We now use standard record layer return values for this function. We
also convert the code to use RLAYERfatal instead of SSLfatal.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
