The SSL3 prefix no longer seems appropriate. We choose TLS_RL_RECORD instead
of TLS_RECORD because that type already exists elsewhere.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
The SSL3 prefix no longer seems appropriate.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
We move many of the declarations in record.h and record_local.h into
locations inside ssl/record/methods instead. Also many declarations were
no longer required and could be removed completely.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19586)
We had two different macros for calculating the potential growth due to
encryption. The macro we use for allocating the underlying buffer should be
the same one that we use for reserving bytes for encryption growth.
Also if we are adding the MAC independently of the cipher algorithm then
the encryption growth will not include that MAC so we should remove it
from the amount of bytes that we reserve for that growth. Otherwise we
might exceed our buffer size and the WPACKET_reserve operation will
fail.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19622)
We fix dtls_get_max_record_overhead() to give a better value for the max
record overhead. We can't realistically handle the compression case so we
just ignore that.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19516)
Stitched ciphersuites can grow by more during encryption than the code
allowed for. We fix the calculation and add an assert to check we go it
right.
Reviewed-by: Paul Dale <pauli@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19516)
During read pipelining we must ensure that the buffer is sufficiently large
to read enough data to fill our pipelines. We also remove some code that
moved data to the start of the packet if we can. This was unnecessary
because of later code which would end up moving it anyway. The earlier move
was also incorrect in the case that |clearold| was 0. This would cause the
read pipelining code to fail with sufficiently large records.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
TLS pipelining provides the ability for libssl to read or write multiple
records in parallel. It requires special ciphers to do this, and there are
currently no built-in ciphers that provide this capability. However, the
dasync engine does have such a cipher, so we add a test for this capability
using that engine.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19456)
Remove two function pointers from the OSSL_RECORD_METHOD. Those functions
were no-ops and were never called.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19472)
This test was disabled during the record write record layer refactor.
We can now enable it again.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19470)
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We no longer use the old buffer management code now that it has all been
moved to the new record layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We already set the record type on the SSL3_RECORD structure. We don't
need to do it again (inconsistently).
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
The sequence counter was incremented in numerous different ways in
numerous different locations. We introduce a single function to do this
inside the record layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
Don't calculate the potential record layer expansion outside of the
record layer. We move some code that was doing that into the record
layer.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
We have standard functions for most of the work that dtls_write_records
does - so we convert it to use those functions instead.
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19424)
This removes some KTLS specific code from tls_retry_write_records().
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
The KTLS code no longer calls this function so this is not necessary.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
For example in this we add the MAC if we are doing encrypt-then-mac.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
This applies any mac that might be necessary, ensures that we have
enough space in the WPACKET to perform the encryption and sets up the
SSL3_RECORD ready for that encryption.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
Only tls13_meth.c needs to handle adding record padding. All other
*_meth.c files can ignore it.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
The KTLS cipher function is a no-op so it doesn't matter if we call it.
We shouldn't special case KTLS in tls_common.c
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
We introduce a new function to prepare the record header. KTLS has its own
version since this is done by the kernel.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
Remove TLSv1.3 specific processing of the record type out of tls_common.c
and into tls13_meth.c
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
We move some protocol specific code for write buffer and WPACKET allocation
and initialisation out of tls_common.c and into the protocol specific files.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
This field was used to track whether a cipher ctx was valid for writing
or not, and also whether we should write out plaintext alerts. With the new
record layer design we no longer need to track whether a cipher ctx is valid
since the whole record layer will be aborted if it is not. Also we have a
different mechanism for tracking whether we should write out plaintext
alerts. Therefore this field is removed from the SSL object.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
Most of this was unnecessary anyway since DTLS isn't using these codepaths.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
We also clean up some of the KTLS code while we are doing it now that all
users of KTLS have been moved to the new write record layer.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19343)
We also convert to passing COMP_METHOD rather than SSL_COMP to the record
layer. The former is a public type while the latter is internal only - and
the only thing we need from SSL_COMP is the method.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19217)
Since OPENSSL_malloc() and friends report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE, and
at least handle the file name and line number they are called from,
there's no need to report ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE where they are called
directly, or when SSLfatal() and RLAYERfatal() is used, the reason
`ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` is changed to `ERR_R_CRYPTO_LIB`.
There were a number of places where `ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE` was reported
even though it was a function from a different sub-system that was
called. Those places are changed to report ERR_R_{lib}_LIB, where
{lib} is the name of that sub-system.
Some of them are tricky to get right, as we have a lot of functions
that belong in the ASN1 sub-system, and all the `sk_` calls or from
the CRYPTO sub-system.
Some extra adaptation was necessary where there were custom OPENSSL_malloc()
wrappers, and some bugs are fixed alongside these changes.
Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz <tomas@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19301)
Move the multiblock code into a separate file and introduce the usage of
record_functions_st for some write functions.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
We use the returned data to decide how to split the data we want to write
into records.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
This also means we can convert SSLfatal calls to RLAYERfatal
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
There were a small number of references to the SSL_CONNECTION that can
be removed easily and replaced with record layer equivalents.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
Previously we were referencing the block_padding value through the
SSL_CONNECTION. Now it is held within OSSL_RECORD_LAYER.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
We wrap the callback and pass it to the record layer via the dispatch
array, in order to avoid accessing it directly via SSL_CONNECTION.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
In all cases we should be able to replace this with a simple check
against rl->version.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
This flag can now be managed entirely by the new record layer code so we
move it into ossl_record_layer_st.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
Now that we are no longer recursively addinng the prefix record this
doesn't seem necessary any more. We always add it every time we do
tls_write_records.
Reviewed-by: Hugo Landau <hlandau@openssl.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Levitte <levitte@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/19198)
